cover
Article Per Year (5 Year)
All
Home Page
OAI Link
Editorial Team
Contact
Reviewer
Google Scholar
Contact Name
Agus Susanto
Contact Email
agus.susanto0508@unsoed.ac.id
Phone
+6285642805008
Journal Mail Official
animalproduction@unsoed.ac.id
Editorial Address
R 108 Fakultas Peternakan Universitas Jenderal Soedirman, Jl. dr. Soeparno Utara No 60, Grendeng, Purwokerto Utara 53123 phone (0281) 638792 email: redaksijap@gmail.com - animalproduction@unsoed.ac.id
Location
Kab. banyumas,
Jawa tengah
INDONESIA
Animal Production : Indonesian Journal of Animal Production
Published by Universitas Jenderal Soedirman
ISSN : 14112027     EISSN : 25415875     DOI : https://doi.org/10.20884/1.jap.2021.23.2.10
Core Subject : Health, Science, Agriculture, Social,
Agriculture, Biological Sciences & Forestry Biochemistry, Genetics & Molecular Biology Environmental Science Veterinary
Animal Production is a peer-reviewed journal published by the Faculty of Animal Science, Jenderal Soedirman University in association with the Animal Scientist Society of Indonesia. The journal was established in 1999 and available online since May 4, 2011. Animal Production was initially published twice a year, then three times a year starting in 2005. The journal coverage focused on small scale livestock farming and technologies which includes the recent science development in animal production, including all aspects of nutrition, breeding, reproduction, post-harvest processing and socio-economics. All articles are available online. Full text available in pdf format and can be downloaded for free. Starting Vol 22 No 1 the papers have been and will be published in our new website (http://animalproduction.id), as the continuation of our previous but still active website (http://animalproduction.net).
Arjuna Subject : Ilmu Pertanian dan Biologi (Semua) - Ilmu Hewan dan Zoologi
Articles 7 Documents
 1 
Search results for , issue "Vol. 22 No. 3 (2020)" : 7 Documents clear
Concentration of Partial VFA and Methane Production of Beef Cattle Rument Fluid which Red Dragon Fruit Skin (Hylocereus costaricensis) and Guava Leaf (Psidium guajava L.) in Ammoniated Rice Straw Based Ration Rahmat, Aziz Nur; Suryapratama, Wardhana; Suhartati, FM
ANIMAL PRODUCTION Vol. 22 No. 3 (2020)
Publisher : Faculty of Animal Science, Jenderal Soedirman University in associate with Animal Scientist Society of Indonesia (ISPI)

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (739.702 KB) | DOI: 10.20884/1.jap.2020.22.3.21

Abstract

The research aimed to examine the effect of red dragon fruit skin and guava leaves supplemented into beef cattle feed on the concentration of partial VFA and methane gas production. The in vitro study was conducted in a completely randomized design (CRD) with 3 treatments, namely P0: 50 % concentrate + 50 % ammoniated straw (Control), P1: 50 % concentrate + 50 % ammoniated straw + 5 % red dragon fruit skin flour, and P2: 50 % concentrate + 50 % ammonia straw + 5 % red dragon fruit skin flour + 2.5 % guava leaf flour. The concentrate consisted of 2 parts of rice bran and 1 part of coconut meal. The ratio of concentrat and ammoniated rice straw was 50:50. Each treatment was repeated 6 times. The results showed that the concentration of acetic acid, butyrate and methane gas decreased while the concentration of propionate increased with the addition of red dragon fruit and guava leaves. The research concluded that the addition of 5 % red dragon fruit skin flour combined with 2.5 % guava leaves flour in beef cattle feed could further reduce the concentration of acetic acid, butyric acid and the production of methane gas, but increase the concentration of propionic acid. It is suggested that defaunated agents of red dragon fruit skin and guava leaves could reduce the production of methane gas in the rumen of beef cattle.
Nitrogen Metabolism and Microbial Protein Synthesis by Local Sheep Fed Diet Containing Hibiscus Leave Meal (HLM) with Different Direct-Fed Microbials (DFM) Supplementation Nasution, Risda Amelia Putri; Rahayu, Sri; Bata, Muhamad
ANIMAL PRODUCTION Vol. 22 No. 3 (2020)
Publisher : Faculty of Animal Science, Jenderal Soedirman University in associate with Animal Scientist Society of Indonesia (ISPI)

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (915.095 KB) | DOI: 10.20884/1.jap.2020.22.3.22

Abstract

The interaction of Hibiscus Leaf Meal (HLM) and Direct-Fed Microbials (DFM) supplementation on nitrogen metabolism and rumen microbial synthesis by local sheep was investigated. Thirty six male local sheep aged ±2 years, weight 28.01±2.61 kg were fed concentrate (3% of body weight) supplemented with HLM twice a day, amoniated rice-straw (ARS) supplemented with DFM were given ad-libitum were assigned randomly to nine treatment in an experiment of 3×3 factorial design. The first factor (P) was DFM were supplemented in ARS (P0=without DFM, P1=DFMAMS, and P2=DFMRK). Second factor (W) was the level of HLM supplementation in concentrate (W0=0%, W1=0.24% and W2=0.48% of DM consentrate. The study measured variables including nitrogen digestibility (ND), nitrogen retention (NR), microbial protein synthesis (MPS), and Efficiency of microbial protein synthesis (EMPS). There were significant interaction between DFM and HLM suplementation on MPS and EMPS. However, the interaction of ND and NR was non-existent. Based on polynomial graph, the most efficient MPS was achieved on combination between DFMRK and 0.23% HLM about 8.70 gN/day. Despite the absence of interaction (P>0.05) between DFM supplementation and HLM on KN and RN, DFM supplementation significantly affected (P<0.01) Nitrogen metabolism (ND and NR). The treatment without DFM supplementation resulted the highest nitrogen metabolism (ND and NR). This study concludes that HLM without DFM suplementation positively impacted N Metabolism. Combination between 0.23% HLM and DFMRK resulted the most efficient Microbial Protein Synthesis.
Comparative Antibiotic and Probiotic Effects on Antimicrobial Sensitivity of Escherichia coli Isolates and Performance of Broiler Chickens Ogbu, Cosmas Chikezie; Ibeneme, Nwabueze
ANIMAL PRODUCTION Vol. 22 No. 3 (2020)
Publisher : Faculty of Animal Science, Jenderal Soedirman University in associate with Animal Scientist Society of Indonesia (ISPI)

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.20884/1.jap.2020.22.3.60

Abstract

The study evaluated the growth performance, haematology, serum biochemistry, intestinal microbial count, and antimicrobial resistance profile of Escherichia coli (E. coli) from broiler chicks fed diets supplemented with antibiotics (neomycin, and oxytetracycline), and probiotic (Saccharomyces cerevisiae). One hundred and twenty Abor acre broiler chicks randomly alloted to four treatment groups (30 birds/group; 10 birds/replicate) were used in the 49 days study. Group one (G 1, control) were fed basal diet while G 2, 3, and 4 received basal diet containing S. cerevisiae (0.80g/kg; 108cfu/g), neomycin (0.50g/kg) and oxytetracycline (0.30g/kg), respectively. Results showed significant treatment effects on body weight, feed intake, linear body values, some haematological indices, intestinal, caecal and combined caecal and intestinal bacteria counts, diameter of E. coli inhibition zone, and mortality. Body weight and feed intake were significantly higher in the supplemented groups. Intestinal bacterial count was highest in neomycin and control groups (5.29 ± 0.01 and 5.22 ± 0.02 Log10 cfu/ml, respectively) while S. cerevisiae and neomycin groups yielded the highest caecal, and combined caecal and intestinal bacterial counts. Eimeria Oocyst count did not differ significantly between groups. Escherichia coli from antibiotic fed groups had reduced sensitivity or were resistant to the antibiotics. It was concluded that subtherapeutic use of antibiotics as growth promoters in broiler chickens caused the development of antibiotic resistance, and therefore, should be avoided.
Reduction Spermatozoa Motility and Viability on Various Local Chickens During Storage at 5℃ Hidayat, Nu'man; Hidayah, Chomsiatun Nurul; Nugroho, Aras Prasetiyo
ANIMAL PRODUCTION Vol. 22 No. 3 (2020)
Publisher : Faculty of Animal Science, Jenderal Soedirman University in associate with Animal Scientist Society of Indonesia (ISPI)

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.20884/1.jap.2020.22.3.64

Abstract

The research compared the changes motility and viability of sperm from various local chickens during storage at 5℃ for 72 hours. Semen was collected every three days using the dorsal-abdominal massage from twelve chickens consisting of Kedu, Sentul and Pelung chicken. semen was diluted in extender contains 90% lactate ringer and 10% egg yolk extender with 0.025% sodium dodecyl sulfate and 2% vitamin E (LREYSE). Sperm motility and viability was observed every 12 hours and the measurements were made up to 72 hours of storage. Complete random design repeated measurement with 4 replications was used in this study. One-way analysis of variance was used to analyze the data and followed by Duncan’s Multiple Range Test. The results showed sperm motility declined and sperm viability reduced during storage for all breeds. The significant declined of motility between breeds were only observed at 60 and 72 hours and the reduced viability between breeds was observed at 72 hours of storage. The declined sperm motility for Kedu chicken (31.59±3.26% and 75.36±1.25%) and Pelung chicken (36.11±4.05% and 75.83±5.34%) were significantly lower (p<0.05) than Sentul Chicken (50.39±2.60% and 95.00±5.00%) at 60 and 72 hours of storage respectively, while the decline sperm viability of Kedu chicken (57.59±3.64%) and Pelung chicken (54.39±5.73%) was significantly lower (p<0.05) than Sentul Chicken (90.30±9.70%) after 72 hours storage. It can be concluded that the reduction sperm motility and viability of Kedu and Pelung chicken is lower than Sentul chicken which are stored at 5℃ for 72 hours.
The Effect of Incorporating Ginger Extract (Zingiber officinale) to Cow Milk Kefir: An Analysis of Antioxidant and Microbiological and Physicochemical Characteristics Wulansari, Putri Dian; Rahayu, Novia; Frasiska, Nurul
ANIMAL PRODUCTION Vol. 22 No. 3 (2020)
Publisher : Faculty of Animal Science, Jenderal Soedirman University in associate with Animal Scientist Society of Indonesia (ISPI)

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.20884/1.jap.2020.22.3.67

Abstract

This study aimed to analyze the antioxidant activities and microbiological and physicochemical characteristics of cow milk kefir fortified with ginger extract (Zingiber officinale). The ginger extract was incorporated together with grain before the fermentation. The levels of ginger extract concentrate were 0, 0.5, 1.0, 1.5, and 2.0 % (w/w). The ginger used in this study is a thick ginger extract that is added before the kefir fermentation process. The result showed that a higher level of ginger extract added to the fermentation could improve the antioxidant activities of the cow milk kefir. The kefir sample fortified with 2.0% ginger extract produced the highest antioxidant activities, particularly DPPH IC50 (0.32%) and a total polyphenol of 0.72%. This study found that the higher the ginger extract level, the lower the total count, total LAB, and total yeast. The average value of physicochemical characteristics for free fatty acid, lactic acids, alcohol, and pH in the present study was 0.5503 mg/KOH, 1.0005%, 1.628 g/dL, and 4.42, respectively. In conclusion, the ginger extract was effective for producing kefir with high antioxidant activities (DPPH IC50) and total polyphenol.
Evaluating the Digestibility of Ammonia Fermented (Amofer) Corn Cob Using Different Levels of M21 Decomposer and Urea (In Vitro Study) Fitria, Restuti; Zulaikhah, Siti Rahmawati; Hindratiningrum, Novita
ANIMAL PRODUCTION Vol. 22 No. 3 (2020)
Publisher : Faculty of Animal Science, Jenderal Soedirman University in associate with Animal Scientist Society of Indonesia (ISPI)

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.20884/1.jap.2020.22.3.69

Abstract

This research aimed to evaluate the addition of M21 Decomposer (MD) and urea (U) on the Dry matter digestibility (DMD) and Organic matter digestibility (OMD) in vitro. There were five treatments and five replicates. The treatments in this study were the addition of MD and U at different levels. namely R0 = Corn cob without amofer/control; R1 = Amofer Corn cob plus 0.04% MD+3% U; R2 = Amofer Corn cob plus 0.06% MD+3% U; R3 = Amofer Corn cob plus 0.04% MD+5% U; and R4 = Amofer Corn cob plus 0.06% MD+5% U. The obtained data were subjected to Analysis of Variance and continued by an Orthogonal Contrast. The result showed that the treatments significantly affected (P<0.05) both DMD and OMD digestibility. The digestibility of amofer corncob was higher than the non-amofer that exhibited 17.982±2.4409% DMD and 26.024±3.009% OMD. The highest DMD and OMD digestibility was observed in R4. i.e.. 24.655±4.858% and 34.276±5.176%. respectively. In conclusion. the best level in the incorporating MD and U is at MD 0.06% and U 5% could improve DMD by 6.673% and OMD by 8.252%.
Sensory, Physicochemical and Antioxidants Evaluation of Kecombrang (Etlingera elatior) Preservative Powder with Foam-mat Drying Method for Beef Meatballs Products Naufalin, Rifda; Wuryatmo, Erminawati; Wicaksono, Rumpoko; Islami, Laila Sausan El
ANIMAL PRODUCTION Vol. 22 No. 3 (2020)
Publisher : Faculty of Animal Science, Jenderal Soedirman University in associate with Animal Scientist Society of Indonesia (ISPI)

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.20884/1.jap.2020.22.3.77

Abstract

This study aims to determine the effect of the type and concentration of preservative powder with foam-mat drying method to produce optimal beef meatballs products seen from the chemical, sensory, and antioxidant evaluation. This study used an experimental method with a randomized block design with the factors being studied were the type of powder of kecombrang plant parts, namely flowers and stems with the concentrations used, namely 0%, 1%, 2%, and 3%. Physicochemical analysis was performed on moisture content, pH, and total protein hydrolyzed (Formol test). The sensory evaluation was carried out by 25 trained people using the descriptive and hedonic testing methods on a scale of 1-5 (very dislike to very much like). Meanwhile, the best treatment from the results of physicochemical and sensory evaluation was analyzed of bioactive compounds (antioxidants) was carried out on total flavonoids and total phenols. The results showed that the best treatment combination was the type of flower preservative with a concentration of 2% which had characteristics with an average moisture content of 57.19 ± 5.71%, pH 7.1 ± 0.21, hydrolyzed protein content (Formol) 1.40 ± 0.35%, whitish-gray color (2.72 ± 1.40), scents of meat and kecombrang (3.64 ± 0.49), slightly chewy texture (3.52 ± 0.65), flavored with meat and kecombrang (3.68 ± 0.75), is rather preferenced by panelists (3.12 ± 0.97), and results of antioxidants evaluation were total flavonoids 2.42 mg QE / 100 mg, total phenolic 179.53 mg QE / 100 mg. The concentration of kecombrang flower and stems powder suitable for adding to beef meatballss is seen from the physicochemical and sensory evaluation up to 2%.

Page 1 of 1 | Total Record : 7

 1 

Filter by Year

2020 2020


Reset
Filter By Issues
All Issue Vol. 25 No.2 (2023) Vol. 25 No. 1 (2023) Vol. 24 No. 3 (2022) Vol. 24 No. 2 (2022) Vol. 24 No. 1 (2022) Vol. 23 No. 3 (2021) Vol. 23 No. 2 (2021) Vol. 23 No. 1 (2021) Vol. 22 No. 3 (2020) Vol. 22 No. 2 (2020) Vol. 22 No. 1 (2020) Vol 21, No 3 (2019) Vol 21, No 2 (2019) Vol 21, No 1 (2019) Vol 20, No 3 (2018) Vol 20, No 2 (2018) Vol 20, No 1 (2018) Vol 19, No 3 (2017) Vol 19, No 2 (2017) Vol 19, No 1 (2017) Vol 18, No 3 (2016): September 2016 Vol 18, No 2 (2016): May Vol 18, No 2 (2016): May Vol 18, No 1 (2016): January Vol 18, No 1 (2016): January Vol 17, No 3 (2015): September Vol 17, No 3 (2015): September Vol 17, No 2 (2015): May Vol 17, No 1 (2015): January Vol 16, No 3 (2014): September Vol 16, No 3 (2014): September Vol 16, No 2 (2014): May Vol 16, No 1 (2014): January Vol 15, No 3 (2013): September Vol 15, No 3 (2013): September Vol 15, No 2 (2013): May Vol 15, No 2 (2013): May Vol 15, No 1 (2013): January Vol 14, No 3 (2012): September Vol 14, No 2 (2012): May Vol 14, No 1 (2012): January Vol 14, No 1 (2012): January Vol 13, No 3 (2011): September Vol 13, No 2 (2011): May Vol 13, No 2 (2011): May Vol 13, No 1 (2011): January Vol 12, No 3 (2010): September Vol 12, No 2 (2010): May Vol 12, No 2 (2010): May Vol 12, No 1 (2010): January Vol 11, No 3 (2009): September Vol 11, No 2 (2009): May Vol 11, No 1 (2009): January Vol 11, No 1 (2009): January Vol 10, No 3 (2008): September Vol 10, No 3 (2008): September Vol 10, No 2 (2008): May Vol 10, No 1 (2008): January Vol 10, No 1 (2008): January Vol 9, No 3 (2007): September Vol 9, No 2 (2007): May Vol 9, No 1 (2007): January Vol 9, No 1 (2007): January Vol 8, No 3 (2006): September Vol 8, No 2 (2006): May Vol 8, No 1 (2006): January Vol 7, No 3 (2005): September Vol 7, No 3 (2005): September Vol 7, No 2 (2005): May Vol 7, No 1 (2005): January Vol 6, No 2 (2004): May Vol 6, No 2 (2004): May Vol 6, No 1 (2004): January Vol 6, No 1 (2004): January Vol 5, No 2 (2003): May Vol 5, No 1 (2003): January Vol 5, No 1 (2003): January Vol 4, No 2 (2002): May Vol 4, No 1 (2002): January Vol 3, No 2 (2001): May Vol 3, No 1 (2001): January Vol 2, No 2 (2000): May Vol 2, No 1 (2000): January Vol 1, No 2 (1999): May Vol 1, No 2 (1999): May Vol 1, No 1 (1999): January More Issue