cover
Contact Name
Tiara Sugih Hartati
Contact Email
tiara.hartati@kpk.go.id
Phone
+6288223612523
Journal Mail Official
jurnal.integritas@kpk.go.id
Editorial Address
Gedung Merah Putih, Komisi Pemberantasan Korupsi. Jl. Kuningan Persada Kav. 4 Jakarta
Location
Kota adm. jakarta selatan,
Dki jakarta
INDONESIA
Integritas: Jurnal Antikorupsi
ISSN : 2477118X     EISSN : 26157977     DOI : https://doi.org/10.32697/integritas
Core Subject : Social,
Terbit sejak 2015, Jurnal Antikorupsi INTEGRITAS (p-ISSN: 2477-118X; e-ISSN: 2615-7977) merupakan jurnal yang menyebarluaskan hasil penelitian atau kajian konseptual tentang korupsi dan subyek yang berelasi dengan korupsi. Jurnal Antikorupsi INTEGRITAS terbit dua nomor dalam setahun ditujukan untuk kalangan pakar, akademisi, peneliti, praktisi, penyelenggara negara, pegiat antikorupsi, dan masyarakat pada umumnya.
Articles 255 Documents
The criminal liability of Civil Servants and Non-Governmental Organizations in corrupt collaboration Ananda Chrisna D. Panjaitan; Torang Fadly Panjaitan
Integritas: Jurnal Antikorupsi Vol 12 No 1 (2026): Article in Progress
Publisher : Komisi Pemberantasan Korupsi

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.32697/integritas.v12i1.1682

Abstract

This article analyzes the expansion of the meaning of abuse of authority under Article 3 of Law Number 31 of 1999 concerning the Eradication of Corruption Crimes, as amended by Law Number 20 of 2001. The principal issues examined include: (1) whether omission or deliberate inaction by an civil servants may be legally qualified as an abuse of authority and (2) how joint liability between civil servants and NGO may be constructed within the framework of corrupt practices. Through this methodological framework, the doctrinal boundaries of abuse of authority and participation were systematically examined. The findings indicate that an omission by an civil servants who is under a legal duty to act may be qualified as an abuse of authority where such omission is carried out consciously and with the intent to benefit oneself or another person, and where it results instate financial loss. Within the context of collaboration, the doctrine of participation (medepleger) serves as the juridical foundation for attributing joint criminal responsibility between civil servants and NGO actors. It is concluded that the expansion of the interpretation of Article 3 must be undertaken cautiously within the confines of the principle of legality, while remaining responsive to the evolving patterns of collaborative corruption.
The risk of coerced confession in the plea mechanism and its implications for corruption cases Jason Thimoty Silitonga
Integritas: Jurnal Antikorupsi Vol 12 No 1 (2026): Article in Progress
Publisher : Komisi Pemberantasan Korupsi

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.32697/integritas.v12i1.1690

Abstract

The integration of guilty plea mechanisms into Indonesia's reformed Code of Criminal Procedure (KUHAP) raises fundamental questions regarding the tension between procedural efficiency and the integrity of substantive truth-seeking, particularly in corruption cases that demand comprehensive evidentiary processes to expose systemically structured criminal networks. This study employs normative legal research utilizing statutory, conceptual, and comparative approaches, supported by analysis of primary legal materials, academic literature, and cross-jurisdictional examination of plea bargaining practices across common law and civil law systems. The analysis reveals that the special track mechanism under Law No. 20 of 2025 structurally generates conditions conducive to coerced confession, as negotiations between prosecutors and defendants unfold within an inherently asymmetric power relationship. In corruption cases, this risks producing guilty pleas driven by legal risk calculation rather than factual acknowledgment, potentially halting evidentiary processes before criminal networks are fully exposed  a risk compounded in multi-defendant scenarios where asymmetric use of plea mechanisms may produce evidentiary fragmentation and inconsistent judicial outcomes. Effective implementation requires operationalization through subordinate regulations, strengthened independent judicial verification of confession voluntariness, and inter-institutional coordination to safeguard evidentiary coherence in collective corruption cases.
Organizational silence and barriers to early corruption detection: A qualitative study of local governments in North Sulawesi Brain Fransisco Supit; Jeane Mantiri
Integritas: Jurnal Antikorupsi Vol 12 No 1 (2026): Article in Progress
Publisher : Komisi Pemberantasan Korupsi

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.32697/integritas.v12i1.1692

Abstract

North Sulawesi's Enforcement and Early Corruption Detection Score Index declined from 80,63  (on a 0-100 scale) in 2024 to 65,94 in 2025, nearly twice the national drop, despite a compliance score of 98,63 out of 100 in public services. This integrity paradox signals a decoupling between administrative performance and accountability. Prior studies have examined political capture, organizational silence, and digital governance failures separately; none has mapped their coupling within a local government context. This study investigates the tripartite interrelationship among silence culture, elite political intervention, and digital accountability instrument degradation as the primary explanation for declining early detection capacity within North Sulawesi’s local government oversight system. A qualitative case study was conducted across the Provincial Government of North Sulawesi and City Governments of Manado, Bitung, and Tomohon. Data was collected through interviews, document analysis, and ATLAS.ti thematic coding, analyzed through Principal-Agent Theory, Institutional Theory, and Organizational Silence Theory. Findings reveal a self-reinforcing cycle: elite political intervention hollows out digital instruments including I-Mut /Siladen and the Whistleblowing System; degradation deepens organizational silence; and entrenched silence shields elite intervention from oversight. Minahasan values of Si Tou Timou Tumou Tou and Mapalus, though co-opted to rationalize silence, carry latent normative resources for reform. This study recommends strengthening APIP independence, mandating fiscal allocation for oversight, consolidating whistleblowing platforms, enforcing merit-based sanctions, and reappropriating local wisdom.  
Corruption, rule of law, and environmental damage: Evidence from 177 countries, including Indonesia Muhammad Abduh; Meita Istianda; Aos Kuswandi
Integritas: Jurnal Antikorupsi Vol 12 No 1 (2026): Article in Progress
Publisher : Komisi Pemberantasan Korupsi

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.32697/integritas.v12i1.1705

Abstract

This study examines whether corruption is associated with environmental damage and if the rule of law conditions this relationship, with particular attention to Indonesia’s relevance for anti-corruption policy in resource-linked sectors. Environmental damage is measured by reversing the Environmental Performance Index (EPI 2024) score (100 − EPI), so that higher values indicate worse conditions. Governance indicators come from the Worldwide Governance Indicators (WGI 2021–2023). We estimate an interaction model in which corruption (coded so higher values indicate higher corruption) and law enforcement strength (rule of law) jointly explain environmental damage, with income included as a control variable. Results show a positive corruption–damage association in baseline models and a statistically significant interaction term, indicating that the association varies across enforcement regimes. Indonesia is benchmarked within the sample and falls in the upper tail of environmental damage, with corruption above the median and rule-of-law strength around the middle of the distribution. The findings suggest that environmental policy in Indonesia should be integrated with anti-corruption controls through licensing, inspection, sanctioning, transparency, and extractive-sector governance.
Clean energy, clean governance: A diagnostic framework for preventing corruption in indonesia’s energy transition Elisabeth Medina Dewi Saraswati; Julius Ferdinand; Mochamad Agung Sasongko; Rika Krisdianawati
Integritas: Jurnal Antikorupsi Vol 12 No 1 (2026): Article in Progress
Publisher : Komisi Pemberantasan Korupsi

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.32697/integritas.v12i1.1752

Abstract

Indonesia’s energy transition involves large-scale infrastructure investment, complex procurement, regulatory uncertainty, fragmented oversight, and coordination among multiple public and private actors, conditions that structurally expose the transition to corruption risks. Yet existing governance frameworks often remain at the level of normative principles, or focus on sector-specific case studies, without translating anti-corruption safeguards into operational tools tailored to a specific country’s institutional context. This study addresses that gap by developing the Energy Transition Governance Framework (ETGF), an indicator-based diagnostic framework designed to assess governance quality and identify corruption vulnerabilities across Indonesia’s electricity transition. Using a qualitative, participatory framework-development approach that combines document analysis, iterative stakeholder validation through multistakeholder focus group discussions, and expert peer review, the study maps corruption risks across the renewable energy project lifecycle and synthesizes these findings with international governance benchmarks. The resulting framework is organized into three pillars, five dimensions, and 77 indicators applicable to both renewable energy expansion and fossil fuel retirement. ETGF is proposed as a diagnostic tool intended to support integrity-oriented oversight, although its practical effectiveness remains subject to future institutional adoption, data availability, and methodological refinement.