Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
0.444
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Al-MIKRAJ: Jurnal studi Islam dan Humaniora Al Fuadiy: Jurnal Hukum Keluarga Islam
Hamka Husein Hasibuan
Universitas Islam Negeri Sumatera Utara
Religion Economics, Econometrics & Finance Education Languange, Linguistic, Communication & Media Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Social Sciences

Published : 2 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

 1 
Rekonstruksi Hak Keperdataan Anak Luar Kawin: dari Perlindungan Nasab ke Perlindungan Hak Anak Hamka Husein Hasibuan; Pagar; Hasan Matsum; Fauziah Lubis
Al Fuadiy Jurnal Hukum Keluarga Islam Vol. 8 No. 1 (2026): January-June, Al Fuadiy : Journal of Islamic Family Law (in Press)
Publisher : LP3M INSTITUT KH YAZID KARIMULLAH

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.55606/af.v8i1.1859

Abstract

Children born out of wedlock constitute a complex legal and social issue, particularly in relation to the fulfillment of civil rights within plural legal systems. In Indonesia, the regulation of such rights reflects an ongoing tension between positive law, which increasingly emphasizes child protection, and Islamic law, which prioritizes the preservation of lineage (nasab). This article examines the construction of civil rights of children born out of wedlock under Indonesian positive law and Islamic law, with particular attention to lineage, guardianship, inheritance, and maintenance. Using a normative legal method with statutory, conceptual, and comparative approaches, the discussion highlights the impact of Constitutional Court Decision No. 46/PUU-VIII/2010 in reshaping the legal relationship between children born out of wedlock and their biological fathers. The findings indicate that positive law has shifted toward a child-centered paradigm by allowing civil relations based on scientific proof, while Islamic law maintains normative restrictions rooted in the sanctity of lawful marriage. Despite these differences, both legal systems share a common commitment to safeguarding the welfare and dignity of children. The article contributes to legal discourse by mapping points of convergence and divergence between the two systems and offering a balanced understanding of how child protection and moral-legal principles interact within Indonesia’s family law framework.
Menyoal Kedudukan dan Otoritas Sunnah dalam Istinbāṭ Al-Aḥkām Ahmadiyah Hamka Husein Hasibuan; Mhd. Syahnan; Nisful Khoiri; Dhiauddin Tanjung
AL-MIKRAJ Jurnal Studi Islam dan Humaniora (E-ISSN 2745-4584) Vol. 6 No. 1: Al-Mikraj, Jurnal Studi Islam dan Humaniora
Publisher : Pascasarjana Institut Agama Islam Sunan Giri Ponorogo

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.37680/almikraj.v6i1.9132

Abstract

This article is an attempt to analyze the position and authority of the Sunnah in the Ahmadiyya istinbāṭ al-aḥkām. This departs from the epistemological claim of the Ahmadiyya who explicitly identify themselves as Aḥnāf (followers of the Ḥanafi school), who are essentially ahl ar-ra’y, on the one hand, and at the same time claim to be ahl al-ḥadīs, on the other. This position is methodologically unique and interesting, because it has the potential to create tension between rational reasoning and the authority of hadith texts. This paper is a literature review (library research) by analyzing primary sources of the Ahmadiyya. The results of the study indicate that the sunnah/hadith for the Ahmadiyya is a secondary source of law, by distinguishing between binding sunnah (mulzim li al-hukmi) and non-binding sunnah (gairu mulzim li al-hukmi). However, the authority of the Sunnah is limited to its confirmatory (ta’kid) and explanatory (mubayyin) functions regarding the Qur’an, while its formative (making new laws), takhṣīṣ, and naskh functions are explicitly rejected. This limitation has the effect of narrowing the normative space of the Sunnah. Although theoretically it does not recognize the formative function of the hadith (making new laws), in practice, the Ahmadiyya uses the hadith to create new laws, namely when legitimizing the mahdīth and mujaddiqīyah of Mirza Ghulam Ahmad, even though this is not mentioned in the Qur’an. This “narrow” authority of the Sunnah has consequences for the high authority of the caliph in the practice of istinbāṭ al-ahkām of the Ahmadiyya. Of course, this is a characteristic feature of istinbāṭ al-ahkām, where the caliph has the highest authority as the highest interpreter. This finding also emphasizes the importance of studying Islamic jurisprudence (fiqh) and Islamic jurisprudence (ushul fiqh) in understanding the dynamics of Ahmadiyya thought more comprehensively.
Co-Authors Dhiauddin Tanjung Fauziah Lubis Hasan Matsum Mhd. Syahnan Nisful Khoiri Pagar