cover
Article Per Year (5 Year)
All
Home Page
OAI Link
Editorial Team
Contact
Reviewer
Google Scholar
Contact Name
Rochmat Aldy Purnomo
Contact Email
purnomo@umpo.ac.id
Phone
-
Journal Mail Official
legalstanding@umpo.ac.id
Editorial Address
-
Location
Kab. ponorogo,
Jawa timur
INDONESIA
Legal Standing : Jurnal Ilmu Hukum
Published by Universitas Muhammadiyah Ponorogo
ISSN : 25808656     EISSN : 25803883     DOI : -
Core Subject : Social,
Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice
Legal Standing : Jurnal Ilmu Hukum adalah jurnal ilmiah berkala yang diterbitkan oleh Fakultas Hukum Universitas Muhammadiyah Ponorogo dua kali setahun pada bulan Maret dan Desember. Redaksi Legal Standing : Jurnal Ilmu Hukum menerima naskah artikel laporan hasil penelitian empirik dan naskah hasil kajian teoritis yang sesuai dengan visi Legal Standing : Jurnal Ilmu Hukum tentang Hukum Pidana, Perdata, Tata Negara, Tata Usaha Negara, Hukum Adat, Hukum Islam, Sosiologi Hukum, teori hukum, Hukum Agraria, Filsafat Hukum, Hukum dan Korupsi, Hukum Lingkungan, Pemerintahan Daerah, Hukum Perkawinan, Hukum Acara Pidana dan Perdata, Hukum dagang dan Perbankan, Hukum dan ITE, Konstitusi, Hukum Pidana Khusus, Kebijakan Publik, Politik Hukum dan Victimology
Arjuna Subject : -
Articles 563 Documents
 53   54   55   56   57 
Kekuatan Pembuktian Keterangan Tanpa Sumpah Anak sebagai Korban Pencabulan dalam Putusan Nomor 106/Pid.Sus/2025/PN CLP Hanafiah Hanafiah; Rahtami Susanti; Yusuf Saefudin; Selamat Widodo
Legal Standing : Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Vol. 10 No. 2 (2026): Legal Standing (On Progress)
Publisher : Universitas Muhammadiyah Ponorogo

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.24269/ls.v10i2.14188

Abstract

This research examines the evidentiary value of unsworn testimony provided by child victims and analyzes judicial considerations in imposing sanctions for child molestation cases through the perspective of the negative statutory proof theory. Employing a normative legal research method, the study applies statutory, case, and conceptual approaches, with a focus on Cilacap District Court Decision Number 106/Pid.Sus/2025/PN Clp. The findings reveal that a child victim’s statement delivered without an oath does not qualify as independent legal evidence under Article 185 paragraph (7) of the Indonesian Criminal Procedure Code. Nevertheless, such testimony may contribute to the evidentiary process when supported by other lawful evidence, including witness statements, the defendant’s confession, and the Visum et Repertum. The court’s reasoning demonstrates the application of the lex specialis derogat legi generali principle through the Child Protection Act, which served as the legal basis for establishing the defendant’s guilt. Accordingly, this study highlights the need for standardized child-sensitive examination procedures to ensure effective legal protection and minimize the risk of revictimization during judicial proceedings.
Perlindungan Hukum bagi Pemenang Lelang Hak Tanggungan terhadap Penguasaan Objek Lelang oleh Debitur Zenda Renata Choiriya; Adlin Budhiawan
Legal Standing : Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Vol. 9 No. 5 (2025): Legal Standing
Publisher : Universitas Muhammadiyah Ponorogo

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.24269/ls.v9i5.14614

Abstract

The implementation of the auction of the execution of the right of dependency is a mechanism for settling non-performing loans that provides an opportunity for creditors to obtain repayment of their receivables through the sale of collateral objects. However, in practice, problems are often found in the form of still being controlled by the auction object by the debtor after the auction, so that the auction winner who has obtained juridical rights has not been able to physically control the object. This study aims to analyze the form of legal protection for auction winners over the auction object of the dependent rights that are still controlled by the debtor and to examine the legal position of the auction winner on the control of the auction object after the auction and the transfer of rights are legally carried out. The method used is normative research with legislative, case, and conceptual approaches. Primary legal materials include Law Number 4 of 1996 concerning Dependent Rights, Minister of Finance Regulation Number 122/PMK.06/2023 concerning Guidelines for Auction Implementation, Civil Code, and other related regulations. Secondary legal materials are obtained from the scientific literature. The analysis was carried out qualitatively using a descriptive method. The results of the study show that legal protection for auction winners consists of preventive and repressive protection.  Preventive protection is realized through the issuance of auction minutes as an authentic deed and the provision of information about the condition of the auction object before the auction is held. Repressive protection is provided through the mechanism of execution of the auction object emptying based on Article 200 paragraph (11) of the Criminal Code if the debtor refuses to hand over the object voluntarily. In addition, the auction winners are recognized as buyers in good faith. After the auction is carried out legally, the auction winner has legal status as the new and legal owner of the object of dependent rights and has the right to acquire ownership of the auction object, change the name, control and make full use of the auction object. Debtors who still control the auction object have lost the legal basis to maintain the control. Therefore, it is necessary to implement effective emptiness execution to ensure the fulfillment of the rights of the auction winner, and increase public confidence in the auction mechanism for the execution of dependent rights.
Reasonable Accommodation bagi Penyandang Disabilitas dalam Proses Hukum: Perbandingan Hukum Konstitusi Indonesia dan Jepang St.Puan Khaliza A. Ilham; Andi Arsya Zalsabilah Putri; Fadlah Dzikra Azis; Zakiya Ramadhani Sanusi; Diana Rezkita; Eka Merdekawati Djafar
Legal Standing : Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Vol. 9 No. 5 (2025): Legal Standing
Publisher : Universitas Muhammadiyah Ponorogo

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.24269/ls.v9i5.14632

Abstract

This study aims to analyze the provision of Reasonable Accommodation for persons with disabilities who are users of legal services in the implementation of legal proceedings, particularly from the perspective of constitutional law in the application of legal norms and the protection of human rights. The research focuses on how the concept of Reasonable Accommodation is regulated under Law Number 20 of 2025 concerning the Criminal Procedure Code (KUHAP), Law Number 8 of 2016 concerning Persons with Disabilities, and the United Nations Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities (UNCRPD). Through Law Number 19 of 2011, the Government of Indonesia ratified the United Nations Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities. A comparative analysis is conducted with Japan, where the right to Reasonable Accommodation for persons with disabilities is guaranteed through the Basic Act for Persons with Disabilities and the Act for Eliminating Discrimination against Persons with Disabilities. This research employs a normative legal method using statutory and comparative approaches. Data were collected through visits to courts to assess the extent to which Reasonable Accommodation is provided for persons with disabilities as users of legal services, including adequate information, accessibility support, and disability assistance during legal proceedings.  The findings indicate that, from a normative perspective, the legal framework governing Reasonable Accommodation within the judiciary is relatively well established. Regulations provide for non-discriminatory services, accessible facilities, interpreters, assistants, and special examination standards for persons with disabilities. The provision of Reasonable Accommodation in judicial institutions is essential for ensuring accessibility and enabling persons with disabilities to participate effectively in criminal court proceedings. Many courts have provided various facilities, such as designated parking areas, accessible entrances, waiting areas, and disability-friendly restrooms. However, shortcomings remain in the availability and quality of accessibility measures in several locations, which hinder the delivery of services to persons with disabilities. Furthermore, implementation continues to face challenges, including limited physical infrastructure, insufficient training for law enforcement officials, and the absence of standardized assessments to identify the individual accommodation needs of persons with disabilities.

Page 57 of 57 | Total Record : 563

 53   54   55   56   57 

Filter by Year

2017 2026


Reset
Filter By Issues
All Issue Vol. 10 No. 2 (2026): Legal Standing (On Progress) Vol. 10 No. 1 (2026): Legal Standing Vol. 9 No. 5 (2025): Legal Standing Vol 9, No 4 (2025): Legal Standing Vol. 9 No. 4 (2025): Legal Standing Vol 9, No 3 (2025): Legal Standing Vol. 9 No. 3 (2025): Legal Standing Vol 9, No 2 (2025): Mei-Agustus Vol. 9 No. 2 (2025): Mei-Agustus Vol. 9 No. 1 (2025): Januari-April Vol 9, No 1 (2025): Januari-April Vol 8, No 3a (2024): September-Desember Vol. 8 No. 3 (2024): September-Desember Vol. 8 No. 3a (2024): September-Desember Vol 8, No 3 (2024): September-Desember Vol 8, No 2 (2024): Mei-Agustus Vol. 8 No. 2 (2024): Mei-Agustus Vol. 8 No. 1 (2024): Januari-April Vol 8, No 1 (2024): Januari-April Vol. 7 No. 2 (2023): September Vol 7, No 2 (2023): September Vol 7, No 1 (2023): Maret Vol 6, No 2 (2022): September Vol 6, No 1 (2022): Maret Vol 5, No 2 (2021): September Vol 5, No 1 (2021): Maret Vol 4, No 2 (2020): September Vol 4, No 1 (2020): Maret Vol 3, No 2 (2019): September Vol 3, No 1 (2019): Maret Vol 2, No 2 (2018): September Vol 2, No 2 (2018): September Vol 2, No 1 (2018): Maret Vol 1, No 2 (2017): September Vol 1, No 2 (2017): September Vol 1, No 1 (2017): Maret Vol 1, No 1 (2017): Maret More Issue