cover
Contact Name
-
Contact Email
-
Phone
-
Journal Mail Official
-
Editorial Address
-
Location
Kota medan,
Sumatera utara
INDONESIA
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL ON LANGUAGE, RESEARCH AND EDUCATION STUDIES
ISSN : 25806777     EISSN : 25806785     DOI : -
Core Subject : Education,
International Journal on Language, Research and Education Studies (IJLRES), published by English Language Center, Faculty of Education and Teachers Training, State Islamic University (UIN) of North Sumatra, Medan - Indonesia is an open access journal that can be used as the medium of interaction for all scholars in the range of Language, Research and Education Studies.
Arjuna Subject : -
Articles 147 Documents
Urgency of Regulation on Bankruptcy Applicants for Regional Public Companies Rozaan, Thufail; Sukarmi, Sukarmi; Dewantara, Reka
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL ON LANGUAGE, RESEARCH AND EDUCATION STUDIES Vol 9, No 2 (2025): Inpress
Publisher : State Islamic University of North Sumatra Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.47006/ijlres.v9i2.25404

Abstract

The absence of a clear legal framework governing the authority to initiate bankruptcy proceedings against Regional Public Companies (Perusahaan Umum Daerah, or Perumda) has resulted in a normative gap that undermines legal certainty and institutional accountability. This article explores the urgency of establishing a new normative order (ius constituendum) concerning eligible bankruptcy petitioners against Perumda by critically examining its legal standing within Indonesia’s economic and public law system. Employing a normative juridical method that integrates statutory and conceptual approaches, this research applies systematic and grammatical interpretations to relevant primary and secondary legal sources. The findings reveal that the lack of explicit legal norms not only exposes Perumda to arbitrary actions and potential misuse of authority but also jeopardizes creditor protection and public service continuity. The study concludes by advocating for a firm regulatory framework that delineates clear procedural safeguards, thereby reinforcing the function of law as an instrument of justice and public interest protection.
Legal Interpretation of Honorariums and Free Services by PPAT in Land Registration Setyo, Riki Eri; Widhiyanti, Hanif Nur; Jauharoh, Arini
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL ON LANGUAGE, RESEARCH AND EDUCATION STUDIES Vol 9, No 2 (2025): Inpress
Publisher : State Islamic University of North Sumatra Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.47006/ijlres.v9i2.25056

Abstract

This study examines the normative interpretation of the terms “honorarium” and “services without charging fees” under Article 32 of PP No. 24/2016 and Permen ATR/BPN No. 33/2021. Using a normative juridical method with statutory and conceptual approaches, the research explores legal ambiguities in PPAT obligations, especially in digital land services outside the deed-making process. Findings reveal a regulatory vacuum that creates unequal treatment for PPATs and the poor, with unclear implementation boundaries and unjust workloads. The study proposes a normative interpretation model that aligns doctrine with practical conditions, emphasizing distributive and procedural justice. It recommends regulatory reform to classify service types, define reasonable honorariums, and ensure legal protection for all parties in digital land administration.
Legal Politics of Investment Screening in Indonesia’s Foreign Investment Reform Rahmah, Sherina Azkia; Sihabudin, Sihabudin; Dewantara, Reka
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL ON LANGUAGE, RESEARCH AND EDUCATION STUDIES Vol 9, No 2 (2025): Inpress
Publisher : State Islamic University of North Sumatra Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.47006/ijlres.v9i2.25695

Abstract

This study aims to examine the significance and regulatory models of investment screening mechanisms in the context of Indonesia's legal and political framework for foreign investment. Employing a normative juridical method combined with a political-legal approach, this research critically analyzes the growing global trend of screening foreign direct investment (FDI) to safeguard national interests. The study finds that Indonesia has yet to establish a coherent legal basis for investment screening, despite increasing strategic and security risks associated with uncontrolled FDI inflows. The absence of a legal framework creates vulnerability in upholding national economic sovereignty and managing foreign capital with precautionary oversight. The research concludes that reforming Indonesia’s investment policy is imperative, not only to ensure regulatory consistency but also to build a national mechanism capable of assessing the potential impacts of foreign investment on strategic sectors. Establishing such a screening regime would align Indonesia with global best practices while preserving its autonomy in economic governance.
The Concept of State Financial Loss Recovery Reviewed from the Perspective of the Judex Factie Court's Considerations Nasrudin, Zaldi; Noerdajasakti, Setiawan; Istiqomah, Milda
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL ON LANGUAGE, RESEARCH AND EDUCATION STUDIES Vol 9, No 2 (2025): Inpress
Publisher : State Islamic University of North Sumatra Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.47006/ijlres.v9i2.25454

Abstract

Corruption causes measurable state financial losses, making restitution a critical component of Indonesia's criminal justice system. Although mechanisms such as restitution and asset forfeiture are regulated under the Corruption Eradication Law, their implementation faces significant obstacles, including limited technical provisions, difficulties in tracing the origin of assets, and reliance on court decisions with permanent legal force. This study employs a normative juridical method to examine the regulatory framework governing restitution and its effectiveness in recovering state assets. The findings reveal that the absence of clear standards for calculating and enforcing restitution hampers legal consistency and weakens the recovery process. The study concludes that a reformulation of restitution policy is essential to ensure legal certainty and to transform restitution into an effective tool for restoring real state losses.
The Urgency of Electronically Storing Notary Protocol Archives Documents in the Concept of Progressive Law in Indonesia Fitrianingrum, Dana Ayu; Setia Negara, Tunggul Anshari; Wisnuwardhani, Diah Aju
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL ON LANGUAGE, RESEARCH AND EDUCATION STUDIES Vol 9, No 2 (2025): Inpress
Publisher : State Islamic University of North Sumatra Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.47006/ijlres.v9i2.25524

Abstract

The development of information technology has encouraged transformation in the practice of notarial administration, including the urgency of digitizing notary protocol storage. This research aims to analyze the legal needs of the e-documents storage system in a progressive legal perspective, emphasizing the regulatory vacuum and the urgency of norm reconstruction. Using a normative juridical approach and qualitative analysis of legal documents as well as the results of previous studies, it is found that the absence of explicit regulation in the Notary Office Law regarding digital archives creates legal uncertainty and evidentiary risks. This study argues that electronic-based storage of notarial protocols should be recognized as a normative necessity in line with the principles of expediency and legal certainty. The conclusion of this study confirms the importance of new regulations that provide legitimacy to notary e-documents as part of the state's responsibility in realizing efficient, fair, and accountable legal services.
Legal Protection for Flat Buyers in Underhand Sale and Purchase Agreements within the Pre-Project Selling System Sasmitaningrum, Dini; Widhiyanti, Hanif Nur; Anggraini, Erna
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL ON LANGUAGE, RESEARCH AND EDUCATION STUDIES Vol 9, No 2 (2025): Inpress
Publisher : State Islamic University of North Sumatra Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.47006/ijlres.v9i2.26234

Abstract

Penelitian ini mengkaji perlindungan hukum bagi konsumen yang membeli unit apartemen melalui skema penjualan pra-proyek dengan menggunakan Perjanjian Pengikatan Jual Beli (PPJB) di bawah tangan. Meskipun dianggap efisien oleh pengembang, praktik ini menempatkan konsumen pada posisi rentan karena ketiadaan perlindungan hukum formal dan tanpa keterlibatan notaris. Penelitian ini menggunakan pendekatan yuridis normatif untuk mengkaji ketiadaan sanksi yang tegas dalam Pasal 43 Undang-Undang No. 20/2011 tentang Rumah Susun, yang seringkali digunakan pengembang untuk menghindari kewajiban. Temuan penelitian menunjukkan adanya ketidakseimbangan struktur kekuasaan hukum antara konsumen dan pengembang, diperparah oleh lemahnya pengawasan dan celah hukum. PPJB, yang seharusnya dibuat di hadapan notaris, seringkali digunakan sebagai kontrak informal yang tidak memberikan perlindungan efektif bagi konsumen. Penelitian ini menyimpulkan bahwa reformasi regulasi yang mendesak diperlukan untuk mewajibkan pengesahan PPJB oleh notaris dan memperjelas sanksi administratif dan perdata atas pelanggaran. Kebaruan penelitian ini terletak pada fokus pada ketidakseimbangan kekuatan hukum dalam transaksi PPS dan usulan norma preskriptif yang menjamin keadilan kontraktual bagi konsumen.
Protection of Third Party Preferential Rights in the Confiscation of Corruption Crime Assets in Indonesia Purwandari, Rini; Hadiyantina, Shinta; Sugiri, Bambang
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL ON LANGUAGE, RESEARCH AND EDUCATION STUDIES Vol 9, No 2 (2025): Inpress
Publisher : State Islamic University of North Sumatra Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.47006/ijlres.v9i2.26000

Abstract

Corruption in Indonesia is not only understood as a criminal act that harms state finances, but also as a violation of human rights, especially when assets resulting from corruption are confiscated but are found to be controlled by third parties acting in good faith. This study aims to analyze the meaning of legal regulations related to the protection of third-party preferential rights and to formulate an ideal regulatory concept for the future. Using a prescriptive-analytical normative juridical method, this study examines legislative approaches, case studies, and court decisions. The results show that the existing legal framework, including the PTPK Law and Supreme Court Regulation No. 2 of 2022, does not provide comprehensive guarantees for the rights of third parties. The case studies of Bank Jatim and PT Sritex reveal a legal vacuum in practice, where legitimate secured creditors remain vulnerable when assets are confiscated. This study concludes that without clear and synchronized regulations, asset seizure has the potential to create new injustices, undermine public trust, and disrupt legal certainty in economic activities. Therefore, the reconstruction of more adaptive and transparent regulations is an urgent need to balance the interests of the state in asset recovery and the protection of bona fide third parties.