Garuda - Garba Rujukan Digital

PENERAPAN PROGRAM MODERASI BERAGAMA DALAM MASYARAKAT MUTIKULTURAL: STUDI ETNOGRAFI DESA BUNURAYA, KECAMATAN TIGA PANAH, KABUPATEN KARO Edi Saputra; Rahman Al Fauzi Siregar; Israhq Fauziah; Winda Agustin; Niswa Auliya Lubis; Luthfia Masfa Nur
Martabe : Jurnal Pengabdian Kepada Masyarakat Vol 8, No 10 (2025): MARTABE : JURNAL PENGABDIAN KEPADA MASYARAKAT
Publisher : Universitas Muhammadiyah Tapanuli Selatan

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31604/jpm.v8i10.3692-3701

Penelitian ini menganalisis peran program pemberdayaan yang dilakukan oleh tim KKN 78 UINSU dalam meningkatkan pemahaman tentang moderasi agama di Desa Bunuraya, Kecamatan Tiga Panah, Kabupaten Karo. Moderasi agama, yang merupakan konsep krusial dalam memelihara keharmonisan sosial di Indonesia yang beragam, sering kali diterapkan secara spontan oleh masyarakat, tetapi kurang dipahami secara mendalam. Kajian ini bertujuan untuk mengukur pengaruh dari berbagai aktivitas pemberdayaan, termasuk diskusi keagamaan dan sosialisasi tentang toleransi, terhadap peningkatan pemahaman dan penerapan moderasi beragama. Temuan penelitian ini menunjukkan bahwa program-program tersebut berhasil meningkatkan kesadaran masyarakat mengenai pentingnya moderasi beragama, memperkuat hubungan antar anggota masyarakat, dan menciptakan kondisi sosial yang lebih harmonis. Program ini juga membantu warga untuk lebih siap dalam menghadapi tantangan informasi radikal yang berasal dari media sosial.

Cross-Border Arbitration in Indonesia: Between International Arbitration Commitments and Domestic Judicial Practice Annisa Putri Sinaga; Annisa Putri Andini Tanjung; Siti Salmiah Dalimunthe; Rahman Al Fauzi Siregar; Khotibul Umam
Jurnal Cendikia ISNU SU Vol. 3 No. 1 (2026): ISNU Cendikia Mei
Publisher : ISNU Sumatera Utara

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.70826/jcisnu.v3i1.1309

This paper examines the trends, legal challenges, and effectiveness of cross-border arbitration in Indonesia within the context of contemporary international trade and investment. The rapid growth of global commerce necessitates reliable dispute resolution mechanisms, positioning international arbitration as a preferred alternative due to its neutrality, procedural flexibility, and enforceability under instruments such as the 1958 New York Convention. Using a normative juridical approach, this study analyzes primary and secondary legal sources, including statutory regulations, scholarly literature, and arbitral decisions, through systematic stages of data collection, analysis, and synthesis. The findings reveal that while Indonesia possesses a solid legal framework for arbitration, practical challenges persist, including inconsistent judicial interpretations, limited institutional capacity, high procedural costs, and deficiencies in arbitration clause drafting. These factors affect the effectiveness and credibility of international arbitration. The study argues that the principal challenge does not lie in the inadequacy of Indonesia's arbitration legislation, but rather in the inconsistent interaction between domestic judicial practice and international arbitration commitments. It contributes to the existing literature by proposing a harmonized interpretative framework that reconciles national judicial sovereignty with Indonesia's obligations under the New York Convention, thereby strengthening legal certainty in cross-border commercial dispute resolution.

Reconceptualizing Investor Protection Through Arbitration: Legal Challenges and the Future of Investment Dispute Resolution in Indonesia Ikhsan Sahriyan; M. Fazli Pratama; Rahman Al Fauzi Siregar; Siti Salmiah Dalimunthe; Muhammad Ikhlas Bin Rosele
Jurnal Cendikia ISNU SU Vol. 3 No. 1 (2026): ISNU Cendikia Mei
Publisher : ISNU Sumatera Utara

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.70826/jcisnu.v3i1.1312

This study examines the strategic role of arbitration as a mechanism for resolving investment disputes in Indonesia. Investment plays a vital role in national economic development, yet it inherently carries the potential for conflicts between investors, business partners, and the government. Conventional litigation often proves lengthy, costly, and insufficiently confidential, prompting a demand for alternative dispute resolution. This research employs normative legal methods (doctrinal research), using statute and conceptual approaches to analyze relevant legislation, including Law No. 30 of 1999 on Arbitration and Alternative Dispute Resolution and Law No. 25 of 2007 on Investment, as well as arbitral awards and scholarly literature. The study systematically identifies legal issues, collects and classifies legal materials, and applies qualitative analysis through grammatical, systematic, and teleological interpretation. Findings indicate that arbitration provides legal certainty, procedural flexibility, neutrality, and enforceable outcomes, strengthened by Indonesia’s ratification of the 1958 New York Convention. Despite legal and practical challenges, arbitration effectively protects investor rights, supports a conducive investment climate, and enhances Indonesia’s economic competitiveness. Recommendations include strengthening institutions, human resources, and future research aligned with digital and cross-border investments. Unlike previous studies that primarily discuss arbitration as a procedural alternative to litigation, this article reconceptualizes arbitration as an institutional safeguard for investor protection within contemporary investment governance. The study argues that the effectiveness of arbitration depends not only on procedural efficiency but also on the coherence between domestic investment law, international arbitration standards, judicial support, and regulatory certainty. Accordingly, this article contributes to arbitration scholarship by proposing an integrated legal framework capable of strengthening investor confidence while preserving national regulatory sovereignty.

Cross-Border Arbitration in Indonesia: Between International Arbitration Commitments and Domestic Judicial Practice Annisa Putri Sinaga; Annisa Putri Andini Tanjung; Siti Salmiah Dalimunthe; Rahman Al Fauzi Siregar; Khotibul Umam
Jurnal Cendikia ISNU SU Vol. 3 No. 1 (2026): ISNU Cendikia Mei
Publisher : ISNU Sumatera Utara

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.70826/jcisnu.v3i1.1309

This paper examines the trends, legal challenges, and effectiveness of cross-border arbitration in Indonesia within the context of contemporary international trade and investment. The rapid growth of global commerce necessitates reliable dispute resolution mechanisms, positioning international arbitration as a preferred alternative due to its neutrality, procedural flexibility, and enforceability under instruments such as the 1958 New York Convention. Using a normative juridical approach, this study analyzes primary and secondary legal sources, including statutory regulations, scholarly literature, and arbitral decisions, through systematic stages of data collection, analysis, and synthesis. The findings reveal that while Indonesia possesses a solid legal framework for arbitration, practical challenges persist, including inconsistent judicial interpretations, limited institutional capacity, high procedural costs, and deficiencies in arbitration clause drafting. These factors affect the effectiveness and credibility of international arbitration. The study argues that the principal challenge does not lie in the inadequacy of Indonesia's arbitration legislation, but rather in the inconsistent interaction between domestic judicial practice and international arbitration commitments. It contributes to the existing literature by proposing a harmonized interpretative framework that reconciles national judicial sovereignty with Indonesia's obligations under the New York Convention, thereby strengthening legal certainty in cross-border commercial dispute resolution.

Reconceptualizing Investor Protection Through Arbitration: Legal Challenges and the Future of Investment Dispute Resolution in Indonesia Ikhsan Sahriyan; M. Fazli Pratama; Rahman Al Fauzi Siregar; Siti Salmiah Dalimunthe; Muhammad Ikhlas Bin Rosele
Jurnal Cendikia ISNU SU Vol. 3 No. 1 (2026): ISNU Cendikia Mei
Publisher : ISNU Sumatera Utara

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.70826/jcisnu.v3i1.1312

This study examines the strategic role of arbitration as a mechanism for resolving investment disputes in Indonesia. Investment plays a vital role in national economic development, yet it inherently carries the potential for conflicts between investors, business partners, and the government. Conventional litigation often proves lengthy, costly, and insufficiently confidential, prompting a demand for alternative dispute resolution. This research employs normative legal methods (doctrinal research), using statute and conceptual approaches to analyze relevant legislation, including Law No. 30 of 1999 on Arbitration and Alternative Dispute Resolution and Law No. 25 of 2007 on Investment, as well as arbitral awards and scholarly literature. The study systematically identifies legal issues, collects and classifies legal materials, and applies qualitative analysis through grammatical, systematic, and teleological interpretation. Findings indicate that arbitration provides legal certainty, procedural flexibility, neutrality, and enforceable outcomes, strengthened by Indonesia’s ratification of the 1958 New York Convention. Despite legal and practical challenges, arbitration effectively protects investor rights, supports a conducive investment climate, and enhances Indonesia’s economic competitiveness. Recommendations include strengthening institutions, human resources, and future research aligned with digital and cross-border investments. Unlike previous studies that primarily discuss arbitration as a procedural alternative to litigation, this article reconceptualizes arbitration as an institutional safeguard for investor protection within contemporary investment governance. The study argues that the effectiveness of arbitration depends not only on procedural efficiency but also on the coherence between domestic investment law, international arbitration standards, judicial support, and regulatory certainty. Accordingly, this article contributes to arbitration scholarship by proposing an integrated legal framework capable of strengthening investor confidence while preserving national regulatory sovereignty.

Title

Found 5 Documents
Search

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Title Search

Found 5 Documents Search

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Title

Found 5 Documents
Search