cover
Contact Name
Sigar P. Berutu
Contact Email
sigarpberutu@unprimdn.ac.id
Phone
-
Journal Mail Official
sigarpberutu@unprimdn.ac.id
Editorial Address
-
Location
Kota medan,
Sumatera utara
INDONESIA
Ilmu Hukum Prima
ISSN : 20885288     EISSN : 26142244     DOI : https://doi.org/10.34012
Jurnal ilmu hukum prima merupakan salah satu sumber bacaan yang sangat penting bagi kita untuk mengupdate informasi-informasi hukum yang terbaru. Hal ini disebabkan karena jurnal hukum biasanya memuat informasi mengenai hukum yang kontemporer dan up to date. Informasi yang disajikan dalam jurnal tidak menyerupai berita seperti yang dapat kita temukan pada halaman koran namun juga memuat analisa-analisa terhadap suatu masalah hukum yang sangat baik untuk menambah khasanah berpikir kita sekaligus sebagai bahan diskusi yang cukup menarik.
Arjuna Subject : -
Articles 250 Documents
Legal Settlement Of Breach Of Bank Loan Agreement With Fair Guarantees Vic S, Binsar Jon; Iryani, Dewi
Ilmu Hukum Prima (IHP) Vol. 8 No. 2 (2025): JURNAL ILMU HUKUM PRIMA
Publisher : jurnal.unprimdn.ac.id

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.34012/jihp.v8i2.7636

Abstract

Debt is an integral part of the business world, particularly as a solution for entrepreneurs experiencing capital shortages. Financial institutions, particularly banks, act as facilitators providing credit with or without collateral. A crucial aspect of credit provision is the existence of collateral to protect the bank, as the creditor, from the risk of default by the debtor. This study aims to analyze the legal resolution of default in bank loan agreements secured by certificates in a fair manner, using the case study of Decision Number 141/Pdt.GS/2021/PN Byw. This study uses a normative juridical method with a descriptive-analytical approach, based on primary, secondary, and tertiary legal materials. The results of the study indicate that legally, banks have the right to execute collateral if the debtor is in default, according to Article 6 and Article 20 of the Mortgage Law. However, in practice, the execution process is often faced with resistance from debtors who lack good faith, including the filing of new lawsuits to hinder the execution. In the context of justice, the judge in the decision of the case did not immediately grant all of the bank's demands, but instead considered the principle of substantive justice by rejecting some of the fine demands that were deemed disproportionate. This approach aligns with the views of legal philosophers such as Aristotle, John Rawls, and the progressive legal thought of Satjipto Rahardjo, who emphasized that justice is not merely formal equality but also treatment appropriate to the social and moral context. Therefore, the court's decision in this case demonstrates the implementation of guarantee law in accordance with statutory regulations and reflects the value of justice in resolving banking disputes.
Legal Protection Of Consumer Personal Data In Electronic Transactions With Legal Certainty Sihite, Thomas Ericson Hadinata; Iryani, Dewi; Setiawan, Puguh Aji Hari
Ilmu Hukum Prima (IHP) Vol. 8 No. 2 (2025): JURNAL ILMU HUKUM PRIMA
Publisher : jurnal.unprimdn.ac.id

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.34012/jihp.v8i2.7637

Abstract

Online buying and selling can result in the leakage of consumer personal data, as seen in the breaches of user accounts on the Tokopedia and Shopee marketplaces. The data leaks on e-commerce platforms have left users' personal data unprotected. Law No. 19 of 2016 also does not specifically address personal data protection. The type of research used in this research is normative legal research. The results of this research, namely Regulations related to the protection of personal data according to the laws and regulations in force in Indonesia, include: Government Regulation Number 71 of 2019 concerning the Implementation of Electronic Systems and Transactions is a revision of Government Regulation Number 82 of 2012. In addition, it is also regulated in Government Regulation No. 44 of 2008 concerning the Provision of Compensation, Restitution, and Assistance to Victim Witnesses, in addition there is Article 1 paragraph (6) and Article 5 paragraph (1) Point A of the Law concerning the Protection of Witnesses and Victims, PERKOMINFO (Regulation of the Minister of Communication and Information) Number 20 of 2016 and Article 28 paragraph (1) of Law Number 1 of 2024 concerning the Second Amendment to Law Number 11 of 2008 concerning Electronic Information and Transactions. These regulations are aimed at encouraging the public to respect personal data, which is part of the right to privacy, so that other people's personal data is not widely disseminated or traded for any reason. Legal protection of consumer personal data in electronic transactions with legal certainty is as stated in Article 19 of the Consumer Protection Law, which states that e-commerce startups are responsible for losses experienced by consumers by providing administrative compensation to consumers.
Settlement Of Industrial Relations Disputes Due To Termination Of Employment Due To Efficiency In Maintaining Balance Between Employers And Workers Sudirgo, Tony; Iryani, Dewi; Setiawan, Puguh Aji Hari
Ilmu Hukum Prima (IHP) Vol. 8 No. 2 (2025): JURNAL ILMU HUKUM PRIMA
Publisher : jurnal.unprimdn.ac.id

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.34012/jihp.v8i2.7645

Abstract

Regulations related to termination of employment for reasons of efficiency are not explained explicitly, this will have an impact on the emergence of industrial relations disputes, thus affecting the balance between the interests of employers and the protection of workers/laborers. This study aims to examine the regulations regarding termination of employment for reasons of efficiency based on laws and judges' decisions and efforts to resolve them to ensure justice for the parties. In this study, a normative juridical method is used with a statutory and case approach, where this study analyzes Law Number 13 of 2003, Law Number 6 of 2023, Government Regulation Number 35 of 2021, and decisions such as the Constitutional Court Number 19/PUU-IX/2011. With the findings of ambiguity in the definition of efficiency, the phrase loss, and prevention of potential losses, which are seen in the cases of PT. S against Mrs. E and PT. Jtrust Olympindo Multi Finance against Sudadi Hari Widianto, causing misuse of efficiency reasons in termination of employment. Thus, in its implications, it is necessary to update regulations with a more explicit definition of efficiency, strengthening the role of judges in analyzing company financial audit reports, and transparent steps by companies such as analyzing the company's macro and micro conditions in advance and mapping workers/laborers to ensure the achievement of justice, benefits, and legal certainty, so as to support a harmonious balance in industrial relations.
Binding Force Of Land Ownership Certificates In Name-Borne Agreements By Foreign Citizens To Realize Justice Japar, Kasun; Suhariyanto, Didik; Ismail, Ismail
Ilmu Hukum Prima (IHP) Vol. 8 No. 2 (2025): JURNAL ILMU HUKUM PRIMA
Publisher : jurnal.unprimdn.ac.id

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.34012/jihp.v8i2.7646

Abstract

Indonesian land law based on the Basic Agrarian Law (UUPA) adheres to the principle of nationality which prohibits foreign citizens (WNA) from owning freehold land.However, the high interest of foreign nationals in property investment has triggered legal smuggling (fraus legis) through nominee agreements, where the name of an Indonesian citizen (WNI) is used on the Certificate of Ownership (SHM) even though the land is controlled by a foreign national. This phenomenon creates a lack of synchronization between das sollen (legal norms) and das sein (societal practice), creating a legal vacuum because nominee agreements are not regulated in the Indonesian civil law system. The main legal issue is the binding force of SHMs from these illegal transactions and how justice is achieved when disputes arise between formal ownership and actual control. This research is a normative legal research with a statute approach and a case approach.. Secondary data consisting of primary, secondary, and tertiary legal materials were collected through library research. The data were analyzed qualitatively by focusing the study on three court decisions, namely Gianyar District Court Decision No. 259/Pdt.G/2020/PN. Gin, Denpasar District Court Decision No. 274/Pdt.G/2020/PN. Dps, and Gianyar District Court Decision No. 137/Pdt.G/2021/PN. Gin, to understand the judge's considerations in name-borrowing disputes. The results of the research show that the agreement to borrow a name by a foreign national is legally void because it does not fulfill the requirements of a lawful cause (Article 1320 of the Civil Code) and violates Article 26 paragraph (2) of the UUPA.The binding power of a SHM is absolute, with the court upholding the certificate as the sole valid evidence, demonstrating formal justice and legal certainty. This situation conflicts with substantive justice, as foreign nationals lose their investments without recourse. The judicial system ultimately prioritizes the integrity of national agrarian law by adhering to the principle of ex turpi causa non oritur actio, which states that no rights can arise from reprehensible acts.
Legal Certainty Regarding The Cancellation Of Arbitration Awards In District Courts Juniarty, Santy; Setiawan, Puguh Aji Hari; Iryani, Dewi
Ilmu Hukum Prima (IHP) Vol. 8 No. 2 (2025): JURNAL ILMU HUKUM PRIMA
Publisher : jurnal.unprimdn.ac.id

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.34012/jihp.v8i2.7647

Abstract

Arbitration in Indonesia, based on Law Number 30 of 1999, is designed as a dispute resolution mechanism that provides legal certainty through its final and binding decisions. This principle, known as das sollen, is expected to support a conducive investment climate. However, in practice (das sein), Article 70 of the same law authorizes the District Court to annul arbitration awards. The implementation of this authority, particularly on grounds of "trickery," often leads to inconsistencies in court decisions. This study uses a normative juridical research method with a statute approach and a conceptual approach. Data collection was conducted through library research on primary, secondary, and tertiary legal materials. The collected data were then analyzed qualitatively using systematic, theological, and grammatical interpretations. To analyze legal issues in depth, this study uses the Theory of Legal Certainty and the Theory of Agreements as analytical tools for three relevant case studies of Supreme Court decisions: Decision Number 941 B/Pdt.Sus-Arbt/2024, Decision Number 244 B/Pdt.Sus-Arbt/2022, and Decision Number 477 B/Pdt.Sus-Arbt/2022. The research findings indicate that the legal basis and considerations of judges in annulling arbitral awards are in accordance with legal provisions only if they are based on violations of fundamental principles in the legal process, such as the existence of legally proven fraud that affects the legal standing of the parties or the integrity of the process. However, court intervention becomes unlawful when re-examining the substance of the dispute, because it violates the autonomy of the parties' will. It is concluded that legal certainty regarding the annulment of arbitral awards is in a vulnerable condition due to inconsistent interpretations of judges. This inconsistency directly weakens the predictability of law and the principle of finality of arbitration, which has implications for declining investor confidence in the domestic dispute resolution system.
Application of the Principle of Commercial Exit from Financial Distress in Corporate Bankruptcy Applications and its Implications for Creditor Protection Elina, Rindi; Suhariyanto, Didik; Setiawan, Puguh Aji Hari
Ilmu Hukum Prima (IHP) Vol. 8 No. 2 (2025): JURNAL ILMU HUKUM PRIMA
Publisher : jurnal.unprimdn.ac.id

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.34012/jihp.v8i2.7665

Abstract

This research is motivated by the increasing misuse of bankruptcy mechanisms in Indonesia, where solvent debtors exploit bankruptcy as a strategy to evade obligations rather than as a genuine solution for financial distress. The study aims to analyze the regulation of corporate bankruptcy applications that reflect the principle of Commercial Exit from Financial Distress and to examine creditor protection in cases that deviate from this principle. Using a normative juridical approach through statute, case, and conceptual methods, this research relies on primary legal materials including Law Number 37 of 2004 concerning Bankruptcy and Suspension of Debt Payment Obligations and two court decisions: Number 04/Pdt.Sus-Pailit/2023/PN Niaga Medan (PT Ricky Kurniawan Kertapersada) and Number 41/Pdt.Sus-Pailit/2025/PN Niaga Central Jakarta (PT Teknik Lancar Mandiri). The analysis was conducted qualitatively using sociological interpretation to link legal norms with judicial practice. The findings reveal that Indonesia’s bankruptcy system remains formalistic because it does not apply an insolvency test as a substantive basis for determining financial failure. The PT RKK case demonstrates bankruptcy abuse to avoid debt, while the PT TLM case exemplifies fair application of the Commercial Exit from Financial Distress principle. Hence, reform of bankruptcy law is essential to achieve substantive justice and equitable legal protection for creditors. Penelitian ini menggunakan metode hukum normatif dengan pendekatan yuridis normatif, melalui statute approach, case approach, dan conceptual approach. Bahan hukum primer yang digunakan meliputi peraturan perundang-undangan dan dua putusan pengadilan, yaitu Putusan Nomor 04/Pdt.Sus-Pailit/2023/PN Niaga Medan (PT Ricky Kurniawan Kertapersada) dan Putusan Nomor 41/Pdt.Sus-Pailit/2025/PN Niaga Jakarta Pusat (PT Teknik Lancar Mandiri). Analisis dilakukan secara kualitatif menggunakan metode interpretasi sosiologis untuk menemukan relevansi norma hukum dengan penerapannya di pengadilan. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa sistem kepailitan Indonesia masih bersifat formalistik karena belum menerapkan insolvency test sebagai dasar substantif. Kasus PT RKK menunjukkan penyalahgunaan mekanisme pailit untuk menghindari kewajiban, sedangkan PT TLM mencerminkan penerapan prinsip Commercial Exit from Financial Distress secara adil dan proporsional. Oleh karena itu, reformasi hukum kepailitan diperlukan untuk memastikan keadilan substantif dan perlindungan hukum kreditur secara seimbang.
Taxpayer Protection Against Administrative Sanctions In The Fair Tax Dispute Objection And Appeal Process Tjahjadi, Hamdani; Suhariyanto, Didik; Iryani, Dewi
Ilmu Hukum Prima (IHP) Vol. 8 No. 2 (2025): JURNAL ILMU HUKUM PRIMA
Publisher : jurnal.unprimdn.ac.id

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.34012/jihp.v8i2.7667

Abstract

This research is motivated by the lack of synchronization between das sollen (the ideal law) and das sein (the reality) in the implementation of administrative sanctions during tax objection and appeal processes. Law Number 7 of 2021 concerning the Harmonization of Tax Regulations (HPP) introduced reforms to enhance compliance and fairness, yet its application often raises issues of legal uncertainty and potential injustice for taxpayers. The study aims to examine how taxpayer protection against administrative sanctions in the objection and appeal process can be implemented fairly. Using a normative juridical method with statutory, conceptual, and comparative approaches, this research analyzes primary legal sources (laws and regulations), secondary materials (literature and journals), and tertiary materials as support. The analysis employs descriptive-analytical techniques with deductive reasoning. The findings reveal that the administrative sanctions under the HPP Law still create justice-related problems, particularly concerning legal certainty and the protection of taxpayers’ rights. Although intended to enforce compliance, these sanctions may burden taxpayers seeking justice. Therefore, a more proportional and transparent protection mechanism is required to align sanction enforcement with the principles of justice and fairness, balancing the interests of the state and taxpayers in resolving tax disputes. Metode penelitian yang digunakan adalah penelitian yuridis normatif dengan pendekatan perundang-undangan (statute approach), pendekatan konseptual (conceptual approach), dan pendekatan perbandingan (comparative approach). Bahan hukum primer berupa peraturan perundang-undangan terkait, bahan hukum sekunder berupa literatur dan jurnal hukum perpajakan, serta bahan hukum tersier digunakan sebagai pendukung analisis. Teknik analisis yang digunakan adalah deskriptif-analitis dengan penalaran deduktif untuk menarik kesimpulan. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa sanksi administratif dalam proses keberatan dan banding sebagaimana diatur dalam UU HPP masih menyisakan problematika keadilan, baik dari sisi kepastian hukum maupun perlindungan hak wajib pajak. Di satu sisi, sanksi administratif dimaksudkan sebagai instrumen penegakan kepatuhan. Namun, di sisi lain, penerapannya dalam konteks keberatan dan banding berpotensi membebani wajib pajak yang sedang memperjuangkan haknya. Oleh karena itu, diperlukan perlindungan WP terhadap sanksi administratif yang lebih proporsional, transparan, dan konsisten dengan asas keadilan, sehingga dapat menciptakan keseimbangan antara kepentingan negara dalam pemungutan pajak dan hak wajib pajak untuk memperoleh keadilan dalam sengketa perpajakan.
ANALISIS HUKUM PENETAPAN SURAT DAKWAAN OLEH JAKSA PENUNTUT UMUM TERHADAP SUATU TINDAK PIDANA: Determination, Indictment, Criminal. joseph, hasvian
Ilmu Hukum Prima (IHP) Vol. 3 No. 2 (2020): JURNAL ILMU HUKUM PRIMA
Publisher : jurnal.unprimdn.ac.id

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.34012/jihap.v3i2.1119

Abstract

Surat dakwaan dalam hukum acara pidana sangat penting karena merupakan dasar pemeriksaan di sidang pengadilan. Pemeriksaan yang dilakukan oleh hakim terbatas pada apa yang didakwakan penuntut umum. Penyusunan rumusan surat dakwaan mesti cermat dan tepat agar tidak ada lubang bagi terdakwa untuk terlepas dari pertanggung jawaban hukum atas tindak pidana yang dilakukannya. Dari rumusan tersebut dapat dilihat bahwa surat dakwaan yang dibuat oleh penuntut umum yang berisi identitas terdakwa/para terdakwa. Syarat materiil, menyebutkan waktu dan tempat tindak pidana dilakukan; memuat uraian secara cermat, jelas, dan lengkap mengenai tindak pidana yang didakwakan
ASPEK PERLINDUNGAN HUKUM HAK KEKAYAAN INTELEKTUAL (HKI) : FUNGSI SENTRA HKI DALAM PENGEMBANGAN HKI DI PERGURUAN TINGGI Keliat, Venia Utami; Simanjuntak, Immanuel; Tarigan Sibero, Chandra Lahirisa Putra
Ilmu Hukum Prima (IHP) Vol. 5 No. 2 (2022): JURNAL ILMU HUKUM PRIMA
Publisher : jurnal.unprimdn.ac.id

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.34012/jihp.v5i2.2924

Abstract

The implementation of the Intellectual Property Rights (IPR) system qualitatively and quantitatively in Indonesia can be said to be still not running properly, especially in the university environment while universities are institutions that produce a lot of Intellectual Property. The low knowledge of the academic community about the Definition of IPR and the Legal Basis for IPR Protection is the main problem in this journal. This journal explains the understanding, types, and legal basis of IPR as a whole and the function of the IPR Center in the development of IPR in the Higher Education environment. The method used in this research is normative legal research, the data used in this research is secondary data and the data collection technique in this research is through library research. Keywords : Intellectual Property Rights (IPR), University, Legal Protection
PENANGANAN DUGAAN PEMERASAN DALAM PENERAPAN RESTORATIVE JUSTICE DALAM PERATURAN POLISI NO.08 TAHUN 2021 BAGI PENYALAHGUNAAN NARKOTIKA DI PANTI REHABILITASI Kusumah, R. Wikra Febrian
Ilmu Hukum Prima (IHP) Vol. 7 No. 1 (2024): JURNAL ILMU HUKUM PRIMA
Publisher : jurnal.unprimdn.ac.id

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.34012/jihp.v7i1.4010

Abstract

Rehabilitation Center is a place. In this study, researchers used the normative juridical method, which is research focused on examining the application of rules or norms in positive law. This method is carried out to know the handling of allegations of extortion in the application of restorative justice against drug abuse in rehabilitation centers and to find out the implementation of restorative justice in Perpol No. 8 of 2021 against drug abuse in rehabilitation centers. This study found that this restorative justice approach involves law enforcement officials, families, and communities, considering addicts and victims as individuals who need rehabilitation. Measures to prevent extortion in rehabilitation centers, respond to reports, investigate, enforce the law, and protect and support victims should be provided. Education and collaboration with relevant agencies are also important. Restorative justice can address drug abuse holistically, protect individual rights, and create a safe rehabilitation environment. Synergy from law enforcement officials, stakeholders, and the community is needed to tackle drug abuse, especially among children, adolescents, and the younger generation. Restorative justice approaches help victims recover, create a safer environment, and minimize community unrest. Its implementation needs to involve various parties to increase the effectiveness of drug case resolution and provide rehabilitation opportunities for drug users.