cover
Contact Name
Tiara Sugih Hartati
Contact Email
tiara.hartati@kpk.go.id
Phone
+6288223612523
Journal Mail Official
jurnal.integritas@kpk.go.id
Editorial Address
Gedung Merah Putih, Komisi Pemberantasan Korupsi. Jl. Kuningan Persada Kav. 4 Jakarta
Location
Kota adm. jakarta selatan,
Dki jakarta
INDONESIA
Integritas: Jurnal Antikorupsi
ISSN : 2477118X     EISSN : 26157977     DOI : https://doi.org/10.32697/integritas
Core Subject : Social,
Terbit sejak 2015, Jurnal Antikorupsi INTEGRITAS (p-ISSN: 2477-118X; e-ISSN: 2615-7977) merupakan jurnal yang menyebarluaskan hasil penelitian atau kajian konseptual tentang korupsi dan subyek yang berelasi dengan korupsi. Jurnal Antikorupsi INTEGRITAS terbit dua nomor dalam setahun ditujukan untuk kalangan pakar, akademisi, peneliti, praktisi, penyelenggara negara, pegiat antikorupsi, dan masyarakat pada umumnya.
Articles 319 Documents
The criminal liability of Civil Servants and Non-Governmental Organizations in corrupt collaboration Ananda Chrisna D. Panjaitan; Torang Fadly Panjaitan
Integritas: Jurnal Antikorupsi Vol 12 No 1 (2026): INTEGRITAS: Jurnal Antikorupsi
Publisher : Komisi Pemberantasan Korupsi

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.32697/integritas.v12i1.1682

Abstract

This article analyzes the expansion of the meaning of abuse of authority under Article 3 of Law Number 31 of 1999 concerning the Eradication of Corruption Crimes, as amended by Law Number 20 of 2001. The principal issues examined include: (1) whether omission or deliberate inaction by an civil servants may be legally qualified as an abuse of authority and (2) how joint liability between civil servants and NGO may be constructed within the framework of corrupt practices. Through this methodological framework, the doctrinal boundaries of abuse of authority and participation were systematically examined. The findings indicate that an omission by an civil servants who is under a legal duty to act may be qualified as an abuse of authority where such omission is carried out consciously and with the intent to benefit oneself or another person, and where it results instate financial loss. Within the context of collaboration, the doctrine of participation (medepleger) serves as the juridical foundation for attributing joint criminal responsibility between civil servants and NGO actors. It is concluded that the expansion of the interpretation of Article 3 must be undertaken cautiously within the confines of the principle of legality, while remaining responsive to the evolving patterns of collaborative corruption.
The risk of coerced confession in the plea mechanism and its implications for corruption cases Jason Thimoty Silitonga
Integritas: Jurnal Antikorupsi Vol 12 No 1 (2026): INTEGRITAS: Jurnal Antikorupsi
Publisher : Komisi Pemberantasan Korupsi

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.32697/integritas.v12i1.1690

Abstract

The integration of guilty plea mechanisms into Indonesia's reformed Code of Criminal Procedure (KUHAP) raises fundamental questions regarding the tension between procedural efficiency and the integrity of substantive truth-seeking, particularly in corruption cases that demand comprehensive evidentiary processes to expose systemically structured criminal networks. This study employs normative legal research utilizing statutory, conceptual, and comparative approaches, supported by analysis of primary legal materials, academic literature, and cross-jurisdictional examination of plea bargaining practices across common law and civil law systems. The analysis reveals that the special track mechanism under Law No. 20 of 2025 structurally generates conditions conducive to coerced confession, as negotiations between prosecutors and defendants unfold within an inherently asymmetric power relationship. In corruption cases, this risks producing guilty pleas driven by legal risk calculation rather than factual acknowledgment, potentially halting evidentiary processes before criminal networks are fully exposed  a risk compounded in multi-defendant scenarios where asymmetric use of plea mechanisms may produce evidentiary fragmentation and inconsistent judicial outcomes. Effective implementation requires operationalization through subordinate regulations, strengthened independent judicial verification of confession voluntariness, and inter-institutional coordination to safeguard evidentiary coherence in collective corruption cases.
Organizational silence and barriers to early corruption detection: A qualitative study of local governments in North Sulawesi Brain Fransisco Supit; Jeane Mantiri
Integritas: Jurnal Antikorupsi Vol 12 No 1 (2026): INTEGRITAS: Jurnal Antikorupsi
Publisher : Komisi Pemberantasan Korupsi

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.32697/integritas.v12i1.1692

Abstract

North Sulawesi's Enforcement and Early Corruption Detection Score Index declined from 80,63  (on a 0-100 scale) in 2024 to 65,94 in 2025, nearly twice the national drop, despite a compliance score of 98,63 out of 100 in public services. This integrity paradox signals a decoupling between administrative performance and accountability. Prior studies have examined political capture, organizational silence, and digital governance failures separately; none has mapped their coupling within a local government context. This study investigates the tripartite interrelationship among silence culture, elite political intervention, and digital accountability instrument degradation as the primary explanation for declining early detection capacity within North Sulawesi’s local government oversight system. A qualitative case study was conducted across the Provincial Government of North Sulawesi and City Governments of Manado, Bitung, and Tomohon. Data was collected through interviews, document analysis, and ATLAS.ti thematic coding, analyzed through Principal-Agent Theory, Institutional Theory, and Organizational Silence Theory. Findings reveal a self-reinforcing cycle: elite political intervention hollows out digital instruments including I-Mut /Siladen and the Whistleblowing System; degradation deepens organizational silence; and entrenched silence shields elite intervention from oversight. Minahasan values of Si Tou Timou Tumou Tou and Mapalus, though co-opted to rationalize silence, carry latent normative resources for reform. This study recommends strengthening APIP independence, mandating fiscal allocation for oversight, consolidating whistleblowing platforms, enforcing merit-based sanctions, and reappropriating local wisdom.  
Corruption, rule of law, and environmental damage: Evidence from 177 countries, including Indonesia Muhammad Abduh; Meita Istianda; Aos Kuswandi
Integritas: Jurnal Antikorupsi Vol 12 No 1 (2026): INTEGRITAS: Jurnal Antikorupsi
Publisher : Komisi Pemberantasan Korupsi

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.32697/integritas.v12i1.1705

Abstract

This study examines whether corruption is associated with environmental damage and if the rule of law conditions this relationship, with particular attention to Indonesia’s relevance for anti-corruption policy in resource-linked sectors. Environmental damage is measured by reversing the Environmental Performance Index (EPI 2024) score (100 − EPI), so that higher values indicate worse conditions. Governance indicators come from the Worldwide Governance Indicators (WGI 2021–2023). We estimate an interaction model in which corruption (coded so higher values indicate higher corruption) and law enforcement strength (rule of law) jointly explain environmental damage, with income included as a control variable. Results show a positive corruption–damage association in baseline models and a statistically significant interaction term, indicating that the association varies across enforcement regimes. Indonesia is benchmarked within the sample and falls in the upper tail of environmental damage, with corruption above the median and rule-of-law strength around the middle of the distribution. The findings suggest that environmental policy in Indonesia should be integrated with anti-corruption controls through licensing, inspection, sanctioning, transparency, and extractive-sector governance.
Clean energy, clean governance: A diagnostic framework for preventing corruption in indonesia’s energy transition Elisabeth Medina Dewi Saraswati; Julius Ferdinand; Mochamad Agung Sasongko; Rika Krisdianawati
Integritas: Jurnal Antikorupsi Vol 12 No 1 (2026): INTEGRITAS: Jurnal Antikorupsi
Publisher : Komisi Pemberantasan Korupsi

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.32697/integritas.v12i1.1752

Abstract

Indonesia’s energy transition involves large-scale infrastructure investment, complex procurement, regulatory uncertainty, fragmented oversight, and coordination among multiple public and private actors, conditions that structurally expose the transition to corruption risks. Yet existing governance frameworks often remain at the level of normative principles, or focus on sector-specific case studies, without translating anti-corruption safeguards into operational tools tailored to a specific country’s institutional context. This study addresses that gap by developing the Energy Transition Governance Framework (ETGF), an indicator-based diagnostic framework designed to assess governance quality and identify corruption vulnerabilities across Indonesia’s electricity transition. Using a qualitative, participatory framework-development approach that combines document analysis, iterative stakeholder validation through multistakeholder focus group discussions, and expert peer review, the study maps corruption risks across the renewable energy project lifecycle and synthesizes these findings with international governance benchmarks. The resulting framework is organized into three pillars, five dimensions, and 77 indicators applicable to both renewable energy expansion and fossil fuel retirement. ETGF is proposed as a diagnostic tool intended to support integrity-oriented oversight, although its practical effectiveness remains subject to future institutional adoption, data availability, and methodological refinement.
Pemodelan Intensi Whistleblowing Pegawai di Indonesia: Aplikasi Whistleblowing Triangle Nurul Mustafida; Lufi Yuwana Mursita
Integritas: Jurnal Antikorupsi Vol 7 No 2 (2021): INTEGRITAS: Jurnal Antikorupsi
Publisher : Komisi Pemberantasan Korupsi

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.32697/integritas.v7i2.265

Abstract

Previous research has integrated theory of planned behavior and fraud theory. This research seeks to integrate those theories towards whistleblowing intention and examine the comparison of it between government and private employees. This study uses an online survey with 124 samples. The result shows, the perceived norm and attitude positively affect whistleblowing intention. However, it does not apply to perceived control. Also found no difference in whistleblowing intention between both sector employees. It concludes, the need for creating whistleblowing motivation and identifying which factors can strengthen. Besides, employee’s whistleblowing awareness in Indonesia is increasing and no level gap among organizations.     Abstrak Penelitian terdahulu telah mengintegrasikan theory of planned behavior dan fraud triangle. Penelitian ini mereplikasi dan mengembangkan penelitian tersebut dengan menguji integrasi pengaruh theory of planned behavior dan fraud triangle terhadap intensi whistleblowing, serta menguji perbandingan intensi whistleblowing antara pegawai pemerintah dan swasta. Studi ini menggunakan metode survei daring dengan sampel 124 pegawai pemerintah dan swasta. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa persepsi norma dan sikap berhubungan positif dengan intensi whistleblowing. Meskipun tidak demikian dengan persepsi kontrol. Selain itu, ditemukan tidak adanya perbedaan intensi whistleblowing antara pegawai pemerintahan dan swasta. Dari temuan tersebut disimpulkan, perlunya upaya untuk menciptakan situasi pendorong whistleblowing dan mengidentifikasi faktor apa yang dapat memperkuatnya. Temuan lainnya, kesadaran whistleblowing pegawai di Indonesia semakin meningkat dan tidak mengalami kesenjangan antarjenis instansi.  
Memaknai Turunnya Skor Indeks Persepsi Korupsi Indonesia Tahun 2020 Wawan Heru Suyatmiko
Integritas: Jurnal Antikorupsi Vol 7 No 1 (2021): INTEGRITAS: Jurnal Antikorupsi
Publisher : Komisi Pemberantasan Korupsi

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.32697/integritas.v7i1.717

Abstract

Corruption, pandemic, democracy and investment are factors reflected in the Corruption Perceptions Index score for 2020. The relations between Covid-19 pandemic handling and corruption; political integrity and democracy in the policy-making process to making important political decisions that have the potential to create political corruption; up to the risk of corruption in the problem of ease of doing business during the Covid-19 pandemic handling and the economic recovery which at the same time saw a number of business processes being trimmed and the potential for recentralization; is the portrayed in the Corruption Perception Index 2020. The drop in Indonesia's Corruption Perceptions Index score in 2020 to 37 indicates that there are still far away efforts to eradicate corruption in the midst of a pandemic situation that has hit with shared aspirations and hopes.
Sistem Pengawasan Dana Otonomi Khsusus Aceh dan Dampaknya terhadap Pemberantasan Korupsi Khairil Akbar; Zahlul Pasha Karim; Nyak Fadlullah; Muhammad Siddiq Armia
Integritas: Jurnal Antikorupsi Vol 7 No 1 (2021): INTEGRITAS: Jurnal Antikorupsi
Publisher : Komisi Pemberantasan Korupsi

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.32697/integritas.v7i1.719

Abstract

DOKA is the biggest source of corruption that has driven distric heads in Aceh to prison. This fact raises the question, how has the DOKA monitoring system been carried out and what is the impact on corruption eradication? This study aims to explain the DOKA monitoring system and its impact on corruption eradication. The theory used is the theory of Check and Balances and the theory of Willingness & Oppurtunity. This research is classified into qualitative research with descriptive analysis techniques. The main findings of the study indicate that DOKA is not being taken seriously. This can be seen in the absence of a special supervision system and the normal supervision system for DOKA is not optimal. In addition, there is no special institution that oversees the implementation of DOKA. Such a supervisory system has no impact on corruption eradication. It needs serious improvement and a comprehensive evaluation of the use and distribution of DOKA for the realization of social welfare in Aceh.
Malpraktik Pemilu dan Korupsi: Analisis terhadap Proses Penghitungan dan Rekapitulasi pada Pemilu Indonesia 2019 Luthfi Hamzah Husin; Heroik Mutaqin Pratama; Wegik Prasetyo; Hendra Hendra; Wawan Budi Darmawan; Firman Manan; Feri Amsari
Integritas: Jurnal Antikorupsi Vol 7 No 1 (2021): INTEGRITAS: Jurnal Antikorupsi
Publisher : Komisi Pemberantasan Korupsi

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.32697/integritas.v7i1.720

Abstract

This article attempts to examine the relationship between election malpractice and corruption by focusing on analyzing frauds in the vote counting and recapitulation process in the 2019 Indonesian Election, specifically in the legislative election. This study tries to fill in the gaps in literature that examines electoral malpractice in Indonesia which is seen more at the campaign stage rather than the vote counting and recapitulation stages in which the role of election management body is very central. To analyze this, this study analyses more specifically the involvement of the General Election Commission (KPU) as election organizer in electoral malpractice. Using document analysis and case study method, this study found that the vote recapitulation stage, especially at the district level, is the most prone phase to electoral malpractice where the involvement of the ad-hoc election administrator and candidates’ witness play an important role there.
The Cooperation Pattern between the Maluku Provincial Government and the Private Sector in the Arrangement and Normalization of Ex-Illegal Gold Mining Allegedly Prone to Corruption Arman Anwar; Irma Halima Hanafi; Muhammad Irham
Integritas: Jurnal Antikorupsi Vol 7 No 1 (2021): INTEGRITAS: Jurnal Antikorupsi
Publisher : Komisi Pemberantasan Korupsi

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.32697/integritas.v7i1.721

Abstract

Buru District has been developed since 1970 as a transmigration area. The nuance of agriculture is characteristic of Buru Regency so that it is designated as a national rice granary area. However, since gold was discovered in Mount Botak and Gogrea in 2011, Buru Regency has turned into an illegal gold mining area. As a result, there is massive environmental damage and pollution caused by the use of cyanide and mercury by illegal miners. To overcome this problem, the Maluku Provincial Government is working with a third party (private) to normalize and restore the environment in ex-illegal mining, but the cooperation is prone to corruption. The purpose of this research is to prevent corruption in this sector. The research method uses Social Network Analysis, the data is qualitative. The research findings show that cooperation between the Maluku Provincial government and third parties (private) who are prone to corruption can be prevented by mapping the vulnerability of corruption to determine the pattern of relations between cooperative actors who tend to be easily bribed so that a cooperation model that does not have corruption implications can be obtained. Key words: Corruption; Mining; Cooperation; Local government; Private;

Filter by Year

2015 2026


Filter By Issues
All Issue Vol 12 No 1 (2026): INTEGRITAS: Jurnal Antikorupsi Vol 11 No 2 (2025): INTEGRITAS: Jurnal Antikorupsi Vol 11 No 1 (2025): INTEGRITAS: Jurnal Antikorupsi Vol 10 No 2 (2024): INTEGRITAS: Jurnal Antikorupsi Vol. 10 No. 2 (2024): INTEGRITAS: Jurnal Antikorupsi Vol 10 No 1 (2024): INTEGRITAS: Jurnal Antikorupsi Vol. 10 No. 1 (2024): INTEGRITAS: Jurnal Antikorupsi Vol 9 No 2 (2023): INTEGRITAS: Jurnal Antikorupsi Vol. 9 No. 2 (2023): INTEGRITAS: Jurnal Antikorupsi Vol 9 No 1 (2023): INTEGRITAS: Jurnal Antikorupsi Vol. 9 No. 1 (2023): INTEGRITAS: Jurnal Antikorupsi Vol 8 No 2 (2022): INTEGRITAS: Jurnal Antikorupsi Vol. 8 No. 2 (2022): INTEGRITAS: Jurnal Antikorupsi Vol 8 No 1 (2022): INTEGRITAS: Jurnal Antikorupsi Vol. 8 No. 1 (2022): INTEGRITAS: Jurnal Antikorupsi Vol. 7 No. 2 (2021): INTEGRITAS: Jurnal Antikorupsi Vol 7 No 2 (2021): INTEGRITAS: Jurnal Antikorupsi Vol. 7 No. 1 (2021): INTEGRITAS: Jurnal Antikorupsi Vol 7 No 1 (2021): INTEGRITAS: Jurnal Antikorupsi Vol. 6 No. 2 (2020): INTEGRITAS: Jurnal Antikorupsi Vol. 6 No. 1 (2020): INTEGRITAS: Jurnal Antikorupsi Vol. 5 No. 2-2 (2019): INTEGRITAS Volume 05 Nomor 2-2 Tahun 2019 Vol. 5 No. 2 (2019): INTEGRITAS Volume 05 Nomor 2 Tahun 2019 Vol. 5 No. 1 (2019): INTEGRITAS Volume 05 Nomor 1 Tahun 2019 Vol. 4 No. 2 (2018): INTEGRITAS Volume 04 Nomor 2 Tahun 2018 Vol. 4 No. 1 (2018): INTEGRITAS Volume 04 nomor 1 Tahun 2018 Vol. 3 No. 2 (2017): INTEGRITAS Volume 03 Nomor 2 Tahun 2017 Vol. 3 No. 1 (2017): INTEGRITAS Volume 03 Nomor 1 Tahun 2017 Vol. 2 No. 1 (2016): INTEGRITAS Volume 02 Nomor 1 Tahun 2016 Vol. 1 No. 1 (2015): INTEGRITAS Volume 01 Nomor 1 Tahun 2015 More Issue