Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 14 Documents
Search

Implementasi Program Rumah Restorative Justice Kejaksaan Negeri Kabupaten Probolinggo dalam Penyelesaian Perkara Tindak Pidana Ringan Bebly Rajes Punjabi; Muhamad Dluha; Kholidazia El Hamzah F.
PESHUM : Jurnal Pendidikan, Sosial dan Humaniora Vol. 5 No. 3: April 2026
Publisher : CV. Ulil Albab Corp

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.56799/peshum.v5i3.16181

Abstract

Penerapan Restorative Justice (RJ) oleh Kejaksaan merupakan bagian dari pembaruan sistem Peradilan Pidana yang berorientasi pada keadilan substantif dan pemulihan hubungan sosial. Penelitian ini dilatarbelakangi oleh dinamika penerapan Restorative Justice di Kejaksaan Negeri Kabupaten Probolinggo, khususnya perubahan mekanisme prosedural sejak awal tahun 2026 serta hambatan dalam implementasinya. Tujuan penelitian ini adalah untuk menganalisis implementasi Program Rumah Restorative Justice dalam penyelesaian tindak pidana ringan serta mengidentifikasi hambatan yang dihadapi. Metode penelitian yang digunakan adalah penelitian hukum empiris dengan pendekatan Socio-Legal Research dan Statute Approach, melalui wawancara, observasi, dan studi dokumentasi. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa penerapan Restorative Justice di Kejaksaan Negeri Kabupaten Probolinggo dilaksanakan secara selektif dengan memenuhi syarat normatif dan sosiologis, termasuk verifikasi terhadap latar belakang tersangka, pelaksanaan dalam waktu 14 hari setelah Tahap II, serta kewajiban ekspos kepada Kejaksaan Tinggi sebelum diterbitkan SKP2. Di wilayah Jawa Timur, persetujuan penghentian penuntutan cukup dikeluarkan oleh Kepala Kejaksaan Tinggi. Hambatan utama yang ditemukan adalah tuntutan ganti rugi korban yang tidak proporsional serta rendahnya pemahaman masyarakat terhadap mekanisme penyelesaian melalui Rumah Restorative Justice. Penelitian ini menyimpulkan bahwa pelaksanaan RJ telah berjalan efektif, namun masih memerlukan penguatan sosialisasi dan penyempurnaan mekanisme teknis.
The Implementation of the Return of Criminal Evidence in the Probolinggo District Court Based on Prosecutor's Regulation Number 7 of 2020 Hadiah Hadiah; Muhamad Dluha; Kholidazia El HF
Jurnal AL-MAQASID: Jurnal Ilmu Kesyariahan dan Keperdataan Vol 11, No 2 (2025)
Publisher : UIN Syekh Ali Hasan Ahmad Addary Padangsidimpuan

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.24952/almaqasid.v11i2.17827

Abstract

This study discusses the implementation of the return of evidence in criminal cases at the Probolinggo City District Attorney's Office based on Prosecutor's Regulation Number 7 of 2020 concerning Asset Recovery. The main focus of this study is to describe the administrative mechanisms and obstacles faced in the process of returning evidence after a court decision with permanent legal force. This research was analyzed using the Lawrence M. Friedman Legal System Theory approach which includes three main elements, namely legal structure, legal substance, and legal culture. The method used is an empirical juridical approach with a combination of legislative and socio-legal approaches. Data was obtained through literature studies, observations, and interviews with prosecutors, evidence officers, and the recipient of goods. The results of the study show that the return of evidence is carried out through the digital service system "Sobat Ali" (Evidence Return Solution by the State Attorney Ali), but its implementation still faces several obstacles, including the ignorance of the owner of the goods, low public awareness, and limited evidence storage facilities.
The Implementation of the Return of Criminal Evidence in the Probolinggo District Court Based on Prosecutor's Regulation Number 7 of 2020 Hadiah Hadiah; Muhamad Dluha; Kholidazia El HF
Jurnal AL-MAQASID: Jurnal Ilmu Kesyariahan dan Keperdataan Vol 11, No 2 (2025)
Publisher : UIN Syekh Ali Hasan Ahmad Addary Padangsidimpuan

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.24952/almaqasid.v11i2.17827

Abstract

This study discusses the implementation of the return of evidence in criminal cases at the Probolinggo City District Attorney's Office based on Prosecutor's Regulation Number 7 of 2020 concerning Asset Recovery. The main focus of this study is to describe the administrative mechanisms and obstacles faced in the process of returning evidence after a court decision with permanent legal force. This research was analyzed using the Lawrence M. Friedman Legal System Theory approach which includes three main elements, namely legal structure, legal substance, and legal culture. The method used is an empirical juridical approach with a combination of legislative and socio-legal approaches. Data was obtained through literature studies, observations, and interviews with prosecutors, evidence officers, and the recipient of goods. The results of the study show that the return of evidence is carried out through the digital service system "Sobat Ali" (Evidence Return Solution by the State Attorney Ali), but its implementation still faces several obstacles, including the ignorance of the owner of the goods, low public awareness, and limited evidence storage facilities.
Kejahatan Seksual dan Paradigma Victim-Centered Justice dalam Hukum Pidana Indonesia Kholidazia El Hamzah F.; Hasan Basri; Samsul Huda; Abdur Rohim
Jurnal Hukum Lex Generalis Vol 7 No 7 (2026): Tema Hukum Pidana
Publisher : Himpunan Ilmu Hukum dan Ilmu Hukum Islam

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.56370/jhlg.v7i7.3849

Abstract

Sexual crimes inflict prolonged physical, psychological and social impacts on victims. Indonesia's criminal law reform through the Law on Sexual Violence Crimes and the National Criminal Code (KUHP) demonstrates a paradigm shift toward victim protection through a victim-centered justice approach. This article analyzes the implementation of this paradigm in handling sexual crimes in Indonesia. The findings indicate that although the normative framework has accommodated the victims' interests and rights, judicial practices still face challenges in the form of secondary victimization. Furthermore, a gap remains between statutory regulations and their enforcement by law enforcement authorities in providing effective protection to victims. Therefore, it is necessary to formulate and implement standard operating procedures (SOPs) oriented toward victim protection and recovery at every stage of the criminal justice process.