Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
0.444
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal PRISMA Pedagogy: Journal of Multidisciplinary Education
Mubarik
Universitas Tadulako
Education Mathematics Social Sciences Other

Published : 2 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

 1 
Jejak Kebenaran Matematika Menurut Platonisme Elisa Setyaningrum; Nurhidayah; Dina Damayanti; Desi Putri Andini; Anggun Putri Handayani; Mubarik
Pedagogy: Journal of Multidisciplinary Education Vol. 2 No. 1 (2025): Mei 2025
Publisher : PT. Academic Bright Collaboration

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.61220/pedagogy.v2i1.260

Abstract

Platonisme dalam matematika mencerminkan keyakinan Plato bahwa ada dunia bentuk atau ide yang lebih nyata dan abadi dibandingkan dunia fisik yang kita lihat sehari-hari. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk menelusuri kebenaran matematika dalam filsafat matematika ditinjau dari aliran Platonisme. Dalam penelitian ini, digunakan metode kualitatif dengan pendekatan study literature berdasarkan data-data referensi atau kepustakaan. Hasil pembahasan dari penelitian ini bahwa platonisme dalam matematika adalah pandangan bahwa objek-objek matematika memiliki keberadaan yang nyata dan obyektif dalam suatu alam ideal. matematika dianggap sebagai penemuan, bukan ciptaan manusia, di mana para matematikawan menemukan hubungan dan kebenaran yang sudah ada di alam ideal tersebut. Platonisme telah banyak dikritik oleh para filsuf yang disebut “nominalisme” dengan dua kelemahan utama. Pertama, Platonisme tidak dapat memberikan penjelasan yang memadai tentang bagaimana para matematikawan memperoleh akses ke pengetahuan tentang bidang yang bersifat platonis. Kedua, Platonisme tidak dapat memberikan penjelasan yang memadai tentang matematika, baik secara internal maupun eksternal. Manfaat dari penelitian ini dapat membantu pemahaman akan pandangan Platonisme terhadap kebenaran serta keberadaan matematika.
An Analysis of Students' Pseudo-Thinking Processes in Solving Algebra Problems from The Perspective of Self-Confidence Nur Rahma; Mubarik; Fajriani; Pathuddin
PRISMA Vol. 15 No. 1 (2026): PRISMA
Publisher : Universitas Suryakancana

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.35194/jp.v15i1.6251

Abstract

This study aims to describe the pseudo-thinking processes of eighth-grade junior high school students in solving algebra problems, as viewed from the perspectives of high, moderate, and low levels of self-confidence. This study was conducted in the eighth grade at SMP Negeri 7 Palu during the 2025/2026 school year. A total of 3 students were selected from a group of 29 students. This research method uses a qualitative approach of a descriptive nature.The researcher employed a self-confidence questionnaire, an algebraic problem-solving test, and interviews. The results indicate that students have high self-confidence in their ability to solve problems correctly and follow problem-solving steps; however, they still struggle to explain their reasoning conceptually, suggesting that their thinking is pseudo-correct. Students with moderate self-confidence are able to solve problems fairly well, but they still make mistakes in their approach and conceptual understanding, so they tend to engage in pseudo-correct thinking, although not to the same extent as students with high self-confidence. Students with low self-confidence tend to have difficulty understanding and solving problems, leading them to give incorrect answers; however, they are able to correct their mistakes after reflecting on them, thus demonstrating pseudo-errors.
Co-Authors Anggun Putri Handayani Desi Putri Andini Dina Damayanti Elisa Setyaningrum Fajriani Nur Rahma Nurhidayah Pathuddin