cover
Contact Name
Pahlefi
Contact Email
pahlefi@unja.ac.id
Phone
+6282181066381
Journal Mail Official
recital@unja.ac.id
Editorial Address
recital@unja.ac.id
Location
Kota jambi,
Jambi
INDONESIA
Recital Review
Published by Universitas Jambi
ISSN : 26232928     EISSN : 26225891     DOI : https://doi.org/10.22437/rr.v6i2
Core Subject : Social,
Recital Review is peer-review journal published by Universitas Jambi, Magister Konatariatan, Jambi, Indonesia. Recital review receives research-based and conceptual articles with a broad range of topics related with Notary area, including: deed-making techniques, Agrarian law; Family Law; Inheritance Law; Contract Law; Auction Law; Code Ethic of Notary; Land Law; Company and Insolvency Law; Intellectual Property Rights; Tax Law; Politics of Notarial Law; Guarantee Law; Banking Law.
Arjuna Subject : Ilmu Sosial - Hukum
Articles 120 Documents
Relaksasi Kredit Pada Kepemilikan Rumah Subsidi Di Bank Mandiri Kota Medan Di Masa Pendemi Covid-19 Berdasarkan Peraturan Otoritas Jasa Keuangan Gema Medianson Saragih
Recital Review Vol. 3 No. 2 (2021): Volume 3 Nomor 2 2021
Publisher : Magister Kenotariatan, Universitas Jambi

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

Covid-19 pandemic that occurs in Iitdonesia not only creates contagious disease resulting deaths, but also causes stagnancy in economic cycle of a country and its people. The policy of large-scale social restriction (PSBB) makes the company, factory, stores, supermarket and shopping centers temporarily stop their economic activities and terminate their employees. The results demonstrate that Bank Mandiri, as the lender, does not implement the policy of credit relaxation in the covid-19 pandemic to the debtors of subsidized mortgage in accordance with the law. Bank Mandiri makes special policy in the form of debtor classification, namely employees who have been terminated as the customers. External constraint comes from the debtors who state their inability to pay the installment of subsidized mortgage. Another constraint comes from the management of Bank Mandiri Medan City that has the technical implementation guidelines of credit relaxation distribution, based only on subjective assessment of the surveyor and the management of Bank Mandiri Medan City, guided by the justice limited by prudence principles.    
Perjanjian Penyerahan Jaminan Sebagai Penyelesaian Hutang Di Hadapan Notaris Agustina Maryana Siregar
Recital Review Vol. 3 No. 2 (2021): Volume 3 Nomor 2 2021
Publisher : Magister Kenotariatan, Universitas Jambi

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

The notary makes an agreement regarding AYDA (repossessed assets) which aims to authorize the bank represented by one of its directors.The existence of an agreement on the delivery of collateral as a debt settlement before a notary that is emerging in banking practice is certainly expected to provide legal certainty for both the debtor, the owner of the collateral and the bank as the creditor. However, in the laws and regulations in Indonesia there is no regulation that specifically regulates the agreement on the delivery of collateral as debt settlement.This thesis is a descriptive research and the type of research used is a normative juridical study. Study on Verdict Number: 24/Pdt.G/2019/PN.Pti regarding the deed of guarantee delivery agreement between the creditor and the debtor indicates that the agreement does not meet the legal requirements as an agreement. This became evident in March 2016 when the debtor experienced financial difficulties so that the payment of debt installments was delayed.Then there are six deeds issued by a notary in which the six deeds are defects of will or defects of agreement due to abuse of circumstances.This stems from the existence of procedures that are not carried out by creditors, namely the absence of a warning letter regarding delays.Thus, the debtor as the aggrieved party files a lawsuit as a form of legal certainty against the object of the dispute that is his.   Keywords: AYDA, deed of sale & purchase, mortgage right
Sertifikasi Atas Tanah Pusaka Tinggi (Studi Nagari Ulakan, Kecamatan Ulakan Tapakis, Kabupaten Padang Pariaman, Provinsi Sumatera Barat) Hariz Novirja Panyalai
Recital Review Vol. 3 No. 2 (2021): Volume 3 Nomor 2 2021
Publisher : Magister Kenotariatan, Universitas Jambi

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

A plot of land has an important meaning and role in human life. Indonesian government has legal authority in land as it is specified in Law No. 5/1960 on Basic Regulation of Agrarian Affairs. Land Certification is used to create legal certainty in land by organizing land registration and providing certificate as evidence. There many plots of land which have not been registered such as tanah ulayat (village land), especially in Sumatera Barat Province where the majority of its people is Minangkabaunese. The reserch problems are how about the process registering tanah pusako tinggi (ancestral land) by the adat (traditional) community, how about its legal consequences, and how about its obstacles. The research used juridical normative method. Primarv data were gathered by conducting interview and secondary data were obtained from library research such as from books, journals, and electronic media. Certification of tanah pusako tinggi has the same procedure as the other land certification which is referred to the Directive of the Head of the National Land Agency No. 1/2010 on the Standard of Land Service and Regulation. However, there are some things which distinguish them from land registration in general. One of them is the right which is attached to the land is communal right. The certification causes the recognition of land rights and anything related to the control, handing out, expiration, and land acquisition as well as legal certainty on the ancestral land. Some obstacles found in the process of certification are varied, viewed from the government's few point, the internal and external factors and the people. The government has also attempted to handle the obstacles in registering tanah pusako tinggi.  
Analisis Yuridis Pembubaran Perseroan Terbatas (PT) Yang Tidak Beroperasi Priscila Patricia Yosephin
Recital Review Vol. 3 No. 2 (2021): Volume 3 Nomor 2 2021
Publisher : Magister Kenotariatan, Universitas Jambi

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

Dissolution of a limited liability company consists of some methods pursuant to Article 142 of Law No. 40/2007 On Limited Liability Companies, one of which is by a court ruling. According to explanation of Article 146 of the Law on Limited Liability Companies, dissolution of a limited liability company with an excuse that it no longer operates has to be proved with a letter submitted to tax agency. However, the law does not mention who is authorized to submit the letter to tax agency. This research analyses the position of directors and stockholders in the process of dissolution of a limited liability company that no longer operates, the consideration and ruling handed down by the judge in the Verdict of the Supreme Court Number 1618 K/PDT/2016 and the Verdict of the Constitutional Court No. 63/PUU-XVI/2018 concerning legal certainty of position of director and stockholders related to the process of dissolution of a limited liability company that no longer operates, and the legal protection for stockholders in case the director fail to perform their duties and report to related institutions in the process of dissolution of a limited liability company. This research employs normative juridical method and is juridical analytical. The data are collected through library research conducted by document study. The data analysed qualitatively and the conclusion is drawn deductively. The juridical analysis demonstrate that concerning the dissolution of a limited liability company that no longer operates in the Verdict Number 1618 K/PDT/2016, the Panel of Judges state that the director is rightful to submit a letter related tax agency regarding that the limited liability company no longer operates. In relation with the explanation of article 146 paragraph 1 letter C o the Law on Limited Liability Companies in the Verdict No. 63/PUU-XVI/2018, the Panel of Judges state that the explanation is not unconstitutional an has provuded adequate explanation that although director is not mentioned as the organ of a limited liability company that shall submit the letter to tax agency concerning its non-operating company, it has to be clearly understood that the Law on Limited Liability Companies delegate the responsibility of organization of the company only to the director. With this anlysis, it is suggested that more assertive and clear regulations be made in order to prevent various interpretations patricularly in understanding the explanation of the Law No. 40/2007 on Limited Liability Companies.  
Mekanisme Pendaftaran Hak Tanggungan Elektronik Dan Akibat Hukumnya Frans Meyer Simatupang
Recital Review Vol. 4 No. 1 (2022): Volume 4 Nomor 1 Januari 2022
Publisher : Magister Kenotariatan, Universitas Jambi

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.22437/rr.v4i1.9213

Abstract

Basically granting Mortgage Rights must be done by the owner himself, but if a legal action cannot be carried out by the person concerned himself in a situation then he can authorize his actions to someone appointed so that if the giver of Mortgage can not face himself to the PPAT, then he can appoint someone to act on his behalf by first making a Power of Attorney Imposing Mortgage Rights. At present SKMHT cannot be facilitated by the electronic Mortgage Registration System. The electronic registration system itself goes through two registration processes, namely the fulfillment of debtor and creditor data by the Bank as creditor and data delivery by PPAT as a notary public as a partner of the Bank as creditor. If there is an error in the compilation by the creditor regarding the data of the debtor's data, this can be a risk if there is a request for confiscation and the APHT will be canceled by law. The Electronic Registration process is also an obstacle if the PPAT is late in submitting it to the Land Agency because it has been recorded when the registration was carried out by the Bank as the creditor. Regarding the delay in submitting APHT, this could also be a risk in the Court of the object of the Underwriting Right and would place the Underwriting Creditors do not yet have a preference for paying off their receivables or are still concurrent credit. ABSTRAKAkta hak tanggungan dan peranan PPAT pengajuan pembebanan jaminan melalui haktanggungan biasa hingga hak tanggungan dengan elektronik dalam perspektif hukum diIndonesia.Tipe penelitian ini ialah hukum yuridis normatif, dengan pendekatan perundangundangan (statute approach) dan pendekatan konseptual (conceptual approach), melalui bahanhukum primer, sekunder dan tertier. HT-el mulai berlaku pada tanggal diundangkan, PPAT danBPN perlu kesiapan dalam pelaksanaan meliputi beberapa faktor, baik faktor internal maupunfaktor eksternal, pemerintah juga wajib berbenah dengan melakukan tindakan yang bersifat tidakhanya preventif namun juga represif. Dalam prakteknya, tidak adanya pembatasan subjek yangdapat menjadi pemberi HT tersebut menimbulkan permasalahan.Isu hukum yang diteliti dalamtulisan ini adalah kelemahan dan kelebihan serta aturan-aturan yang dapatmengakomodirnya.Menjadi permasalahannya.Bagaimana kedudukan PPAT dalam layanan HTdan HT-el?dan jaminan hak tanggungan dan jaminan hak tanggungan elektronik terhadap pihakketiga? Sehingga perlu adanya koordinasi terkait antara para pihak yang berkepentingan untukmembahas lebih lanjut mengenai persoalan HT-el perlu disikapi dengan bijak.    
Prinsip Kehati-Hatian PPAT Dalam Proses Pengikatan Jual Beli Tanah Sebagai Perwujudan Kepastian Hukum Arsiendy Aulia
Recital Review Vol. 4 No. 1 (2022): Volume 4 Nomor 1 Januari 2022
Publisher : Magister Kenotariatan, Universitas Jambi

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.22437/rr.v4i1.13364

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to identify and analyze the precautionary principle of PPAT in the land sale and purchase binding process as a manifestation of legal certainty and the legal consequences of PPAT if it does not use the PPAT caution principle in the land sale and purchase binding process in realizing legal certainty. As for the formulation of the problem. What is the form of the PPAT precautionary principle in the land sale and purchase binding process in realizing legal certainty? What are the legal consequences for PPAT if they do not use the precautionary principle in the process of binding the sale and purchase of land as a manifestation of legal certainty? This type of research uses a normative juridical approach using a statutory approach and a conceptual approach using the precautionary theory, responsibility theory, legal certainty theory and authority theory. The method used in data processing and data analysis used in this study is a qualitative method which refers to a particular problem or is based on the prevailing laws and regulations. The results of the study are a form of sanction against PPAT if they do not use the precautionary principle, namely administrative sanctions in the form of verbal warning, temporary dismissal, dismissal with respect and disrespectful dismissal, both legal consequences of the PPAT deed if they do not use the precautionary principle contained in the article. 22 government regulations number 37 of 1998, namely the PPAT deed can be canceled and null and void by law. Suggestions should be that there are detailed and clear rules regarding PPAT prudence in making deeds so that PPAT is protected and PPAT is expected to be able to understand and then apply the form of prudential principle in carrying out its duties, especially in land transfer using the land sale and purchase agreement process. so that it is able to provide legal certainty for the parties who use its services and is able to provide legal protection for the parties and the PPAT themselves Abstrak Tujuan penelitian ini adalah untuk mengetahui dan menganalisis prinsip kehati-hatian PPAT dalam proses pengikatan jual beli tanah sebagai perwujudan kepastian hukum dan akibat hukum terhadap PPAT jika tidak menggunakan prinsip ke hati hati an PPAT dalam proses pengikatan jual beli tanah dalam mewujudkan kepastian hukum. Adapun rumusan masalah Bagaimana bentuk prinsip ketahi-hatian PPAT dalam proses pengikatan jual beli tanah dalam mewujudkan kepastian hukum? Bagaimana akibat hukum terhadap PPAT jika tidak menggunakan prinsip kehati-hatian dalam proses pengikatan jual beli tanah sebagai perwujudkan kepastian hukum? Tipe penelitian ini menggunakan metode pendekatan yuridis normatif dengan menggunakan metode pendekatan perundang-undangan dan pendekatan konsep dengan menggunakan teori kehati-hatian, teori tanggungjawab, teori kepastian hukum dan teori kewenangan. Metode yang digunakan dalam pengolahan data maupun analisis data yang digunakan dalam penelitian ini adalah metode kualitatif yang mengacu pada suatu masalah tertentu maupun berdasarkan peraturan perundang-undangan yang berlaku. Hasil penelitian adalah bentuk sanksi terhadap PPAT jika tidak menggunakan prinsip kehati-hatian yaitu sanksi secara administrasi berupa teguran lisan, pemberhentian sementara, pemberhentian secara hormat dan pemberhentian secara tidak hormat kedua akibat hukum terhadap akta PPAT jika tidak menggunakan prinsip kehati-hatian yang terdapat didalam pasal 22 peraturan pemerintah nomor 37 tahun 1998 yaitu akta ppat dapat dibatalkan dan batal demi hukum. Saran hendaknya ada aturan yang secara rinci dan jelas tentang kehati-hatian PPAT didalam membuat akta agar PPAT mendapat perlindungan dan PPAT diharapkan mampu memahami dan kemudian menerapkan bentuk prinsip kehati-hatian dalam pelaksanaan tugas jabatannya khususnya dalam peralihan tanah yang menggunakan proses perjanjian pengikatan jual beli tanah sehingga mampu memberikan kepastian hukum bagi para pihak yang menggunakan jasanya dan mampu memberikan perlindungan hukum bagi para pihak dan PPAT sendiri
Prinsip Kehati-Hatian Notaris Di Dalam Pembuatan Akta Yang Sempurna Bella Okladea Amanda
Recital Review Vol. 4 No. 1 (2022): Volume 4 Nomor 1 Januari 2022
Publisher : Magister Kenotariatan, Universitas Jambi

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.22437/rr.v4i1.13815

Abstract

The aims of this study are: 1. To find out and analyze the principle of prudence of a notary in making a perfect deed. 2. To find out and analyze the legal consequences of an imperfect notarial deed. The formulation of the problem from this writing are: 1. What is the form of the notary prudence principle in making a perfect deed?. 2. What are the legal consequences of an imperfect notarial deed? In this study the author uses normative juridical research, the results of this study are the forms of the notary prudence principle in making a perfect deed, namely one introducing the penghadao, two verifying carefully and the subject and object of the appearers, third giving a grace period in processing the deed. The fourth is to act carefully, carefully and thoroughly in the process of making a perfect deed, the fifth to fulfill all the technical requirements for making a perfect notary deed, and the sixth to report to the authorities if there are indications of money laundering in transactions at a Notary. Then the legal consequences of an imperfect notarial deed are proven in case number 69/Pid.B/2021 Plk notary Agustri Paruna, S.H Bin Bena and court decision number 40/Pid.B/2013/PN. Notary NGO Imran Zubir Daoed bi M. Daoed Therefore, with the proof that the Notary has committed a criminal act and in making a notarial deed that is not in accordance with the procedures or rules as stipulated by the Notary Position Act, the notary deed becomes a private deed , is not the same as the legal force of a notarial deed which is valid in its manufacture and is sentenced to imprisonment, this causes losses for parties with an interest in the deed. Abstrak Tujuan dari penelitian ini adalah: 1. Untuk mengetahui dan menganalisis mengenai prinsip kehati-hatian notaris dalam pembuatan akta yang sempurna. 2. Untuk mengetahui dan menganalisis akibat hukum terhadap akta notaris yang tidak sempurna. Adapun rumusan masalah dari penulisan ini yaitu: 1. Bagaimana bentuk prinsip kehati-hatian notaris dalam pembuatan akta yang sempurna?. 2. Bagaimana akibat hukum terhadap akta notaris yang tidak sempurna?. Dalam penelitian ini penulis menggunakan penelitian yuridis normatif, hasil penelitian ini adalah bentuk-bentuk prinsip kehati-hatian notaris didalam pembuatan akta yang sempurna yaitu satu melakukan pengenalan terhadap penghadao, dua memverifikasi secara cermat dan subyek dan obyek penghadap, ketiga memberikan tenggang waktu dalam pengerjaan akta yang sempurna, keempat bertindak hati-hati, cermat dan teliti dalam proses pembuatan akta yang sempurna, kelima memenuhi segala syarat teknik pembuatan akta notaris yang sempurna, dan keenam melaporkan kepada pihak yang berwajib apabila terjadi indikasi pencucian uang dalam transaksi di Notaris. Kemudian akibat hukum terhadap akta notaris yang tidak sempurna yaitu terbukti didalam kasus nomor 69/Pid.B/2021 Plk notaris Agustri Paruna, S.H Bin Bena dan putusan pengadilan nomor 40/Pid.B/2013/PN. Lsm notaris Imran Zubir Daoed bi M. Daoed Oleh karena itu dengan terbuktinya Notaris telah melakukan perbuatan pidana dan dalam pembuatan akta notaris yang tidak sesuai dengan prosedur atau aturan sebagaimana yang telah ditetapkan oleh Undang-Undang Jabatan Notaris, maka akta notaris tersebut menjadi akta dibawah tangan, tidak sama kekuatan hukumnya dengan akta notaris yang sah dalam pembuatannya serta dijatuhkan pidana penjara, hal ini menimbulkan kerugian bagi pihak yang berkepentingan dengan akta tersebut.  
Pengaturan Perlindungan Hukum Terhadap Kreditur Dalam Eksekusi Objek Hipotek Kapal Laut Yang Dijaminkan Ke Bank Berdasarkan Perspektif Perundang-Undangan Zainuddin Yasin
Recital Review Vol. 4 No. 1 (2022): Volume 4 Nomor 1 Januari 2022
Publisher : Magister Kenotariatan, Universitas Jambi

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.22437/rr.v4i1.14089

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to determine and criticize the regulation of legal protection for creditors in execution of marine mortgage objects in perspective of legislation and regulation of execution of marine mortgage objects guaranteed in banks. In this study, the authors use normative juridical research methods. The approach used is a statutory approach, conceptual approach, and case approach. The results of this research are that the debtor is based on Article 1178 of the Civil Code which focuses on fiat execution (there must be annmainig 1,2,3), while the creditor focuses on Article 224 of the HIR which contains the title of executorial, so this does not provide a guarantee. legal certainty and legal protection for the creditor in getting the accounts receivable paid off from the debtor. Second, the arrangements for the execution of ships as objects of collateral, namely: First, Law Number 17 of 2008 concerning Shipping regulates the process of execution to court through an executorial title, that each mortgage deed is issued one mortgage grosse deed and Article 224 HIR Jo. Article 195 HIR with the lines contained in the mortgage grosse deed, if it is listed for the sake of justice based on supreme Godhead, then the mortgage is attached to the executorial power (executoriale kracht) because the law itself equates it with a judge's decision or justice which has permanent legal force Second, with the Parate Execution process or it can be called auction sale by creditors based on their own power of attorney (eigenmachtige verkoopI). In this Mortgage is based on Article 1178 paragraph (2) KUHPerdata. The conditions for executing Parate Execution are that the power of attorney must be set forth as a clause in the Mortgage deed which contains a statement that the debtor gives the creditor the right or power of attorney to sell the object of the Mortgage goods himself, if the debtor is default with the procedure of selling must remain subject to Article 1211 KUHPerdata, namely the sale must be made in public, and the Creditor requests the assistance of the Auction Office to conduct the auction sale. The third process is an underhand sales process.    Abstrak Tujuan dari penelitian ini adalah untuk mengetahui dan mengkritisi pengaturan perlindungan hukum terhadap kreditur dalam eksekusi objek Hipotek kapal laut dalam perspektif peraturan perundang-undangandan pengaturan eksekusi objek  Hipotek kapal laut yang di jaminkan di bank.Dalam penelitian ini penulis menggunakan metode penelitian yuridis normatif. Pendekatan yang digunakan adalah pendekatan undang-undang, pendekatan konseptual, dan pendekatan kasus. Adapun hasil dari penelitian ini yaitu bahwa Debitur berpijak pada Pasal 1178 KUHperdata yang bertitik berat kepada fiat eksekusi (harus ada anmainig 1, 2, 3), sementara pihak kreditur bertitik berat pada Pasal 224 HIR yang mengandung titel eksekutorial, sehingga hal tersebut tidak memberikan jaminan kepastian hukum dan perlindungan hokum kepada pihak kreditur dalam mendapatkan pelunasan piutang dari pihak debitur. Kedua, Pengaturan eksekusi kapal laut sebagai obyek jaminan yaitu: Pertama, Undang-Undang Nomor 17 Tahun 2008 Tentang Pelayaran mengatur proses eksekusi ke pengadilan melalui titel eksekutorial, bahwa setiap akta Hipotek diterbitkan satu grosse akta Hipotek dan Pasal 224 HIR Jo. Pasal 195 HIR dengan irah-irah yang terdapat dalam grosse akta Hipotek, apabila tercantum Demi Keadilan Berdasarkan Ketuhanan Yang Maha Esa, maka pada Hipotek melekat kekuatan eksekutorial (executoriale kracht) karena undang-undang sendiri mempersamakannya dengan putusan hakim atau keadilan yang berkekuatan hukum tetap. Kedua, dengan proses Parate Eksekusi atau dapat disebut penjualan lelang oleh kreditur berdasarkan kuasa sendiri (eigenmachtige verkoopI). Dalam Hipotek hal ini didasarkan Pasal 1178 ayat (2) BW. Syarat-syarat untuk melakukan Parate Eksekusi adalah dalam kuasa tersebut harus dituangkan sebagai klausul dalam akta Hipotek yang berisi pernyataan, bahwa debitur memberikan hak atau kuasanya kepada kreditur untuk menjual sendiri objek barang Hipotek, apabila debitur cedera janji dengan tata cara penjualan harus tetap tunduk pada Pasal 1211 BW, yaitu penjualan harus dilakukan di muka umum, dan Kreditur meminta bantuan Kantor Lelang untuk melakukan penjualan lelang. Proses yang ketiga adalah proses penjualan di bawah tangan.
Analisis Yuridis Terhadap Perbuatan Notaris Yang Tidak Membacakan Akta (Studi Kasus Putusan Mpwn Sumatera Utara Nomor 7 /MPWN.Provinsi Sumatera Utara/X/2016) Notarianul Syamsi
Recital Review Vol. 4 No. 1 (2022): Volume 4 Nomor 1 Januari 2022
Publisher : Magister Kenotariatan, Universitas Jambi

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.22437/rr.v4i1.14222

Abstract

This is a descriptive research employed normative jurisdiction research type using primary and secondary data obtained from field research. The results of this research demonstrated that the impact of Notary who did not read out the deed created a gradated deed into Privately Made Deed and caused detriments to the parties. Notary had violated article 16. paragraph 1 letter MUUJN (Rules of Notary Profession). It was responsibility of a Notary that a non-read out deed causing compensation that can be requested by the appearer to the Notary in accordance with article 44. paragraph 5 UUJN (Rules of Notary Profession). Protection against violation of reading out this deed has been stated in the Decree of MPWN (Region Supervisory Council of Notary) North Sumatera Number 7 / MPWN Provinsi Sumatera Utara / X / 2016. The conclusion demonstrated that the Notary caused detriments to the appearers due to a non-read out deed to the appearers. What Notary did by not reading out deed violated the obligation. What the Notary did not do violated the article 16, paragraph 1 letter M. It was recommended that a Notary should be more thorough in carrying out the obligations and authorities given to them. Abstrak Hasil dari penelitian diperoleh bahwa dampak dari notaris tidak membacakan akta mengakibatkan akta terdegradasi menjadi akta dibawah tangan sehingga merugikan para pihak. Notaris telah melanggar pasal 16 ayat 1 huruf M UUJN yang merupakan tanggung jawab notaris terhadap akta yang tidak dibacakan menimbulkan suatu ganti kerugian yang dapat diminta oleh penghadap kepada notaris sesuai pasal 44 ayat 5 UUJN . Perlindungan terhadap pelanggaran pembacaan akta ini telah diberikan dalam Putusan MPWN Sumatera Utara Nomor 7/MPWN Provinsi Sumatera Utara/X/2016.Kesimpulan yang diperoleh notaris membuat kerugian kepada para penghadap karena tidak dibacakan kepada para penghadap. hal yang dilakukan notaris dengan tidak membacakan akta melanggar kewajiban yang tidak dilakukan oleh notaris yang melanggar pasal 16 ayat 1 huruf m.disarankan agar notaris lebih teliti dalam melakukan kewajiban dan kewenangan yang diberikan kepadanya.
Penyalahgunaan Keadaan Dalam Pembuatan Akta Jual Beli (Studi Putusan Nomor 91/ Pdt.G/ 2019/PN. Pms) Indra Agus Swardani Sihaloho
Recital Review Vol. 4 No. 1 (2022): Volume 4 Nomor 1 Januari 2022
Publisher : Magister Kenotariatan, Universitas Jambi

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.22437/rr.v4i1.14341

Abstract

This research is a descriptive analysis that analyzes something that is done in a way that is not out of the scope of the problem and based on general theories or concepts and is applied to explain a set of data, or to show the comparison or relationship of a data set with other data sets. The results of this study shows that elements of abuse of circumstances (Misbruik Van Omstandigheden) in making a Sale and Purchase Certificate (AJB) Number: 24/2018, it can be analyzed for the existence of economic advantages, urgent needs and losses of the weak. The existence of an element of abuse of the situation (Misbruik Van Omstandigheden) in making the Sale and Purchase Certificate (AJB) Number: 24/2018 resulted in the deed becoming invalid and null and void. Judges' considerations in Decision number: 91 / Pdt.G / 2019 / PN. Pms is in accordance with several court decisions in Indonesia where indicators of abuse of circumstances (Misbruik Van Omstandigheden) can be assessed from the aspects of the parties' positions in the contractual phase, agreement formulation, and morality Abstrak Penelitian ini merupakan penelitian deskriptif analisis yang menganalisis sesuatu yang dilakukan dengan cara yang tidak keluar dari ruang lingkup masalah dan berdasarkan teori atau konsep umum dan diterapkan untuk menjelaskan sekumpulan data, atau untuk menunjukkan perbandingan atau hubungan antara kumpulan data dengan kumpulan data lainnya. Hasil penelitian ini menunjukkan bahwa unsur penyalahgunaan keadaan (Misbruik Van Omstandigheden) dalam pembuatan Akta Jual Beli (AJB) Nomor: 24/2018, dapat dianalisis adanya keuntungan ekonomi, kebutuhan mendesak dan kerugian lemah. Adanya unsur penyalahgunaan keadaan (Misbruik Van Omstandigheden) dalam pembuatan Akta Jual Beli (AJB) Nomor: 24/2018 mengakibatkan akta menjadi tidak sah dan batal demi hukum. Pertimbangan Hakim dalam Putusan nomor: 91/Pdt.G/2019/PN. Pms sesuai dengan beberapa putusan pengadilan di Indonesia dimana indikator penyalahgunaan keadaan (Misbruik Van Omstandigheden) dapat dinilai dari aspek kedudukan para pihak dalam tahap kontrak, perumusan perjanjian, dan moralitas.  

Page 6 of 12 | Total Record : 120