Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Optimizing Confiscation of Assets in Accelerating the Eradication of Corruption Danil, Elwi; Kurniawan, Iwan
Hasanuddin Law Review VOLUME 3 ISSUE 1, APRIL 2017
Publisher : Hasanuddin University

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (490.765 KB) | DOI: 10.20956/halrev.v3i1.717

Abstract

Nowadays, corruption is still the most and biggest problem facing by Indonesian, due to its impacts on the nation. It caused huge loss to the state finance and even to the democratic life in this country. Various efforts have been resorted to fight corruption, but the results are unfruitful. Until recently, Indonesia is still the third most corrupt country in Asia according to the survey of Transparency International Indonesia (TII) in 2015, with the Corruption Perceptions Index of 36 points. The fight in eradicating corruption cannot be separated from the effort to deter the criminals through severe punishment. However, ICW’s most recent data shows otherwise. During the first half of 2014, there were 261 accused of corruption, with 242 of them were convicted guilty by the Corruption Courts. Among them, 193 were sentenced lenient (between 1-4 years imprisonment), 44 moderate (4-10 years), and only 4 with over 10 years imprisonment. The average length of sentence is therefore 2,9 years. The lenient sentence can also be found in criminal restitution. Only in 87 of the total cases state compensation is imposed, amounting 87.04 billion rupiahs in total. The amount is only 0.022% of the total financial loss of 3.863 trillion rupiahs. The weak penalty triggered then the idea of impoverishing corruptors as a strategic step to accelerate the eradication of corruption while restoring the loss to the state. In contrast to the criminal restitution, which is restricted only to the state loss caused by the perpetrators, criminal confiscation of assets has no limit in amount.
Konstitusionalitas Penerapan Hukum Adat dalam Penyelesaian Perkara Pidana Danil, Elwi
Jurnal Konstitusi Vol 9, No 3 (2012)
Publisher : Mahkamah Konstitusi Republik Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (503.489 KB) | DOI: 10.31078/jk%x

Abstract

Indonesia is a plural country with a lot of diversities in it. As a country that embracing positivistic in law perspective, Indonesia is applying the codification of law that has most popular maxim: the certainty of law. That maxim can reduce traditional law that believed by indigenous people. This paper talks about possibility of criminal law in traditional law perspective in Indonesian plural culture.
Implication of Regulation Authorities on the Efforts to Accelerate the Eradication of Corruption Sukmareni, Sukmareni; Danil, Elwi; Ismansyah, Ismansyah; Daulay, Zainul
Hasanuddin Law Review VOLUME 4 ISSUE 3, DECEMBER 2018
Publisher : Faculty of Law, Hasanuddin University

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (450.349 KB) | DOI: 10.20956/halrev.v4i3.1078

Abstract

Investigation of corruption, as an extra ordinary crime is granted to the three institutions, namely the Police, Attorney General and the Indonesian Corruption Eradication Commission (KPK). The granting of authority to these three institutions aims to accelerate the eradication of corruption, not only detrimental to the finances and the economy of the country but has damaged the joints of life of the nation and state. The research is descriptive and uses a normative juridical approach. Aiming to find out, and analyze qualitatively the implications of regulating investigative authority over the eradication of corruption in Indonesia. The study found that all three institutions that were given the authority to investigate corruption crimes were administratively separated, but functionally these three institutions should collaborate to accelerate the eradication of corruption, but in practice this was not the case, each institution tended to be shackled by fragmentary and institutional nature. centric that does not support the eradication of corruption. This is because the regulation of the authority of each institution has not been strictly regulated, then the arrangements are not synchronized and among the existing legislation, so that there is overlap of authority due to differences in interpretation between investigators, which results in investigations not going well.
Konstitusionalitas Penerapan Hukum Adat dalam Penyelesaian Perkara Pidana Elwi Danil
Jurnal Konstitusi Vol 9, No 3 (2012)
Publisher : The Constitutional Court of the Republic of Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (503.489 KB) | DOI: 10.31078/jk938

Abstract

Indonesia is a plural country with a lot of diversities in it. As a country that embracing positivistic in law perspective, Indonesia is applying the codification of law that has most popular maxim: the certainty of law. That maxim can reduce traditional law that believed by indigenous people. This paper talks about possibility of criminal law in traditional law perspective in Indonesian plural culture.
Criminal Law Policy About Monetary Sanction In The Bill of Penal Code OF Indonesia Yoserwan Yoserwan; Elwi Danil; Iwan Kurniawan
Simbur Cahaya VOLUME 27 NOMOR 1, JUNI 2020
Publisher : Universitas Sriwijaya

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (862.491 KB) | DOI: 10.28946/sc.v27i1.809

Abstract

Criminal law policy about criminal punishment is one of the most important substances in Criminal law making and reform. Even, the regulation of criminal punishment is assumed as one of indicators in measuring the development and civilization of a nation.  The current Penal Code of Indonesia (PCI) or KUHP that is the heritage of Dutch colonial is much influenced by Classical School and placed imprisonment as priority.  The consequence is that in one hand the high rate of imprisonment and over-capacity in the prison on the other hand. Such a condition will result in problems such as the diffulties conducting rehabilitation and providing the budgeting.  In its development, modern criminal law, especially from the the idea of utilitariansme, tries to find various alternatives to imprisonment, especially Monetary Punishment.  Even though PCI has adopted regulation on monetary punishment, the existing system still places imprisonment very dominant.  The Indonesian legislator which is currently hearing the Bill of PCI to replace the current PCI should foster the function of monetary punishment so that it results in the utility for the people. This article is discussing about how criminal law policy   about the monetary punishment regulated in Bill of PCI.  This study applies normative legal research and put stressing in (content analysis). The result of this study shoes that Bill of PCI has not yet placed monetary punishment as first priority in criminal punishment. There are some regulations that make it is not possible for monetary punishment is more selected in criminal enforcement. Therefore, Bill of PCI should be more accommodative in optimizing financial punishment in   realizing criminal punishment for the benefit of the people.
Pembekalan Program Anti Korupsi Kepada Penerima Dana Gempa di Kenagarian Pakandangan, Kabupaten Padang Parimaan Shinta Agustina; Elwi Danil; Yoserwan Yoserwan; Iwan Kurniawan; Edita Elda
Jurnal Pengabdian Warta Andalas Vol 23 No 3 (2016): Warta Pengabdian Andalas
Publisher : Lembaga Penelitian dan Pengabdian kepada Masyarakat (LPPM) Universitas Andalas

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

Corruption has penetrated into all aspects of people’s life in Indonesia as nation and state, as well as to the communities in rural areas. Corruption occurs in all fields, such as politics, education, religion, and social affairs, including in the distribution of earthquake relief fund in West Sumatra. One of the Corruption Court’s decisions in Padang, has sentenced several chairmans of Community Group, which has been formed to coordinate the distribution of the fund, due to corruption. Corruption by the low level people in the countryside is very different from the the corruption’s shape by state officials. They often happened due to lack of information that it is a form of corruption rather than habbits in community practices. This fact is precisely found in the distribution of reliefs fund in Kenagarian Pakandangan, the province of Padang Pariaman. Debriefing Program conducted by the lecturers from the faculty of law, Andalas University, brings substantial benefits to citizens in Pakandangan, in understanding the shape and behaviors of corruption. In general, people want this program to be continued in the following years, and given not only to adult but also to students, ranging from elementary to higher education.
Konstitusionalitas Penerapan Hukum Adat dalam Penyelesaian Perkara Pidana Elwi Danil
Jurnal Konstitusi Vol 9, No 3 (2012)
Publisher : The Constitutional Court of the Republic of Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (503.489 KB) | DOI: 10.31078/jk938

Abstract

Indonesia is a plural country with a lot of diversities in it. As a country that embracing positivistic in law perspective, Indonesia is applying the codification of law that has most popular maxim: the certainty of law. That maxim can reduce traditional law that believed by indigenous people. This paper talks about possibility of criminal law in traditional law perspective in Indonesian plural culture.
PENERAPAN PRINSIP “ULTIMUM REMEDIUM” TERHADAP TINDAK PIDANA ADMINISTRASI Elwi Danil
Jurnal Hukum Pidana dan Kriminologi Vol 1 No 1 (2020): Jurnal Mahupiki Oktober 2020
Publisher : Masyarakat Hukum Pidana dan Kriminologi Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (192.508 KB) | DOI: 10.51370/jhpk.v1i1.2

Abstract

Karakteristik perkembangan hukum pidana Indonesia ditandai oleh semakin “massive”nya pertumbuhan undang-undang hukum administrasi yang mengandung sanksi pidana,sehingga melahirkan konsep “administrative criminal law”. Hukum administrasi dipertautkandengan hukum pidana disebabkan kurangnya “kepercayaan” kepada sanksi administratif untukmempertahankan norma hukum administrasi, sehingga perlu bantuan hukum pidana. Namunpertumbuhan yang demikian pesat menjadi beban tersendiri bagi hukum pidana yang memilikikemampuan terbatas, sehingga menimbulkan “overcriminalizatin”. Karenanya penggunaandoktrin “ultimum remedium” adalah solusi yang ditawarkan. Doktrin ultimum remedium telahmengalami perluasan makna yang tidak lagi hanya terbatas pada leval kebijakan legislatif;melainkan juga telah memasuki tataran implementasi dalam penegakan hukum. Di Indonesia,doktrin ultimum remedium telah digunakan secara sangat terbatas dalam undang-undang hukumpidana administrasi, seperti UU Lingkungan Hidup. Praktik penegakan hukum secara implisittelah menggunakan doktrin ini sebagaimana tergambar dalam beberapa putusan hakim.Mengingat demikian penting dan strategisnya posisi doktrin ultimum remedium, maka sudahsangat mendesak diterapkan terhadap pelanggaran hukum administrasi. Tidak saja untukmengatasi “overcriminalization”; melainkan juga untuk mengatasi “overcapasity” LembagaPemasyarakatan, sehingga secara ekonomis mengurangi beban negara dan masyarakat. Tapidoktrin ini tidak boleh digunakan secara general dan membabibuta untuk semua jenispelanggaran pidana administratif; melainkan hanya diterapkan secara kasuistis terhadap tindakpidana administrasi yang tingkat kesalahan pelakunya relatif ringan, dan perbuatan relatif tidakmenimbulkan bahaya atau keresahan masyarakat.
Penegakan Hukum Tindak Pidana Cukai Di Perbatasan Kawasan Perdagangan Dan Pelabuhan Bebas Bintan Irwandi Syahputra; Elwi Danil; Oksep Adhayanto; Ayu Efritadewi
Jurnal Selat Vol. 8 No. 1 (2020): Jurnal Selat
Publisher : Program Studi Ilmu Hukum Universitas Maritim Raja Ali Haji

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (754.572 KB) | DOI: 10.31629/selat.v8i1.2747

Abstract

Sebagian wilayah Tanjungpinang merupakan kawasann perdagangan bebas dan pelabuhan bebas. Menempatkan sebagian wilayah tersebut mengakibatkan sulitnya melakukan pengawasan terhadap lalu lintas barang terutama barang kena cukai jenis rokok ditambah dalam hal penegakan hukum tindak pidana cukai tersebut belum ada yang di sampai kepengadilan.Rumusan masalah dalam penelitian ini yaitu bagaimana penegakan hukum tindak pidanacukai di perbatasan kawasan perdagangan dan pelabuhan bebas bintan. Metode yang digunakan dalam penelitian ini adalah metode yuridis Sosiologis. Atau yang dikenal dengan empiris. Berdasarkan penelitian ini dapat disimpulkan dalam penegakan hukum pemberian sanksi tindakan harus memperhatikan beberapa hal yang menjadi satu kesatuan yaitu ketidaktahuan orang akan barang yang dilarang, jumlah barang dalam hitungan sedikit dan bukan merupakan pengulangan tindak pidana yang sama. Pemberian kuota pembebasan cukai terhadap barang kena cukai jenis rokok untuk konsumsi masyarakat harus dijadikan pertimbangan terhadap urgensi hal tersebut.
EKSISTENSI PERBUATAN MELAWAN HUKUM SECARA MATERIIL (MATERIELE WEDERRECHTELIJKHEID) DALAM ARTI NEGATIF TERHADAP TINDAK PIDANA KORUPSI Indah Nadilla; Elwi Danil; Yoserwan Yoserwan
UNES Journal of Swara Justisia Vol 7 No 1 (2023): UNES Journal of Swara Justisia (April 2023)
Publisher : Program Magister Ilmu Hukum Universitas Ekasakti

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31933/ujsj.v7i1.319

Abstract

Korupsi merupakan kejahatan luar biasa (extra ordinary crime) yang memerlukan perhatian khusus di Indonesia. Korupsi tidak hanya merugikan kekayaan dan keuangan negara, namun korupsi juga menghilangkan legitimasi penegakan hukum dengan menghancurkan kepercayaan masyarakat terhadap hukum. Dalam upaya penegakan hukum terhadap pemberantasan tindak pidana korupsi diperlukannya kepastian hukum agar Hakim dapat malahirkan putusan yang adil dan bermanfaat bagi masyarakat. Namun terjadi persoalan terkait penafsiran hukum terhadap Pasal 2 ayat (1) Undang-Undang Nomor 31 Tahun 1999 tentang Pemberantasan Tindak Pidana Korupsi sebagaimana diubah dengan Undang-Undang Nomor 20 Tahun 2001 tentang Pemberantasan Tindak Pidana Korupsi (selanjutnya disebut UU PTPK) khususnya pada bagian penjelasan pasal mengenai perbuatan melawan hukum materiil (Materiele Wederrechtelijkheid). Persoalan ini lahir akibat judicial review ke Mahkamah Konstitusi dengan Nomor Putusan 003/PUU-VI/2006. Maka untuk Menjawab persoalan tersebut, perlu diketahui bagaimana pengaturan dan penafsiran serta eksistensi perbuatan melawan hukum materiil (materiele wederrechtelijkheid) dalam arti negatif terhadap tindak pidana korupsi. Metode Penelitian yang digunakan adalah penelitian normatif yang bersifat deskriptif. Hasil penelitian mengungkapkan bahwa Perbuatan melawan hukum materiil dalam arti positif akibat lahirnya putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi dianggap bertentangan dengan Pasal 28 D Undang-Undang Dasar Tahun 1945, sehingga hanya perbuatan melawan hukum materiil dalam fungsi negatif saja yang masih berlaku. Kemudian dalam pengejawantahan delik tersebut, hakim haruslah melakukan penafsiran hukum yang ideal guna terciptanya kepastian hukum terhadap Pasal 2 ayat (1) UU PTPK tersebut.
Co-Authors A. Irzal Rias Ade Candra, Ade Adrian Bima Putra Aldyans Rio Pratra Anak Agung Gede Sugianthara Angga Pratama Angga Pratama Aria Zurnetti, Aria Ayu Efritadewi Azmi Fendri Bagas, Alkautsar Chandra, Yonatan Iskandar Dafit Riadi Dharma Yuda Putra Edi Yunara Edita Elda Ekaputra, Mohammad Elda, Edita Elvia Puspita Siregar Fadillah Sabri Fadillah Sabri Fortuna, Lovely Gaol, Suryadinata LBN Hendri Joni Hengki Andora Ikhwan, Indah Indah Ikhwan Indah Nadilla Irsal Habibi Irwandi Syahputra, Irwandi Ismansyah Ismansyah Ismansyah Iwan Kurniawan Iwan Kurniawan Jenny Susmita Susilo Joni, Hendri Kamila Hesti Khairani Khairani Khairani Khairani Khairun Nissa, Zakiyah Kurniati, Dea Eling LBN Gaol, Suryadinata Lovely Fortuna Mahmud Mulyadi Muhammad Hasbi Muthia Anggela Mawadhaty Putry Mutya, Sherly Nadilla, Indah Nani Mulyati Nazif Firdaus Neneng Oktarina Nursafitri, Kharisma Oksep Adhayanto Oktarina, Neneng Partynia Nur Imantya Pengki Sumardi Pradana, Rido Prihatin Ningsih, Chyntia Puspita Siregar, Elvia Putra, Adrian Bima Putra, Vananda Putry, Muthia Anggela Mawadhaty Rafifa, Dhiyaul Okasha Rahma Noviyanti Rembrandt, Rembrandt Rias, A. Irzal Ridho Ilham, Ridho Ridho Ridho Ilham Rina Melati Sitompul Rina Rusman Rina Rusman Robensyah, Andes Rosmalinda, Rosmalinda Saibih, Junaedi Sarah Qurrata A’yun Sayutis, Sayutis Sherly Mutya Shinta Agustina Sipayung, Ronald Fredy Christian Siska Elvandari Sofyan, Syofirman Stella Dea Firsty Sukmareni Sukmareni, Sukmareni Suryadinata LBN Gaol Suryadinata LBN Gaol Susmita Susilo, Jenny Syofiarti Syofirman Sofyan Topo Santoso Topo Santoso Vananda Putra Wetria Fauzi Yasniwati, Yasniwati Yofirsta, Rova Yohanes Yohanes Yohanes Yohanes Yonatan Iskandar Chandra Yoserwan Yoserwan Yoserwan Yoserwan, Yoserwan Yuslim Yuslim Zainul Daulay Zakaria, Iqbal