Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

Sejarah Peradaban Islam Masa Dinasti Umayyah (661-750 M) Zuairiyah, Zuairiyah; Husna, Fathiyah; Nisrina, Nisrina; Nada, Rona Sifaun; Setyawati, Yuli; Purnomo, Purnomo
Gemi: Jurnal Penelitian dan Pengabdian Vol. 5 No. 2 (2026): Gemi
Publisher : Universitas Cokroaminoto Yogyakarta

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.47200/gemi.v5i2.3081

Abstract

The Umayyad Dynasty in Damascus marked the beginning of Islam’s shift from a democratic caliphate to a hereditary monarchy. This study aims to examine the history, civilizational advancements, and causes of the Umayyad Dynasty's decline in Damascus. The method used is library research, referring to historical texts, articles, and relevant academic sources. Findings reveal significant progress in politics, law, culture, economy, education, and religion during the dynasty’s rule. However, internal issues such as weak leadership, tribal fanaticism, and economic decline led to its fall. This research is crucial for understanding the dynamics of classical Islamic civilization and its relevance to the development of contemporary Islamic politics.
The Concept of Bughat in Islamic Political Fiqh: A Comparison of Madhhab Shafi'i and Hanafi Zuairiyah, Zuairiyah; Husna, Fathiyah; Azzahra, Kamila Nayli; Ulyani, Attikah; Siyono, Siyono
Tasyri' : Journal of Islamic Law Vol. 5 No. 1 (2026): Tasyri'
Publisher : STAINI Press

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.53038/tsyr.v5i1.435

Abstract

This study examines the differing perspectives of the Mazhab Shafi’i and Hanafi regarding the concept of bughat (rebellion) within Islamic political jurisprudence. The core issue lies in the variation of criteria, legal treatment, and evidential bases used by the two schools. Using a library research method, analyzing classical sources, relevant hadiths such as those indicating early signs of rebellion (at-thalab), and major fiqh works, the study finds that the Mazhab Shafi’i  requires the presence of military strength, leadership, and legitimate ta’wil to classify a group as bughat, and distinguishes between Muslim and non-Muslim rebels, prioritizing peaceful resolution. In contrast, the Mazhab Hanafi emphasizes governmental stability and allows pre-emptive defensive measures once signs of rebellion appear, without differentiating religious status. These differences stem from each Mazhab’s method of legal derivation. The findings highlight the significant implications of these methodological variations for the application of Islamic public law in contemporary political contexts.