cover
Article Per Year (5 Year)
All
Home Page
OAI Link
Editorial Team
Contact
Reviewer
Google Scholar
Contact Name
Iyah Faniyah
Contact Email
editor.unesreview@gmail.com
Phone
+6285263256164
Journal Mail Official
editor.unesreview@gmail.com
Editorial Address
JL. Bandar Purus No.11, Padang Pasir, Kec. Padang Barat, Kota Padang
Location
Kota padang,
Sumatera barat
INDONESIA
Unes Law Review
Published by Universitas Ekasakti
ISSN : 26543605     EISSN : 26227045     DOI : https://doi.org/10.31933/unesrev.v6i1.1019
Core Subject : Health, Science, Education, Social,
Education Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Physics Public Health Social Sciences
UNES Law Review adalah Jurnal Penelitian Hukum yang dikelola oleh Magister Hukum Pascasarjana, Universitas Ekasakti Padang. Penelitian yang dimuat merupakan pendapat pribadi peneliti dan bukan merupakan pendapat editor. Jurnal terbit secara berkala 4 (empat) kali dalam setahun yaitu September, Desember, Maret, dan Juni. UNES Law Review mulai Volume 4 Nomor 3 Tahun 2022 sampai Volume 9 Nomor 2 Tahun 2027 Reakreditasi Naik Peringkat dari Peringkat 5 ke Peringkat 4 sesuai nomor Akreditasi : 204/E/KPT/2022, 3 Oktober 2022 UNES Law Review is a Legal Research Journal managed by Postgraduate Law Masters, Ekasakti University, Padang. The published research is the personal opinion of the researcher and is not the opinion of the editor. The journal is published periodically 4 (four) times a year, namely September, December, March and June. UNES Law Review Volume 4 Number 3 of 2022 to Volume 9 Number 2 of 2027 Reaccreditation Raised Rank from Rank 5 to Rank 4 according to Accreditation number: 204/E/KPT/2022, 3 October 2022
Arjuna Subject : Umum - Umum
Articles 552 Documents
 28   29   30   31   32 
Search results for , issue "Vol. 5 No. 4 (2023)" : 552 Documents clear
INVESTASI BODONG BERKEDOK ROBOT TRADING DENGAN SKEMA PONZI Wijaya Kusuma, Rizki; Ratnawati Gultom, Efrida
UNES Law Review Vol. 5 No. 4 (2023)
Publisher : Universitas Ekasakti

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31933/unesrev.v5i4.473

Abstract

Businesses in Indonesia are currently experiencing rapid development following the digital era, namely by utilizing technology to facilitate the transaction process. The Indonesian financial services industry has taken advantage of a facility called fintech. Companies and individuals also feel the convenience of their business because it is assisted by fintech technology. However, in practice there are still many companies that use technology for illegal business, especially in the field of fraudulent investment with various schemes, one of which is a ponzi scheme. The research method used is normative legal research method, namely providing legal arguments in accordance with primary data and secondary data. The purpose of this study is to analyze the legal consequences for ponzi scheme actors and legal protection for ponzi scheme victims. The results of the study found that while there are no specific regulations governing ponzi schemes, the law used is Article 378 of the Criminal Code concerning Fraud Article 105 and or Article 106 of Law Number 7 of 2014 concerning Trade and or Article 4 and or Article 19 Law Number 8 of 1999 concerning Consumer Protection Article 3 and/or Article 4 and/or Article 5 and/or Article 6 in conjunction with Article 10 of the Law of the Republic of Indonesia Number 8 of 2010 concerning Prevention and Eradication of Money Laundering Crimes and preventive measures that can be taken is to periodically provide insights regarding investment to the public.
KEPASTIAN HUKUM TERHADAP PUTUSAN NOMOR 1025/Pdt.G/2020/PN JKT.SEL MENGENAI KUALITAS KENDARAAN BERMOTOR Jerry, Jerry; Ratnawati Gultom, Elfrida
UNES Law Review Vol. 5 No. 4 (2023)
Publisher : Universitas Ekasakti

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31933/unesrev.v5i4.474

Abstract

The quality of motor vehicles, especially cars, is very important when used in various conditions. Car manufacturers/sellers are required to ensure the quality of their products. Consumers as buyers/consumers or users must receive protection from the quality of the products they buy. If the product consumed by consumers has hidden defects, it is appropriate for consumers to be given legal protection, so that in the future there will be no legal problems. Legal certainty regarding consumer protection needs to be understood by consumers, aiming for consumers to have the knowledge to make claims, as well as receive appropriate after-sales service from producers/sellers. Therefore, consumers need to be protected by the positive laws that apply in Indonesia. The law used for consumer protection is the Law of the Republic of Indonesia Number 8 of 1999 concerning Consumer Protection. If there are legal issues related to products that are not suitable for consumption by consumers, consumers have several ways to settle through legal channels, namely through courts or alternative dispute resolution outside the court. So that in the future the relationship between the seller/manufacturer and the buyer/consumer has balance in the eyes of the law, and has legal certainty that can be accounted for.
PERBUATAN MELAWAN HUKUM TERHADAP IZIN USAHA PERTAMBANGAN BATUBARA (Studi Putusan No.10Pdt.G2015PN. Tgt) Nazir, Muhammad Afdal; Ratnawati, Elfrida
UNES Law Review Vol. 5 No. 4 (2023)
Publisher : Universitas Ekasakti

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31933/unesrev.v5i4.475

Abstract

The coal commodity mining industry in Indonesia has various kinds of legal problems in its management, including regarding overlapping coal Mining Business Permits (IUP), because in the same IUP Area coal IUP has been issued by the relevant government to two different parties, causing disputes between the parties holding the IUP that are protracted and tend to be no legal certainty for IUP holders to be able to carry out its business activities as experienced by PT Pasir Prima Coal Indonesia (PT. PPCI) as the holder of the Production Operation IUP, which in its IUP Area has been issued another IUP on behalf of PT Mandiri Sejahtera Energindo (PT. MSE), thus causing a dispute between the two parties, why did this happen, is there any unlawful act on it? For this reason, it needs to be legally tested through the Court in order to achieve legal certainty regarding who is more entitled to carry out mining activities in the IUP Area. After there is legal certainty with a court decision with permanent legal force (Inkracht van gewijsde), then what about IUP to carry out mining activities within the IUP Area after Decision No.10 / Pdt.G / 2015 / PN.Tgt.? Therefore, the author is interested in analyzing Decision No.10/Pdt.G/2015/PN.Tgt using qualitative normative research methods, while the results found that the IUP holders of PT. PPCI, which has also been decided by the Tanah Grogot District Court (Inkracht van gewijsde) as the party entitled to the disputed IUP Area, has not been able to carry out mining activities in the IUP area, which on the contrary is PT. MSE that has carried out mining activities in the IUP area, or in other words, legal certainty has not been achieved for PT. PPCI.
KEMUDAHAN PERIZINAN BERUSAHA PADA SEKTOR PERTAMBANGAN NIKEL DI INDONESIA PASCA BERLAKUNYA UNDANG-UNDANG NOMOR 11 TAHUN 2020 TENTANG CIPTA KERJA Mahal Frawansa, Syukron; Maria Tri Anggraini, Anna
UNES Law Review Vol. 5 No. 4 (2023)
Publisher : Universitas Ekasakti

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31933/unesrev.v5i4.476

Abstract

Nickel mining activities include various stages, such as investigation, exploration, feasibility study, building, mining, processing, refining, transportation, and post-mining are all examples of mining operations. The government has the authority to manage nickel mining, but usually grants licenses to other parties to carry out mining activities. Law Number 11/2020 on Job Creation was introduced to simplify licensing and bureaucracy. The purpose of this study is to assess the influence of the law on the ease of business licencing and management of nickel mining in Indonesia. The research utilized both legal and non-legal materials and resulted in a descriptive and analytical juridical study. The study determined that nickel mining activities need a central government business licence, which is now simpler to obtain with a business identity number, standard certificate, and permission. The management of nickel mining following the passage of Law Number 11 of 2020 on Job Creation has had environmental and social consequences.
PERTANGGUNGJAWABAN PIDANA KORPORASI PADA KJPP MENURUT UNDANG-UNDANG NOMOR 1 TAHUN 2023 Hamidi, Dudung; Ratnawati Gultom, Elfrida
UNES Law Review Vol. 5 No. 4 (2023)
Publisher : Universitas Ekasakti

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31933/unesrev.v5i4.478

Abstract

Law Number 1 of 2023 concerning the criminal code in articles 12, 20, 36, as well as in articles 45 to 50, states that corporations have legal responsibilities where the corporation is a business entity or not a legal entity in the form of a firm, limited partnership or equivalent according to law legislation. One of the business entities is the Office of public appraisal service (KJPP) was formed based on the regulation of the Minister of Finance number 228/PMK.01/2019. The research is a descriptive analysis research using a normative juridical and references in the form of legislation and literature that supports the research. The purpose of the research is to analyze the existence of corporate responsibility for KJPP to Law number 1 of 2023 and legal protection in carrying out appraisal professional service activities. The results of the analysis show that until recently: (1) KJPP is directly related to corporate criminal responsibility and (2) its activities of KJPP does not currently have good legal protection because in carrying out the appraisal profession it is still supported by a Ministerial of Finance Regulation which hierarchically, legislation are at the bottom.
URGENSI PENGATURAN LENIENCY PROGRAM TERHADAP DUGAAN KARTEL ATAS KELANGKAAN MINYAK GORENG DI INDONESIA Putra Rizal Pratama, Arya; Setyawati, Ria; Budi Kagramanto, L.; Aju Wulandari, Sinar
UNES Law Review Vol. 5 No. 4 (2023)
Publisher : Universitas Ekasakti

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31933/unesrev.v5i4.479

Abstract

Law Number 5 of 1999 concerning the Prohibition of Monopolistic Practices and Unfair Business Competition stipulates various prohibitions for actions that cause unfair business competition, especially contractual activities between business actors, one of which is a cartel The actions of this cartel have an impact on the sustainability and welfare of consumers as a result of price and production regulation in the market. In proving the realm of unfair business competition, namely cartel, it can be proven through indirect evidence. Indirect evidence according to the Regulation of the Commission for the Supervision of Business Competition Number 1 of 2010 concerning Procedures for Handling Cases is a guide. The cartel case approach which is regulated through Article 11 of Law Number 5 of 1999 adopts the principlerule of reason tend to see and examine the reasons of business actors who commit an act that is considered to violate the competition law. However, the success of disclosing cartel cases is still experiencing obstacles. Several countries have implemented leniency program as a response to cartel cases. The process of enforcing business competition law in Indonesia has not been able to overcome cartel cases that have harmed consumers. The results of this study explain the difficulty in disclosing cartel cases in Indonesia because there are no parties or informants to assist law enforcement to ascertain the alleged cartel. The urgency of the leniency program is the only way to reduce difficulties and restore an efficient and effective economic situation so that consumers are able to prosper.
PERLINDUNGAN HUKUM BAGI PEKERJA SENI LUKIS DIGITAL MENURUT FATWA MUI NOMOR 1/MUNAS VII/MUI/5/2005 TENTANG HAK KEKAYAAN INTELEKTUAL DI KOTA MEDAN Hamidah Polem, Wanda; Zuhri, Ahmad
UNES Law Review Vol. 5 No. 4 (2023)
Publisher : Universitas Ekasakti

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31933/unesrev.v5i4.480

Abstract

Nikmat akal merupakan salah satu karunia Allah SWT kepada manusia. Karena anugerah ini, orang dapat bernalar, membuat penilaian moral, dan berkreasi dengan membuat berbagai alat yang membuat hidup mereka lebih mudah, terutama dalam hal penggunaan teknologi digital. Berkat teknologi yang serba digital ini, informasi dapat dengan mudah diperoleh dari jaringan internet di mana saja dan kapan saja. Namun, tidak dapat dipungkiri bahwa isu lain muncul. Salah satunya adalah perlindungan hak cipta bagi seniman yang kreasi digitalnya diposting secara online. Metodologi penelitian hukum-empiris digunakan. Adalah tirani untuk memakai, mengungkapkan, membuat, memakai, menjual, mengimpor, mengekspor, mendistribusikan, memberikan, menerbitkan, mereproduksi, menjiplak, memalsukan, dan membajak hak kekayaan intelektual orang lain tanpa persetujuan mereka. Perundang-undangan tersebut inkonstitusional, menurut Fatwa MUI Nomor 1/MUNAS VII/MUI/5/2005 Tentang Hak Kekayaan Intelektual (HKI). Selanjutnya menurut Undang-Undang Nomor 28 Tahun 2014 tentang Hak Cipta, setiap orang yang memakai hak komersial atas suatu ciptaan harus terlebih dahulu mendapat persetujuan dari pencipta atau pemegang hak cipta. Upaya pembelaan hukum turut wajib sejalan terhadap hukuman yang keras serta memadai kepada pelanggar hak cipta oleh aparat penegak hukum berdasarkan pada peraturan perundang-undangan yang ada.
PERLINDUNGAN HUKUM TERHADAP DEBITUR ATAS AKTA CESSIE YANG DILAKSANAKAN SEPIHAK OLEH KREDITUR (STUDI KASUS PUTUSAN No. 53/ Pdt.G/2018/PN Gpr. DAN PUTUSAN No. 21/ Pdt.G/2019/PN Kdr) Yusvaldi, Rhonny; Azheri, Busyra; Adelina Mannas, Yussy
UNES Law Review Vol. 5 No. 4 (2023)
Publisher : Universitas Ekasakti

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31933/unesrev.v5i4.481

Abstract

According to Article 613 paragraph (1) of the Civil Code, it is stated that the surrender of receivables on behalf of and other incorporeal objects are carried out by making an authentic deed and/or private deed, by which the rights to the object are delegated to another person. In a cessie, the takeover of bank receivables by a third party does not mean that only the receivables are taken over, but is accompanied by the takeover of the bank's rights and obligations, including the transfer of collateral for the debtor's debt. The research method used in this study is a Normative Juridical approach, the research results obtained are 1. As a result of the Cessie Deed being carried out unilaterally by the creditor, the Jessie is carried out by making an authentic deed or private deed, the Jessie is transferred by the creditor, and there will be a replacement of the creditor only if the cassie is carried out by Article 613 of the Civil Code, but if the cassie is carried out unilaterally by the creditor then the cassie deed has no legal consequences because the cassie in the deed does not fulfill one of the elements of Article 613 of the Civil Code 2. In case, the taking over of a receivables bank by a third party does not mean that only the receivables are taken over, but it is accompanied by the takeover of the rights and obligations of the bank, including the transfer of collateral for the debtor's debt. The transfer of receivables by Jessie does not result in the termination of the existing agreement made between the creditor and the debtor. 3. The debtor's legal protection for a session which is carried out unilaterally by the creditor according to the Civil Code Article 613 such submission to the debtor has no consequences unless the delivery is notified to him or in writing it is approved and acknowledged if the cassie is carried out unilaterally by the creditor the Jessie has not resulted in the debtor, in other words, the Jessie has not occurred or has not been transferred and the debtor can file a lawsuit in court.
PERLINDUNGAN HUKUM KONSUMEN TERHADAP PRODUK PANGAN KADALUWARSA Nugroho, Ali; Ratnawati, Elfrida
UNES Law Review Vol. 5 No. 4 (2023)
Publisher : Universitas Ekasakti

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31933/unesrev.v5i4.482

Abstract

The rampant distribution of expired food and drinks does not only occur before major holidays, but also occurs on weekdays, which is common in the community. Everyone, at one time either in a single position/alone or in a group with other people. under any circumstances, a citizen must be a consumer for a particular product or service, entitled to legal protection that must be provided by the state. One of the protections that must be provided by the state is consumer protection. This study uses a juridical method by conducting legal research that prioritizes literary materials which basically aims to find secondary data consisting of primary, secondary and tertiary legal materials. This is done so that people do not consume products or services that endanger safety, health, and so on, so that people get satisfaction. In RI Law. No. 8 of 1999, concerning consumer protection (UUPK). Legal protection for consumers can be in the form of non-litigation mechanisms, namely settlements without a judicial process based on Article 47 of Law No. 8 of 1999 concerning consumer protection. As well as the legal form of protection for consumers who experience losses from the distribution and trade of expired food is protection. laws to be upheld and enforced. The responsibility of the business actors for the losses they experience, the consumer can report it to the relevant parties or agencies.
SURAT PERNYATAAN PENGUASAAN FISIK BIDANG TANAH SECARA SPORADIK YANG AKAN DIJADIKAN SEBAGAI DASAR PEMBERIAN PEMBIAYAAN PADA BANK BSI KCP PASAMAN BARAT Sofiani, Suci; Rembrandt, Rembrandt; Hasbi, M.
UNES Law Review Vol. 5 No. 4 (2023)
Publisher : Universitas Ekasakti

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31933/unesrev.v5i4.483

Abstract

Tujuan pendaftaran tanah menurut Pasal 3 huruf a Peraturan Pemerintah Nomor 24 Tahun 1997 tentang Pendaftaran Tanah yaitu untuk memberikan kepastian hukum dan perlindungan hukum kepada pemegang hak atas suatu bidang tanah, Surat Penyataan Fisik Bidang Tanah (Sporadik) merupakan gerbang awal dari pihak yang mendaftarkan tanahnya secara sporadik. Kegunaan dari surat ini ialah sebagai bentuk penegasan bahwa yang bersangkutan telah menguasai sebidang tanah tersebut secara sah sebelum memohon pengajuan hak atas tanah tersebut. Di sebagian besar Daerah Kabupaten Pasaman Barat Provinsi Sumatera Barat masih sangat banyak tanah-tanah yang belum terdaftar atau belum bersertipikat. Dalam penulisan ini menggunakan metode yuridis empiris. Dari hasil penelitian disimpulkan bahwa 1) Bank Bsi KCP Pasaman Barat menerima agunan berupa Surat pernyataan penguasaan fisik bidang tanah secara sporadic untuk dijaminkan sebagai anggunan untuk pinjaman KUR dibawah 100 juta 2). pihak Bank Bsi KCP Pasaman Barat hanya menjadikan surat sporadik tersebut sebagai pegangan untuk menjadi jaminan pada kredit KUR karena sporadik tidak bisa diikat hak tanggungannya dan tidak dibunyikan dalam akad kredit KUR tersebut.

Page 30 of 56 | Total Record : 552

 28   29   30   31   32 

Filter by Year

2023 2023


Reset
Filter By Issues
All Issue Vol. 8 No. 3 (2026) Vol. 8 No. 2 (2025) Vol. 8 No. 1 (2025) Vol. 7 No. 4 (2025) Vol. 7 No. 3 (2025) Vol. 7 No. 2 (2024): UNES LAW REVIEW (Desember 2024) Vol. 7 No. 1 (2024): UNES LAW REVIEW (September 2024) Vol. 6 No. 4 (2024): UNES LAW REVIEW (Juni 2024) Vol. 6 No. 3 (2024): UNES LAW REVIEW (Maret 2024) Vol. 7 No. 2 (2024) Vol. 7 No. 1 (2024) Vol. 6 No. 4 (2024) Vol. 6 No. 3 (2024) Vol. 6 No. 2 (2023): UNES LAW REVIEW (Desember 2023) Vol. 6 No. 1 (2023): UNES LAW REVIEW (September 2023) Vol. 5 No. 4 (2023): UNES LAW REVIEW (Juni 2023) Vol. 5 No. 3 (2023): UNES LAW REVIEW (Maret 2023) Vol. 6 No. 2 (2023) Vol. 6 No. 1 (2023) Vol. 5 No. 4 (2023) Vol. 5 No. 3 (2023) Vol 5 No 2 (2022): UNES LAW REVIEW (Desember 2022) Vol. 5 No. 2 (2022): UNES LAW REVIEW (Desember 2022) Vol. 5 No. 1 (2022): UNES LAW REVIEW (September 2022) Vol 5 No 1 (2022): UNES LAW REVIEW (September 2022) Vol. 4 No. 4 (2022): UNES LAW REVIEW (Juni 2022) Vol 4 No 4 (2022): UNES LAW REVIEW (Juni 2022) Vol 4 No 3 (2022): UNES LAW REVIEW (Maret 2022) Vol. 5 No. 2 (2022) Vol. 5 No. 1 (2022) Vol. 4 No. 4 (2022) Vol. 4 No. 3 (2022) Vol 4 No 2 (2021): UNES LAW REVIEW (Desember 2021) Vol 4 No 1 (2021): UNES LAW REVIEW (September 2021) Vol 3 No 4 (2021): UNES LAW REVIEW (Juni 2021) Vol 3 No 3 (2021): UNES LAW REVIEW (Maret 2021) Vol. 4 No. 2 (2021) Vol. 4 No. 1 (2021) Vol. 3 No. 4 (2021) Vol. 3 No. 3 (2021) Vol 3 No 2 (2020): UNES LAW REVIEW (Desember 2020) Vol 3 No 1 (2020): UNES LAW REVIEW (September 2020) Vol 2 No 4 (2020): UNES LAW REVIEW (Juni 2020) Vol 2 No 3 (2020): UNES LAW REVIEW (Maret 2020) Vol. 3 No. 2 (2020) Vol. 3 No. 1 (2020) Vol. 2 No. 4 (2020) Vol. 2 No. 3 (2020) Vol 2 No 2 (2019): UNES LAW REVIEW (Desember 2019) Vol 2 No 1 (2019): UNES LAW REVIEW (September 2019) Vol. 2 No. 2 (2019) Vol. 2 No. 1 (2019) Vol. 1 No. 4 (2019) Vol. 1 No. 3 (2019) Vol. 1 No. 2 (2018) Vol. 1 No. 1 (2018) More Issue