Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
0.702
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal JUDGE: Jurnal Hukum Al-Zayn: Jurnal Ilmu Sosial & Hukum Al Fuadiy: Jurnal Hukum Keluarga Islam ALADALAH: Jurnal Politik, Sosial, Hukum dan Humaniora
Pagar
Universitas Islam Negeri Sumatera Utara
Religion Humanities Economics, Econometrics & Finance Education Languange, Linguistic, Communication & Media Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Social Sciences

Published : 4 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 4 Documents
Search

 1 
Rekonstruksi Hak Keperdataan Anak Luar Kawin: dari Perlindungan Nasab ke Perlindungan Hak Anak Hamka Husein Hasibuan; Pagar; Hasan Matsum; Fauziah Lubis
Al Fuadiy Jurnal Hukum Keluarga Islam Vol. 8 No. 1 (2026): January-June, Al Fuadiy : Journal of Islamic Family Law (in Press)
Publisher : LP3M INSTITUT KH YAZID KARIMULLAH

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.55606/af.v8i1.1859

Abstract

Children born out of wedlock constitute a complex legal and social issue, particularly in relation to the fulfillment of civil rights within plural legal systems. In Indonesia, the regulation of such rights reflects an ongoing tension between positive law, which increasingly emphasizes child protection, and Islamic law, which prioritizes the preservation of lineage (nasab). This article examines the construction of civil rights of children born out of wedlock under Indonesian positive law and Islamic law, with particular attention to lineage, guardianship, inheritance, and maintenance. Using a normative legal method with statutory, conceptual, and comparative approaches, the discussion highlights the impact of Constitutional Court Decision No. 46/PUU-VIII/2010 in reshaping the legal relationship between children born out of wedlock and their biological fathers. The findings indicate that positive law has shifted toward a child-centered paradigm by allowing civil relations based on scientific proof, while Islamic law maintains normative restrictions rooted in the sanctity of lawful marriage. Despite these differences, both legal systems share a common commitment to safeguarding the welfare and dignity of children. The article contributes to legal discourse by mapping points of convergence and divergence between the two systems and offering a balanced understanding of how child protection and moral-legal principles interact within Indonesia’s family law framework.
Perlindungan Hak Nafkah Anak Pasca Perceraian: Perspektif Maslahat dan Undang-Undang Nomor 35 Tahun 2014 Azuratun Nasuha; Pagar; Muhammad Iqbal Irham
ALADALAH: Jurnal Politik, Sosial, Hukum dan Humaniora Vol. 4 No. 2 (2026): ALADALAH: Jurnal Politik, Sosial, Hukum dan Humaniora
Publisher : LP3M INSTITUT KH YAZID KARIMULLAH

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.59246/aladalah.v4i2.1927

Abstract

Post-divorce conditions frequently result in the neglect of children’s rights, particularly financial support, despite clear legal obligations imposed on parents. Children, as a vulnerable group, require both normative and practical protection to ensure their well-being and sustainable development. This article examines the protection of child support rights after divorce through an integrative analysis of maslahah (public benefit) and Law Number 35 of 2014 on Child Protection. A qualitative approach is employed by combining normative juridical analysis with limited empirical insights derived from interviews with legal practitioners, enabling a more contextual understanding of the gap between legal norms and their implementation. The findings reveal that although legal frameworks and Islamic principles consistently position child support as a mandatory responsibility—primarily borne by the father—its enforcement remains weak due to limited monitoring mechanisms, low legal awareness, and socio-economic constraints. From the perspective of maqasid al-sharia, the fulfillment of child support constitutes a fundamental effort to preserve life, intellect, and lineage, thereby reinforcing its urgency beyond formal legality. The novelty of this study lies in its integrative framework that bridges positive law and Islamic legal philosophy to strengthen child protection discourse. Strengthening enforcement mechanisms, enhancing institutional supervision, and internalizing ethical-religious values are essential to ensure a more just, effective, and sustainable protection of children’s rights.
Sengketa Waris dalam Keluarga Muslim: Analisis Normatif terhadap Wasiat, Konflik Waris dan Pembatalan Hibah dalam Putusan Mahkamah Agung Nomor 179K/AG/2011 Ainul Mardhiah; Zulkarnain; Pagar
Al-Zayn: Jurnal Ilmu Sosial, Hukum & Politik Vol 4 No 4 (2026): 2026
Publisher : Yayasan pendidikan dzurriyatul Quran

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.61104/alz.v4i4.8189

Abstract

Tulisan ini membahas Sengketa waris dalam keluarga Muslim sering terjadi akibat perbedaan kepentingan terkait pembagian harta warisan, hibah, dan perlindungan hak para ahli waris. Salah satu perkara yang mencerminkan persoalan tersebut adalah Putusan Mahkamah Agung Republik Indonesia Nomor 179 K/AG/2011 yang berkaitan dengan pembatalan hibah yang dianggap merugikan ahli waris lainnya. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk menganalisis pertimbangan hukum hakim dalam menyelesaikan sengketa waris, mengkaji kedudukan hibah dalam hukum kewarisan Islam, serta menelaah implikasi hukum pembatalan hibah berdasarkan perspektif hukum Islam dan Kompilasi Hukum Islam (KHI). Penelitian ini menggunakan metode penelitian hukum normatif dengan pendekatan kasus (case approach) dan pendekatan perundang-undangan (statute approach). Data dikumpulkan melalui studi kepustakaan dengan menggunakan bahan hukum primer berupa Putusan Mahkamah Agung Nomor 179 K/AG/2011, Kompilasi Hukum Islam, Al-Qur’an, dan hadis, serta bahan hukum sekunder berupa buku dan artikel ilmiah yang relevan. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa Mahkamah Agung mengedepankan prinsip keadilan substantif dan perlindungan hak ahli waris dibandingkan sekadar menilai keabsahan formal hibah. Hibah yang menimbulkan ketimpangan dan merugikan ahli waris lain secara tidak proporsional dapat ditinjau kembali dan dibatalkan demi tercapainya keadilan serta terjaganya keharmonisan keluarga. Putusan tersebut menunjukkan adanya harmonisasi antara prinsip-prinsip hukum Islam dan hukum positif dalam penyelesaian sengketa waris di lingkungan Peradilan Agama Indonesia.
DILEMA NIKAH SIRI: ANTARA HUKUM ISLAM DAN HUKUM POSITIF Harry Permana; M. Iqbal Irham; Pagar
Judge : Jurnal Hukum Vol. 6 No. 07 (2026): Judge : Jurnal Hukum
Publisher : Cattleya Darmaya Fortuna

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.54209/judge.v6i07.2119

Abstract

The phenomenon of unregistered marriages is a social reality that still occurs frequently in Indonesia, especially among communities that adhere strongly to religious values. According to Islamic jurisprudence, unregistered marriages are considered valid as long as they fulfill the pillars and requirements, namely a guardian, two witnesses, and a marriage contract (ijab kabul). However, from the perspective of Indonesian positive law, specifically Marriage Law No. 1/1974 and the Compilation of Islamic Law (KHI), the validity of a marriage must be proven by official registration before a Marriage Registrar. This difference creates a legal dilemma: on the one hand, unregistered marriages are recognized religiously, but on the other hand, they have no legal force in the eyes of the state. This gives rise to various social and legal problems such as the lack of legal protection for wives and children, as well as difficulties in obtaining inheritance rights and family legal status. The purpose of this study is to analyze the relationship between unregistered marriages and their validity according to Islamic law and legal certainty according to Indonesian laws and regulations. This study uses a normative-juridical approach with a descriptive-comparative analysis method, namely comparing the provisions of Islamic law with positive law and analyzing their implications. The research results show that unregistered marriages fulfill the requirements for a valid marriage, but they do not guarantee legal certainty and protection because they are not officially registered. This situation creates potential injustice, especially for women and children born from unregistered marriages. Therefore, harmonization of Islamic law and positive law is necessary to ensure legal enforcement without neglecting the legality of the state. Marriage registration is not merely an administrative matter, but an instrument of legal protection that aligns with the principle of benefit in Islamic law.
Co-Authors Ainul Mardhiah Azuratun Nasuha Fauziah Lubis Hamka Husein Hasibuan Harry Permana Hasan Matsum M Iqbal Irham Zulkarnain