cover
Article Per Year (5 Year)
All
Home Page
OAI Link
Editorial Team
Contact
Reviewer
Google Scholar
Contact Name
-
Contact Email
-
Phone
-
Journal Mail Official
-
Editorial Address
-
Location
Kab. sleman,
Daerah istimewa yogyakarta
INDONESIA
Jurnal Filsafat
Published by Universitas Gadjah Mada
ISSN : 08531870     EISSN : 25286811     DOI : -
Core Subject : Humanities, Education, Art, Social,
Arts Humanities Education Languange, Linguistic, Communication & Media Social Sciences
Jurnal Filsafat is a scientific journal that first published in 1990, as a forum for scientific communication, development of thinking and research in philosophy. Jurnal Filsafat is published twice a year, in February and August with p-ISSN: 0853-1870, and e-ISSN: 2528-6811 The Editorial Team of Jurnal Filsafat accepts manuscript in the field of philosophy which has never been published in other media. Editorial Team has the right to edit the manuscript as far as not changing the substance of its contents.
Arjuna Subject : -
Articles 9 Documents
 1 
Search results for , issue "Vol 33, No 1 (2023)" : 9 Documents clear
A Synthesis Between Phenomenological and Naturalism Approach in Interpreting Home: A Home Bubble Theory Dimitry Ratulangie Ichwan; Embun Kenyowati Ekosiwi
Jurnal Filsafat "WISDOM" Vol 33, No 1 (2023)
Publisher : Fakultas Filsafat, Universitas Gadjah Mada Yogyakarta

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.22146/jf.67198

Abstract

A phenomenological interpretation of home is usually done romantically, in which the home is thought to be a source of safety, comfort, and security. This conclusion about home is problematic, considering that if all of these components do not exist in a certain place, the home will dissipate. This research, which was conducted by using the synthesis of horizon method, aims to see if the concept of home can be understood through a new approach that weighs in natural law in human perception towards a certain spacetime. Through this method, home is formed along with the positive connection between a subject with a certain place in a certain spacetime. The memories and experiences of a subject towards a place allow their home bubble that is always carried by them to merge with the bubbles in the environment. The more frequently this merger happens, the subject will have access to more varieties of time. Hence, through this phenomeno-naturalistic perspective, home is defined as a bubble that is dynamic, transformative, and has the ability to be physical and metaphysical entities.
Philosophy of Emancipatory Education through the Masters of Suspicion John Christianto Simon; I Gusti Nyoman Arnawa
Jurnal Filsafat "WISDOM" Vol 33, No 1 (2023)
Publisher : Fakultas Filsafat, Universitas Gadjah Mada Yogyakarta

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.22146/jf.67429

Abstract

 This paper will answer what the masters of suspicion say about the construction of today’s relevant philosophy of education. This paper is a qualitative research intended to construct meaning through a literature search on selected reading sources. The hermeneutic perspective used in this paper means an attempt to put the text, namely the thoughts of these masters of suspicion, in the present context to construct a meaning for the relevant philosophy of education. Three masters of suspicion, i.e. Marx, Freud, and Nietzsche, spoke respectively of a critical task in the realm of human action. Marx suspected that economic motives are often not to support life but to suppress it instead. Nietzsche suspected that religion only produced decadent and timid humans so they never became their true selves, hypocrite, and like to scare others. Freud was suspicious of human subconscious motivation so it must be seriously criticized in order to bring out an action that is truly born of compassionate political and social morality. These three masters present important education values to be developed today, namely education for social change, empowerment, and building compassionate social and political morality.
Dimension and Characteristic of Pragmatic Contextualism In Chinese Philosophy From Perspective of Confucianist and Daoist Ayu Larasati
Jurnal Filsafat "WISDOM" Vol 33, No 1 (2023)
Publisher : Fakultas Filsafat, Universitas Gadjah Mada Yogyakarta

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.22146/jf.69223

Abstract

 “Science denialism”, which counters “science” with “science” to direct a “selected knowledge” has caused a “gap of truth” as in hoax that led to doubts of knowledge, which is a phenomenon of skepticism in the digital era. “Cartesian” verification of knowledge is limited because an algorithm-psychological-based “tool” can direct and utilize scientific data/values to support/negate knowledge for particular purpose regardless of objective truth. Thus, differentiation between truth and false needs to acknowledge the “qualitative reasoning”, as in pragmatic contextualism: a context-sensitive approach, exercised on local values-based actions as communication acts of “truth” and “false”. Pragmatic contextualism is practiced in Chinese philosophy, composed by “yin” and “yang” duality characteristics based on Confucius and Dao philosophy, which permeates into varied dimensions. Therefore, the paper aims to identify the characteristic and dimensions of pragmatic contextualism in Chinese philosophy from Confucianist and Daoist as an attempt to discover an alternative “verification” of “truth” on local values-based acts. The literature study from lectures, books, and articles (journals, news) is conducted to identify the characteristics and dimensions of pragmatic contextualism. The study founds the characteristics of pragmatic contextualism are personalization, relativity, holistic, multiscale, relationality, inter-spatiality, adaptivity, and plurality. Further, these characteristics are expressed in social, education, politic, spiritual, environment, aesthetics, and temporal dimension.
Reinterpeting Nietzsche: An Introduction to the Textualists' Approach Yulius Tandyanto
Jurnal Filsafat "WISDOM" Vol 33, No 1 (2023)
Publisher : Fakultas Filsafat, Universitas Gadjah Mada Yogyakarta

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.22146/jf.71785

Abstract

The core of Nietzsche's philosophy is typically articulated comprehensively by contentists through key concepts such as the will to power, the eternal return, and the overman. Unfortunately, such goals are frequently arbitrary and lack rigorous textual support. Textists, on the other hand, tend to prioritize a historical-contextual approach in interpreting Nietzsche's texts in order to overcome this weakness. The textists' approach is distinguished by the genetic and literary analysis of the critical editions of Nietzsche's texts compiled by Colli/Montinari. As a result, this article begins with a brief topography of the critical editions, focusing on the role of KGW IX in genetic analysis. Furthermore, the style of genetic and literary analysis applied to aphorism 36 of BGE becomes a case study to demonstrate how the interpretation differs from that of the contentists. Textists show Nietzsche's creativity as the author of the aphorism that makes parody, irony, and satire of will-causality and moral demands in scientific explanations, whereas contentists interpret the will to power hypothesis as the essence of reality. For textists, the principle of the will to power in BGE 36 is framed in suppositional language, implying that the proposition of the will to power is also unreal.
What Is Perception?: Interpreting “Flesh, Chiasm (L'entrelacs-Le Chiasme) According To Maurice Merleau-Ponty Paulus Eko Kristianto
Jurnal Filsafat "WISDOM" Vol 33, No 1 (2023)
Publisher : Fakultas Filsafat, Universitas Gadjah Mada Yogyakarta

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.22146/jf.74744

Abstract

 The study of the body and chiasm according to Merleau-Ponty is an interesting subject that deserves to be explored. This is because it touches the "visible" and "invisible" areas, which are often interpreted ambiguously when dealing with bodily functions. The ambiguity that often arises is that the two are not used together or one is chosen. Even if together, it is usually seen as a support or a complement. In fact, the two are inseparable and interrelated. Through literature research, the author tries to show key descriptions related to the area by overseeing the perception frame. The results show that the "visible" can be likened to the skin and surface, while the "unseen" is the flesh beneath. For Merleau-Ponty, it does not mean "the invisible" supports "the visible". The integration between the "visible" and "invisible" can be said as a chiasm. A chiasm is a criss-cross framework. This idea is not easily accepted by feminist philosophers. Merleau-Ponty seems to understand that the inherent flesh with the chiasm of subjects and the world is the embodiment of a new ontology. This ontology focuses on between life and death, animals and humans, which seem hierarchical, so it attracts the attention of feminists, at least represented by Irigaray. Irigaray believes that the "visible" privilege of touch contributes to phallogocentrism because the penis is judged to be "the visible", while the vagina is the opposite, "the invisible".
The Possibility of Interreligious Dialogue: A Philosophical Foundation Risalatul Hukmi
Jurnal Filsafat "WISDOM" Vol 33, No 1 (2023)
Publisher : Fakultas Filsafat, Universitas Gadjah Mada Yogyakarta

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.22146/jf.77361

Abstract

The possibility of interreligious dialogue depends, at least, on the justification for the existence of religion itself. Thus, the constructionist theory of religion becomes a fundamental problem in constructing a framework of interreligious dialogue theory because religion is expressed as an imaginary existence, in the sense that it is only the construction of scholars and academics. If the existence of religion itself cannot be justified ontologically, it means that interreligious dialogue is impossible. Hence, to answer that problem, we inevitably have to prove ontologically the existence of religion without having to reject the constructionist theory. In this paper, I use the social ontology analysis proposed by John Searle and the historical ontology theory proposed by Ian Hacking to prove that religion as a constructed social reality exists objectively. Thus, interreligious dialogue is possible within a framework of existential hermeneutics that presupposes a process of understanding that changes continuously in accordance with historical ontology as its foundation.
Ethical Reflections on the Practice of Pre-Election Polls in Indonesia Samsul Maarif Mujiharto
Jurnal Filsafat "WISDOM" Vol 33, No 1 (2023)
Publisher : Fakultas Filsafat, Universitas Gadjah Mada Yogyakarta

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.22146/jf.81051

Abstract

 This paper aims to connect the practice of pre-election polls to moral issues and democracy. Several studies have indicated that pre-election polls have grown to become essential pillars of democracy. The prediction capabilities of pre-election polls can help politicians arrange strategies to listen to the public's voice and win political contestation. However, since the practice of pre-election polls is not only scientific evidence but also political credential, it crosses the blurry boundary where they intersect one another. Consequently, this may exacerbate some pathologies of polls such as method corruption, data manipulation, bandwagon effect, and political mobilization. Focusing on the 2014 and 2019 Indonesia presidential elections, this paper suggests that ethical consideration to ensure the practice of pre-election polls is necessary for bringing the polls back as one of the prime pillars of democracy.
Iqbal Humanism and Human Rights Mustofa Anshori Lidinillah; Mukhtasar Syamsuddin; Arqom Kuswanjono
Jurnal Filsafat "WISDOM" Vol 33, No 1 (2023)
Publisher : Fakultas Filsafat, Universitas Gadjah Mada Yogyakarta

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.22146/jf.81126

Abstract

Contrasting religion with human rights is a critical response that is unproductive because basically the relationship between religion and human rights is ambivalent. Meanwhile, freedom of religion is understood as part of human rights, but in reality, religious practices emerge which result in violations of human rights. This research wants to answer the question of how to bridge the relationship between religion and human rights by taking the case of Iqbal's concept of humanism, "How does Iqbal's humanism reconcile religion and human rights?" This study uses the hermeneutic-philosophical method by applying the following methodical steps: interpretation, analysis-synthesis, internal coherence, description, and heuristics. The results of the research show that Iqbal's humanism as a framing that reconciles religion and human rights based on a reciprocal relationship between religion and humanity. Tauhid as a working idea and the main spiritual basis for building a civilization with a human perspective contains values that are in accordance with the principles of human rights. The development of a new civilization with human insight must be pursued intellectually and vitally. Religion is a mode of human development as long as it is not accepted dogmatically. Therefore, Iqbal's humanism has a very strong relevance in efforts to uphold the principles of human rights in people's lives. 
[JF] Preface Jurnal Filsafat Vol 33 No 1 February 2023 Editor Jurnal Filsafat; Editor Jurnal Filsafat
Jurnal Filsafat "WISDOM" Vol 33, No 1 (2023)
Publisher : Fakultas Filsafat, Universitas Gadjah Mada Yogyakarta

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.22146/jf.82647

Abstract

Page 1 of 1 | Total Record : 9

 1 

Filter by Year

2023 2023


Reset
Filter By Issues
All Issue Vol 35, No 1-2 (2025): Special Issue 2025: Law and Politics Vol 35, No 2 (2025): (Article in Press) Vol 35, No 1 (2025) Vol 34, No 2 (2024) Vol 34, No 1 (2024) Vol 33, No 2 (2023) Vol 33, No 1 (2023) Vol 32, No 2 (2022) Vol 32, No 1 (2022) Vol 31, No 2 (2021) Vol 31, No 1 (2021) Vol 30, No 2 (2020) Vol 30, No 1 (2020) Vol 29, No 2 (2019) Vol 29, No 1 (2019) Vol 28, No 2 (2018) Vol 28, No 1 (2018) Vol 27, No 2 (2017) Vol 27, No 1 (2017) Vol 26, No 2 (2016) Vol 26, No 1 (2016) Vol 25, No 2 (2015) Vol 25, No 1 (2015) Vol 24, No 2 (2014) Vol 24, No 1 (2014) Vol 23, No 3 (2013) Vol 23, No 2 (2013) Vol 23, No 1 (2013) Vol 22, No 3 (2012) Vol 22, No 2 (2012) Vol 22, No 1 (2012) Vol 21, No 3 (2011) Vol 21, No 2 (2011) Vol 21, No 1 (2011) Vol 20, No 3 (2010) Vol 20, No 2 (2010) Vol 20, No 1 (2010) Vol 19, No 3 (2009) Vol 19, No 2 (2009) Vol 19, No 1 (2009) Vol 18, No 3 (2008) Vol 18, No 2 (2008) Vol 18, No 1 (2008) Vol 17, No 3 (2007) Vol 17, No 2 (2007) Vol 17, No 1 (2007) Vol 16, No 3 (2006) Vol 16, No 2 (2006) Vol 16, No 1 (2006) Vol 14, No 3 (2004) Vol 14, No 2 (2004) Vol 14, No 1 (2004) Vol 13, No 3 (2003) Vol 13, No 2 (2003) Vol 13, No 1 (2003) Vol 10, No 2 (2000) Jurnal Filsafat Seri 30 Oktober 1999 Jurnal Filsafat Seri 29 Juni 1999 Jurnal Filsafat Seri 28 Juli 1997 Jurnal Filsafat Seri 27 Maret 1997 Jurnal Filsafat Edisi Khusus Agustus 1997 Jurnal Filsafat Seri 26 Desember 1996 Jurnal Filsafat Seri 25 Mei 1996 Jurnal Filsafat Seri 24 Februari 1996 Jurnal Filsafat Seri 23 November 1995 Jurnal Filsafat Seri 22 Agustus 1995 Jurnal Filsafat Seri 21 Mei 1995 Jurnal Filsafat Seri 20 Desember 1994 Jurnal Filsafat Seri 19 Agustus 1994 Jurnal Filsafat Seri 18 Mei 1994 Jurnal Filsafat Seri 17 Februari 1994 Jurnal Filsafat Seri 16 November 1993 Jurnal Filsafat Seri 15 Agustus 1993 Jurnal Filsafat Seri 14 Mei 1993 Jurnal Filsafat Seri 13 Februari 1993 Jurnal Filsafat Seri 12 November 1992 Jurnal Filsafat Seri 11 Agustus 1992 Jurnal Filsafat Seri 10 Mei 1992 Jurnal Filsafat Seri 9 Februari 1992 Jurnal Filsafat Seri 8 November 1991 Jurnal Filsafat Seri 7 Agustus 1991 Jurnal Filsafat Seri 6 Mei 1991 Jurnal Filsafat Seri 5 Februari 1991 Jurnal Filsafat Seri 4 November 1990 Jurnal Filsafat Seri 3 1990 Jurnal Filsafat Seri 1 1990 More Issue