Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
0.882
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Jurnal CENDIKIA ISNU Jurnal Sahabat ISNU SU Jurnal Cendikia ISNU SU
Ahmad Yasin Dongoran
Unknown Affiliation
Religion Arts Humanities Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice

Published : 5 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 5 Documents
Search

 1 
Islamic Law in the Metaverse World: A Normative Study of Virtual Worship Practices and Transactions Ahmad Rifai Yoga; Ahmad Yasin Dongoran; Arsyad Rizky Pratama Siregar; Nur Hafizah Husna; Rahmad Fauzi Hasibuan
Jurnal Sahabat ISNU SU Vol. 2 No. 3 (2025): ISNU Sahabat Vol.2 No.3 Desember 2025
Publisher : ISNU Sumatera Utara

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.70826/jsisnu.v2i3.896

Abstract

The development of metaverse technology has presented new challenges in the application of Islamic law, particularly regarding worship practices and virtual transactions. The non-physical and interactive nature of the metaverse world demands a normative approach to assess the legal validity and legitimacy of various activities occurring within it. This study aims to examine how Islamic legal principles are applied in the context of virtual worship, such as online congregational prayer and digital marriage contracts, as well as digital asset-based economic transactions such as NFTs and cryptocurrencies. Using a juridical-normative approach and qualitative analysis, this study examines the relevance of Islamic jurisprudence (fiqh), maqasid sharia (the principles of sharia), and contemporary fatwas (religious edicts) in responding to the metaverse phenomenon. The results indicate that activities in the metaverse world are subject to Sharia law as long as they meet the principles of clarity (bayyinah), justice ('adl), and benefit (maslahah). Virtual space can be treated as a functional area of ​​Sharia law, as activities within it have real legal implications. This study recommends the importance of establishing a responsive and contextual digital Islamic legal framework to holistically address the dynamics of virtual space.
Annulment of Arbitral Awards as an Extraordinary Legal Remedy: Distortion or Protection of Justice Khairunnisa Siregar; Nadilah Andini; Suci Hidayati Malau; Raja Muda Pahlevi Siregar; Ahmad Yasin Dongoran
Jurnal Cendikia ISNU SU Vol. 3 No. 1 (2026): ISNU Cendikia Januari
Publisher : ISNU Sumatera Utara

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.70826/jcisnu.v3i1.1304

Abstract

This paper examines the annulment of arbitral awards within the Indonesian legal system as an extraordinary legal remedy that intersects with the principles of arbitral autonomy and final and binding effect. The background of the study is grounded in the growing reliance on arbitration as an efficient and autonomous mechanism for resolving commercial disputes, alongside emerging controversies arising from judicial intervention in annulment proceedings. This research employs a normative legal method, using statutory and conceptual approaches. The research stages include identifying legal issues, collecting and classifying relevant legal materials, conducting normative analysis, and drawing deductive conclusions. The results and discussion demonstrate that Law Number 30 of 1999 strictly limits annulment to procedural defects of a fundamental nature, such as document forgery, decisive new evidence, or fraud, and does not permit substantive review of arbitral awards. However, judicial practice reveals interpretative inconsistencies that risk distorting arbitral finality. The study concludes that annulment should function as a procedural safeguard to protect justice without undermining the essence of arbitration.
The Challenges and Opportunities of Arbitration in the Digital Era: Legal Perspectives and Online Dispute Resolution Practices Irham Mahromy Munthe; Maria Arfah Nasution; Ahmad Yasin Dongoran; Usamah Zaki
Jurnal Cendikia ISNU SU Vol. 3 No. 1 (2026): ISNU Cendikia Januari
Publisher : ISNU Sumatera Utara

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.70826/jcisnu.v3i1.1311

Abstract

This study examines the challenges and opportunities of arbitration in the digital era, focusing on the legal and practical perspectives of online dispute resolution in Indonesia. The research is motivated by the rapid development of information technology, which has transformed dispute resolution mechanisms through digital platforms, particularly in e-commerce transactions and cross-border contracts. This study employs a normative legal approach or doctrinal research, analyzing legislation, legal theory, academic literature, and jurisprudence related to digital arbitration. The research stages include problem identification, literature review, collection of primary and secondary data, and qualitative analysis to evaluate the challenges and benefits of digital arbitration. The findings indicate that while national regulations do not explicitly govern online arbitration, they provide a legal foundation through principles of party consent, arbitrator independence, and award recognition. Moreover, digital arbitration offers cost and time efficiency, procedural flexibility, broader access, and technological innovations, provided that fairness, confidentiality, and legal certainty are ensured through secure platforms and competent arbitrators.
Annulment of Arbitral Awards as an Extraordinary Legal Remedy: Distortion or Protection of Justice Khairunnisa Siregar; Nadilah Andini; Suci Hidayati Malau; Raja Muda Pahlevi Siregar; Ahmad Yasin Dongoran
Jurnal Cendikia ISNU SU Vol. 3 No. 1 (2026): ISNU Cendikia Januari
Publisher : ISNU Sumatera Utara

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.70826/jcisnu.v3i1.1304

Abstract

This paper examines the annulment of arbitral awards within the Indonesian legal system as an extraordinary legal remedy that intersects with the principles of arbitral autonomy and final and binding effect. The background of the study is grounded in the growing reliance on arbitration as an efficient and autonomous mechanism for resolving commercial disputes, alongside emerging controversies arising from judicial intervention in annulment proceedings. This research employs a normative legal method, using statutory and conceptual approaches. The research stages include identifying legal issues, collecting and classifying relevant legal materials, conducting normative analysis, and drawing deductive conclusions. The results and discussion demonstrate that Law Number 30 of 1999 strictly limits annulment to procedural defects of a fundamental nature, such as document forgery, decisive new evidence, or fraud, and does not permit substantive review of arbitral awards. However, judicial practice reveals interpretative inconsistencies that risk distorting arbitral finality. The study concludes that annulment should function as a procedural safeguard to protect justice without undermining the essence of arbitration.
The Challenges and Opportunities of Arbitration in the Digital Era: Legal Perspectives and Online Dispute Resolution Practices Irham Mahromy Munthe; Maria Arfah Nasution; Ahmad Yasin Dongoran; Usamah Zaki
Jurnal Cendikia ISNU SU Vol. 3 No. 1 (2026): ISNU Cendikia Januari
Publisher : ISNU Sumatera Utara

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.70826/jcisnu.v3i1.1311

Abstract

This study examines the challenges and opportunities of arbitration in the digital era, focusing on the legal and practical perspectives of online dispute resolution in Indonesia. The research is motivated by the rapid development of information technology, which has transformed dispute resolution mechanisms through digital platforms, particularly in e-commerce transactions and cross-border contracts. This study employs a normative legal approach or doctrinal research, analyzing legislation, legal theory, academic literature, and jurisprudence related to digital arbitration. The research stages include problem identification, literature review, collection of primary and secondary data, and qualitative analysis to evaluate the challenges and benefits of digital arbitration. The findings indicate that while national regulations do not explicitly govern online arbitration, they provide a legal foundation through principles of party consent, arbitrator independence, and award recognition. Moreover, digital arbitration offers cost and time efficiency, procedural flexibility, broader access, and technological innovations, provided that fairness, confidentiality, and legal certainty are ensured through secure platforms and competent arbitrators.
Co-Authors Ahmad Rifai Yoga Arsyad Rizky Pratama Siregar Irham Mahromy Munthe Khairunnisa Siregar Maria Arfah Nasution Nadilah Andini Nur Hafizah Husna Rahmad Fauzi Hasibuan Raja Muda Pahlevi Siregar Suci Hidayati Malau Usamah Zaki