cover
Article Per Year (5 Year)
All
Home Page
OAI Link
Editorial Team
Contact
Reviewer
Google Scholar
Contact Name
-
Contact Email
-
Phone
-
Journal Mail Official
-
Editorial Address
-
Location
Kota jayapura,
P a p u a
INDONESIA
Jurnal Penelitian Arkeologi Papua dan Papua Barat
Published by Balai Arkeologi Jayapura Papua
ISSN : 20859767     EISSN : 25809237     DOI : -
Core Subject : Art,
Arts
Journal of Papua is published twice a year in June and November by the Balai Arkeologi Papua. The Papua Journal contains the results of research, conceptual ideas, studies and the application of theory relating to archeology.
Arjuna Subject : -
Articles 410 Documents
 9   10   11   12   13 
ALAT PERTANIAN TRADISIONAL SEBAGAI WARISAN KEKAYAAN BUDAYA BANGSA (Traditional of Agricultural Equipment as Nation Cultural Heritage Property) Suranny, Lilyk Eka
Jurnal Penelitian Arkeologi Papua dan Papua Barat Vol 6, No 1 (2014): Juni 2014
Publisher : BALAI ARKEOLOGI PAPUA

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (832.661 KB)

Abstract

Traditional farm equipment is one of the cultural richness of Indonesia. Modernization in agriculture causes decreasing of traditional farm equipment using by farmers. There are many different kinds of traditional farm equipment made by our ancestors in earlier time, for example plows, harrows, hoes, ani-ani, sickle, etc. In some region of Indonesia, the traditional farm equipments has different local name although has the same usability. This traditional farm equipment contains adi luhung values according to the personality of the Indonesian nation. Therefore, traditional farm equipment needs to be preserved from exitinction and can be inherited to the next generations. ABSTRAKAlat pertanian telah dibuat oleh manusia prasejarah sejak masa neolitik. Alat pertanian tradisional merupakan salah satu kekayaan budaya bangsa Indonesia. Modernisasi di bidang pertanian menyebabkan berkurangnya penggunaan alat pertanian tradisional oleh petani. Tulisan ini akan menjelaskan mengenai berbagai peralatan pertanian tradisional yang digunakan untuk bercocok tanam baik dari fungsi maupun cara pemakaiannya. Selain itu penulis mencoba untuk mengupas nilai-nilai yang terkandung dalam penggunaan peralatan tradisional tersebut. Metode yang digunakan dalam tulisan ini yaitu observasi, wawancara dan studi pustaka. Peralatan pertanian tradisional merupakan bentuk kearifan lokal, memiliki nilai tradisi dan budaya yang telah diwariskan oleh nenek moyang.
Back Cover Jurnal Penelitian Arkeologi, Redaksi
Jurnal Penelitian Arkeologi Papua dan Papua Barat Vol 6, No 1 (2014): Juni 2014
Publisher : BALAI ARKEOLOGI PAPUA

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (877.147 KB)

Abstract

Front Cover Jurnal Penelitian Arkeologi, Redaksi
Jurnal Penelitian Arkeologi Papua dan Papua Barat Vol 2, No 1 (2010): Juni 2010
Publisher : BALAI ARKEOLOGI PAPUA

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (113.587 KB)

Abstract

TINGGALAN TRADISI MEGALITIK Dl KAMPUNG KOKAS, KOMBIF, SUN WABAN KABUPATEN MAYBRAT (Megalithic Tradition in Village of Kokas, Kombi Sun-Waban, Maybrat Regency) Fairyo, Klementin
Jurnal Penelitian Arkeologi Papua dan Papua Barat Vol 8, No 1 (2016): Juni 2016
Publisher : BALAI ARKEOLOGI PAPUA

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (3985.007 KB)

Abstract

The remains of the megalithic tradition in Papua since prehistoric times. Megalithic relics are not only found in coastal areas, but also found in the interior. This paper aims to describe and analyze the relic, the function and role of the remains of the megalithic tradition for the community supporters. The method used is a literature study, observation, and interviews. The results of field observations are megalithic structures and totor. Processing data includes identification and archaeological data description and ethnoarchaeology. AbstrakTinggalan tradisi megaiitik di Papua sejak masa prasejarah. Peninggalan megailitik tidak hanya ditemukan di daerah pesisir saja, tatapi juga ditemukan di pedalaman. Tulisan ini bertujuan mendeskripsikan dan mengkaji bentuk peninggalan, fungsi dan peran tinggalan tradisi megailitik tersebut bagi masyarakat pendukungnya. Metode peneiitian yang digunakan adalah stud I kepustakaan, observasi lapangan, dan wawancara. Hasil observasi lapangan adalah struktur bangunan megaiitik dan totor. Pengolahan data meliputi pengindentifikasian dan pendeskripsian data arkeologi dan etnoarkeoiogi. 
MEMIKIRKAN KEMBALI ETNOARKEOLOGI Tanudirjo, Daud Aris
Jurnal Penelitian Arkeologi Papua dan Papua Barat Vol 1, No 2 (2009): November 2009
Publisher : BALAI ARKEOLOGI PAPUA

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (159.73 KB)

Abstract

Up until now there is still much confusion about ethnoarchaeological research in archaeological community in Indonesia. There are many archaeologists who could not distinguish between ethnographic and ethnoarchaeological research. Therefore, after the evaluation of ethnoarchaeological research done in more than 20 years ago, there is a necessity to rethink about ethnoarchaeological research. In brief, ethnography in archaeology is an effort to depict all of the archaeological activities and ideas which tries to put the past (archaeology) in the context of society today (ethnography). The ethnoarchaeological research is not a way to find the truth in the past but an effort to increase the faith upon the phenomenon that might be happened in the past.
FUNGSI SISTEM MANIBOB DALAM KEHIDUPAN ORANG BIAK Hapsari, Windy
Jurnal Penelitian Arkeologi Papua dan Papua Barat Vol 3, No 2 (2011): November 2011
Publisher : BALAI ARKEOLOGI PAPUA

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (43.388 KB)

Abstract

For the Biak people, manibob means friend. Manibob is a trade relation, whereas manibob system is a system in which two individuals from two villages or two different locations to see each other through trade relations. Trade relations in the exchange system without use the currency values. The meeting can take two different individuals on closer ties and old. Problems in this paper is whether the system manibob functions in the lives of Biak. The core of this manibob system is a form of reciprocity in Biak people who reactivate the social relations in society.
PENGELOLAAN SUMBERDAYA BUDAYA UNTUK PUBLIK: STUDI KASUS DI UPTD MUSEUM NEGERI PROVINSI PAPUA Mas’ud, Zubair
Jurnal Penelitian Arkeologi Papua dan Papua Barat Vol 4, No 2 (2012): November 2012
Publisher : BALAI ARKEOLOGI PAPUA

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (976.637 KB)

Abstract

The presence of cultural resources in Papua UPTD State Museum is an important asset in understanding the culture in Papua. Directed as a means of community identity in Papua through a collection of cultural resources. In facts, the manager of the museum does not provide enough knowledge about relevant information contained in these cultural resources. This study used a qualitative approach with descriptive methods. Based on the results of the study indicate that the management of cultural resources at the State Museum of Papua UPTD not optimally provide knowledge and information to comprehend the culture in Papua which needed by the public. Knowledge or values contained in less cultural resource providing information in accordance with the vision and mission statement by the museum. Therefore, it is necessary to develop the cultural resource management in order to reflect the appreciation of the culture as a people’s identity, in identifying Papua.
EKSPLORASI GEOARKEOLOGI SITUS PALEOLITIK DI PULAU SERAM, PROVINSI MALUKU [Geoarchaeological Exploration of Paleolitical Sites on The Island of Seram, Moluccas Province] Intan, Muh Fadhlan S
Jurnal Penelitian Arkeologi Papua dan Papua Barat Vol 9, No 1 (2017): Juni 2017
Publisher : BALAI ARKEOLOGI PAPUA

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (1595.802 KB)

Abstract

East Seram District, Central Maluku, and West Seram regency is located on the island of Seram, where research was conducted, save a lot of cultural, one of the paleolithic period, which is a long time not received attention from environmental researchers. It is used as the basis of the main issues that include geology in general. Therefore, the purpose of this study was to perform surface geological mapping in general as one of the efforts to provide geological information, while the goal is to determine aspects of geomorphology, stratigraphy, structural geology associated with the existence of paleolithic sites in the study area. The research method begins with a literature review, surveys, analysis, and interpretation of field data. Environmental scanning provides information about the landscape consists of plains morphological units, units of corrugated morphology weak, strong corrugated morphology unit, and units of karst morphology. The river berstadia old-mature river stadium, periodical/permanent river, and river episodic/intermittent river. Constituent rock is sandstone, limestone, marl, andesite, tuff, schist, volcanic breccias, reef limestones, conglomerates, and alluvial. Geological structures such as faults and folds. Ceram Research discovered 14 Paleolithic sites. From the analysis of petrology, lithic tools made of jasper rocks, chert, metalimestone, flint, and quartzite. Rock as raw material litik tool, found in the middle of Seram Island, then spread to the west and to the east which has a flat relief.   ABSTRAKKabupaten Seram Bagian Timur, Kabupaten Maluku Tengah, dan Kabupaten Seram Bagian Barat terletak di Pulau Seram, yang menjadi lokasi penelitian, menyimpan banyak tinggalan budaya, salah satunya dari masa paleolitik, yang sekian lama tak mendapat perhatian dari para peneliti lingkungan. Hal inilah yang dijadikan dasar permasalahan utama yang mencakup geologi secara umum. Oleh sebab itu, maksud penelitian ini dalah untuk melakukan pemetaan geologi permukaan secara umum sebagai salah satu upaya untuk menyajikan informasi geologi, sedangkan tujuannya adalah untuk mengetahui aspek-aspek geomorfologi, stratigrafi, struktur geologi yang dikaitkan dengan keberadaan di situs-situs paleolitik wilayah penelitian. Metode penelitian diawali dengan kajian pustaka, survei, analisis, dan interpretasi data lapangan. Pengamatan lingkungan memberikan informasi tentang bentang alamnya terdiri yang dari satuan morfologi dataran, satuan morfologi bergelombang lemah, satuan morfologi bergelombang kuat, dan satuan morfologi karst. Sungainya berstadia sungai dewasa-tua, sungai periodik/permanen, dan sungai episodik/ intermittent. Batuan penyusun adalah batupasir, batugamping, napal, andesit, tufa, sekis, breksi volkanik, batugamping terumbu, konglomerat, dan aluvial. Struktur geologi berupa patahan, dan lipatan. Eksplorasi di Pulau Seram telah menemukan 14 situs paleolitik. Dari analisis petrologi, alat-alat litik terbuat dari batuan jasper, chert, metagamping, batuapi, dan kuarsit. Batuan sebagai bahan baku alat litik, ditemukan di bagian tengah Pulau Seram, lalu disebarkan ke arah barat dan timur yang berelief datar.    
JEJAK BUDAYA PENUTUR AUSTRONESIA PADA SITUS KAMPUNG FORIR, FAKFAK (The Last Vestiges of The Austronesian Culture in Kampung Forir Site, Fakfak) Sukandar, Sri Chiirullia
Jurnal Penelitian Arkeologi Papua dan Papua Barat Vol 7, No 1 (2015): Juni 2015
Publisher : BALAI ARKEOLOGI PAPUA

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (2106.121 KB)

Abstract

Research on Sosoraweru cave site and Kampung Forir site, shows a number of issues Austronesian context. There are two issue to be discussed in this article, namely: (1) Traces of Austronesian speakers in Kampung Furir; (2) Function Sosoraweru cave site in the past. To explore both of these issues used the method of observation, excavation, and literature and analyzed based on contextual analysis. The baseline data obtained and analyzed in the form of artifacts and ekofak the influence of Austronesian culture in the southwestern coast of Papua. Based on the data and the context concluded that traces the influence of Austronesian in Sosoraweru cave include: red slip pottery fragments, the system of burial niches and frescoes which show the influence of Austronesian cultures. In addition, based on the context of the locus is known that the Sosoraweru cave site and Kampung Forir site serve as a residential in the past.AbstrakPenelitian di Situs Kampung Forir dan Gua Sosoraweru memperlihatkan sejumlah konteks isu Austronesia. Ada dua masalah yang akan dibahas dalam artikel ini, yaitu: (1) Jejak penutur Austronesia di Kampung Furir; (2) Fungsi situs Gua Sosoraweru di masa lalu. Untuk mendalami kedua masalah tersebut, digunakan metode observasi, ekskavasi, dan studi pustaka. Data-data pokok yang diperoleh dianalisis berdasarkan analisis kontekstual, berupa artefak dan ekofak untuk melihat adanya pengaruh budaya Austronesia di kawasan pesisir baratdaya Papua. Berdasarkan data dan konteksnya disimpulkan bahwa jejak pengaruh Austronesia di Gua Sosoraweru meliputi: fragmen gerabah berslip merah, sistem penguburan ceruk dan lukisan dinding yang menunjukkan adanya pengaruh budaya Austronesia. Selain itu, berdasarkan konteks lokus temuan diketahui bahwa Gua Sosoraweru dan kawasan Kampung Forir berfungsi sebagai hunian di masa lalu
Front Cover Jurnal Penelitian Arkeologi, Redaksi
Jurnal Penelitian Arkeologi Papua dan Papua Barat Vol 7, No 1 (2015): Juni 2015
Publisher : BALAI ARKEOLOGI PAPUA

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (798.138 KB)

Abstract

Page 11 of 41 | Total Record : 410

 9   10   11   12   13 

Filter by Year

2009 2021


Reset
Filter By Issues
All Issue Vol. 13 No. 2 (2021): November 2021 Vol. 13 No. 1 (2021): Juni 2021 Vol. 12 No. 2 (2020): November 2020 Vol. 12 No. 1 (2020): Juni 2020 Vol. 11 No. 2 (2019): November 2019 Vol. 11 No. 1 (2019): Juni 2019 Vol. 10 No. 2 (2018): November 2018 Vol. 10 No. 1 (2018): Juni 2018 Vol 9, No 2 (2017): November 2017 Vol. 9 No. 2 (2017): November 2017 Vol. 9 No. 1 (2017): Juni 2017 Vol 9, No 1 (2017): Juni 2017 Vol 8, No 2 (2016): November 2016 Vol. 8 No. 2 (2016): November 2016 Vol. 8 No. 1 (2016): Juni 2016 Vol 8, No 1 (2016): Juni 2016 Vol. 7 No. 2 (2015): November 2015 Vol 7, No 2 (2015): November 2015 Vol 7, No 1 (2015): Juni 2015 Vol. 7 No. 1 (2015): Juni 2015 Vol 6, No 2 (2014): November 2014 Vol. 6 No. 2 (2014): November 2014 Vol. 6 No. 1 (2014): Juni 2014 Vol 6, No 1 (2014): Juni 2014 Vol 5, No 2 (2013): November 2013 Vol. 5 No. 2 (2013): November 2013 Vol 5, No 1 (2013): Juni 2013 Vol. 5 No. 1 (2013): Juni 2013 Vol 4, No 2 (2012): November 2012 Vol. 4 No. 2 (2012): November 2012 Vol 4, No 1 (2012): Juni 2012 Vol. 4 No. 1 (2012): Juni 2012 Vol. 3 No. 2 (2011): November 2011 Vol 3, No 2 (2011): November 2011 Vol 3, No 2 (2011): November 2011 Vol 3, No 1 (2011): Juni 2011 Vol. 3 No. 1 (2011): Juni 2011 Vol 2, No 2 (2010): November 2010 Vol. 2 No. 2 (2010): November 2010 Vol. 2 No. 1 (2010): Juni 2010 Vol 2, No 1 (2010): Juni 2010 Vol. 1 No. 2 (2009): November 2009 Vol 1, No 2 (2009): November 2009 Vol. 1 No. 1 (2009): Juni 2009 Vol 1, No 1 (2009): Juni 2009 More Issue