cover
Article Per Year (5 Year)
All
Home Page
OAI Link
Editorial Team
Contact
Reviewer
Google Scholar
Contact Name
Dr. Muslim Lobubun, S.H., M.H.
Contact Email
azizfahruddin@gmail.com
Phone
+6298127270
Journal Mail Official
azizfahruddin@gmail.com
Editorial Address
https://journal.stihbiak.ac.id/index.php/kyadiren/about/editorialTeam
Location
Kab. biak numfor,
P a p u a
INDONESIA
Jurnal Ilmu Hukum KYADIREN
Published by Sekolah Tinggi Ilmu Hukum Biak-Papua
ISSN : 25025058     EISSN : 2715503X     DOI : -
Core Subject : Social,
Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice
Jurnal Hukum Kyadiren menerima manuskrip dengan topik-topik terkait masalah hukum di indonesia dan mancanegara secara umum. Artikel-artikel yang dikirim mencakup permasalahan seputar hukum perdata (Civil Law), hukum pidana(Criminal Law), hukum acara perdata (Civil Procedural Law), Hukum acara pidana (Criminal Procedure Law), hukum dagang (Commercial Law), hukum konstitusi (Constitutional Law), hukum internasional (International Law), hukum administrasi negara (State Administrative Law), hukum adat (Adat Law), hukum agama (Islamic Law), hukum agraria (Agrarian Law), hukum lingkungan (Environmental Law), Hukum Pendidikan (Educational Law), Bahasa Hukum (Legal Linguistics) dan sebagainya.
Arjuna Subject : Umum - Umum
Articles 364 Documents
 33   34   35   36   37 
Aceh’s Position in the Designation of People’s Mining Areas (WPR) amid the Centralization of Mining Authority Kurdi Kurdi; Ibnu Mazjah; Teuku Ahmad Dadek
Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Kyadiren Vol 8 No 2 (2027): Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Kyadiren
Publisher : PPPM, Sekolah Tinggi Ilmu Hukum (STIH) Biak-Papua

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.46924/jihk.v8i2.529

Abstract

The centralization of mining authority following the enactment of Law No. 2 of 2025 and Government Regulation No. 39 of 2025 has raised questions concerning the position of the Aceh Government in the designation of People’s Mining Areas (Wilayah Pertambangan Rakyat/WPR), particularly regarding the interaction between the national legal framework governing mineral and coal mining and Aceh’s special status under Law No. 11 of 2006. This study aims to examine the scope of the Aceh Government’s authority and develop an appropriate normative framework for WPR designation based on the principle of lex specialis derogat legi generali. Employing a normative juridical approach, the study applies statutory, conceptual, historical, and legal harmonization approaches. The Law on the Government of Aceh (UUPA) continues to operate as lex specialis, whereas the national mineral and coal mining framework applies only to the extent that it does not supersede Aceh’s special legal arrangements. The principal legal issue arises from a regulatory gap in the implementing framework governing the exercise of authority. This study proposes a functional allocation of authority in which regency and municipal governments submit WPR proposals, the Governor of Aceh exercises designation authority, and the Central Government performs standardization and supervisory functions. This framework is intended to reconcile the national mining governance system with Aceh’s constitutionally and statutorily recognized special autonomy.
Protecting a Spouse’s Assets or Recovering the Proceeds of Corruption? The Dilemma of Legal Certainty Donna Valentina Yanti; Agus Surono; Zaitun Abdullah
Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Kyadiren Vol 8 No 2 (2027): Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Kyadiren
Publisher : PPPM, Sekolah Tinggi Ilmu Hukum (STIH) Biak-Papua

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.46924//jihk.v8i2.533

Abstract

Marital agreements regulate the separation of assets between spouses; however, their legal status in corruption cases raises questions about their evidentiary value and their capacity to protect assets from seizure or forfeiture. This study examines the legal status of marital agreements as authentic deeds, identifies the legal criteria for determining asset provenance, third-party good faith, and the nexus between assets and criminal offenses, and analyzes these issues in light of Supreme Court Decision No. 5009 K/Pid.Sus/2025. It also examines notaries’ responsibilities in exercising due diligence and adhering to the principle of prudence. This study employs a normative legal research method using statutory and case-law approaches, with qualitative analysis of legal materials. The findings indicate that the evidentiary force of an authentic deed does not confer absolute immunity from asset seizure or forfeiture. Asset protection depends on the validity of the agreement, the origin of the assets, the parties’ good faith, the connection between the assets and the alleged criminal offense, and the sufficiency of the evidence. Notaries are required to verify supporting documents and draft contractual clauses with due care. Legal certainty therefore requires proportionate evidentiary standards and stronger due diligence requirements within the notarial profession.
The Limits of Notarial Responsibility in Cross-Border Public Company Acquisitions Sherly Berliana; Yoyo Arifardhani; R. Utji Sriwulan W
Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Kyadiren Vol 8 No 2 (2027): Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Kyadiren
Publisher : PPPM, Sekolah Tinggi Ilmu Hukum (STIH) Biak-Papua

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.46924/jihk.v8i2.535

Abstract

The acquisition of a publicly traded company involving foreign investors raises several legal issues concerning notarial authority, document validity, procedural compliance, and shareholder protection. This study examines whether the exercise of notarial authority in the acquisition process complies with the legal framework governing limited liability companies, capital markets, and foreign investment. It also identifies the legal challenges arising in such transactions. The study adopts a normative legal research methodology using statutory, conceptual, and case approaches. Legal materials are analyzed qualitatively through deductive reasoning and systematic legal interpretation. The findings indicate that notaries play a crucial role in ensuring the authenticity of legal documents and providing legal certainty in corporate transactions. However, their authority does not replace or supersede the respective responsibilities of directors, investors, or regulatory authorities. The principal legal challenges involve document validity, compliance with acquisition procedures, disclosure obligations, and the consistent application of legal requirements governing changes in share ownership and corporate control. This study concludes that legal certainty in cross-border acquisitions requires rigorous document verification, procedural compliance, and effective coordination among all parties involved.
Returning Land Title Certificates to Parties Other Than the Registered Rights Holder in Criminal Judgments Latu Rangga Mito Sejati; Himawan Estu Bagijo
Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Kyadiren Vol 8 No 2 (2027): Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Kyadiren
Publisher : PPPM, Sekolah Tinggi Ilmu Hukum (STIH) Biak-Papua

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.46924/4njcq250

Abstract

The return of land title certificates admitted as evidence in criminal proceedings raises legal concerns when the designated recipient differs from the registered rights holder. This study examines the consistency of the legal reasoning in Mojokerto District Court Judgment No. 136/Pid.B/2023/PN.Mjk concerning Certificate of Ownership (Sertifikat Hak Milik [SHM]) No. 4177, registered in the name of Moh. Saifuddin Annafabi. It also develops an analytical framework for distinguishing the return of evidence from the formal determination of land ownership. Using normative legal research, this study employs statutory, case, and conceptual approaches, followed by prescriptive qualitative analysis. The findings indicate that the designation of STIT Raden Wijaya Mojokerto as the recipient of the certificate must be distinguished from a definitive determination of land ownership. Trial testimony and the status of the registered rights holder underscore the need to verify the legal basis for any transfer of land rights. This study concludes that the legal analysis should address three distinct aspects: the return of evidence, the validity of the transfer of land rights, and the recipient’s legal capacity to hold such rights. Distinguishing these aspects is essential to strengthening legal certainty in land ownership.

Page 37 of 37 | Total Record : 364

 33   34   35   36   37 

Filter by Year

2016 2026


Reset
Filter By Issues
All Issue Vol 8 No 2 (2027): Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Kyadiren Vol 8 No 1 (2026): Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Kyadiren Vol 7 No 2 (2026): Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Kyadiren Vol 7 No 1 (2025): Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Kyadiren Vol 6 No 2 (2025): Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Kyadiren Vol 6 No 1 (2024): Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Kyadiren Vol 5 No 2 (2024): Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Kyadiren Vol 5 No 1 (2023): Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Kyadiren Vol 4 No 1 (2022): Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Kyadiren Vol 3 No 2 (2022): Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Kyadiren Vol 6 No 1 (2021): Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Kyadiren Vol 3 No 1 (2021): Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Kyadiren Vol 2 No 2 (2021): Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Kyadiren Vol 5 No 2 (2020): Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Kyadiren Vol 5 No 1 (2020): Jurnal Ilmu Hukum KYADIREN Vol 2 No 1 (2020): Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Kyadiren Vol 1 No 2 (2020): Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Kyadiren Vol 4 No 2 (2019): Jurnal Ilmu Hukum KYADIREN Vol 1 No 1 (2019): Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Kyadiren Vol 1 No 1 (2016): Jurnal Ilmu Hukum KYADIREN More Issue