cover
Article Per Year (5 Year)
All
Home Page
OAI Link
Editorial Team
Contact
Reviewer
Google Scholar
Contact Name
Ali Umar Dani
Contact Email
ali.umardani@gmail.com
Phone
+6281214414530
Journal Mail Official
jpf@uin-alauddin.ac.id
Editorial Address
Jl. Sultan Alauddin No.63, Romangpolong, Kec. Somba Opu, Kabupaten Gowa, Sulawesi Selatan 92113
Location
Kab. gowa,
Sulawesi selatan
INDONESIA
JPF (Jurnal Pendidikan Fisika) Universitas Islam Negeri Alauddin Makassar
Published by Universitas Islam Negeri Alauddin Makassar
ISSN : 23555785     EISSN : 25500325     DOI : -
Core Subject : Science, Education,
Education Physics Other
JPF (Journal of Physics Education) is a peer-reviewed academic journal published biannually, by the Department of Physics Education, Faculty of Tarbiyah and Teacher Training, Alauddin State Islamic University Makassar. It serves as a comprehensive platform for sharing and advancing scientific research in both physics and physics education. The journal features significant contributions to the field, including innovative studies on the development of learning media, pedagogical methods, the application of various teaching strategies, and the practical applications of physics in real-world contexts. JPF is committed to publishing research that adds valuable knowledge to the physics and physics education communities. Each issue of JPF includes high-quality research articles and expert reviews that offer important new insights. The journal is dedicated to disseminating findings that are of critical importance to the ongoing development of physics education and the scientific community.
Arjuna Subject : Fisika dan Astronomi - Fisika dan Astronomi (Lain-Lain)
Articles 273 Documents
 24   25   26   27   28 
Exploring Trends in Physics Practicum: A Literature Review and Bibliometric Analysis Herman; Kaniawati, Ida; Setiawan, Agus; Rusdiana, Dadi
JPF (Jurnal Pendidikan Fisika) Universitas Islam Negeri Alauddin Makassar Vol 13 No 2 (2025)
Publisher : Pendidikan Fisika UIN Alauddin Makassar

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.24252/jpf.v13i2.63091

Abstract

This study aims to conduct a literature review on physics practicum using the Systematic Literature Review (SLR) method and bibliometric analysis through visual mapping with the VOSviewer software. The focus of this research is on articles published between 2020 and 2025, with the keyword "Physics Practicum." A total of 122 articles were identified, with 14 selected for the literature review. The results indicate that the number of publications on physics practicum decreased from 2020 to 2023, increased in 2024, and then declined again in 2025. The study also reveals that both conventional and digital technologies, such as Arduino-based sensors, smartphone applications, wireless sensor networks, as well as advanced technologies like Augmented Reality (AR), Virtual Reality (VR), and e-learning platforms, have enhanced the effectiveness of physics practicum. However, significant research gaps remain, particularly in the development of worksheets and assessment tools that provide a holistic evaluation of psychomotor skills and overall practicum performance. The bibliometric analysis using VOSviewer highlights keyword mapping that clusters aspects of methodology, evaluation, technology, and external factors such as the pandemic, offering valuable insights for future development of physics practicum.
Pengaruh Model Pembelajaran Novick terhadap Pemahaman Konsep dan Hasil Belajar Fisika Pada Materi Pemanasan Global Kasmiati; Syamsuddin, Sahara; Anggereni, Santih
JPF (Jurnal Pendidikan Fisika) Universitas Islam Negeri Alauddin Makassar Vol 14 No 1 (2026)
Publisher : Pendidikan Fisika UIN Alauddin Makassar

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to determine the level of conceptual understanding and learning outcomes of students using the Novick learning model on global warming material. This study was categorized as an experimental study, with a Nonequivalent posttest only control group design. The population in this study were students of class XI MIPA SMAN 8 Takalar consisting of 2 classes and a total of 32 students. The results of the descriptive study showed that the average value of student learning outcomes in the control class post-test was 76.25 which was in the high category while the experimental class post-test value was 90 which was in the very high category. The results of the hypothesis testing obtained a Mann Whitney (U) value by calculation = 14,000. The Zcount value = 4.3 and the Asymp.Sig. (2-tailed) value = 0.00. The Asymp.Sig. (2-tailed) value was accepted. The results of the descriptive study showed that the average value of students' conceptual understanding in the post-test of the control class was 31.88, which is in the low category, while the post-test value of the experimental class was 58.13, which is in the medium category. By testing the hypothesis, the calculated Mann Whitney (U) value was obtained = 1.500. The calculated Z value = 5.4 and the Asymp.Sig. (2-tailed) value = 0.00. The Asymp.Sig. (2-tailed) value was accepted. This shows that there is a difference in the use of the Novick Learning Model on learning outcomes and conceptual understanding between the control and experimental classes. The results of the study indicate that the implementation of physics learning using the Novick Model has a significant effect on learning outcomes and conceptual understanding so that it can be applied to subsequent teaching activities
Implementation of Environment-Based Learning Using a Scientific Approach to Improve Physics Learning Outcomes for Grade XI Students at SMA Negeri 3 Enrekang Nurheini; Dian Fitrasari; Suhardiman; Ashar, Hasbullahair
JPF (Jurnal Pendidikan Fisika) Universitas Islam Negeri Alauddin Makassar Vol 14 No 1 (2026)
Publisher : Pendidikan Fisika UIN Alauddin Makassar

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.24252/jpf.v14i1.72353

Abstract

This research was motivated by teachers' use of conventional teaching methods, which left students unable to re-explain or independently summarize the material presented to them. To address this and strengthen students' conceptual understanding, an environment-based learning model was implemented. This study aims to describe and examine the change in eleventh-grade students' physics learning outcomes before and after the model was applied. The research employed a pre-experimental design, with 32 eleventh-grade science (XI MIPA 1) students serving as the research subjects. Learning outcomes were measured using a 32-item multiple-choice test instrument. The collected data were then processed through descriptive analysis to calculate the mean, standard deviation, and variance, followed by an N-Gain test to determine the learning model's effectiveness in improving students' learning outcomes. The findings show that students' average score, which was initially 50.62 before treatment, rose to 66.56 after the intervention. However, the N-Gain test fell into the moderate category, with an effectiveness level of 42%, indicating a less-than-optimal improvement. Based on these findings, it can be concluded that although students' learning outcomes improved following the implementation of environment-based learning, its level of effectiveness remains relatively low, as the average score achieved did not reach 70. Nevertheless, this model remains a viable option for teaching physics, given the measurable improvement observed in the learning outcomes of eleventh-grade science students at SMA Negeri 3 Enrekang. These findings are expected to serve as a reference for teachers seeking to improve the learning outcomes of eleventh-grade science students at the school.

Page 28 of 28 | Total Record : 273

 24   25   26   27   28 

Filter by Year

2013 2026


Reset
Filter By Issues
All Issue Vol 14 No 1 (2026) Vol 13 No 2 (2025) Vol 13 No 1 (2025) Vol 12 No 2 (2024) Vol 12 No 1 (2024) Vol 11 No 2 (2023) Vol 11 No 1 (2023) Vol 10 No 2 (2022) Vol 10 No 1 (2022) Vol 9 No 2 (2021): September 2021 Vol 9 No 1 (2021): Maret 2021 Vol 8 No 2 (2020): SEPTEMBER Vol 8 No 1 (2020): Maret Vol 7 No 2 (2019): September Vol 7 No 1 (2019): Maret Vol 6 No 1 (2018): Vol 6, No 1, 2018 Vol 6 No 2 (2018): September Vol 5 No 2 (2017): Vol 5, No 2, 2017 Vol 5 No 1 (2017): Vol 5, No 1, 2017 Vol 4 No 2 (2016): Vol 4, No 2, 2016 Vol 4 No 1 (2016): Vol 4, No 1, 2016 Vol 3 No 2 (2015): Vol 3, No 2, 2015 Vol 3 No 1 (2015): Vol 3, No 1, 2015 Vol 2 No 2 (2014): Vol 2, No 2, 2014 Vol 2 No 1 (2014): Vol 2, No 1, 2014 Vol 1 No 2 (2013): Pendidikan Fisika Vol 1 No 1 (2013): Pendidikan Fisika More Issue