Rahmad Fauzi Hasibuan
Unknown Affiliation

Published : 3 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 3 Documents
Search

Islamic Law in the Metaverse World: A Normative Study of Virtual Worship Practices and Transactions Ahmad Rifai Yoga; Ahmad Yasin Dongoran; Arsyad Rizky Pratama Siregar; Nur Hafizah Husna; Rahmad Fauzi Hasibuan
Jurnal Sahabat ISNU SU Vol. 2 No. 3 (2025): ISNU Sahabat Vol.2 No.3 Desember 2025
Publisher : ISNU Sumatera Utara

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.70826/jsisnu.v2i3.896

Abstract

The development of metaverse technology has presented new challenges in the application of Islamic law, particularly regarding worship practices and virtual transactions. The non-physical and interactive nature of the metaverse world demands a normative approach to assess the legal validity and legitimacy of various activities occurring within it. This study aims to examine how Islamic legal principles are applied in the context of virtual worship, such as online congregational prayer and digital marriage contracts, as well as digital asset-based economic transactions such as NFTs and cryptocurrencies. Using a juridical-normative approach and qualitative analysis, this study examines the relevance of Islamic jurisprudence (fiqh), maqasid sharia (the principles of sharia), and contemporary fatwas (religious edicts) in responding to the metaverse phenomenon. The results indicate that activities in the metaverse world are subject to Sharia law as long as they meet the principles of clarity (bayyinah), justice ('adl), and benefit (maslahah). Virtual space can be treated as a functional area of ​​Sharia law, as activities within it have real legal implications. This study recommends the importance of establishing a responsive and contextual digital Islamic legal framework to holistically address the dynamics of virtual space.
Corporations Before Arbitral Awards: Between Contractual Autonomy and State Intervention Ahmad Nizar Mohammad Syamwil; Nur Hafizah Husna; Siti Kholizah; Irpan Mauliandi Damanik; Rahmad Fauzi Hasibuan
Jurnal Cendikia ISNU SU Vol. 3 No. 1 (2026): ISNU Cendikia Januari
Publisher : ISNU Sumatera Utara

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.70826/jcisnu.v3i1.1306

Abstract

The increasing complexity of corporate business activities has intensified the potential for commercial disputes, thereby necessitating effective, efficient, and legally certain dispute resolution mechanisms. Arbitration has emerged as a preferred alternative for corporations due to its flexibility, confidentiality, and reliance on contractual autonomy. This study examines the legal status of corporations as subjects of law in arbitration, the scope of contractual autonomy in determining arbitral mechanisms, and the limits of state intervention through courts in Indonesia. Employing a normative legal research method with statutory and conceptual approaches, the research analyzes Law Number 30 of 1999 and relevant legal doctrines through systematic stages of issue identification, legal material collection, normative analysis, and conclusion formulation. The findings indicate that corporations possess full legal capacity to bind themselves to arbitration agreements and are obligated to comply with final and binding arbitral awards. Judicial intervention is strictly limited to procedural aspects of recognition, enforcement, and annulment, thereby preserving arbitral finality while ensuring legal certainty.
Corporations Before Arbitral Awards: Between Contractual Autonomy and State Intervention Ahmad Nizar Mohammad Syamwil; Nur Hafizah Husna; Siti Kholizah; Irpan Mauliandi Damanik; Rahmad Fauzi Hasibuan
Jurnal Cendikia ISNU SU Vol. 3 No. 1 (2026): ISNU Cendikia Januari
Publisher : ISNU Sumatera Utara

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.70826/jcisnu.v3i1.1306

Abstract

The increasing complexity of corporate business activities has intensified the potential for commercial disputes, thereby necessitating effective, efficient, and legally certain dispute resolution mechanisms. Arbitration has emerged as a preferred alternative for corporations due to its flexibility, confidentiality, and reliance on contractual autonomy. This study examines the legal status of corporations as subjects of law in arbitration, the scope of contractual autonomy in determining arbitral mechanisms, and the limits of state intervention through courts in Indonesia. Employing a normative legal research method with statutory and conceptual approaches, the research analyzes Law Number 30 of 1999 and relevant legal doctrines through systematic stages of issue identification, legal material collection, normative analysis, and conclusion formulation. The findings indicate that corporations possess full legal capacity to bind themselves to arbitration agreements and are obligated to comply with final and binding arbitral awards. Judicial intervention is strictly limited to procedural aspects of recognition, enforcement, and annulment, thereby preserving arbitral finality while ensuring legal certainty.