Jurnal Konstitusi
Jurnal Konstitusi merupakan media triwulanan guna penyebarluasan (diseminasi) hasil penelitian atau kajian konseptual tentang konstitusi dan putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi. Jurnal Konstitusi terbit empat nomor dalam setahun (Maret, Juni, September, dan Desember). Jurnal Konstitusi memuat hasil penelitian atau kajian konseptual (hasil pemikiran) tentang konstitusi, putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi serta isu-isu hukum konstitusi dan ketatanegaraan yang belum pernah dipublikasikan di media lain. Jurnal Konstitusi ditujukan untuk kalangan pakar, akademisi, praktisi, penyelenggara negara, LSM, serta pemerhati hukum konstitusi dan ketatanegaraan.
Articles
10 Documents
Search results for
, issue
"Vol 17, No 1 (2020)"
:
10 Documents
clear
Perlindungan Pengetahuan Tradisional sebagai Hak Konstitusional di Indonesia
Reh Bungana Beru Perangin-angin;
Ramsul Nababan;
Parlaungan G. Siahaan
Jurnal Konstitusi Vol 17, No 1 (2020)
Publisher : The Constitutional Court of the Republic of Indonesia
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
Full PDF (383.923 KB)
|
DOI: 10.31078/jk1718
Indonesia is a country that has abundant genetic resources, multi ethnicity, and diverse cultures. This situation makes Indonesia very rich in traditional knowledge. Protecting traditional knowledge is very important because traditional knowledge is the identity of the community as the owner. Through Article 18B Paragraph (2) and Article 28I Paragraph (3) of the 1945 Constitution, traditional knowledge which is a traditional right and the identity of the indigenous culture are implicitly recognized as constitutional rights. Protection of traditional knowledge in Indonesia is regulated in the Copyright Law, Patent Law, and Culture Promotion Act. However, the protection of traditional knowledge in Indonesia has not been optimal, because it has not provided adequate protection to traditional knowledge.
Hukum yang Hidup dalam Masyarakat dalam Pembaharuan Hukum Pidana Nasional
Pan Mohamad Faiz;
Muhammad Erfa Redhani
Jurnal Konstitusi Vol 17, No 1 (2020)
Publisher : The Constitutional Court of the Republic of Indonesia
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
Full PDF (367.609 KB)
|
DOI: 10.31078/jk1717
The question about the existence of the living law in the criminal law reform can at least be done both in juridical and theoretical perspectives. This paper attempts to discuss and present two important perspectives on the living law in the criminal law reform. First, how the position of the living law in the criminal law reform is seen from the perspective of legal theory. Secondly, how far of the living law is gaining justification for contributing to the criminal law reform. Both problems are studied in doctrinal and produce findings as follows: first, the contribution of the living law in the criminal law reform is gaining theoretical strengthening. Secondly, the contributions of the living law in the criminal law reform also obtained not only by national legal instruments, but also by international legal instruments.
Penghapusan Kriminalisasi Terhadap Hakim dan Jaksa dalam Rangka Mewujudkan Sinkronisasi Sistem Peradilan Pidana Anak
Syamsul Fatoni
Jurnal Konstitusi Vol 17, No 1 (2020)
Publisher : The Constitutional Court of the Republic of Indonesia
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
Full PDF (348.251 KB)
|
DOI: 10.31078/jk17110
In connection with the submission of judicial review to the Constitutional Court conducted by the Indonesian Judges Association (IKAHI) and the Indonesian Prosecutors Association (IJI), this research aims to examine the criminalization of Judges and Prosecutors in the Criminal Justice System as regulated in Act Number 11 of 2012 about the Juvenile Criminal System. This type of research is descriptive normative juridical, namely inventorying the legislation through the statute approach and conceptual approach to develop legal arguments and legal opinions in solving legal issues. Whereas legal material collection techniques (primary, secondary and tertiary) use literature study and analysis with deductive thinking logic. The results showed that the submission of the judicial review submission by the Constitutional Court was appropriate because Law Number 11 of 2012 concerning the Child Criminal Justice System is a form of protection and enforcement of children’s rights in the criminal justice process so that criminalization efforts against officers and law enforcement officers, especially against Judges (Article 96, Article 100 and Article 101) and Prosecutors (Article 99) will influence the criminal justice system. In addition, the principles of criminalization must be considered, namely the principles of legality, the principle of subsidiarity and the principle of equality or equality so as to realize structural synchronization, substantial synchronization and cultural synchronization in the juvenile justice system.
Judicial Consistency dalam Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi tentang Pengujian Undang-Undang Penodaan Agama
Zaka Firma Aditya
Jurnal Konstitusi Vol 17, No 1 (2020)
Publisher : The Constitutional Court of the Republic of Indonesia
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
Full PDF (394.68 KB)
|
DOI: 10.31078/jk1714
This paper will discuss the consistency of the constitutional court decision in the judicial review cases based on the principle of precedent. MK several times deemed inconsistent because often issued a ruling that is overruling. However, there were actually a lot of MK decisions that consistently followed the precedent. Although the use of the precedent principle is only known in common law tradition, the Constitutional Court apparently also applies it. The Constitutional Court’s decision regarding the Blasphemy Prevention Act was one form of the principle of precedent in the Constitutional Court. This decision consistently states that the Blasphemy Prevention Act remains constitutional because a legal vacuum will occur if the Blasphemy Prevention Law was decided to be unconstitutional. In this case, the Court retained its ratio decidendi to the constitutionality of the Blasphemy Prevention Law, even though the Court was aware that the Law contained many weaknesses. The consistency of the Constitutional Court on the judicial review of the Blasphemy Prevention Act is one form of the practice of precedent doctrine.
Positivisme dan Implikasinya terhadap Ilmu dan Penegakan Hukum oleh Mahkamah Konstitusi (Analisa Putusan Nomor 46/PUU-XIV/2016)
Tundjung Herning Sitabuana;
Ade Adhari
Jurnal Konstitusi Vol 17, No 1 (2020)
Publisher : The Constitutional Court of the Republic of Indonesia
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
Full PDF (441.543 KB)
|
DOI: 10.31078/jk1715
This paper reveals fundamental questions about the implications of the school of positivism for science and law enforcement in the Constitutional Court. The study results show First, at the level of jurisprudence, this school understands its adherents that jurisprudence as “a normological understanding of the meaning of positive law (normological apprehension of the meaning of positive law)”. The development of jurisprudence is then carried out through the activities of studying, researching and teaching various positive laws, “which in the end the development of jurisprudence is more towards” dogmatic jurisprudence “. Second, at the level of law enforcement in the Constitutional Court, the implication of judges is to base the process of law enforcement as stipulated in the positive norms of statutory regulations. Upholding the law becomes synonymous with enforcing positive rules. Judges as legal bearers are practically proficient in reading and sounding positive law in their legal decisions. Decision of the Constitutional Court Number 46/PUUXIV/2016 related to the existence of adultery in the Criminal Code is one of the decisions that have a strong influence from this school.
Sistem Keadilan Pemilu dalam Penanganan Pelanggaran dan Sengketa Proses Pemilu Serentak 2019 di Sumatera Barat
Khairul Fahmi;
Feri Amsari;
Busya Azheri;
Muhammad Ichsan Kabullah
Jurnal Konstitusi Vol 17, No 1 (2020)
Publisher : The Constitutional Court of the Republic of Indonesia
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
Full PDF (440.18 KB)
|
DOI: 10.31078/jk1711
The electoral justice system has been established in Law Number 7 of 2017. It is marked the electoral justice system has been established in Law Number 7 of 2017. It is marked by the regulation of all procedures for implementing the election stages and the mechanism for handling election violations or disputes. The settlement of violations and election disputes is carried out by Election Supervisory Body (Bawaslu). In resolving violations and conflicts, Bawaslu has the authority to issue final decisions. With this authority, the role of Bawaslu is strengthened in the framework of law enforcement for election justice. This study would like to examine how this authority is exercised, especially in West Sumatra. West Sumatra has chosen because this province has become one of the most vulnerable areas in terms of organizing free and fair elections. Furthermore, there has also been an increase in the number of cases handled by Bawaslu in the 2019 elections compared to 2014 in West Sumatera. Therefore, how election law enforcement is carried out by Bawaslu to realize electoral justice, particularly in handling election violations and disputes. This article using normative legal research methods by relying on legal materials in the form of court decisions and decisions of the Bawaslu in province and city. In this study, it was concluded that the electoral justice system had implemented in the process of handling violations and disputes by Bawaslu in West Sumatra. All complaint report indicated it, i.e., administrative offenses, alleged criminal acts, and election disputes have been passed based on procedures determined by statutory regulations. However, there are still some weaknesses that must be evaluated because the election justice can not maximize.
Anomali Penerapan Klausul Bersyarat dalam Putusan Pengujian Undang-Undang terhadap Undang-Undang Dasar
Anang Sulistyono;
Abdul Wahid;
Mirin Primudyastutie
Jurnal Konstitusi Vol 17, No 1 (2020)
Publisher : The Constitutional Court of the Republic of Indonesia
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
Full PDF (397.031 KB)
|
DOI: 10.31078/jk1712
In the implementation of constitutional review by the Constitutional Court, one of the dynamics occur is the emergence of conditionally constitutional unconstitutional decisions. Furthermore, the utilization of these types of decisions also has its dynamics, especially concerning the interpretation of conditional decisions. It can be indicated by the existence of anomalies decisions, which in the legal consideration, states that the norms reviewed are conditionally constitutional, but in its verdict, the norms are declared conditionally unconstitutional. Therefore, this paper aimed to comprehend the utilization of conditional decisions in constitutional review and to understand how is the anomaly in conditional clause implementation, as well as what Constitutional Court can do to prevent the anomalies to occur. Based on the analysis of conditional decision’s anomalies, there are at least three points that need to be pointed out. First, the anomalies increasingly show that conditionally constitutional and conditionally unconstitutional are substantially the same. Second, the use of conditionally constitutional clause as a ratio decidendi is considered to have no impact on the implementation of decisions. Third, the seven decisions analyzed further emphasized the Constitutional Court views that conditionally constitutional clause is deemed to be more effective in the implementation.
Komisi Pemberantasan Korupsi sebagai Tata Konstitusional Abnormal dan Implikasi Yuridis Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Nomor 36/PUU-XV/2017
Titon Slamet Kurnia
Jurnal Konstitusi Vol 17, No 1 (2020)
Publisher : The Constitutional Court of the Republic of Indonesia
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
Full PDF (413.244 KB)
|
DOI: 10.31078/jk1716
This article expresses the author’s view to disagree with the existence of the KPK and its supporting Constitutional Theory. This article is based on classical model of the trias politica theory and suggests that the existence of executive bodies should conform with the prescription of unitary executive theory. According to the unitary executive theory, the president should have the power to appoint and remove any executive official exclusively. This norm is based on the status of the president as the Chief Executive. According to this notion, the KPK, as independent agency, is unconstitutional. In line with the Constitutional Court Decision No. 36/PUU-XV/2017, qualifying the KPK as executive, our abnormal constitutional order, with the existence of the KPK, should be normalized in accordance with the unitary executive theory.
Model Rekrutmen Penyelenggara Pemilu yang Independen dan Berintegritas di Daerah Istimewa Yogyakarta
Suranto Suranto;
Nasrullah Nasrullah;
Tanto Lailam
Jurnal Konstitusi Vol 17, No 1 (2020)
Publisher : The Constitutional Court of the Republic of Indonesia
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
Full PDF (360.771 KB)
|
DOI: 10.31078/jk1713
This study aims to find a model for the recruitment of election administrators with integrity and independence in the Special Region of Yogyakarta using qualitative research. The underlying problem is the large number of reports on election organizers who are not independent and have not integrity in various regions. To uncover these problems, the qualitative research with statutory, analytical, and case approaches is used. The results show that the recruitment model in the Law Number 12 Year 2008 still involves executive power (Governor or Regent/ Mayor), while the Law Number 15 Year 2011 and the Law Number 7 Year 2017 have better recruitment model and measurable process. The recruitment system contained in the Law Number 7 of 2017 is quite ideal, among the advantages of this system is that there is public involvement in the recruitment process, so the recruitment results are more accountable. Moreover, the current system is through the formation of a Selection Team consisting of academics, professionals, and community leaders who have integrity. However, some weaknesses still need to be fixed, namely: (1) the recruitment of the Selection Team must be conducted openly, (2) the integration of the CAT system in writing to ensure that candidates for election management have good theoretical and practical capabilities; (3) involvement of Provincial KPU and Provincial Bawaslu to select and determine candidates for election at Regency/ City level; (4) increasing public awareness that the Electoral Management Body (EMB) is an independent and professional institution so that political preferences can be eliminated.
Perlindungan Hak Penyandang Disabilitas dalam Memperoleh Pekerjaan dan Penghidupan yang Layak bagi Kemanusiaan
Bayu Dwi Anggono
Jurnal Konstitusi Vol 17, No 1 (2020)
Publisher : The Constitutional Court of the Republic of Indonesia
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
Full PDF (398.587 KB)
|
DOI: 10.31078/jk1719
Decent work and livelihoods for humanity are part of human rights for everyone, including people with disabilities, so the 1945 Constitution provides guarantees and legal protection for their implementation. The problem is the discriminatory attitude towards persons with disabilities and the low level of education of persons with disabilities as a gap between people with disabilities and non-disabled workers. The absence of exact data related to the number of workers with disabilities both in the private sector and non-private sectors (PNS, BUMN and BUMD) raises its own problems in the protection of persons with disabilities. The quota of minimum requirement is 2 percent as a mandatory for the government, local government, BUMN, and BUMD and 1 percent for private companies from the number of employees or workers in the Disability Act is apparently not enough to provide protection for people with disabilities. This research is a normative legal research to examine the laws and regulations in order to obtain justice for persons with disabilities. This becomes very important as a form of government commitment through supervision and improvement of policies becomes very important so that persons with disabilities get decent work and livelihoods.