cover
Contact Name
Tole Sutikno
Contact Email
ijece@iaesjournal.com
Phone
-
Journal Mail Official
ijece@iaesjournal.com
Editorial Address
-
Location
Kota yogyakarta,
Daerah istimewa yogyakarta
INDONESIA
International Journal of Electrical and Computer Engineering
ISSN : 20888708     EISSN : 27222578     DOI : -
International Journal of Electrical and Computer Engineering (IJECE, ISSN: 2088-8708, a SCOPUS indexed Journal, SNIP: 1.001; SJR: 0.296; CiteScore: 0.99; SJR & CiteScore Q2 on both of the Electrical & Electronics Engineering, and Computer Science) is the official publication of the Institute of Advanced Engineering and Science (IAES). The journal is open to submission from scholars and experts in the wide areas of electrical, electronics, instrumentation, control, telecommunication and computer engineering from the global world.
Articles 6,393 Documents
Hybrid systems modelling and control using multiple mixed logical dynamical predictive model control: Application to a three-tank spherical system Benaissa, Tahar; Belazreg, Mohamed Fouzi; Halbaoui, Khaled; Djaroum, Belaid; Boukhetala, Djamel
International Journal of Electrical and Computer Engineering (IJECE) Vol 16, No 3: June 2026
Publisher : Institute of Advanced Engineering and Science

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.11591/ijece.v16i3.pp1148-1158

Abstract

This study employs the mixed logical dynamical (MLD) framework for modelling, simulating, and controlling hybrid dynamical systems. Hybrid systems, which combine continuous-time dynamics and discrete logical events, pose significant challenges for conventional control strategies, such as proportional-integral-derivative (PID) controllers, particularly under complex operational constraints. To address these challenges, the MLD formalism provides a unified representation that integrates differential equations, logical rules, and inequality constraints. Based on the MLD model, a multivariable hybrid model predictive control (HMPC) approach is designed to optimize control system performance and operational efficiency over a prediction time horizon. At each sampling time step, a mixed quadratic programming (MIQP) optimization problem is solved online to determine the control law. The proposed control approach is applied to a three-spherical tank system, where simulation and experimental results demonstrate its effectiveness in ensuring stability, minimizing tracking errors, and satisfying physical constraints. These results underscore the relevance of MLD-based predictive control approaches for the optimization and advanced control of complex multivariable hybrid dynamical systems in industrial fields.
Designing self-healing database fabrics for real-time payment rails Gollapudi, Raghu
International Journal of Electrical and Computer Engineering (IJECE) Vol 16, No 3: June 2026
Publisher : Institute of Advanced Engineering and Science

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.11591/ijece.v16i3.pp1360-1368

Abstract

Real-time payment platforms operating at scale face an unforgiving operational reality: even brief outages translate directly into failed transactions, regulatory exposure, and eroded customer trust. Database replication and failover automation have matured considerably over the past two decades, yet a troubling blind spot remains. Recovery frameworks built for general-purpose distributed systems were never designed with settlement finality in mind, and that design omission leaves payment operators exposed to split-brain scenarios that generic high-availability tooling cannot reliably prevent. This paper addresses that omission head-on through a self-healing database fabric purpose-built for payment rail environments. The proposed autonomous resilience fabric architecture (ARFA) operates across three coordinated layers: a continuous monitoring layer that harvests telemetry from compute, storage, and network subsystems; a decision layer that fuses rule-based heuristics with an ensemble of isolation forests, recurrent neural networks, and gradient boosting classifiers to separate genuine fault conditions from transient noise; and a deterministic action layer that executes recovery procedures anchored to explicit settlement finality constraints. In fault injection trials covering node crashes, network partitions, replication lag, and performance degradation, the architecture cut average recovery times by 88% against manual baselines, restoring service in roughly 8 seconds rather than the 180 seconds that human-driven remediation typically requires. False positive rates held below 2% across all failure categories, and the system achieved a 98% recovery success rate. Taken together, these results make a practical case that autonomous resilience and regulatory compliance reinforce rather than conflict with each other when the regulatory constraints are designed in from the start.
AI-driven log reduction and storage optimization for security operations Chalaemwongwan, Nutthakorn
International Journal of Electrical and Computer Engineering (IJECE) Vol 16, No 3: June 2026
Publisher : Institute of Advanced Engineering and Science

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.11591/ijece.v16i3.pp1417-1424

Abstract

In this study, we present an AI-driven framework that integrates semantic log reduction with compliance-aware storage optimization, specifically designed for security operations center (SOC) and managed security service provider (MSSP) environments. Traditional approaches such as uniform compression, keyword filtering, and static tiering often either miss critical anomalies or preserve redundant noise, leading to excessive storage use, slower search performance, and analyst fatigue. The proposed framework addresses these challenges by combining three components: semantic reduction of repetitive entries, anomaly-focused retention supported by self-supervised models, and adaptive tiering aligned with regulatory requirements. Evaluations on HDFS, BGL, CICIDS2017, and Suricata datasets achieved 70%–80% log reduction, 55%–65% storage savings, recall rates above 95%, and a one-third reduction in query latency. These results demonstrate that pre-index reduction, together with anomaly- and compliance-aware retention, offers a scalable and regulator-ready solution for operational security environments.

Filter by Year

2011 2026


Filter By Issues
All Issue Vol 16, No 3: June 2026 Vol 16, No 2: April 2026 Vol 16, No 1: February 2026 Vol 15, No 6: December 2025 Vol 15, No 5: October 2025 Vol 15, No 4: August 2025 Vol 15, No 3: June 2025 Vol 15, No 2: April 2025 Vol 15, No 1: February 2025 Vol 14, No 6: December 2024 Vol 14, No 5: October 2024 Vol 14, No 4: August 2024 Vol 14, No 3: June 2024 Vol 14, No 2: April 2024 Vol 14, No 1: February 2024 Vol 13, No 6: December 2023 Vol 13, No 5: October 2023 Vol 13, No 4: August 2023 Vol 13, No 3: June 2023 Vol 13, No 2: April 2023 Vol 13, No 1: February 2023 Vol 12, No 6: December 2022 Vol 12, No 5: October 2022 Vol 12, No 4: August 2022 Vol 12, No 3: June 2022 Vol 12, No 2: April 2022 Vol 12, No 1: February 2022 Vol 11, No 6: December 2021 Vol 11, No 5: October 2021 Vol 11, No 4: August 2021 Vol 11, No 3: June 2021 Vol 11, No 2: April 2021 Vol 11, No 1: February 2021 Vol 10, No 6: December 2020 Vol 10, No 5: October 2020 Vol 10, No 4: August 2020 Vol 10, No 3: June 2020 Vol 10, No 2: April 2020 Vol 10, No 1: February 2020 Vol 9, No 6: December 2019 Vol 9, No 5: October 2019 Vol 9, No 4: August 2019 Vol 9, No 3: June 2019 Vol 9, No 2: April 2019 Vol 9, No 1: February 2019 Vol 8, No 6: December 2018 Vol 8, No 5: October 2018 Vol 8, No 4: August 2018 Vol 8, No 3: June 2018 Vol 8, No 2: April 2018 Vol 8, No 1: February 2018 Vol 7, No 6: December 2017 Vol 7, No 5: October 2017 Vol 7, No 4: August 2017 Vol 7, No 3: June 2017 Vol 7, No 2: April 2017 Vol 7, No 1: February 2017 Vol 6, No 6: December 2016 Vol 6, No 5: October 2016 Vol 6, No 4: August 2016 Vol 6, No 3: June 2016 Vol 6, No 2: April 2016 Vol 6, No 1: February 2016 Vol 5, No 6: December 2015 Vol 5, No 5: October 2015 Vol 5, No 4: August 2015 Vol 5, No 3: June 2015 Vol 5, No 2: April 2015 Vol 5, No 1: February 2015 Vol 4, No 6: December 2014 Vol 4, No 5: October 2014 Vol 4, No 4: August 2014 Vol 4, No 3: June 2014 Vol 4, No 2: April 2014 Vol 4, No 1: February 2014 Vol 3, No 6: December 2013 Vol 3, No 5: October 2013 Vol 3, No 4: August 2013 Vol 3, No 3: June 2013 Vol 3, No 2: April 2013 Vol 3, No 1: February 2013 Vol 2, No 6: December 2012 Vol 2, No 5: October 2012 Vol 2, No 4: August 2012 Vol 2, No 3: June 2012 Vol 2, No 2: April 2012 Vol 2, No 1: February 2012 Vol 1, No 2: December 2011 Vol 1, No 1: September 2011 More Issue