Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
0.408
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Media Hukum Indonesia (MHI) Jurnal Kajian Hukum Dan Kebijakan Publik
Mamanda Syahputra Ginting
Fakultas Hukum, Universitas Lampung
Education Environmental Science Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Social Sciences

Published : 2 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

 1 
Analisis Dasar Pertimbangan Hakim Dalam Menjatuhkan Pidana Dibawah Minimum Khusus Terhadap Tindak Pidana Tanpa Hak Menguasai Narkotika Golongan I Benny David Silaen; Heni Siswanto; Budi Rizki Husin; Erna Dewi; Mamanda Syahputra Ginting
Jurnal Kajian Hukum Dan Kebijakan Publik | E-ISSN : 3031-8882 Vol. 3 No. 4 (2026): Januari-Februari
Publisher : CV. ITTC INDONESIA

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.62379/jkhkp.v3i2.2044

Abstract

The criminal case committed by the defendant in Decision Number 341/Pid.Sus/2024/PN Gns was proven to involve the abuse of methamphetamine for personal use. The issue examined by the author is the judges' consideration in imposing a sentence below the minimum specifically for the defendant and the purpose of sentencing for the defendant. This research uses a normative juridical approach supported by interviews. The research findings show that from a juridical perspective, the judges made a breakthrough based on Supreme Court Circular Letter (SEMA) No. 3 of 2015 by imposing a 1-year prison sentence, which falls below the 4-year minimum threshold stipulated in Article 112 Paragraph (1) of Law Number 35 of 2009. Philosophical and sociological considerations underpinned this decision, as the judges sought substantive justice by examining the defendant's background as a woman, a non-recidivist, and the sole breadwinner for her child suffering from polio. Furthermore, this study identifies a procedural flaw resulting from the absence of both a urine test and a recommendation from the Integrated Assessment Team (TAT). Consequently, the judges did not mandate medical or social rehabilitation measures, shifting the sentencing paradigm entirely toward the Absolute Theory which prioritizes physical retribution. This study recommends that future judges adopt a more active and progressive approach in exercising their procedural authority in line with the spirit of modern sentencing embodied in Law No.1 of 2023.
Paradigma Baru Pertanggungjawaban Pidana Advokat Terhadap Tindak Pidana Peradilan Menurut UU No. 1 Tahun 2023 Auliya Bestgati; Maroni M; Maya Shafira; Deni Achmad; Mamanda Syahputra Ginting
Media Hukum Indonesia (MHI) Vol 4, No 1 (2026): March
Publisher : Penerbit Yayasan Daarul Huda Kruengmane

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.18269053

Abstract

The legal profession enjoys immunity in performing defense duties; however, in practice this immunity often conflicts with the offense of contempt of court. This study aims to analyze the new paradigm of criminal liability for advocates following the enactment of Law Number 1 of 2023 on the National Criminal Code (KUHP Nasional) and to examine the limits of professional protection for advocates. The research employs a normative juridical method using statutory and case approaches. The findings indicate that Article 281 of the National Criminal Code provides clearer and more explicit regulation of offenses against judicial proceedings compared to the previous Criminal Code. Although Article 16 of the Advocate Law guarantees legal protection, acts of misbehaving in court committed in bad faith may still give rise to criminal liability. A case study of the Central Jakarta District Court Decision Number 521/Pid.B/2019/PN Jkt.Pst confirms that professional immunity does not apply to conduct that constitutes a pure criminal offense and undermines the dignity of the court. This study concludes that the National Criminal Code clarifies the boundary between legitimate advocacy and contempt of court, requiring advocates to balance client defense with respect for the authority of the judiciary
Co-Authors Auliya Bestgati Benny David Silaen Budi Rizki Husin Deni Achmad Erna Dewi Heni Siswanto Maroni M Maya Shafira