cover
Article Per Year (5 Year)
All
Home Page
OAI Link
Editorial Team
Contact
Reviewer
Google Scholar
Contact Name
Iyah Faniyah
Contact Email
editor.unesreview@gmail.com
Phone
+6285263256164
Journal Mail Official
editor.unesreview@gmail.com
Editorial Address
JL. Bandar Purus No.11, Padang Pasir, Kec. Padang Barat, Kota Padang
Location
Kota padang,
Sumatera barat
INDONESIA
Unes Law Review
Published by Universitas Ekasakti
ISSN : 26543605     EISSN : 26227045     DOI : https://doi.org/10.31933/unesrev.v6i1.1019
Core Subject : Health, Science, Education, Social,
Education Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Physics Public Health Social Sciences
UNES Law Review adalah Jurnal Penelitian Hukum yang dikelola oleh Magister Hukum Pascasarjana, Universitas Ekasakti Padang. Penelitian yang dimuat merupakan pendapat pribadi peneliti dan bukan merupakan pendapat editor. Jurnal terbit secara berkala 4 (empat) kali dalam setahun yaitu September, Desember, Maret, dan Juni. UNES Law Review mulai Volume 4 Nomor 3 Tahun 2022 sampai Volume 9 Nomor 2 Tahun 2027 Reakreditasi Naik Peringkat dari Peringkat 5 ke Peringkat 4 sesuai nomor Akreditasi : 204/E/KPT/2022, 3 Oktober 2022 UNES Law Review is a Legal Research Journal managed by Postgraduate Law Masters, Ekasakti University, Padang. The published research is the personal opinion of the researcher and is not the opinion of the editor. The journal is published periodically 4 (four) times a year, namely September, December, March and June. UNES Law Review Volume 4 Number 3 of 2022 to Volume 9 Number 2 of 2027 Reaccreditation Raised Rank from Rank 5 to Rank 4 according to Accreditation number: 204/E/KPT/2022, 3 October 2022
Arjuna Subject : Umum - Umum
Articles 552 Documents
 43   44   45   46   47 
Search results for , issue "Vol. 5 No. 4 (2023)" : 552 Documents clear
IMPLIKASI TANGGUNG JAWAB NOTARIS TERHADAP AKTA PERNYATAAN KEPUTUSAN RAPAT UMUM PEMEGANG SAHAM YANG DIBUAT DENGAN MENGGUNAKAN DOKUMEN PALSU Tanjung, Adrian; Sudiro, Amad
UNES Law Review Vol. 5 No. 4 (2023)
Publisher : Universitas Ekasakti

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31933/unesrev.v5i4.654

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to critically analyze the quality of Supreme Court decisions in achieving justice and legal certainty in Indonesia. The Supreme Court is an important part of the justice system in upholding justice and providing legal security to the public. Nonetheless, the success of achieving the goals largely depends on the quality of the decisions made. Relevant Supreme Court decisions and a review of supporting literature were used in this qualitative research. This method allows for a thorough analysis of the components that affect the quality of decisions, such as the protection of human rights, equality before the law, equality of treatment, consistency in the interpretation and application of the law, and the guarantee of fair and clear legal protection.
KETERANGAN SAKSI YANG MENGAKIBATKAN PUTUSAN BEBAS (VRIJSPRAAK) KEPADA TERDAKWA TINDAK PIDANA PEMBUNUHAN DITINJAU DARI ASAS IN DUBIO PRO REO (STUDI PUTUSAN NOMOR : 155/Pid/2020/PT TJK) Sidauruk, Cancolio Frederick; Hutabarat, Rugun Romaida
UNES Law Review Vol. 5 No. 4 (2023)
Publisher : Universitas Ekasakti

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31933/unesrev.v5i4.655

Abstract

The position and role of the witness in a criminal case is evidence to uncover and dismantle a crime. The judiciary is used to prove a crime, evidence and evidence play a role in the process of proving the Criminal Procedure Code. Witness does not give confidence to the Panel of Judges, so that the Panel of Judges is obliged to give a decision in favor of the accused (in dubio pro reo). The judge's decision is a decision whose contents impose a sentence that already has permanent legal force, so the decision can be executed. One type of judge's decision is an acquittal.
KEDUDUKAN PERJANJIAN “PENEGASAN DAN PERSETUJUAN PEMESANAN UNIT” (PPPU) MEIKARTA DALAM PENYELENGGARAAN JUAL BELI RUMAH SUSUN (STUDI PUTUSAN PENGADILAN NEGERI CIKARANG NOMOR 162/PDT.G/2020/PN CKR) Iksir, Aathira Salsabila; Putri Pratama, Ananda; Istighfarrin, Sarrah
UNES Law Review Vol. 5 No. 4 (2023)
Publisher : Universitas Ekasakti

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31933/unesrev.v5i4.657

Abstract

Meikarta merupakan megaproyek strategis yang digadang-gadang menjadi hunian masa depan impian melalui berbagai upaya marketingnya. Namun sayangnya, proyek tersebut mengalami beragam kendala yang menyebabkan banyak bangunannya mangkrak. Padahal, telah terjadi transaksi jual beli apartemen antara pengembang dengan konsumennya, bahkan hingga lunas harganya seperti yang terjadi dalam perkara dengan nomor register 162/Pdt.G/2020/PN Ckr yang penulis angkat dalam tulisan ini, dimana penggugat selaku konsumen Meikarta telah melunasi kewajibannya dalam Perjanjian “Penegasan dan Persetujuan Pemesanan Unit”. Menarik untuk membahas mengenai kedudukan perjanjian tersebut apakah dapat dipersamakan dengan Perjanjian Pengikatan Jual Beli (PPJB) dalam penyelenggaraan jual beli rumah susun. Secara normatif, PPJB sendiri diharuskan untuk dibuat di hadapan notaris. Akan tetapi dalam perkara ini, didapat fakta bahwa dalam melakukan perjanjian “Penegasan dan Persetujuan Pemesanan Unit”, pengembang dan konsumen tidak membuat dan menandatanganinya di hadapan notaris seperti yang didalilkan oleh pihak penggugat. Hal ini kemudian membawa kepada pertanyaan bagaimana keabsahan dari perjanjian tersebut. Dengan menggunakan metode penulisan yuridis normatif dan pendekatan perundang-undangan serta pendekatan konsep, penulis berupaya rumusan masalah yang meliputi kasus posisi dalam Putusan Pengadilan Negeri Cikarang Nomor 162/Pdt.G/2020/PN Ckr serta kedudukan Perjanjian Penegasan dan Persetujuan Pemesanan Unit Meikarta dalam penyelenggaraan Jual Beli Rumah Susun.
PENYELESAIAN SENGKETA TUMPANG TINDIH SERTIFIKAT HAK ATAS TANAH SECARA NON LITIGASI OLEH KANTOR PERTANAHAN KABUPATEN KUPANG Poy, Rizky Alexander; Usman, Siti Ramlah; Pello, Helsina Fransiska; Jacob, Yossie M. Y.
UNES Law Review Vol. 5 No. 4 (2023)
Publisher : Universitas Ekasakti

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31933/unesrev.v5i4.659

Abstract

The land is essentially the most basic need for everyone so that the presence of the State is to ensure that everyone can be legally protected by their land ownership rights. Many legal problems occur in obtaining recognition from the State of the legal status of one's land ownership. The purpose of this research is to analyze the settlement of disputes overlapping land rights certificates in Non litigation by the Land Office of Kupang Regency. This research method is qualitative, this research was conducted at the Land Office of Kupang Regency, East Nusa Tenggara Province. The population of this research is the Head of the Kupang Regency Land Office 1 person, the Head of Section at the Kupang Regency Land Office 3 people and the Community 2 people. The sample of this research uses a saturated sample technique, which will be the sample in this study are all members of the population. The result of this research is the effort to resolve the dispute over the overlapping certificate of land rights of the Land Office of Kupang Regency in mediation efforts between the two parties in accordance with the Operational Standards and Procedures (SOP) that have been established based on the Regulation of the Minister of Agrarian Affairs Number 21 of 2020 concerning Handling and Settlement of Land Cases, namely by Mediation by bringing both parties with the Head of the Land Office as mediator. While the legal consequences when the occurrence of multiple certificates will cause the certificate does not guarantee legal certainty. Because basically the ownership status of one plot of land there is only one ownership status. It can be concluded that the certificate is strong evidence as long as the other party does not prove otherwise.
PENANGGULANGAN TINDAK KEJAHATAN PADA PENGGUNAAN MATA UANG VIRTUAL/ASET KRIPTO Teguh Jaya, Ricky Vandre; Rinwigati, Patricia
UNES Law Review Vol. 5 No. 4 (2023)
Publisher : Universitas Ekasakti

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31933/unesrev.v5i4.660

Abstract

Cryptocurrency can be defined as a virtual currency that uses a peer-to-peer system so that it is decentralized, which can have positive and negative impacts, One of the negative impacts that are present is that crimes can occur by taking advantage of these present characteristics, so that an appropriate countermeasure is needed. The research method used is normative research with legal comparisons and deductive analysis, that differences in regulations from countries make it difficult for law enforcement in the event of cross-country crimes using cryptocurrency, given the different regulations between countries and limitations on jurisdiction, so a the basic framework of regulation and exchange of information implemented by the international community together and also implemented in positive legal rules by each country, in order to be able to tackle cryptocurrency-related crimes.
KEWENANGAN PENGADILAN AGAMA DALAM HAL PEMBAGIAN WARIS BEDA AGAMA MELALUI WASIAT WAJIBAH (STUDI PENETAPAN PENGADILAN AGAMA JAKARTA SELATAN NOMOR 890/PDT.P/2021/PA.JS) Nabila, Putri; Azheri, Busyra; Mannas, Yussy Adelina
UNES Law Review Vol. 5 No. 4 (2023)
Publisher : Universitas Ekasakti

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31933/unesrev.v5i4.661

Abstract

Inheritance law is the law that regulates the transfer of ownership rights over the inheritance of the heir, then determines who is entitled to become the heir and how much is each part. Regarding the inheritance rights of non-Muslims, the Compilation of Islamic Law refers more to the opinions of scholars who assert that there are religious differences between heirs with heirs that become a barrier to inheritance. In terms of determining the distribution of heirs of different religions, the Religious Courts play a role in upholding justice, truth, order, and legal certainty regarding Islamic civil cases. In 2021 the South Jakarta Religious Court issued stipulation number 890/Pdt..P/2021/PA.JS in which in this decision the South Jakarta Religious Court granted the request for determination of heirs and distribution of legal inheritance from parents who entered into an interfaith marriage with the initials ISW (hereinafter referred to as a first child) who is non-Muslim, and gets a mandatory will of 1/3 of S's inheritance and does not exceed this provision. The formulation of the problems in this research are: 1) What are the judges' considerations in granting the request for determination of heirs and distribution of inheritance in the South Jakarta Religious Court's Decision Number: 890/Pdt.P/2021/PA.JS? 2) How is the division of inheritance from interfaith marriages? This study uses a normative juridical method which is an approach through the practice of law enforcement against laws that are written and equipped with existing legal documents in Indonesia. The results of this study are 1) The basis for the judge's consideration in the Determination of the South Jakarta Religious Court Number: 890/Pdt.P/2021/PA.JS is based on applicable law and the facts revealed in the trial. 2) Distribution of inheritance from interfaith marriages to realize justice and benefit, namely non-Muslim heirs are entitled to inheritance in the form of a mandatory testament.
TINJAUAN YURIDIS TERHADAP TINDAK PIDANA KEKERASAN DALAM RUMAH TANGGA (STUDI PUTUSAN No. 85/Pid.Sus/PN GST) Tiranti Sitepu, Maresha; Marito Sinabutar, Eni
UNES Law Review Vol. 5 No. 4 (2023)
Publisher : Universitas Ekasakti

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31933/unesrev.v5i4.662

Abstract

Acts of domestic violence are the infliction of verbal, physical or mental suffering beyond certain limits on other people who are in the same house, such as against spouses, or parents, and these acts of violence are carried out in the home which can cause physical and psychological harm, humiliation, or deprivation of freedom from one of the parties. From this background, a problem can be stated, namely: what factors cause the occurrence of criminal acts of domestic violence and how the considerations of the Gunungsitoli District Court judges in deciding cases of criminal acts of domestic violence with decision Number 85/Pid.Sus/2020/PN GST. With a juridical normative legal research study method, primary, secondary and tertiary data sources in order to obtain research sources. The results in the decision that has been determined are very unfair to the victim witness where the panel of judges wrongly determined the decision that tried case Number: 85/Pid.Sus/2020/PN GST. The Panel of Judges determined the law of the crime of "Persecution" as in article 351 paragraph 1 of the Criminal Code determined at the Gunungsitoli District Court level I B, which should be included in article 44 paragraph 1.
PENYELESAIAN SENGKETA KEPENGURUSAN KOPERASI PETANI IYO BASAMO Wulan, Sari; Rusli, Benni; Adriaman, Mahlil
UNES Law Review Vol. 5 No. 4 (2023)
Publisher : Universitas Ekasakti

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31933/unesrev.v5i4.664

Abstract

Cooperatives were founded on the principle of kinship, which is the pillar of the nation's economy which is expected to become the strength of the people's economy. Substitution of cooperative management can cause problems where the old management is compared with the new one, such as poor performance or negligence in carrying out their duties. The aim is to find out and understand the dualism settlement in the management of the Iyo Basamo Farmers Cooperative and the considerations of the Panel of Judges in the decision on the Iyo Basamo Farmers Cooperative dispute. This type of research is normative legal research with an approach that is literary, statutory and legal concept analysis. The conclusion and analysis of this study is that there is dualism in management due to the support of many parties who have backgrounds that are classified as important, especially in the government, as well as the cancellation of any decisions previously issued relating to the Iyo Basamo Farmers Cooperative
PERLINDUNGAN HUKUM TERHADAP WANPRESTASI KREDIT PINJAMAN ANGSURAN MODAL KERJA OLEH KOPERASI DALAM PUTUSAN NOMOR 30/PDT.G.S/2018/PN.PWT Ricky, Ricky; Gunadi, Ariawan
UNES Law Review Vol. 5 No. 4 (2023)
Publisher : Universitas Ekasakti

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31933/unesrev.v5i4.666

Abstract

This study examines the form of legal protection against credit default on working capital installment loans by cooperatives. The type of data used in this research is secondary data, namely data that is not obtained directly from the field or the community, but through literature studies by reviewing and studying books, literature, journals, and internet data. The research approach used is an approach to systematic law, namely research conducted on certain laws and regulations or registered law. The data collection technique used was a literature study, while the data analysis technique was carried out qualitatively. The results obtained from this legal research are a form of legal protection against default on working capital installment loans by cooperatives. So that the Defendant's responsibility is in default for the occurrence of default on working capital installment loan loans by savings and loan cooperatives based on Decision Number 30/PDT.G.S/2018/PN.PWT. Thus the Defendants did not fulfill their abilities, So it can be concluded that the problem is how is the legal protection for the parties in cases of loan default based on court decisions Number 30/PDT.G.S/2018/PN.PWT and namely to make payments for their obligations, so that thus the Plaintiffs had sufficient reasons according to law that the Defendants both individually and jointly had defaulted / broken promises / defaults because they did not pay their obligations to the Plaintiffs.
URGENSI PERLINDUNGAN HUKUM BAGI PEGAWAI NOTARIS SEBAGAI SAKSI ATAS KESALAHAN NOTARIS DALAM PEMBUATAN AKTA OTENTIK Solihatunnisa, Liha; Djajaputra, Gunawan
UNES Law Review Vol. 5 No. 4 (2023)
Publisher : Universitas Ekasakti

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31933/unesrev.v5i4.667

Abstract

Notary staff has a very important role in assisting the performance of a notary in providing deed-making services. Apart from being able to help the performance of a notary in carrying out his position, he must also be able to be an instrumental witness in making and formalizing notarial deeds as long as they meet the requirements stipulated in Article 40. Law on the Office of Notaries, namely witnesses who are at least 18 years old who are categorized as legal subjects who are capable of carrying out legal actions, understand the language used in the deed, can put signatures and initials, because the notary employee acts as an instrumental witness in the formalization of the deed, already entered into the realm of law which has legal consequences, so that if a notarial deed in the future occurs a problem or case, the notary employee automatically becomes involved in the problem or case. Witnesses in notary deed cases must also receive legal protection and their safety must be guaranteed in the event of a case or lawsuit in court against a deed where the status of being a witness. Even though the actions of a notary employee as an instrumental witness in the formalization of a notarial deed are included in the field of notarialism, the Law on the Position of a Notary does not provide legal protection for witnesses in the formalization of a notary deed, especially for notary employees. In the absence of provisions in the Notary Office Law regarding protection for notary employees who become instrumentair witnesses in the formalization of deeds, legal protection for notary employees who act as witnesses can only be found in provisions outside the notary office regulations.

Page 45 of 56 | Total Record : 552

 43   44   45   46   47 

Filter by Year

2023 2023


Reset
Filter By Issues
All Issue Vol. 8 No. 3 (2026) Vol. 8 No. 2 (2025) Vol. 8 No. 1 (2025) Vol. 7 No. 4 (2025) Vol. 7 No. 3 (2025) Vol. 7 No. 2 (2024): UNES LAW REVIEW (Desember 2024) Vol. 7 No. 1 (2024): UNES LAW REVIEW (September 2024) Vol. 6 No. 4 (2024): UNES LAW REVIEW (Juni 2024) Vol. 6 No. 3 (2024): UNES LAW REVIEW (Maret 2024) Vol. 7 No. 2 (2024) Vol. 7 No. 1 (2024) Vol. 6 No. 4 (2024) Vol. 6 No. 3 (2024) Vol. 6 No. 2 (2023): UNES LAW REVIEW (Desember 2023) Vol. 6 No. 1 (2023): UNES LAW REVIEW (September 2023) Vol. 5 No. 4 (2023): UNES LAW REVIEW (Juni 2023) Vol. 5 No. 3 (2023): UNES LAW REVIEW (Maret 2023) Vol. 6 No. 2 (2023) Vol. 6 No. 1 (2023) Vol. 5 No. 4 (2023) Vol. 5 No. 3 (2023) Vol. 5 No. 2 (2022): UNES LAW REVIEW (Desember 2022) Vol 5 No 2 (2022): UNES LAW REVIEW (Desember 2022) Vol 5 No 1 (2022): UNES LAW REVIEW (September 2022) Vol. 5 No. 1 (2022): UNES LAW REVIEW (September 2022) Vol 4 No 4 (2022): UNES LAW REVIEW (Juni 2022) Vol. 4 No. 4 (2022): UNES LAW REVIEW (Juni 2022) Vol 4 No 3 (2022): UNES LAW REVIEW (Maret 2022) Vol. 5 No. 2 (2022) Vol. 5 No. 1 (2022) Vol. 4 No. 4 (2022) Vol. 4 No. 3 (2022) Vol 4 No 2 (2021): UNES LAW REVIEW (Desember 2021) Vol 4 No 1 (2021): UNES LAW REVIEW (September 2021) Vol 3 No 4 (2021): UNES LAW REVIEW (Juni 2021) Vol 3 No 3 (2021): UNES LAW REVIEW (Maret 2021) Vol. 4 No. 2 (2021) Vol. 4 No. 1 (2021) Vol. 3 No. 4 (2021) Vol. 3 No. 3 (2021) Vol 3 No 2 (2020): UNES LAW REVIEW (Desember 2020) Vol 3 No 1 (2020): UNES LAW REVIEW (September 2020) Vol 2 No 4 (2020): UNES LAW REVIEW (Juni 2020) Vol 2 No 3 (2020): UNES LAW REVIEW (Maret 2020) Vol. 3 No. 2 (2020) Vol. 3 No. 1 (2020) Vol. 2 No. 4 (2020) Vol. 2 No. 3 (2020) Vol 2 No 2 (2019): UNES LAW REVIEW (Desember 2019) Vol 2 No 1 (2019): UNES LAW REVIEW (September 2019) Vol. 2 No. 2 (2019) Vol. 2 No. 1 (2019) Vol. 1 No. 4 (2019) Vol. 1 No. 3 (2019) Vol. 1 No. 2 (2018) Vol. 1 No. 1 (2018) More Issue