cover
Contact Name
Iyah Faniyah
Contact Email
editor.unesreview@gmail.com
Phone
+6285263256164
Journal Mail Official
editor.unesreview@gmail.com
Editorial Address
JL. Bandar Purus No.11, Padang Pasir, Kec. Padang Barat, Kota Padang
Location
Kota padang,
Sumatera barat
INDONESIA
Unes Law Review
Published by Universitas Ekasakti
ISSN : 26543605     EISSN : 26227045     DOI : https://doi.org/10.31933/unesrev.v6i1.1019
UNES Law Review adalah Jurnal Penelitian Hukum yang dikelola oleh Magister Hukum Pascasarjana, Universitas Ekasakti Padang. Penelitian yang dimuat merupakan pendapat pribadi peneliti dan bukan merupakan pendapat editor. Jurnal terbit secara berkala 4 (empat) kali dalam setahun yaitu September, Desember, Maret, dan Juni. UNES Law Review mulai Volume 4 Nomor 3 Tahun 2022 sampai Volume 9 Nomor 2 Tahun 2027 Reakreditasi Naik Peringkat dari Peringkat 5 ke Peringkat 4 sesuai nomor Akreditasi : 204/E/KPT/2022, 3 Oktober 2022 UNES Law Review is a Legal Research Journal managed by Postgraduate Law Masters, Ekasakti University, Padang. The published research is the personal opinion of the researcher and is not the opinion of the editor. The journal is published periodically 4 (four) times a year, namely September, December, March and June. UNES Law Review Volume 4 Number 3 of 2022 to Volume 9 Number 2 of 2027 Reaccreditation Raised Rank from Rank 5 to Rank 4 according to Accreditation number: 204/E/KPT/2022, 3 October 2022
Arjuna Subject : Umum - Umum
Articles 3,862 Documents
Implikasi Yuridis Undang-Undang Nomor 11 Tahun 2020 tentang Cipta Kerja terhadap Undang-Undang Nomor 25 Tahun 2007 tentang Penanaman Modal Chandra Darmawan, Aditya
UNES Law Review Vol. 6 No. 3 (2024)
Publisher : Universitas Ekasakti

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31933/unesrev.v6i3.1912

Abstract

One of the primary objectives of the state is to advance the general welfare, as mandated in Article 33 of the 1945 Constitution of the Republic of Indonesia. This article emphasizes that the economy should be organized as a collective endeavor based on the principle of kinship, and vital production sectors should be controlled by the state to ensure the welfare of the people. Furthermore, the article states that the national economy should be conducted with economic democracy principles that include efficiency, fairness, sustainability, and independence while maintaining the balance of national economic progress. On the other hand, national economic development is emphasized to proceed with democracy principles to create economic sovereignty. The government's role in advancing people's economy is further strengthened by investment policies focusing on micro, small, and medium enterprises and cooperatives as a means of societal renewal and welfare improvement. Although Indonesia holds significant potential in investment as stated in the World Bank's rankings, there are still challenges in creating a conducive investment climate. Adjustments to legislation such as the Job Creation Law are made to accelerate economic and legal development, investment, and prepare the country for potential recessions. This study focuses on the regulation of investment in Indonesia and the impact of the Job Creation Law on it.
Diskresi Pemerintah Daerah Dalam Penetapan Tarif Pajak Hiburan Pasca Implementasi Undang-Undang Nomor 1 Tahun 2022 Tentang Hubungan Keuangan Antara Pemerintah Pusat dan Pemerintah Daerah Ayuningtyas Manggiasih, Rahajeng
UNES Law Review Vol. 6 No. 3 (2024)
Publisher : Universitas Ekasakti

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31933/unesrev.v6i3.1913

Abstract

The implementation of Law Number 1 of 2022 concerning Financial Relations between the Central Government and Regional Governments (UU HKPD) has changed the structure and tax rates at the regional level, particularly for Specific Goods and Services Tax (PBJT) on arts and entertainment services. These changes include adjustments to entertainment tax rates, which are now set at a minimum of 40% and a maximum of 75% for specific entertainment services such as discotheques, karaoke, nightclubs, bars, and steam baths/spas. Although the increase in rates is in accordance with the provisions of UU HKPD, the policy has sparked controversy and widespread opposition, especially from entertainment business operators who are just beginning to recover post-COVID-19 pandemic. The determination of the PBJT rates is carried out by local governments through Regional Regulations as an implementation of UU HKPD. Local governments are expected to utilize the discretion provided by the law to set tax rates that not only increase regional revenue but also support the growth of the local entertainment industry.
Tinjauan Yuridis Terhadap Penanaman Modal Asing di Sektor Perikanan Indonesia Setelah Berlakunya Undang-Undang Nomor 11 Tahun 2020 Tentang Cipta Kerja Bernando, Alfredo Joshua
UNES Law Review Vol. 6 No. 3 (2024)
Publisher : Universitas Ekasakti

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31933/unesrev.v6i3.1914

Abstract

Indonesia is a maritime country because the lands in Indonesia are surrounded by oceans, so it has the potential that can be developed through the fisheries sector. The fisheries sector can be well developed by investing both foreign and domestic investors. The government has opened the widest possible opportunities for investors since the enactment of Law Number 11 of 2020 concerning Job Creation, so that the fisheries sector in Indonesia can get more attention for foreign investors, because foreign investment can advance the economy in order to realize national development. Therefore, it is hoped that this change in regulations for the fisheries sector can produce maximum results for Indonesia's economic progress through new procedures implemented and supervision by the government itself.
Pertimbangan Hukum Hakim Mengenai Kompetensi Absolut Peradilan Tata Usaha Negara Dalam Menyelesaikan Permohonan Fiktif Positif Pada Putusan No. 3/P/FP/2020/PTUN.MKS Indrana, Bagas Satya
UNES Law Review Vol. 6 No. 3 (2024)
Publisher : Universitas Ekasakti

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31933/unesrev.v6i3.1915

Abstract

This research analyzes the Makassar State Administrative Court Decision No. 3/P/FP/2020/PTUN.MKS which will discuss the object of the petition regarding the positive fictitious decision of the Respondent who did not respond to the Petitioner's letter regarding IUPSWA. This application was registered on December 16, 2020 and decided on January 25, 2021 after the enactment of Law No. 11 of 2020 on Job Creation. Although the Law came into force on November 2, 2020, the decision did not consider the provisions of Article 175 Number 6 of Law No. 11 of 2020. In this case, the Panel of Judges relied more on Article 53 of Law No. 30 of 2014 on Government Administration, without taking into account the changes brought about by Article 175 Point 6 of Law No. 11 of 2020. The petitioner succeeded in filing the petition in its entirety, as the Panel of Judges was of the opinion that the Administrative Court was still authorized to handle cases of positive fictitious petitions. The reference basis for the absolute competence of the PTUN used by the Panel of Judges in adjudicating the application is based on the provisions of Article 53 of Law No. 30 of 2014 to Obtain a Decision on the Receipt of an Application to obtain a Decision and/or Action of a Government Agency or Official.
Transformasi Perluasan Makna Kerugian Keuangan Negara Atas Anak Usaha Bumn Rifqi Aziz, Mohammad
UNES Law Review Vol. 6 No. 3 (2024)
Publisher : Universitas Ekasakti

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31933/unesrev.v6i3.1916

Abstract

In its journey, the concept of state finance, especially the development of the concept of separation of State Finance and State-Owned Enterprises (BUMN), has undergone a fairly progressive transformation. The idea of separating state assets from BUMN assets has implications for affirming that capital participation from the government to the state budget does not make BUMN assets become state-owned assets, so that losses experienced by BUMN are not state losses. However, the definition of separation of wealth has not been strictly applied to SOE subsidiaries, resulting in confusion about the financial status of SOE subsidiaries if they experience losses.
Penerapan Hukum Keimigrasian Pada Perbatasan Negara di Daerah Terpencil Kaitannya Dengan Teori Ruang Berada Zulfikar, Mohammad
UNES Law Review Vol. 6 No. 3 (2024)
Publisher : Universitas Ekasakti

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31933/unesrev.v6i3.1917

Abstract

The application of Immigration Law is carried out in the implementation of immigration checking at Immigration Checkpoints for every person entering or leaving Indonesian territory in order to maintain the upholding of state sovereignty. Immigration checks are carried out by checking travel documents and visas or residence permits as well as checking the preventive and wanted list. Immigration checking at Immigration Checkpoints, such as at airports, harbors, and border crossing posts, are carried out by checking data on people entering or leaving Indonesian territory according to their travel documents and/or visas on the Immigration Management Information System. However, carrying out immigration inspections in accordance with Immigration Law and regulations is difficult to be implemented in remote areas which locations are difficult to reach from urban areas, making it difficult to carry out immigration inspections in accordance with applicable regulations. This is because of the lack of transportation and network are still difficult, making it difficult to connect the Immigration Management Information System. Apart from that, in several border areas where indigenous people live side by side with neighboring countries, they often go in and out of the country's borders in order to carry out daily activities, such as school, trading, work, family visits, and other activities, so if indigenous people around the border must use passport as a travel document for entering and exiting the territory of Indonesia, will burden the community to pay the Non-Tax State Revenue fees for applying for a passport due to the activities of the community who enter and exit the territory of Indonesia every day, whereas the Passport book only has 48 (forty eight) pages, and there are only 42 (forty two) visa pages available to display departure and arrival stamps. In this article, we will discuss further how the Government, in this case the Directorate General of Immigration, Ministry of Law and Human Rights, implements the application of immigration law in remote areas in relation to the Theory of Existing Space and how the Directorate General of Immigration, Ministry of Law and Human Rights, can form regulations or policies. which can accommodate people in border areas that are categorized as Private Spaces.
Kesepakatan Penetapan Harga Dengan Dasar Penetapan Pemerintah Tentang Tarif Batas Bawah Tiket Pesawat Sebagai Pelanggaran Persaingan Usaha (Studi Putusan Nomor 1811 K/Pdt.Sus-KPPU/2022) Christian, Yoel
UNES Law Review Vol. 6 No. 3 (2024)
Publisher : Universitas Ekasakti

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31933/unesrev.v6i3.1918

Abstract

Every human being needs transportation to be able to move to the destination or place they want to go, because transportation is something that every human being needs, there is a need for regulations that can regulate transportation so that it is not exploited by parties who want to gain excessive profits. Air transportation is a type of transportation that is usually the main choice for traveling long distances, because the time and efficiency are better compared to other transportation. However, if you want to use air transportation, the fare is usually higher compared to other forms of transportation. Because the fare is more expensive, the KPPU as a supervisory institution should be able to control it so that unhealthy business competition does not occur so that consumers using air transportation are not disadvantaged because of the policies implemented. detrimental nature implemented by airlines.
Tinjauan Yuridis Intervensi Pemerintah Selaku Host Country Dalam Memberikan Perlindungan Terhadap Investor Asing di Sektor Perbankan Veronica, Tri Wanty Octavia
UNES Law Review Vol. 6 No. 3 (2024)
Publisher : Universitas Ekasakti

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31933/unesrev.v6i3.1919

Abstract

Investment in Indonesia is growing in all sectors including banking, capital markets, automotive and others. The banking industry become a major aspect for state development therefore firm implementation of regulation and supervision is needed. Having good banking supervision will encourage economic growth in Indonesia which will be realized by growing investment in other sectors. Normally, Public Officer carried out their supervisory action straight to banking policies, but in some case discretion become one of the alternative to save banking industry from declining financial liquidity. In the other hand, judiciary verdict tend to consider legal positivism only, the following result this banking supervisory action is not permitted. However, the understanding of the tribunal to analize the banking problem should consider the dynamic changes of society. Therefore, the role of the government as Host Country is very important in creating a good investment climate from a judicial perspective which, apart from providing certainty, can also provide justice for foreign investors in Indonesia.
Pelindungan Busana Kebaya Dalam Perspektif Ekspresi Budaya Tradisional dan Warisan Budaya Bangsa Winuriska, Winuriska
UNES Law Review Vol. 6 No. 3 (2024)
Publisher : Universitas Ekasakti

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31933/unesrev.v6i3.1920

Abstract

Indonesian kebaya clothing as part of Traditional Cultural Expressions has not yet obtained certainty in Indonesian positive law. Traditional cultural expressions are essentially regulated in 3 (three) laws, including the Copyright Act, the Cultural Heritage Act and the Cultural Promotion Act. Indonesian kebaya fashion as a tangible product can basically be placed under the Copyright Law. However, difficulties arise to determine the original creator and originality of the creation considering that Indonesia as a country that has a variety of multicultural (multicultural), has grown various types and styles of kebaya clothing such as traditional kebaya, encim kebaya and modern kebaya. In an official state event, the first lady used kebaya to show the nation's identity. At that time the kebaya was declared as national clothing, when it used cloth with images of flowers using a shawl which at that time represented equality. As is known, kebaya clothing (both traditional and modern) has experienced a good development and gained appreciation from many circles, both domestic and foreign. As a result, the economy from this sector has also grown and has an impact, especially on the parties involved. This prompted the government to register kebaya clothing as the nation's cultural heritage at UNESCO, an organization under the United Nations that takes care of related fields. Unfortunately, the government faces obstacles because kebaya clothing has not been included in the list of national intangible cultural heritage. The problem is that although kebaya clothing is tangible, it falls into the category of intangible properties, so to be categorized as copyrighted objects according to the Copyright Law, there are difficulties because the original creator and originality cannot be found. Thus, kebaya clothing as a traditional cultural expression can be categorized as “heritage” and its protection is included in cultural promotion efforts. This paper uses a normative juridical research method to explain the protection of kebaya clothing from a legal perspective.
Perlindungan Hukum Terhadap Pemilik Hak Terkait Atas Hak Cipta Yang Karya Lagunya Digunakan Tanpa Izin Pada Aplikasi Tiktok (Studi Kasus PT Digital Rantai Maya dan Tiktok PTE., Ltd) Ghinartieka, Vidya Auranti
UNES Law Review Vol. 6 No. 3 (2024)
Publisher : Universitas Ekasakti

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31933/unesrev.v6i3.1921

Abstract

Law Number 28 of 2014 concerning Copyright not only protects the rights of creators or their creations, but also protects the rights of people who display or distribute a work to the public, which are called Related Rights. Phonogram producers as holders of related rights have economic rights to their sound recordings, but it is not impossible that there will be violations of related rights to copyright, as happened between PT Digital Chain Maya and TikTok Pte., Ltd. This research will discuss how legal protection is for owners of related rights for copyright whose song works are used without permission on the Tiktok application and what forms of accountability can be carried out by TikTok to owners of related rights for copyright whose song works are used without permission on the Tiktok application. . This research uses descriptive normative legal research methods. Based on the research results, it is concluded that the Copyright Law has provided legal protection for Related Rights owners whose song works are used without permission in the TikTok application, as stated in Article 24 paragraph (4) and also legal protection from the agreement between the Related Rights owners and TikTok. The form of responsibility from TikTok to the owners of Related Rights whose song works are used without permission on its services is in the form of economic responsibility, namely by providing appropriate compensation.

Filter by Year

2018 2025


Filter By Issues
All Issue Vol. 8 No. 2 (2025) Vol. 8 No. 1 (2025) Vol. 7 No. 4 (2025) Vol. 7 No. 3 (2025) Vol. 7 No. 2 (2024): UNES LAW REVIEW (Desember 2024) Vol. 7 No. 1 (2024): UNES LAW REVIEW (September 2024) Vol. 6 No. 4 (2024): UNES LAW REVIEW (Juni 2024) Vol. 6 No. 3 (2024): UNES LAW REVIEW (Maret 2024) Vol. 7 No. 2 (2024) Vol. 7 No. 1 (2024) Vol. 6 No. 4 (2024) Vol. 6 No. 3 (2024) Vol. 6 No. 2 (2023): UNES LAW REVIEW (Desember 2023) Vol. 6 No. 1 (2023): UNES LAW REVIEW (September 2023) Vol. 5 No. 4 (2023): UNES LAW REVIEW (Juni 2023) Vol. 5 No. 3 (2023): UNES LAW REVIEW (Maret 2023) Vol. 6 No. 2 (2023) Vol. 6 No. 1 (2023) Vol. 5 No. 4 (2023) Vol. 5 No. 3 (2023) Vol 5 No 2 (2022): UNES LAW REVIEW (Desember 2022) Vol. 5 No. 2 (2022): UNES LAW REVIEW (Desember 2022) Vol. 5 No. 1 (2022): UNES LAW REVIEW (September 2022) Vol 5 No 1 (2022): UNES LAW REVIEW (September 2022) Vol 4 No 4 (2022): UNES LAW REVIEW (Juni 2022) Vol. 4 No. 4 (2022): UNES LAW REVIEW (Juni 2022) Vol 4 No 3 (2022): UNES LAW REVIEW (Maret 2022) Vol. 5 No. 2 (2022) Vol. 5 No. 1 (2022) Vol. 4 No. 4 (2022) Vol. 4 No. 3 (2022) Vol 4 No 2 (2021): UNES LAW REVIEW (Desember 2021) Vol 4 No 1 (2021): UNES LAW REVIEW (September 2021) Vol 3 No 4 (2021): UNES LAW REVIEW (Juni 2021) Vol 3 No 3 (2021): UNES LAW REVIEW (Maret 2021) Vol. 4 No. 2 (2021) Vol. 4 No. 1 (2021) Vol. 3 No. 4 (2021) Vol. 3 No. 3 (2021) Vol 3 No 2 (2020): UNES LAW REVIEW (Desember 2020) Vol 3 No 1 (2020): UNES LAW REVIEW (September 2020) Vol 2 No 4 (2020): UNES LAW REVIEW (Juni 2020) Vol 2 No 3 (2020): UNES LAW REVIEW (Maret 2020) Vol. 3 No. 2 (2020) Vol. 3 No. 1 (2020) Vol. 2 No. 4 (2020) Vol. 2 No. 3 (2020) Vol 2 No 2 (2019): UNES LAW REVIEW (Desember 2019) Vol 2 No 1 (2019): UNES LAW REVIEW (September 2019) Vol. 2 No. 2 (2019) Vol. 2 No. 1 (2019) Vol. 1 No. 4 (2019) Vol. 1 No. 3 (2019) Vol. 1 No. 2 (2018) Vol. 1 No. 1 (2018) More Issue