cover
Contact Name
eko subaktiansyah
Contact Email
eko.subaktiansyah@gmail.com
Phone
-
Journal Mail Official
support@inajog.com
Editorial Address
-
Location
Kota adm. jakarta pusat,
Dki jakarta
INDONESIA
Indonesian Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology (Majalah Obstetri dan Ginekologi Indonesia)
ISSN : 23386401     EISSN : 23387335     DOI : -
Core Subject : Health,
The Indonesian Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology is an official publication of the Indonesian Society of Obstetrics and Gynekology. INAJOG is published quarterly.
Arjuna Subject : -
Articles 1,760 Documents
Maternal and Fetal Outcome on Pregnancy in Advanced Maternal Age Dewi, Sianty; Ferry, Ferry; Toynbee, Eddy; Prayudhana, Sandhy
Indonesian Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology Volume. 4, No.3, July 2016
Publisher : Indonesian Socety of Obstetrics and Gynecology

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (98.874 KB) | DOI: 10.32771/inajog.v4i3.432

Abstract

Objective: Pregnancy in advanced maternal age (AMA) was classified as high risk. The study aims to provide a better description of pregnancy outcome in AMA. Method: The cross sectional study was to review the demography, medical and obstetrics problems, mode of delivery, maternal and fetal outcome in Tangerang General Hospital as a referral center in Banten. The data were taken from medical records of 35-year-old and above women age who delivered on the period of January to December 2014. Result: The total number of delivery and live birth was 6,107 and 5,926 respectively, including 1,548 (25.36%) pregnancies in AMA. The prevalence of grandmultiparities was 11.4%. The average education level was mostly elementary. The prevalence of hypertension in pregnancy was 34.6%. There was increasing trend of miscarriages from 10.8% in 35-40-year-old group to 25% in above 45- year-old group. Pregnancy complications were higher consisting of 3.2% multifetal, 16.6% malpresentation, and 7.1% placenta previa. Cesarean section rate was 33.6%. Maternal near-missed cases were 56 of 1000 and the maternal mortality rate (MMR) was 932 of 100,000 live births. The prevalence of stillbirth and perinatal mortality were 5.3% and 12.9%; respectively. Conclusion: Adverse maternal and fetal outcome were higher in AMA as it takes special attention and multidiscipline-approached care started from preconception, antenatal, preparation of delivery, and also postpartum care. Keywords: advanced maternal age (AMA), fetal outcome, maternal outcome, pregnancy
Family Planning Problem in Indonesia Gunardi, Eka R
Indonesian Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology Volume 4, No. 4, October 2016
Publisher : Indonesian Socety of Obstetrics and Gynecology

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (273.117 KB) | DOI: 10.32771/inajog.v4i4.443

Abstract

N/A
The Impacts of Pelvic Floor Dysfunction Counseling to Knowledge Level and Attitude of Pregnant Women with Gestational Age above Thirty Six Weeks in the Selection of Delivery Method Hakim, Surahman; Ekaputra, Fajar
Indonesian Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology Volume. 5, No. 2, April 2017
Publisher : Indonesian Socety of Obstetrics and Gynecology

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (98.12 KB) | DOI: 10.32771/inajog.v5i2.527

Abstract

Objective: To determine the level of knowledge about pelvic floor dysfunction before and after counseling in term pregnant women and knowing whether a difference a change of attitude in the selection method of delivery before and after counseling. Methods: This study design using pre - post test. At the beginning of our study provide some sort of written test to determine the initial knowledge of participants prior to the extension and the selection of the desired method of delivery. Having obtained the results of the test, followed by education about pelvic floor dysfunction. Then do the post-test to determine the level of knowledge of the subject and mode of delivery that would be pursued. The study took place between February and May 2016 in 5 Public Health Center (PHC) in Jakarta that PHC Warakas (North Jakarta), PHC Tanah Abang (Central Jakarta), PHC Cengkareng (West Jakarta), PHC Jatinegara (East Jakarta) and PHC Jagakarsa (South Jakarta). Results: A total of 102 study subjects who began the study gave the results of the pretest mean 71  10.49 (p<0.0001) and post test results of 80.725  7.7 (p<0.0001). Of the 102 subjects who began the study, there were two people who had previously chose method of delivery by caesarean section turned into vaginal. Conclusion: There is a change scores better in knowledge about pelvic floor dysfunction after counseling. There was no significant difference between selecting the desired method of delivery before the after counseling. [Indones J Obstet Gynecol 2017; 5-2: 99-104] Keywords: fecal incontinence, pelvic floor dysfunction, sexual dysfunction, stress urinary incontinence, uterine prolapse
Effect of Artesunate on Peripheral Parasitaemia in Pregnant Women with Plasmodium Falciparum Infection Saragih, Susi W; T. Chalid, St. Maisuri; Malinta, Umar; Wahid, Isra
Indonesian Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology Volume. 5, No. 3, July 2017
Publisher : Indonesian Socety of Obstetrics and Gynecology

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (86.179 KB) | DOI: 10.32771/inajog.v5i3.537

Abstract

Objective: To determine the effect of artesunate on peripheral parasitaemia in pregnant women with Plasmodium falciparum infection. Methods: Pregnant women in second and third trimester with Plasmodium falciparum infection and their newborns were included in cohort prospective study in Sorong West Papua from September 2015 to February 2016. All pregnant women received 200 mg orally artesunate monotherapy for 7 days. Their newborns examined for weight at delivery and parasitaemia in placenta and cord blood. Parasitaemia diagnosis by Rapid Diagnostic Test and blood smear microscopy. Results: After artesunatemonotherapy, 82.5% (33/40) malariainfected pregnant women had negative parasitaemia (p=0.000) although 17.5% (7/40) of the pregnant women had positive parasitaemia. Parasitaemia also found in 10% (4/40) of placenta and 7.5% (3/40) of umbilical cord from newborns of malaria-infected pregnant women treated with artesunate. 70% (28/40) of the newborns in this study had normal weight. Conclusion: Artesunate reduces peripheral parasitaemia in the second and third trimester of pregnancy, and is associated with normal birth weight. [Indones J Obstet Gynecol 2017; 5-3: 135-138] Keywords: artesunate, low birth weight, peripheral parasitaemia
The Degree of Cystocele and Rectocele with Hiatal Area Levator Ani Moegni, Fernandi; Santoso, Hari
Indonesian Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology Volume. 5, No. 4, October 2017
Publisher : Indonesian Socety of Obstetrics and Gynecology

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (206.803 KB) | DOI: 10.32771/inajog.v5i4.566

Abstract

Objective: To investigate the degree of cystocele and rectocele with a maximum of levator hiatal area (AHL) during Valsava. Methods: Secondary data analysis of 90 patients with uterine prolapse January 2012 to November 2013 in the clinic Uroginekologi RSCM, Jakarta. 3D/4D ultrasound measurement and pelvic organ prolapse system Quantification (POP-Q) stage I-IV cystocele and rectocelestage I-IV. All statistical analyses were analyzed using Stata 20 for Windows. Results: Significant difference cystocele stage I-II (n = 25) with stage III-IV (n = 65), the maximum AHL with a difference of 4.33 cm2 (p = 0.040). In rectocele stage I-II (n = 64) and stage III-IV (n = 26) of 3.85 cm2 (p = 0.130). AUC values for stage I-II and III-IV cystocele was 0.607 (IK95% from 0.467 to 0.738), and the ROC for rectocele was 0.603 (IK95% from 0.472 to 0.734). The ROC optimal cut point for cystocele stage I-II with III-IV with the highestsensitivity and specificity is 29 cm2 (0.523 sensitivity, specificity 0.520), the rectocele is 30 cm2 (0.538 sensitivity, specificity 0.584). Conclusion: There is a significant relationship between the degree of cystocele and area of the levator ani muscles when Valsava, but there is no relationship at rectocele. The value of maximum area under the curve (AUC) hiatal area of the levatorani muscle in distinguishing stage I-II and III-IV cystocele are relatively similar to rectocele stage I-II and III-IV. Optimal cut point hiatal area of the levatorani muscle in distinguishing stage I-II and III-IV cystoceleis 29 cm2, while for rectocele is 30 cm2 with sensitivity and specificity values were quite good. Keywords: cystocele, levatorani hiatal area, pelvic organ prolapse, rectocele
INDEX Volume 5, No. 1 - 4 2017 Subaktiansyah, Eko; Della, Frachma
Indonesian Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology Volume. 5, No. 4, October 2017
Publisher : Indonesian Socety of Obstetrics and Gynecology

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (78.251 KB) | DOI: 10.32771/inajog.v5i4.572

Abstract

N/A
How Long is the Safest InterDelivery Interval in Women with Previous History of Cesarean Delivery? Santoso, Budi I; Surya, Raymond; Firdaus, Karina K; Hakim, Surahman
Indonesian Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology Volume 6. No. 2 April 2018
Publisher : Indonesian Socety of Obstetrics and Gynecology

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (169.652 KB) | DOI: 10.32771/inajog.v6i2.764

Abstract

  Objective: To investigate the association between interdelivery interval and uterine rupture in women with previous CD.   Methods: The formulation question was how long is the safest interdeliveryinterval to minimalize the risk of uterine rupture. Theauthors investigated in three databases including Pubmed,Cochrane, and Embase database. Inclusion criteria wereabstract answering the clinical question, written in Englishlanguage, and full-text paper availability.   Results: One systematic review, six cohort studies, and 1 casecontrolstudy were collected to compare the inter-pregnancyinterval to the risk of uterine rupture. The author retrievedseven articles suitable to the inclusion criteria after excluding tenarticles screened by the abstract and language. Then, the authoradded one article used in the systematic review. Hence, the criticalappraisal based on Validity, Importance, and Applicability (VIA)was performed for eight articles.   Conclusion: The inter-delivery interval 18 months is the safest time to avoid uterine rupture. Prostaglandin analogue induction should be avoided and for patients with a history of past cesarean using a single-layer closure to be educated about the increased risk. Keywords: cesarean delivery, inter-delivery interval, uterine rupture,vaginal birth after cesarean delivery
Comparison of Postpartum Urinary Retention Healing between Groups with Methods of Residual Urine Measurement Four Hours versus Six Hours Post-Delivery Moegni, Fernandi; Hani, Ummu
Indonesian Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology Volume 7, No. 1 January 2019
Publisher : Indonesian Socety of Obstetrics and Gynecology

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (58.306 KB) | DOI: 10.32771/inajog.v7i1.838

Abstract

Abstract Objective: To know the difference of recovery time and the urinary residual volume between group of patient with different time of  urinary residual collecting. Method: A randomized controlled trial was held at Dr. Cipto Mangunkusumo central general hospital and central Karawang hospital between March and Desember 2017. Postpartum women with urinary retention risks, willing to contribute to the trial, and diagnosed as post partum urinary retention were divided into 2 groups. Urinary residual volume was measured in 4th hour and 6th hour in each group. Patient then treated according to RSCM guideline, and the time of recovery was documented. Result: Both group have similar characteristic. The median length of recovery in the group which the urinary residual was measured in 4th hour was 30 hours, 21 hours shorter than 6th hour group, 51 hours (p< 0.001). The median of urinary residual volume of the 4th hour group was 600 ml, 400 ml lesser than the 6th hour group, 1000 ml (p< 0.001) Conclussion: time of recovery are shorter in the 4th  hour group and the urinary residual volume are less in the 4th hour group compared to the 6th hour group. Keywords: post partum urinary retention, urine residual, urinary residual collecting time   Abstrak Tujuan: untuk mengetahui lama pemulihan dan volume residu urin pada kelompok pasien dengan retensio urin pascapersalinan dengan beda waktu pengukuran, Metode: Penelitian ini menggunakan desai uji klinis acak di RSUPN Dr. Cipto Mangunkusumo dan RSUD Karawang bulan Maret-Desember 2017. Perermpuan pascasalin dengan risiko retensio urin pasca persalinan, bersedia mengikuti penelitian, dan terdiagnosis retensio urin dibagi menjadi dua kelompok. Kelompok pertama diukur residu urinnya dalam 4 jam, kelompok kedua dalam 6 jam. Pasien lalu diberikan tatalaksana retensio urin sesuai protokol RSUPNCM dan dicatat waktu pulihnya. Hasil: Karakteristik pasien pada kedua kelompok dianggap setara. Median lama pemulihan pasien retensio urin yang diukur residu urin 4 jam adalah 30 jam, berbeda 21 jam dengan pasien yang diukur resiudnya 6 jam, yaitu 51 jam (p<0.001).  Median jumlah  residu urin pada kelompok pengukuran residu urin 4 jam adalah 600 ml, berbeda 400 ml dengan kelompok pengukuran 6 jam, yaitu 1.000 ml (p<0.001). Kesimpulan: Lama pemulihan lebih singkat pada kelompok pasien dengan waktu pengukuran residu urin 4 jam dibandingkan dengan 6 jam. Jumlah residu urin lebih sedikit pada pengukuran residu 4 jam dibanding 6 jam Kata kunci: retensio urin pasca persalinan, residu urin, waktu pengukuran residu urin
N/A INAJOG, INAJOG
Indonesian Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology Volume. 3, No. 4, October 2015
Publisher : Indonesian Socety of Obstetrics and Gynecology

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (77.656 KB) | DOI: 10.32771/inajog.v3i4.62

Abstract

N/A
What So Special with Endometriosis Characteristics ye tWe Don’t Know About? Winarto, Haryono
Indonesian Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology Volume. 4, No. 1, January 2016
Publisher : Indonesian Socety of Obstetrics and Gynecology

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (60.082 KB) | DOI: 10.32771/inajog.v4i1.63

Abstract

N/A

Page 78 of 176 | Total Record : 1760


Filter by Year

2006 2026


Filter By Issues
All Issue Volume 14. No. 1 January 2026 Volume 13. No. 4 October2025 Volume 13. No. 3 July 2025 Volume 13. No. 2 April 2025 Volume 13. No. 1 January 2025 Volume 12 No. 4 October 2024 Volume 12 No. 3 Jully 2024 Volume 12 No. 2 April 2024 Volume 12 No. 1 January 2024 Volume 11 No. 4 October 2023 Volume 11 No. 3 July 2023 Volume 11 No. 2 April 2023 Volume 11 No. 1 January 2023 Volume 10 No. 4 Oktober 2022 Volume 10 No. 3 July 2022 Volume 10 No. 2 April 2022 Volume 10 No. 1 January 2022 Volume 9 No. 4 October 2021 Volume 9 No. 3 July 2021 Volume 9 No. 2 April 2021 Volume 9 No. 1 January 2021 Volume 8 No. 4 October 2020 Volume 8 No. 3 July 2020 Volume 8 No. 2 April 2020 Volume 8 No. 1 January 2020 Volume 7 No. 4 October 2019 Volume 7 No. 3 July 2019 Volume 7 No. 2 April 2019 Volume 7 No. 2 April 2019 Volume 7, No. 1 January 2019 Volume 7, No. 1 January 2019 Volume 6 No. 4 October 2018 Volume 6 No. 4 October 2018 Volume 6 No. 3 July 2018 Volume 6 No. 3 July 2018 Volume 6. No. 2 April 2018 Volume 6. No. 2 April 2018 Volume 6. No. 1. January 2018 Volume 6. No. 1. January 2018 Volume. 5, No. 4, October 2017 Volume. 5, No. 4, October 2017 Volume. 5, No. 3, July 2017 Volume. 5, No. 3, July 2017 Volume. 5, No. 2, April 2017 Volume. 5, No. 2, April 2017 Volume. 5, No. 1, January 2017 Volume. 5, No. 1, January 2017 Volume 4, No. 4, October 2016 Volume 4, No. 4, October 2016 Volume. 4, No.3, July 2016 Volume. 4, No.3, July 2016 Volume. 4, No. 2, April 2016 Volume. 4, No. 2, April 2016 Volume. 4, No. 1, January 2016 Volume. 4, No. 1, January 2016 Volume. 3, No. 4, October 2015 Volume. 3, No. 4, October 2015 Volume. 3, No. 3, July 2015 Volume. 3, No. 3, July 2015 Volume. 3, no. 2, April 2015 Volume. 3, no. 2, April 2015 Volume. 3, No. 1, January 2015 Volume. 3, No. 1, January 2015 Volume. 2, No. 4, October 2014 Volume. 2, No. 4, October 2014 Volume. 2, No. 3, July 2014 Volume. 2, No. 3, July 2014 Volume. 2, No. 2, April 2014 Volume. 2, No. 2, April 2014 Volume. 2, No. 1, January 2014 Volume. 2, No. 1, January 2014 Volume. 37, No. 2, April 2013 Volume. 37, No. 2, April 2013 Volume. 37, No. 1, January 2013 Volume 37, No. 1, January 2013 Volume 37, No. 1, January 2013 Volume. 1, No. 4, October 2013 Volume. 1, No. 4, October 2013 Volume. 1, No. 3, July 2013 Volume. 1, No. 3, July 2013 Volume. 36, No. 4, October 2012 Volume. 36, No. 4, October 2012 Volume. 36, No. 3, July 2012 Volume. 36, No. 3, July 2012 Volume. 36, No. 2, April 2012 Volume. 36, No. 2, April 2012 Volume. 36, No. 1, January 2012 Volume. 36, No. 1, January 2012 Volume. 35, No. 4, October 2011 Volume. 35, No. 4, October 2011 Volume. 35, No. 3, July 2011 Volume. 35, No. 3, July 2011 Volume. 35, No. 2, April 2011 Volume. 35, No. 2, April 2011 Volume. 35, No. 1, January 2011 Volume. 35, No. 1, January 2011 Volume. 34, No. 4, October 2010 Volume. 34, No. 4, October 2010 Volume. 34, No. 3, July 2010 Volume. 34, No. 3, July 2010 Volume. 34. No. 2, April 2010 Volume. 34. No. 2, April 2010 Volume. 34, No. 1, January 2010 Volume. 34, No. 1, January 2010 Volume. 33. No. 4, October 2009 Volume. 33. No. 4, October 2009 Volume. 33, No. 3, July 2009 Volume. 33, No. 3, July 2009 Volume. 33, No. 2, April 2009 Volume. 33, No. 2, April 2009 Volume. 33, No. 1, January 2009 Volume. 33, No. 1, January 2009 Volume. 32, No. 4, October 2008 Volume. 32, No. 4, October 2008 Volume. 32, No. 3, July 2008 Volume. 32, No. 3, July 2008 Volume. 32, No. 2, April 2008 Volume. 32, No. 2, April 2008 Volume. 32, No. 1, January 2008 Volume. 32, No. 1, January 2008 Volume. 31, No. 4, October 2007 Volume. 31, No. 4, October 2007 Volume. 31, No. 3, July 2007 Volume. 31, No. 3, July 2007 Volume. 31, No. 2, April 2007 Volume. 31, No. 2, April 2007 Volume. 31, No. 1, January 2007 Volume. 31, No. 1, January 2007 Volume. 30, No. 4, October 2006 Volume. 30, No. 4, October 2006 Volume. 30, No. 3, July 2006 Volume. 30, No. 3, July 2006 Volume. 30, No. 2, April 2006 Volume. 30, No. 2, April 2006 Volume. 30, No. 1, January 2006 Volume. 30, No. 1, January 2006 More Issue