cover
Article Per Year (5 Year)
All
Home Page
OAI Link
Editorial Team
Contact
Reviewer
Google Scholar
Contact Name
-
Contact Email
-
Phone
-
Journal Mail Official
jelt.fbs.unp@gmail.com
Editorial Address
English Department of Faculty of Languages and Arts of Universitas Negeri Padang. Jalan Prof. Dr. Hamka Air Tawar, Padang Sumatera Barat, Indonesia, 25131
Location
Kota padang,
Sumatera barat
INDONESIA
Journal of English Language Teaching
Published by Universitas Negeri Padang
ISSN : -     EISSN : 23023198     DOI : -
Core Subject : Education,
Languange, Linguistic, Communication & Media
Journal of English Language Teaching is a journal published by English Language Teaching Study Program of FBS Universitas Negeri Padang. This journal is published three times a year (March, June, and September). The main purpose of this journal is to advance and foster English Language Teaching or education, research, and professionalism in Indonesia. The journal provides research and paper to increase awareness, consideration and analysis of issues in Teaching English as Foreign Language, and also promotes the interchange of ideas, and comparative studies in this field.
Arjuna Subject : -
Articles 20 Documents
 1   2 
Search results for , issue "Vol 9, No 3 (2020)" : 20 Documents clear
The Analysis of Students’ Learning Style Preferred by Basic Listening Classes of English Department at Universitas Negeri Padang Juliance Primurizki; Aryuliva Adnan; Don Narius
Journal of English Language Teaching Vol 9, No 3 (2020)
Publisher : Universitas Negeri Padang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.24036/jelt.v9i3.109343

Abstract

The variation of students in acquiring and understanding knowledge is influenced by learning styles. But, based on the observation, the students are less aware of their own preferences in learning styles. This research was conducted to analyze the learning styles preferred by students in the Basic Listening classes of English Department, Universitas Negeri Padang (UNP). This descriptive research used a quantitative descriptive method. The research instrument was questionnaires. There were 2 questionnaires used in this research. First VARK questionnaire (Version 7.8) designed by Fleming. VARK questionnaire represented visual (V), aural (A), read/write (R), and kinaesthetic (K). It consisted of 16 questions with four options. The second questionnaire was Index of Learning Styles (ILS) designed by Richard M. Felder and Barbara A. Soloman in 1997. This questionnaire was categorized into four dimensions, namely active or reflective, visual or verbal, sensitivity or intuition, and sequential or global. It consisted of 44 questions with 2 options. The population of this research was the students in Basic Listening Classes of English Department. The sample was 60 students who were chosen randomly from the total population using Simple Random Sampling. This result of this research showed that the students had various learning styles and mostly their learning styles were dominated by visual style.
An Analysis of Hospitality Students’ Speaking Difficulties in the Hotel Front Office at SMKN 1 Sintuk Toboh Gadang Iva Octi R. Ramli; Aryuliva Adnan
Journal of English Language Teaching Vol 9, No 3 (2020)
Publisher : Universitas Negeri Padang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.24036/jelt.v9i3.109312

Abstract

This study analyzes hospitality students’ speaking difficulties in hotel front office and the causes of the speaking difficulties in grade eleven at SMKN 1 Sintuk Toboh Gadang. The purpose of this research are to find out  hospitality students’ speaking difficulties in front office grade eleven at SMKN 1 Sintuk Toboh Gadang and the causes of hospitality students’ difficulties in speaking. This research used descriptive qualitative method in order to analyze hospitality students speaking difficulties and the causes in hotel front office. The instrumentation of this research is questionnaire sheets. Based on the findings of the study it was found that hospitality students ‘speaking difficulties namely (1) lack of vocabulary 50.00%, 15 students, (2) difficult to understand 47.58%, 15 students, (3) poor in grammar 54.03%, 17 students, (4) poor in pronunciation 51.61%, 16 students, and (5) fluency 65.32%, 20 students. The researcher also found the causes of hospitality students’ speaking difficulties: (1) lack of confident 40.32%, 12 students, (2) anxiety 62.90%, 19 students, (3) inhibition 45.15%, 14 students, (4) nothing to say 46.23%, 14 students, (5) mother tongue use 37.63%, 12 students. The results of this research indicate that hospitality students grade eleven faced difficulties in speaking at hotel front office. 
The Improvement of Students` English Pronunciation by Using Animation (3d) Video for the Second Years Students of Junior High School 1 Payakumbuh Edrian Rahmawati; Ratmanida Ratmanida
Journal of English Language Teaching Vol 9, No 3 (2020)
Publisher : Universitas Negeri Padang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.24036/jelt.v9i3.109297

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to see whether animation video can improve pronunciation level of second years students in Junior High School 1 Payakumbuh. This Classroom Action Research study have 251 students which consist of 7 classes as the population. The participant is 36 students that chosen by using cluster random sampling technique. In collecting the data, researcher used observation to observe the students` behavior during teaching learning process with field notes, then used test to find the improvement of students’ speaking pronunciation during the implementation, and used questionnaire to find out students` opinion about using animation video as learning media. The research was conducted in two cycles, where each cycle consisted of 4 meetings. The research findings showed that the implementation of animation video could improve students’ pronunciation level from “very good” level up to “excellent” level. It can be concluded that the implementation of animation video in learning process has beneficial effect on students’ pronunciation.
Students Ability and Problem in Pronouncing English Vowels Made By the Second Semester Students of Universitas Negeri Padang Muhammad Zaki Arevi; Ratmanida Ratmanida
Journal of English Language Teaching Vol 9, No 3 (2020)
Publisher : Universitas Negeri Padang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.24036/jelt.v9i3.109421

Abstract

This study aimed to find out students’ ability and problem at English Education of Universitas Negeri Padang. This research is designed as descriptive qualitative research. In this study, the researcher focused on the first year students of English Education program in Universitas Negeri Padang in the Academic Year of 2019/2020. There are 20 students as the subject of the research. The process of data collection in this research had to be put in two activities, those are: recording and transcription. The findings of this research indicate that most vowels are pronounced well by the students. There are nine vowels classified as excellent category, they are vowels are vowel /e/ 79,5 (99.4%), vowel /i:/ 78,5 (98.12%), vowel /I/ 78 (97.5%), vowel /ɑ:/ 77,5 (96.9%), vowel /ə/ 76 (95%), vowel /u:/ 75,5 (96.9%), vowel /ɔ:/ 72 (90%), vowel /ɛ:/ 67,5 (84.34%), and vowel /ɑ/ 65 (81.25%). And there are three vowels classified as good category which vowels are vowel /ʌ/ 62 (77.5%), vowel /æ/ 56 (70%), and vowel /ʊ/ 55,5 (69.4%).
An Analysis of the Second Year Students’ Ability in Writing Discussion Text at English Education Study Program in Universitas Negeri Padang Silva Husna; Fitrawati Fitrawati
Journal of English Language Teaching Vol 9, No 3 (2020)
Publisher : Universitas Negeri Padang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.24036/jelt.v9i3.109339

Abstract

This research was about the students' ability in writing a discussion text seen from the rhetorical structure and lexico-grammatical feature of the text., with the topic of Cyber-Bullying. The research design was the descriptive research. The population of this study was second year students of English Education Study Program Academic Year 2018. The population was 151 students from 5 classes. The sample was taken by random sampling technique so that the number of samples obtained was 22 samples. The instrument used was a test of discussion text writing for 90 minutes. The students’ writings were analyzed using discussion text writing rubric related to the rhetorical structure and lexico-grammatical feature of the text. Based on this research, students' ability in writing discussion texts was in fair (2) condition. Although the ability of students to write discussion texts was in fair (2) condition by looking to the rhetorical structure and lexico-grammatical feature of the text, there are several parts of the text that students have not understood how to write them. Students were expected to understand how to write a good discussion text by paying attention to the rhetorical structure and lexico-grammatical feature of the text.Key words: Writing Ability, Discussion text
Senior High School Students’ Ability in Analyzing the Poetic Elements of Poem in English Ani Santika; Delvi Wahyuni
Journal of English Language Teaching Vol 9, No 3 (2020)
Publisher : Universitas Negeri Padang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.24036/jelt.v9i3.109433

Abstract

This study aimed to investigate senior high school students’ ability in analyzing the poetic elements of poem in English and the difficulties faced by the students in analyzing the poetic elements of poem in English. The participants of this research were 19 eleventh grade students in SMA Pembangunan Laboratorium UNP Padang who take the English subject as their elective subject. This study is descriptive research with quantitative approach. The instrumentation of this research is test. The result showed that the level mastery of the students in analyzing the poetic element of poem in English is poor. Based on the data taken, the hardest poetic element for students is onomatopoeia and the easiest is simile. And it can be concluded that students' ability in analyzing the poetic elements of poem in English is and students have difficulty in analyzing poetic elements.Key words: ability, difficulties, poetic elements
An Analysis of English-Speaking Anxiety Experienced by the Second Year Students of English Language and Literature Department of Universitas Negeri Padang and Its Causal Factors Tri Handayani; Yenni Rozimela; Sitti Fatimah
Journal of English Language Teaching Vol 9, No 3 (2020)
Publisher : Universitas Negeri Padang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.24036/jelt.v9i3.109649

Abstract

This study aimed  to investigate the level of speaking anxiety among the second-year students of the English Department at Universitas Negeri Padang, who enrolled in 2017/2018 academic year. Descriptive quantitative approach was applied in this study by collecting both quantitative and qualitative data to be analyzed and presented through a simple statistics formula. Stratified random sampling was employed to determine the sample; meanwhile, the data were collected by using a close-ended and an open-ended online questionnaire that was distributed through SurveyMonkey platform. The findings revealed that most of the students were experiencing a high level of speaking anxiety (68.85%). This study also discovered that among the six principles of the causal factors of speaking anxiety, the classroom management factor had been the most chosen factor that the students experienced during the learning speaking process. Meanwhile, the least chosen factor was the instructor beliefs about the language teaching.
An Analysis of Third Year Students of English Department Faculty Languages and Arts UNP Ability in Pronouncing Diphthong of English Words Mella Fauzia; Zul Amri; Ratmanida Ratmanida
Journal of English Language Teaching Vol 9, No 3 (2020)
Publisher : Universitas Negeri Padang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.24036/jelt.v9i3.100323

Abstract

The purposes of this study are to know how is the pronunciation of the third year students of English department Universitas Negeri Padang in pronouncing diphthong of English words and what diphthong that mostly mispronounced by the students. This research is quantitative research method. The research population is the third year students; the class of 2015. There were 33 students taken as the research sample which selected through cluster sampling technique. The data were collected through pronunciation test. The students were asked to pronounce the list of diphthong of English words. The pronunciation was recorded through tape recorder. Moreover, there were 48 words in the test. The words represented eight types of diphthong. The pronunciations were analyzed by using Cambridge Advanced Learner Dictionary and also help by two raters. The pronunciations were transcribed in order to answer the research problems. The results of the study show that students’ ability in pronouncing diphthong of English words is sufficient. In addition, the highest percentage of diphthong error is diphthong aʊ (24,81 %). The less percentage error is diphthong ɔɪ (2,90 %).  
An Analysis of Students’ Ability in Comprehending TOEFL Reading Test at English Department Universitas Negeri Padang Annisa Kurniawati; Fitrawati Fitrawati
Journal of English Language Teaching Vol 9, No 3 (2020)
Publisher : Universitas Negeri Padang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.24036/jelt.v9i3.109438

Abstract

This research was about the students' ability in comprehending TOEFL reading test at at English department of Universitas Negeri Padang. The research design was the descriptive research. The population of this study was third year students of English Education Study Program Academic Year 2017. The population was 148 students from 6 classes. The sample was taken by cluster random sampling technique so that the number of samples obtained was 22 samples. The instrument used was a reading TOEFL test for 60 minutes. The students’ comprehension ability was also analyzed in 5 types of reading comprehension skill. Based on this research, students' ability in comprehending TOEFL reading texts was poor. This finding indicated that the third-year students at English Department of UNP had less comprehension in reading TOEFL test.
An Analysis of Students' Ability in Differentiating Contrast Adverbia Clauses (Concession and Opposition) at English Department of Universitas Negeri Padang Yolla Suryani Putri; Fitrawati Fitrawati
Journal of English Language Teaching Vol 9, No 3 (2020)
Publisher : Universitas Negeri Padang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.24036/jelt.v9i3.109342

Abstract

This study analyzes the student ability in differentiating contrast adverbial clause(Concession and opposition) at English department of Universitas Negeri Padang. This research is a descriptive qualitative research used in analysing the students ability in differentiating contrast adverbial clause. The instrumentation of this research was a test. From 915 items analysed, the research found that second-year students’ ability in differentiating contrast adverbial clause at English Department of UNP was adequate. It was also found that the mistakes done by the students in using conjunction were 31.26%. This finding indicated that the second-year students at English Department of UNP less understand about contrast adverbial clause.

Page 2 of 2 | Total Record : 20

 1   2 

Filter by Year

2020 2020


Reset
Filter By Issues
All Issue Vol 14, No 4 (2025) Vol 14, No 3 (2025) Vol 14, No 1 (2025) Vol 13, No 3 (2024) Vol 13, No 2 (2024) Vol 13, No 1 (2024) Vol 12, No 4 (2023) Vol 12, No 3 (2023) Vol 12, No 2 (2023) Vol 12, No 1 (2023) Vol 11, No 4 (2022) Vol 11, No 3 (2022) Vol 11, No 2 (2022) Vol 11, No 1 (2022) Vol 10, No 4 (2021) Vol 10, No 3 (2021) Vol 10, No 2 (2021) Vol 10, No 1 (2021) Vol 9, No 4 (2020) Vol 9, No 3 (2020) Vol 9, No 2 (2020) Vol 9, No 1 (2020) Vol 8, No 4 (2019) Vol 8, No 3 (2019) Vol 8, No 2 (2019) Vol 8, No 1 (2019) Vol 7, No 4 (2018) Vol 7, No 3 (2018) Vol 7, No 2 (2018) Vol 7, No 1 (2018) Vol 6, No 1 (2017): Serie A Vol 6, No 1 (2017): Serie E Vol 6, No 1 (2017): Serie D Vol 6, No 1 (2017): Serie B Vol 6, No 1 (2017): Serie C Vol 5, No 1 (2016): Serie B Vol 5, No 1 (2016): Serie A Vol 5, No 1 (2016): Serie E Vol 5, No 1 (2016): Serie C Vol 5, No 1 (2016): Serie F Vol 5, No 1 (2016): Serie D Vol 4, No 2 (2016): Serie A Vol 4, No 1 (2015): Serie A Vol 3, No 1 (2014): Serie B Vol 3, No 1 (2014): Serie A Vol 3, No 1 (2014): Serie C Vol 3, No 1 (2014): Serie D Vol 2, No 3 (2014): Serie A Vol 2, No 2 (2014): Serie B Vol 2, No 2 (2014): Serie A Vol 2, No 2 (2014): Serie C Vol 2, No 1 (2013): Serie E Vol 2, No 1 (2013): Serie C Vol 2, No 1 (2013): Serie B Vol 2, No 1 (2013): Serie F Vol 2, No 1 (2013): Serie D Vol 2, No 1 (2013): Serie A Vol 1, No 3 (2013): Serie A Vol 1, No 2 (2013): Serie B Vol 1, No 2 (2013): Serie I Vol 1, No 2 (2013): Serie D Vol 1, No 2 (2013): Serie C Vol 1, No 2 (2013): Serie E Vol 1, No 2 (2013): Serie A Vol 1, No 2 (2013): Serie F Vol 1, No 2 (2013): Serie H Vol 1, No 2 (2013): Serie G Vol 1, No 1 (2012): Serie B Vol 1, No 1 (2012): Serie D Vol 1, No 1 (2012): Serie C Vol 1, No 1 (2012): Serie A More Issue