cover
Contact Name
Iyah Faniyah
Contact Email
editor.unesreview@gmail.com
Phone
+6285263256164
Journal Mail Official
editor.unesreview@gmail.com
Editorial Address
JL. Bandar Purus No.11, Padang Pasir, Kec. Padang Barat, Kota Padang
Location
Kota padang,
Sumatera barat
INDONESIA
Unes Law Review
Published by Universitas Ekasakti
ISSN : 26543605     EISSN : 26227045     DOI : https://doi.org/10.31933/unesrev.v6i1.1019
UNES Law Review adalah Jurnal Penelitian Hukum yang dikelola oleh Magister Hukum Pascasarjana, Universitas Ekasakti Padang. Penelitian yang dimuat merupakan pendapat pribadi peneliti dan bukan merupakan pendapat editor. Jurnal terbit secara berkala 4 (empat) kali dalam setahun yaitu September, Desember, Maret, dan Juni. UNES Law Review mulai Volume 4 Nomor 3 Tahun 2022 sampai Volume 9 Nomor 2 Tahun 2027 Reakreditasi Naik Peringkat dari Peringkat 5 ke Peringkat 4 sesuai nomor Akreditasi : 204/E/KPT/2022, 3 Oktober 2022 UNES Law Review is a Legal Research Journal managed by Postgraduate Law Masters, Ekasakti University, Padang. The published research is the personal opinion of the researcher and is not the opinion of the editor. The journal is published periodically 4 (four) times a year, namely September, December, March and June. UNES Law Review Volume 4 Number 3 of 2022 to Volume 9 Number 2 of 2027 Reaccreditation Raised Rank from Rank 5 to Rank 4 according to Accreditation number: 204/E/KPT/2022, 3 October 2022
Arjuna Subject : Umum - Umum
Articles 758 Documents
Search results for , issue "Vol. 6 No. 2 (2023)" : 758 Documents clear
Implikasi Yuridis Perjanjian Perkawinan yang Didaftarkan Pada Saat Proses Perceraian Delia Astrid Zahara; Antarin Prasanthi Sigit
UNES Law Review Vol. 6 No. 2 (2023): UNES LAW REVIEW (Desember 2023)
Publisher : LPPM Universitas Ekasakti Padang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31933/unesrev.v6i2.1311

Abstract

A marriage agreement made by a husband and wife before or during the marriage is binding on both parties who have promised since the marriage took place unless otherwise stated in the marriage agreement. In order for a marriage agreement to be binding on third parties involved in the marriage agreement, the marriage agreement must be recorded by a marriage registrar. The marriage agreement should be immediately registered with the marriage registrar to fulfill the principle of publicity. However, in reality, many married couples do not immediately register their marriage agreement with the marriage registrar, and there are even marriage agreements which are only registered with the marriage registrar when the divorce process is underway by only one of the parties. The aim of this research is to analyze whether there is good faith on the part of the party registering the marriage agreement with the marriage registrar employee when the divorce process is in progress as well as the legal consequences of the marriage agreement registered with the marriage registrar employee during the divorce process on joint property. The form of research used in this research is normative juridical, namely research that uses secondary data in the form of primary legal materials and secondary legal materials to analyze the problems raised in this research. The results of this research indicate that recording a marriage agreement with a marriage registrar during the divorce process by one party without the knowledge of the other party is evidence of a lack of good faith on the part of that party. Apart from that, the results were also obtained that the marriage agreement that had just been registered with the marriage registrar during the divorce process had no effect on the marital assets obtained by involving a third party and were obtained during the marriage, before the marriage agreement was recorded by the marriage registrar.
Perlindungan Hukum Bagi Anak Sekolah Dasar dari Tindakan Kekerasan dan Bulyying Erwin Taroreh; Rabiatul Adawiah
UNES Law Review Vol. 6 No. 2 (2023): UNES LAW REVIEW (Desember 2023)
Publisher : LPPM Universitas Ekasakti Padang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31933/unesrev.v6i2.1312

Abstract

Children are God's creation that we need to work together to protect because of their limitations. One of the forms of protection provided is legal protection for children who experience some form of violence and bullying. The forms of violence that children often receive will have a negative impact on the child's future. The essence of this article aims to find out how necessary it is to provide legal protection for children as victims of violence and bullying and legal protection for children as victims of violence and bullying according to statutory regulations. Legal protection for children is provided so that children's rights remain protected as stated in the laws and regulations governing child protection, namely that they do not suffer any form of violence as stated in Articles 76A to 76B of Law Number 35 of 2014 as well as legal protection. given for justice for children. In this way, the state provides legal protection to all children which has been regulated to be implemented in Law Number 31 of 2014 concerning Amendments to Law Number 13 of 2006 concerning Protection of Witnesses and Victims and Law Number 35 of 2014 concerning Child Protection.
Tanggung Jawab Pemegang Protokol Notaris Terhadap Gugatan Pemalsuan Akta Otentik Yenny Rahmadiyanti Rahayu; Dominikus Rato; Y.A Triana Ohoiwutun
UNES Law Review Vol. 6 No. 2 (2023): UNES LAW REVIEW (Desember 2023)
Publisher : LPPM Universitas Ekasakti Padang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31933/unesrev.v6i2.1314

Abstract

In essence, a notary as a public official has the authority to make deeds authentic in accordance with norms, values ​​and provisions of laws and regulations applicable so that the law can work in society. Every deed made by the notary must be kept in the notary's protocol, and the protocol must be transferred in the case of the notary died or his term of office has expired or retired. The existence of a lawsuit addressed to the notary protocol holder regarding the forgery of authentic deeds that have been transferred to him will become a problem in the future. The notary who receives the protocol will still be summoned for information if there are problems related to the protocol in his control, because this is one of the responsibilities of the notary protocol recipient. Article 65 of the Notary's Position Law explains that a notary is responsible for every deed he makes even though the Notarial Protocol has been submitted and transferred to the party holding the Notarial Protocol. The notary holding the Protocol only has the obligation to care for and maintain the deed that has been submitted to him, and is not responsible for the contents of the deed. The storage of notary protocols as state archives is also not regulated in detail in the Notary Public Law. So there needs to be special arrangements regarding policies, guidance and management of notary protocols. In order to create legal certainty for notaries in storing and maintaining notary protocols.
Tinjauan Hukum Terhadap Peran Media Sosial dalam Eksploitasi Anak Alynne Jean Ranice Siregar; Hery Firmansyah
UNES Law Review Vol. 6 No. 2 (2023): UNES LAW REVIEW (Desember 2023)
Publisher : LPPM Universitas Ekasakti Padang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31933/unesrev.v6i2.1315

Abstract

Pada kemajuan era digital, sosial media memiliki peran yang cukup besar dalam kehidupan dan membantu mobilitas masyarakat. Dalam hal ini sangat disayangkan pada kenyataannya sering kali penggunaan media sosial disalahgunakan oleh oknum yang tidak bertanggungjawab untuk melanggar hukum, salah satunya media sosial juga memiliki pengaruh terhadap terjadinya eksploitasi terhadap anak. Metode penelitian yang digunakan dalam penulisan ini adalah metode penelitian hukum normative dengan melakukan studi kepustakaan menggunakan dokumen, asas, prinsip, doktrin para ahli, maupun teori hukum. Adapun, spesifikasi sifat penelitian yang dilakukan adalah secara deskriptif dengan menjelaskan relevansi antara berbagai teori dan regulasi perundang-undangan dalam peristiwa hukum yang akan diteliti secara lebih rinci. Data yang didapatkan melalui teknik pengumpulan data secara studi kepustakaan yang dilakukan merupakan jenis data sekunder dengan pendekatan yuridis yang berlandaskan pada menganalisis regulasi perundang-undangan. Oleh karena itu, melalui penulisan ini diharapkan dapat memberikan penggambaran mengenai bagaimana hukum di Indonesia dalam menyikapi peran media sosial terhadap terjadinya kasus eksploitasi terhadap anak.
Kompetensi Notaris Pengganti dalam Menggantikan Notaris yang Cuti Sebagai Pejabat Negara Maxwell Kurniadi
UNES Law Review Vol. 6 No. 2 (2023): UNES LAW REVIEW (Desember 2023)
Publisher : LPPM Universitas Ekasakti Padang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31933/unesrev.v6i2.1316

Abstract

Notaris adalah pejabat umum yang memiliki wewenang untuk membuat akta otentik dan kewenangan lainnya sebagaimana dimaksud dalam pasal 1 angka (1) Undang-Undang Republik Indonesia Nomor 2 Tahun 2014 Tentang Perubahan atas Undang-Undang Nomor 30 Tahun 2004 Tentang Jabatan Notaris. Sedangkan Notaris Pengganti adalah seseorang yang untuk sementara waktu diangkat sebagai Notaris untuk menggantikan tugas Notaris yang sedang cuti, sakit atau untuk sementara berhalangan menjalankan jabatannya sebagai seorang Notaris. Syarat menjadi Notaris Pengganti yakni seorang warga negara Indonesia yang berijazah sarjana hukum dan telah bekerja sebagai karyawan kantor Notaris paling sedikit 2 (dua) tahun berturut-turut. Notaris Pengganti sendiri memiliki kewajiban dan wewenang yang sama dengan Notaris biasa. Hal menimbulkan suatu kondisi yang timpang dimana syarat menjadi Notaris Pengganti tidak sebanding dengan syarat menjadi Notaris biasa. Penelitian ini merupakan penelitian hukum yang bersifat preskriptif yang menggunakan pendekatan perundang-undangan dan pendekatan konsep. Berdasarkan penelitian ini, diperlukan adanya revisi Undang-Undang Republik Indonesia Nomor 2 Tahun 2014 Tentang Perubahan atas Undang-Undang Nomor 30 Tahun 2004 Tentang Jabatan Notaris dan revisi Peraturan Menteri Hukum dan Hak Asasi Manusia Nomor 19 Tahun 2019 tentang Syarat dan Tata Cara Pengangkatan, Cuti, Perpindahan, Pemberhentian dan Perpanjangan Masa Jabatan Notaris mengenai syarat Notaris Pengganti.
Hukum Perlindungan Konsumen atas Barang yang Tidak Sesuai dengan Gambar pada Transaksi di Marketplace Rifky Pratama Arief
UNES Law Review Vol. 6 No. 2 (2023): UNES LAW REVIEW (Desember 2023)
Publisher : LPPM Universitas Ekasakti Padang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31933/unesrev.v6i2.1317

Abstract

Marketplace is a place for online sellers; Despite having a good security system, there are still loopholes for fraud, one of which is by selling items that do not match the photo. This shows how difficult it is to be a buyer in buying and selling online. This research will discuss consumer legal protection against goods that do not match the image in transactions in the marketplace and the responsibility of business actors. This study used a normative juridical approach. Furthermore, the results of this study show that consumers have the right to get products according to the image, and sellers in the marketplace will be responsible for such errors according to the Consumer Protection Act. The marketplace can provide suggestions to sellers so that images of traded products can be depicted clearly.
Penggunaan Vie Structure untuk Praktik Nominee dalam Praktik Penanaman Modal di Indonesia Anak Agung Ayu Reditha Saras
UNES Law Review Vol. 6 No. 2 (2023): UNES LAW REVIEW (Desember 2023)
Publisher : LPPM Universitas Ekasakti Padang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31933/unesrev.v6i2.1318

Abstract

Indonesia is a popular place for foreign investors to carry out investment activities. The government as the host state can also then provide and determine restrictions to certain actions regarding this investment, among others by issuing Law Number 25 of 2007 concerning Investment and Government Regulations in Lieu of Law Number 2 of 2022 concerning Job Creation. The existence of these restrictions and prohibitions then causes certain parties to smuggle the law in order to make investment easier, including the practice of nominees. What will be discussed in this article is the validity of the nominee practice by looking at the VIE structure practice in the People's Republic of China and looking at it from a civil and corporate perspective. This research method uses normative legal research. The research results show that VIE Structure is a nominee practice which is prohibited in Indonesia. In addition, all agreements for nominee practice will be null and void by law.
Penerapan Pidana Terhadap Terdakwa Tindak Pidana Menambang Terumbu Karang di Kawasan Konservasi Aidil Putra Feli; Fitriati Fitriati; Philips A. Kana
UNES Law Review Vol. 6 No. 2 (2023): UNES LAW REVIEW (Desember 2023)
Publisher : LPPM Universitas Ekasakti Padang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31933/unesrev.v6i2.1319

Abstract

Law Number 1 of 2014 concerning Amendments to Law Number 27 of 2007 concerning Management of Coastal Areas and Small Islands, explicitly explains criminal sanctions for perpetrators of mining coral reefs. This research is Normative Juridical legal research. Criminal Application Against Defendant Mining Coral Reefs in Conservation Areas In Decision Number 73/Pid.B/2017/PN Sit the defendant was charged under Article 73 paragraph (1) letter a of Republic of Indonesia Law No. 27 of 2007 concerning Management of Coastal Areas and Small Islands. Decision Number 592/Pid.Sus/2019/PN Pdg defendant Risal Bin Olleng was proven to have jointly committed the criminal act of destroying coral reef ecosystems in a conservation area as well as defendant I. Usmanto PGL. Brother and defendant II. Muhammad Nur PGL. The act mentioned above has been legally and convincingly proven guilty of committing the criminal act of "participating in committing acts which result in pollution and/or damage to fish resources and/or the environment in the fisheries management area of the Republic of Indonesia." The judge's consideration in imposing a crime on the defendant in Decision Number 73/Pid.B/2017/PN Sit and Number 592/Pid.Sus/2019/PN Pdg is that it has the same elements of consideration, namely each person, and the element of deliberately mining coral reefs, taking coral reefs in Conservation Areas, using explosives and toxic materials, and/or other methods that result in damage to the coral reef ecosystem.
Kebijakan Kriminal dalam Penanganan Tindak Pidana Terorisme di Indonesia Mubdiul Rozaq; Fahmiron Fahmiron
UNES Law Review Vol. 6 No. 2 (2023): UNES LAW REVIEW (Desember 2023)
Publisher : LPPM Universitas Ekasakti Padang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31933/unesrev.v6i2.1320

Abstract

Law Number 5 of 2018 has regulated the Eradication of Indonesian Terrorism Crimes. However, the number of acts of terrorism in Indonesia has not decreased even though the laws and regulations in Indonesia have provided strict sanctions against the perpetrators of terrorism. Crime prevention policies or efforts are urgently needed to reduce the number of acts of terrorism in Indonesia. The problems examined in this thesis are First, how is the criminal policy in handling criminal acts of terrorism in Indonesia? Second, how can the handling of criminal acts of terrorism be better in the future in Indonesia? This research is a legal research with descriptive analytical specifications. The approach used is a normative juridical approach. The data used are secondary data and primary data collected through library research. The data obtained were analyzed qualitatively and presented in an analytical descriptive form. The results of this study are first, criminal policy in handling criminal acts of terrorism in Indonesia is the formation or renewal of legal substance with the issuance of RI Law Number 5 of 2018 concerning Amendments to RI Law Number 15 of 2003 concerning Eradication of Criminal Acts of Terrorism. Second, better handling of Terrorism Crimes in the Future is to change Article 14 by adding 1 (one) new paragraph, namely paragraph (2) concerning mitigating crimes against perpetrators if the crime referred to in paragraph (1) does not occur. Furthermore, amending Article 17 paragraph (2) regarding criminal liability for corporations that commit acts of terrorism.
Penerapan Strict Liability dalam Hukum Pelindungan Konsumen di Indonesia: Perbandingan Negara Lain Aryani Sinduningrum; Henny Marlyna
UNES Law Review Vol. 6 No. 2 (2023): UNES LAW REVIEW (Desember 2023)
Publisher : LPPM Universitas Ekasakti Padang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31933/unesrev.v6i2.1321

Abstract

Dalam Undang-Undang Nomor 8 Tahun 1999 tentang Perlindungan Konsumen mengatur terkait pertanggungjawaban produk terhadap adanya tuntutan ganti kerugian yang terjadi terhadap konsumen. Dalam pelindungan konsumen di Indonesia perlu adanya penerapan konsep strict liability yang lebih kuat lagi dalam konteks pertanggungjawaban produk. Metode penelitian ini menggunakan metode penelitian doktrinal yang menggunaan pendekatan analitis dengan mengumpulkan, mengidentifikasi, serta menganalisis data secara kualitatif. Dari hasil dari penelitian diperoleh: 1. Indonesia belum menerapkan strict liability secara murni sebab masih harus dilakukan pembuktian terbalik serta unsur kesalahan masih harus dibuktikan terlebih dahulu 2. Strict liability tidak murni juga diterapkan di negara Belanda sebagai negara yang memiliki tradisi hukum civil law sebab produsen atau pelaku usaha harus membuktikan bahwa adanya unsur kesalahan. Berbeda dengan negara yang memiliki tradisi hukum common law seperti di Inggris dan Amerika bahwa dalam penerapan strict liability tidak melihat pada unsur kesalahan, melainkan melihat pada unsur risiko yang menimbulkan kerugian. Perbandingan konsep penerapan strict liability di berbagai negara ini diharapkan dapat diadopsi dalam rangka menentukan konsep strict liability yang ideal di Indonesia serta meningkatkan upaya pelindungan hukum terhadap konsumen.

Page 10 of 76 | Total Record : 758


Filter by Year

2023 2023


Filter By Issues
All Issue Vol. 8 No. 3 (2026) Vol. 8 No. 2 (2025) Vol. 8 No. 1 (2025) Vol. 7 No. 4 (2025) Vol. 7 No. 3 (2025) Vol. 7 No. 2 (2024): UNES LAW REVIEW (Desember 2024) Vol. 7 No. 1 (2024): UNES LAW REVIEW (September 2024) Vol. 6 No. 4 (2024): UNES LAW REVIEW (Juni 2024) Vol. 6 No. 3 (2024): UNES LAW REVIEW (Maret 2024) Vol. 7 No. 2 (2024) Vol. 7 No. 1 (2024) Vol. 6 No. 4 (2024) Vol. 6 No. 3 (2024) Vol. 6 No. 2 (2023): UNES LAW REVIEW (Desember 2023) Vol. 6 No. 1 (2023): UNES LAW REVIEW (September 2023) Vol. 5 No. 4 (2023): UNES LAW REVIEW (Juni 2023) Vol. 5 No. 3 (2023): UNES LAW REVIEW (Maret 2023) Vol. 6 No. 2 (2023) Vol. 6 No. 1 (2023) Vol. 5 No. 4 (2023) Vol. 5 No. 3 (2023) Vol 5 No 2 (2022): UNES LAW REVIEW (Desember 2022) Vol. 5 No. 2 (2022): UNES LAW REVIEW (Desember 2022) Vol 5 No 1 (2022): UNES LAW REVIEW (September 2022) Vol. 5 No. 1 (2022): UNES LAW REVIEW (September 2022) Vol. 4 No. 4 (2022): UNES LAW REVIEW (Juni 2022) Vol 4 No 4 (2022): UNES LAW REVIEW (Juni 2022) Vol 4 No 3 (2022): UNES LAW REVIEW (Maret 2022) Vol. 5 No. 2 (2022) Vol. 5 No. 1 (2022) Vol. 4 No. 4 (2022) Vol. 4 No. 3 (2022) Vol 4 No 2 (2021): UNES LAW REVIEW (Desember 2021) Vol 4 No 1 (2021): UNES LAW REVIEW (September 2021) Vol 3 No 4 (2021): UNES LAW REVIEW (Juni 2021) Vol 3 No 3 (2021): UNES LAW REVIEW (Maret 2021) Vol. 4 No. 2 (2021) Vol. 4 No. 1 (2021) Vol. 3 No. 4 (2021) Vol. 3 No. 3 (2021) Vol 3 No 2 (2020): UNES LAW REVIEW (Desember 2020) Vol 3 No 1 (2020): UNES LAW REVIEW (September 2020) Vol 2 No 4 (2020): UNES LAW REVIEW (Juni 2020) Vol 2 No 3 (2020): UNES LAW REVIEW (Maret 2020) Vol. 3 No. 2 (2020) Vol. 3 No. 1 (2020) Vol. 2 No. 4 (2020) Vol. 2 No. 3 (2020) Vol 2 No 2 (2019): UNES LAW REVIEW (Desember 2019) Vol 2 No 1 (2019): UNES LAW REVIEW (September 2019) Vol. 2 No. 2 (2019) Vol. 2 No. 1 (2019) Vol. 1 No. 4 (2019) Vol. 1 No. 3 (2019) Vol. 1 No. 2 (2018) Vol. 1 No. 1 (2018) More Issue