cover
Article Per Year (5 Year)
All
Home Page
OAI Link
Editorial Team
Contact
Reviewer
Google Scholar
Contact Name
-
Contact Email
-
Phone
-
Journal Mail Official
-
Editorial Address
-
Location
Kota yogyakarta,
Daerah istimewa yogyakarta
INDONESIA
Justitia et Pax
Published by Universitas Atma Jaya Yogyakarta
ISSN : 08521883     EISSN : 25413007     DOI : -
Core Subject : Social,
Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice
JEP is primarily aimed to facilitate the legal scholars, researchers or practitioners in publishing their original or reviewed articles as well as to support the enactment of in-depth discussions on the related issues. It is also purposed to become a source of reference for those are involved in legal field. JEP covers any topics related to Indonesian laws and legal system, spanning from the private and public law and covering various legal approaches, such as the comparative law, sociology of law, legal history and many others. Other contemporary legal studies, such as commercial and business law, medical law, law and technology, natural resources law and Islamic law are also covered. Hence, any contributions from legal scholars and practitioners are appreciatively welcomed.
Arjuna Subject : -
Articles 296 Documents
 17   18   19   20   21 
PARAMETER KEYAKINAN HAKIM DALAM MEMUTUS PERKARA PIDANA Triantono Triantono; Muhammad Marizal
Justitia et Pax Vol. 37 No. 2 (2021): Justitia et Pax Volume 37 Nomor 2 Tahun 2021
Publisher : Penerbit Universitas Atma Jaya Yogyakarta

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.24002/jep.v37i2.3744

Abstract

According to Article 183 of the Criminal Procedure Code, a judge may not impose a sentence on a person unless he has at least two valid evidence and he is convinced that a criminal act actually occurred and that the defendant was guilty of committing it. In this context there are at least two means of evidence and belief must be applied cumulatively based on the negative evidence theory (negative wettelijk bewijs theorie) adopted in Indonesia. The word two means of evidence refers to the parameter that there must be at least two pieces of evidence from the four pieces of evidence that have been determined limitatifly based on Article 184 of the Criminal Procedure Code, but the problem is that there is no clear measure (parameter) regarding the judge's conviction. The results of the study concluded that the judge's confidence parameters consisted of formal parameters and material parameters. Formal parameters are very much determined by formal evidence as stipulated in law and jurisprudence. Meanwhile, material actors have a freer character not only to see formal procedural facts but also to juridical, sociological, and philosophical aspects.
KEADILAN RESTORATIF DALAM SISTEM PERADILAN PIDANA SEBAGAI PERWUJUDAN NILAI-NILAI PANCASILA Muhammad Fatahillah Akbar
Justitia et Pax Vol. 37 No. 1 (2021): Justitia et Pax Volume 37 Nomor 1 Tahun 2021
Publisher : Penerbit Universitas Atma Jaya Yogyakarta

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.24002/jep.v37i1.3821

Abstract

Pancasila is the ground fundamental norm as the ultimate source of law in Indonesia. Based on that concept, the establishment of National Legal System shall be based on values contained in the Pancasila. One of the reforms of legal system is the establishment of restorative justice. Restorative justice is the concept where in solving criminal law matters, all related parties shall be involved. Restorative justice is the implementation of Pancasila values in the criminal justice system. The problems discussed in this paper is the urgency restorative justice concept in criminal justice system in reflecting Pancasila values. In terms of existing regulation, restorative justice is merely regulated in The Act of Juvenile Justice System (UU SPPA), the Police Commissioner’s Regulation Number 6 of 2019, and the General Attorney Regulation Number 5 of 2020. However, the implementation in practices, restorative justice still has many weaknesses, including the diversion provision. By discussion restorative justice and Pancasila, it can be stated that restorative justice aims to create social justice for everyone involved in a criminal law case and form a cultural mediation in the system. In short, restorative justice is one of crucial concepts in implementing Pancasila values.
TINJAUAN YURIDIS ASAS PEMBANGUNAN TENAGA KERJA DALAM PEMBERIAN PESANGON DI INDONESIA Emilia Metta Wijaya
Justitia et Pax Vol. 38 No. 1 (2022): Justitia et Pax Volume 38 Nomor 1 Tahun 2022
Publisher : Penerbit Universitas Atma Jaya Yogyakarta

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

Economic growth can realize by increasing investment. Unfortunately, investors are not interested in investing in Indonesia because of the large amount of severance pay for workers. Regulatory adjustments are needed to meet the demands of investors while still paying attention to the principles of labor development. Therefore, this research focuses on the issues of determining and analyzing juridically the principles of labor development in giving severance pay in Indonesia. This research is a normative legal research that focuses on positive legal norms in the form of legislation. The result of this research shows that the provision of severance pay for workers in Indonesia is not currently under the principles of labor development. This is because the regulated severance pay that should be provided in order to develop workers actually taking away workers prosperity.
HAK VETO DEWAN KEAMANAN PERSERIKATAN BANGSA-BANGSA DAN ASAS EQUALITY OF THE STATES DALAM ERA GLOBALISASI Battista Pridana Adventura
Justitia et Pax Vol. 37 No. 2 (2021): Justitia et Pax Volume 37 Nomor 2 Tahun 2021
Publisher : Penerbit Universitas Atma Jaya Yogyakarta

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.24002/jep.v37i2.3849

Abstract

The Security Council is one of the organs of the United Nations to assist its task in maintaining world security and peace. In carrying out its duties, the Security Council is guided by the principles known in the United Nations, as regulated in Article 2 paragraph 1 of the United Nations Charter. One of the principles is the equality of position or degrees of all member countries. But the phenomenon that occurs is the opposite, equality of position is not respected in the UN Security Council considering that in making decisions, it is known that there is a veto that only applies owned by a permanent member state of the Security Council and this right is often used to carry out foreign policy and maintain interests with allied countries. Seeing this phenomenon, is the veto power still relevant today? And are there any attempts to reduce or limit the permanent member states of the UN Security Council from exercising that veto? The purpose of this study is to identify whether or not there is a need for reform of the use of the veto power which incidentally is not by the principle of equity of the states. This research uses normative legal research. The conclusion of this paper is every country has the same position, but the current phenomenon is a country that has strong power, will affect other countries, as evidenced by the three cases discussed in this paper, then the veto right shows the privilege for the five founders of the United Nations compared to other countries.
PENDEKATAN GEOGRAFI HUKUM KRITIS DALAM KAJIAN HUKUM TATA RUANG INDONESIA: SEBUAH WACANA FILSAFAT HUKUM DAN INTERDISIPLIN Victor Imanuel W. Nalle
Justitia et Pax Vol. 37 No. 1 (2021): Justitia et Pax Volume 37 Nomor 1 Tahun 2021
Publisher : Penerbit Universitas Atma Jaya Yogyakarta

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.24002/jep.v37i1.4175

Abstract

The development of legal research shows the importance of an interdisciplinary approach in examining legal issues. Apart from that, legal issues also need to be examined more critically and not to see them as a product of a vacuum without the influence of non-legal factors. This paper explains the development of critical legal geography discourse as well as the theory of social space production and spatial justice associated with this discourse. The study of spatial law has developed an interdisciplinary approach with these critical theories with a critical legal geography framework. However, studies of spatial law in Indonesia have not developed much of this discourse in examining urban problems. Only a few researches on spatial law in Indonesia uses a critical legal geography perspective based on the tracing described in this paper. In fact, urban problems in Indonesia are similar to the phenomena that underlie the emergence of discourse on critical legal geography. Therefore, the study of spatial law in Indonesia requires a more philosophical and critical approach. Various new approaches developed in legal philosophy, one of which is critical legal studies, can be an analytical method for analyzing the influence of economy and power on spatial planning in Indonesia.
STATUS HUKUM KEUANGAN PERSEROAN TERBATAS (PERSERO) BERDASARKAN TEORI BADAN HUKUM DAN TEORI TRANSFORMASI KEUANGAN Debby Debby
Justitia et Pax Vol. 37 No. 2 (2021): Justitia et Pax Volume 37 Nomor 2 Tahun 2021
Publisher : Penerbit Universitas Atma Jaya Yogyakarta

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.24002/jep.v37i2.4183

Abstract

The lack of understanding about public finance and private finance will affect the procedures for the management and accountability of a finance. Based on Article 2 letter g Law Number 17 of 2003, separated state assets which are used as capital participation (in this case money) in Limited Liability Companies (Persero) are part of state finance. This is not in line with the theory of legal entities and the theory of financial transformation. Based on that, this paper aims to explain the financial legal status of Limited Liability Companies (Persero) based on the theory of legal entities and the theory of financial transformation. This research is in the form of juridical-normative. The data used is secondary data consisting of primary and secondary legal materials. Data analysis was carried out using qualitative methods and the form of the results of this study was prescriptive analysis. Based on the theory of legal entities, a Limited Liability Company (Persero) is a private legal entity that has private power that can take provate legal actions and is subject to the provisions of private law. Based on the theory of financial transformation, the legal status of finance changes (transform) as a result of the legal action of transferring and separating finances from one legal subject to another. The transformation of the financial legal status causes changes in rights and obligations in the control and ownership of money in a legal entity so that management, responsibility and risk are under the new legal subjects.
PARADIGMA MAKNA FINAL DAN MENGIKAT PUTUSAN DEWAN KEHORMATAN PENYELENGGARA PEMILU Ismail Ismail; Fakhris Lutfianto Hapsoro
Justitia et Pax Vol. 37 No. 2 (2021): Justitia et Pax Volume 37 Nomor 2 Tahun 2021
Publisher : Penerbit Universitas Atma Jaya Yogyakarta

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.24002/jep.v37i2.4312

Abstract

In several cases of settlement of the State Administrative Court, the Panel of Judges annulled the Presidential Decree (beschikking) which followed up on a Decision of the Honorary Council of Election Organizers regarding the dishonorable dismissal of members of the General Election Commission. Basically, the decision of the Honorary Election Organizing Council is final and binding. With this practice in mind, this paper discusses how the paradigm is "final and binding" in the Decisions of the Honorary Election Organizing Council and what the consequences are for legal certainty. This paper uses a normative juridical approach. The results of this paper indicate that the "final and binding" nature of the DKPP Decision has a paradigm of meaning and creates uncertainty and disruption of legal order in the administration of elections and nullifies the essence of the existence of DKPP as an ethical judiciary institution that balances power (checks and balances).
Author Index Volume 36 Nomor 2 Desember 2020 Manager Justitia Et Pax
Justitia et Pax Vol. 36 No. 2 (2020): Justitia et Pax Volume 36 Nomor 2 Tahun 2020
Publisher : Penerbit Universitas Atma Jaya Yogyakarta

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.24002/jep.v36i2.4345

Abstract

Subject Index Volume 36 Nomor 2 Desember 2020 Manager Justitia Et Pax
Justitia et Pax Vol. 36 No. 2 (2020): Justitia et Pax Volume 36 Nomor 2 Tahun 2020
Publisher : Penerbit Universitas Atma Jaya Yogyakarta

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.24002/jep.v36i2.4346

Abstract

KEUTAMAAN WORLD TRADE ORGANIZATION ATAS REGIONAL TRADE AGREEMENTS DALAM PERDAGANGAN INTERNASIONAL A.D. Agung Sulistyo
Justitia et Pax Vol. 37 No. 2 (2021): Justitia et Pax Volume 37 Nomor 2 Tahun 2021
Publisher : Penerbit Universitas Atma Jaya Yogyakarta

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.24002/jep.v37i2.4381

Abstract

The economic and political needs of countries in the world have provided a strong basis for the birth of the World Trade Organization (WTO). This need has also prompted many countries to form preferential agreements such as the Regional Trade Agreement (RTA). A clash between the two international trading systems is inevitable, there is the ambiguity of the relationship and inconsistency of views held, such as in discriminatory and non-discriminatory approaches. Doctrinal research was conducted to find out which agreement should take precedence over the two legal regimes. This paper concludes that international legal provisions favor the WTO Agreement over preferential agreements such as the RTA. Thus, an RTA that does not conform to the WTO legal regime should be considered contradictory.

Page 19 of 30 | Total Record : 296

 17   18   19   20   21 

Filter by Year

2015 2025


Reset
Filter By Issues
All Issue Vol. 41 No. 2 (2025): Justitia et Pax Volume 41 Nomor 2 Tahun 2025 Vol. 41 No. 1 (2025): Justitia et Pax Volume 41 Nomor 1 Tahun 2025 Vol. 40 No. 2 (2024): Justitia et Pax Volume 40 Nomor 2 Tahun 2024 Vol. 40 No. 1 (2024): Justitia et Pax Volume 40 Nomor 1 Tahun 2024 Vol. 39 No. 2 (2023): Justitia et Pax Volume 39 Nomor 2 Tahun 2023 Vol. 39 No. 1 (2023): Justitia et Pax Volume 39 Nomor 1 Tahun 2023 Vol. 38 No. 2 (2022): Justitia et Pax Volume 38 Nomor 2 Tahun 2022 Vol. 38 No. 1 (2022): Justitia et Pax Volume 38 Nomor 1 Tahun 2022 Vol. 37 No. 2 (2021): Justitia et Pax Volume 37 Nomor 2 Tahun 2021 Vol 37, No 2 (2021): Justitia et Pax Volume 37 Nomor 2 Tahun 2021 Vol 37, No 1 (2021): Justitia et Pax Volume 37 Nomor 1 Tahun 2021 Vol. 37 No. 1 (2021): Justitia et Pax Volume 37 Nomor 1 Tahun 2021 Vol. 36 No. 2 (2020): Justitia et Pax Volume 36 Nomor 2 Tahun 2020 Vol 36, No 2 (2020): Justitia et Pax Volume 36 Nomor 2 Tahun 2020 Vol. 36 No. 1 (2020): Justitia et Pax Volume 36 Nomor 1 Tahun 2020 Vol 36, No 1 (2020): Justitia et Pax Volume 36 Nomor 1 Tahun 2020 Vol. 35 No. 2 (2019): Justitia et Pax Volume 35 Nomor 2 Tahun 2019 Vol 35, No 2 (2019): Justitia et Pax Volume 35 Nomor 2 Tahun 2019 Vol. 35 No. 1 (2019): Justitia et Pax Volume 35 Nomor 1 Tahun 2019 Vol 35, No 1 (2019): Justitia et Pax Volume 35 Nomor 1 Tahun 2019 Vol 34, No 2 (2018): Justitia et Pax Volume 34 Nomor 2 Tahun 2018 Vol. 34 No. 2 (2018): Justitia et Pax Volume 34 Nomor 2 Tahun 2018 Vol. 34 No. 1 (2018): Justitia et Pax Volume 34 Nomor 1 Tahun 2018 Vol 34, No 1 (2018): Justitia et Pax Volume 34 Nomor 1 Tahun 2018 Vol 33, No 2 (2017): Justitia et Pax Volume 33 Nomor 2 Tahun 2017 Vol. 33 No. 2 (2017): Justitia et Pax Volume 33 Nomor 2 Tahun 2017 Vol. 33 No. 1 (2017): Justitia Et Pax Volume 33 Nomor 1 Tahun 2017 Vol 33, No 1 (2017): Justitia Et Pax Volume 33 Nomor 1 Tahun 2017 Vol. 32 No. 2 (2016): Justitia Et Pax Volume 32 Nomor 2 Tahun 2016 Vol 32, No 2 (2016): Justitia Et Pax Volume 32 Nomor 2 Tahun 2016 Vol. 32 No. 1 (2016): Justitia et Pax Volume 32 Nomor 1 Tahun 2016 Vol 32, No 1 (2016): Justitia et Pax Volume 32 Nomor 1 Tahun 2016 Vol 31, No 2 (2015): Justitia Et Pax Volume 31 Nomor 2 Tahun 2015 Vol. 31 No. 2 (2015): Justitia Et Pax Volume 31 Nomor 2 Tahun 2015 More Issue