cover
Contact Name
-
Contact Email
-
Phone
-
Journal Mail Official
-
Editorial Address
-
Location
Kota medan,
Sumatera utara
INDONESIA
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL ON LANGUAGE, RESEARCH AND EDUCATION STUDIES
ISSN : 25806777     EISSN : 25806785     DOI : -
Core Subject : Education,
International Journal on Language, Research and Education Studies (IJLRES), published by English Language Center, Faculty of Education and Teachers Training, State Islamic University (UIN) of North Sumatra, Medan - Indonesia is an open access journal that can be used as the medium of interaction for all scholars in the range of Language, Research and Education Studies.
Arjuna Subject : -
Articles 154 Documents
Juridical Analysis of Legal Protection for Land Deed Officials (PPAT) Undergoing Investigative Proceedings by the Supervisory and Advisory Council of PPAT Liestina, Mirza Tri; Anshari, Tunggul; Kawuryan, Endang Sri
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL ON LANGUAGE, RESEARCH AND EDUCATION STUDIES Vol 10, No 1 (2026): Inpress
Publisher : State Islamic University of North Sumatra Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.47006/ijlres.v10i1.28996

Abstract

Land Deed Officials (Pejabat Pembuat Akta Tanah or PPAT) play a central role in the Indonesian land law system because they are authorized to issue authentic deeds concerning land rights transactions. In practice, deeds made by PPAT may become disputed or linked to alleged criminal offences, placing PPAT in the investigation process. This study examines the legal protection available to PPAT during investigations and analyses the position and limits of the Supervisory and Guidance Council for PPAT within that framework. Using a normative juridical method with statutory and case approaches, this study analyses primary and secondary legal materials through grammatical and systematic interpretation. The findings show that legal protection for PPAT has been recognized through supervision, guidance, and legal assistance. However, the current regulatory framework does not yet provide clear procedures on the summons of PPAT, the limits of professional confidentiality, the use of deeds and official documents in investigations, and the forms of institutional assistance available. The Supervisory and Guidance Council for PPAT therefore remains important in institutional supervision, but has not been clearly formulated as a procedural control mechanism in the investigation stage. Stronger regulation is needed to ensure greater legal certainty and a more balanced relationship between investigative authority, official duties, and legal protection for PPAT.
Jurisdictional Ambiguity over Corruption Crimes Committed by Military Personnel under Indonesia’s New Criminal Law Framework Hadi, Agustinus Purnomo; Prastopo, Prastopo; Novita, Maya Sri; Ridwan, Ridwan
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL ON LANGUAGE, RESEARCH AND EDUCATION STUDIES Vol 10, No 1 (2026): Inpress
Publisher : State Islamic University of North Sumatra Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.47006/ijlres.v10i1.29436

Abstract

The enactment of Indonesia’s National Criminal Code raises a new legal issue concerning the jurisdictional position of corruption crimes committed by military personnel. The problem lies in determining whether the competent court should be based on the offender’s military status or on the special nature of corruption crimes, which involve state financial losses, abuse of public authority, institutional integrity, and public trust. This study uses normative juridical research with statutory, conceptual, and institutional approaches. The analysis examines the relationship between the National Criminal Code, anti-corruption legislation, military justice law, and selected court decisions involving corruption crimes committed by military personnel. The study finds that judicial practice still relies on military courts and connected-case mechanisms in handling such cases. However, these mechanisms have not fully resolved the ambiguity between offender-status-based jurisdiction and offense-based jurisdiction. This article argues that jurisdiction should be determined through a functional approach by considering the offender’s status, the nature of the offense, the object of loss, the lex specialis principle, public accountability, and the institutional purpose of anti-corruption adjudication. Military courts should remain relevant for offenses directly related to military discipline and command, while corruption crimes that harm state finances and public integrity should retain their special character within the national criminal justice system.
Doubts about the Strength of Financial Intelligence Documents as Evidence in Money Laundering Crimes R, Ade Putra; Yuliati, Yuliati; Widyanti, Yenny Etta; Istiqomah, Milda
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL ON LANGUAGE, RESEARCH AND EDUCATION STUDIES Vol 10, No 1 (2026): Inpress
Publisher : State Islamic University of North Sumatra Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.47006/ijlres.v10i1.29336

Abstract

Based on the principle of legality, valid evidence in handling money laundering cases in Indonesia is one of them in the form of documents. The financial intelligence document issued by the Financial Intelligence Unit (FIU) is one of the documents that has been regulated in the provisions of the legislation which is a valid evidence. Recently, cases of Money Laundering Crimes (TPPU) that have occurred in Indonesia, such as cases involving insurance corporations, namely the case of PT Jiwasraya Insurance and PT Asabri Insurance, which used the capital market as a means to launder money from the predicate crime. This study aims to demonstrate by explaining the valid evidence in handling money laundering cases in Indonesia. The method used is normative juridical based on legal analysis and cases, this study found legal ambiguity related to the provisions of Article 73 of Law Number 8 of 2010 concerning the Prevention and Eradication of Money Laundering Crimes (PPTPPU Law). This study provides the conclusion that the harmonization of regulations that are open to multiple interpretations is needed so that law enforcement officers do not hesitate in applying these rules.
Independence of Penal Mediators: Efforts to Realize Impartial Restorative Justice in Indonesia Ardhaxena, I Wayan Prema; Djatmika, Prija
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL ON LANGUAGE, RESEARCH AND EDUCATION STUDIES Vol 10, No 1 (2026): Inpress
Publisher : State Islamic University of North Sumatra Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.47006/ijlres.v10i1.28949

Abstract

Keadilan restoratif di Indonesia bertujuan untuk menggeser paradigma hukum dari retributif ke restoratif, menekankan rehabilitasi daripada sekadar pemenjaraan. Namun, implementasinya saat ini masih terhambat oleh kurangnya regulasi spesifik mengenai kualifikasi dan independensi mediator pidana. Studi ini menganalisis urgensi mediator pidana independen dan merumuskan alternatif regulasi untuk memastikan imparsialitas dalam sistem peradilan pidana. Dengan menggunakan metodologi penelitian hukum normatif dengan pendekatan legislatif, konseptual, dan komparatif, studi ini meneliti kesenjangan hukum antara regulasi sektoral yang ada dan standar internasional. Temuan penelitian menunjukkan bahwa praktik saat ini, di mana petugas penegak hukum sekaligus bertindak sebagai mediator, menciptakan konflik peran yang mengancam netralitas dan kepercayaan publik. Tidak seperti standar komprehensif dalam mediasi perdata, mediasi pidana di Indonesia kurang memiliki sertifikasi dan pengawasan profesional yang memadai. Oleh karena itu, studi ini menyimpulkan bahwa pembentukan model untuk mediator independen bersertifikat sangat penting. Model ini harus diintegrasikan ke dalam revisi Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Acara Pidana (Rancangan Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Acara Pidana) untuk mencegah campur tangan kelembagaan dan memastikan bahwa proses keadilan restoratif mencapai penyembuhan sejati bagi korban, pelaku, dan masyarakat sambil tetap menjunjung tinggi prinsip pengadilan yang adil.