Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
0.444
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal KHAIRUN LAW JOURNAL JoISE : Journal of Integrated Science Education
Ridwan Ridwan
Sultan Ageng Tirtayasa University
Education Environmental Science Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Physics

Published : 2 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

 1 
Motivation and Learning Outcomes after Using PhET Simulations on Hydrostatic Pressure: A Quantitative Analysis Fhazriani Riau; Indri Sari Utami; Annisa Shafirah; Siti Khoirunisa; Helsa Putri Pratama; Novita Ayu Permata Sari; Ridwan Ridwan; Muhammad Yusrizal
JoISE : Journal of Intergratet Science Education Vol 2 No 1 (2025)
Publisher : Universitas Muhammadiyah Cirebon

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.32534/joise.v2i1.8203

Abstract

This article examines the relationship between learning motivation and physics learning outcomes on hydrostatic pressure material after the use of PhET simulation media in grade XI students at SMAN 1 Petir, Banten. The study used a quantitative approach with a descriptive-correlational design involving 22 purposively selected students. Research instruments included a Likert-scale learning motivation questionnaire, multiple-choice tests, and semi-structured interviews to strengthen interpretation. The results show that students’ motivation is in the good category, while learning outcomes are very high and homogeneous, with 86.36% of students achieving a perfect score, creating a ceiling effect that reduces variability. Spearman correlation analysis yielded a coefficient of –0.23, indicating a very weak and insignificant negative relationship between motivation and learning outcomes, suggesting that motivation is not a key predictor of academic performance in this case. The findings point to the influence of other factors such as cognitive abilities, learning strategies, and test characteristics that better explain learning performance. Researchers recommend improving evaluation instruments to increase sensitivity, adding moderating variables such as self-regulated learning or self-concept, and using mixed methods for a more comprehensive understanding of the relationship between motivation and learning outcomes in science education.
PERTANGGUNGJAWABAN PIDANA APARAT PENEGAK HUKUM ATAS PENUNDAAN PROSES PERADILAN KASUS KORUPSI PT KRAKATAU STEEL Norma Risca Pratiwi; Ridwan Ridwan; Reine Rofiana
Khairun Law Journal Volume 8 Issue 1, September 2024
Publisher : Faculty of Law, Khairun University

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.33387/klj.v8i1.8355

Abstract

In the process of examining the PT Krakatau Steel corruption criminal case, there was a neglect of legal obligations by law enforcement officials regarding the fulfillment of the defendant's rights. The main problem studied in this research is how the process of delays in the criminal justice process for criminal acts of corruption in the PT Krakatau Steel case and what forms of criminal responsibility there are for law enforcement officials for delays in the criminal justice process for criminal acts of corruption in the case of PT Krakatau Steel (Legal Study of District Court Decisions Attack). This research was conducted using normative juridical methods. The results of this research show that in the process of examining the criminal corruption case in the PT Krakatau Steel case, during the evidentiary process at trial, which is part of the prosecution stage in the criminal justice process, there were often delays of up to 7 times by the prosecutor and substitute ad hoc judge. The form of criminal responsibility for law enforcement officials for delays in the criminal justice process for the criminal act of corruption in the PT Krakatau Steel case is the prosecutor and substitute ad hoc judge for their actions in delaying the trial by not obeying statutory orders by officials as a form of contempt of justice (contempt). of court). So that the substitute ad hoc prosecutor and judge can be held criminally responsible under Article 216 paragraph (1) of the Criminal Code concerning Crimes Against Public Authorities.
Co-Authors Annisa Shafirah Fhazriani Riau Helsa Putri Pratama Indri Sari Utami Muhammad Yusrizal Norma Risca Pratiwi Novita Ayu Permata Sari Reine Rofiana Siti Khoirunisa