cover
Article Per Year (5 Year)
All
Home Page
OAI Link
Editorial Team
Contact
Reviewer
Google Scholar
Contact Name
Dr. Muslim Lobubun, S.H., M.H.
Contact Email
azizfahruddin@gmail.com
Phone
+6298127270
Journal Mail Official
azizfahruddin@gmail.com
Editorial Address
https://journal.stihbiak.ac.id/index.php/kyadiren/about/editorialTeam
Location
Kab. biak numfor,
P a p u a
INDONESIA
Jurnal Ilmu Hukum KYADIREN
Published by Sekolah Tinggi Ilmu Hukum Biak-Papua
ISSN : 25025058     EISSN : 2715503X     DOI : -
Core Subject : Social,
Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice
Jurnal Hukum Kyadiren menerima manuskrip dengan topik-topik terkait masalah hukum di indonesia dan mancanegara secara umum. Artikel-artikel yang dikirim mencakup permasalahan seputar hukum perdata (Civil Law), hukum pidana(Criminal Law), hukum acara perdata (Civil Procedural Law), Hukum acara pidana (Criminal Procedure Law), hukum dagang (Commercial Law), hukum konstitusi (Constitutional Law), hukum internasional (International Law), hukum administrasi negara (State Administrative Law), hukum adat (Adat Law), hukum agama (Islamic Law), hukum agraria (Agrarian Law), hukum lingkungan (Environmental Law), Hukum Pendidikan (Educational Law), Bahasa Hukum (Legal Linguistics) dan sebagainya.
Arjuna Subject : Umum - Umum
Articles 356 Documents
 32   33   34   35   36 
Controlling Ministerial Discretion in the Designation of State General Reserve Land Utilization Under Government Regulation No. 20 of 2021 Muslim Lobubun
Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Kyadiren Vol 5 No 1 (2023): Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Kyadiren
Publisher : PPPM, Sekolah Tinggi Ilmu Hukum (STIH) Biak-Papua

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.46924/jihk.v5i1.512

Abstract

Government Regulation No. 20 of 2021 establishes State General Reserve Land (TCUN) from abandoned land. Under Articles 27–28 juncto Articles 74 and 87 of ATR/BPN Ministerial Regulation No. 20 of 2021, the Minister holds discretionary authority to determine TCUN allocation. However, broad discretion risks arbitrary land distribution. This study analyzes the legal limits of ministerial discretion in TCUN utilization post-Job Creation Law and formulates control parameters using normative legal research. The study reveals that discretion cannot operate autonomously; it must align with Good Governance Principles (AUPB), the social function of land under Article 6 of the Basic Agrarian Law (UUPA), and agrarian reform goals. This paper proposes a five-stage control model: authority review, discretionary purposes and social function review, agrarian reform relevance review, objectivity and due-care review, and procedural accountability review. Agrarian reform serves as a mandatory consideration whenever TCUN characteristics relate to land redistribution.  
Recognition Before Authorization: Reconstructing FPIC for the Use of Ulayat Land of Customary Law Communities in South Papua Muslim Lobubun
Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Kyadiren Vol 7 No 2 (2026): Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Kyadiren
Publisher : PPPM, Sekolah Tinggi Ilmu Hukum (STIH) Biak-Papua

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.46924/jihk.v7i2.513

Abstract

Constitutional recognition of customary law communities does not, by itself, guarantee the protection of ulayat land when the state is preparing to issue administrative decisions that enable third parties to use such territories. This issue is particularly significant in Papua because the Special Autonomy regime requires the provision of ulayat land to be conducted through deliberation aimed at reaching agreement with the relevant customary law community. This study examines the legal position of recognition of customary law communities and Free, Prior and Informed Consent (FPIC) in decision-making concerning the use of ulayat land and formulates a legal framework that places the protection of ulayat rights before authorization is granted. This study employs normative legal research, using statutory, conceptual, and case approaches. The findings demonstrate that land administration and registration contribute to legal certainty for ulayat rights but cannot be treated as the sole basis for the existence of rights that positive law also links to the continuing factual existence of the community and its ulayat relationship with the land. The study proposes a recognition-before-authorization framework based on the principle of protective sequencing, comprising preliminary examination of indications of ulayat rights, temporary administrative safeguards, participatory inventory and mapping, strengthened recognition, substantive consent, and authorization only after land status and community consent have been resolved. This framework seeks to prevent delays in the administrative recognition of customary law communities from allowing third-party legal interests to be established ahead of ulayat rights over Indigenous territories.
Criminal Liability of Political Buzzers for Disseminating False Information on Social Media under Indonesia's 2026 Criminal Law Adjustments James Simanjuntak; Muhammad Rifky Adamsyah
Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Kyadiren Vol 8 No 2 (2027): Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Kyadiren
Publisher : PPPM, Sekolah Tinggi Ilmu Hukum (STIH) Biak-Papua

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.46924/jihk.v8i2.518

Abstract

Political buzzers become a matter of criminal law when the amplification of political messages shifts into the dissemination of false news or notices through social media. This article examines the structure of the relevant offenses and the criminal liability of political buzzers after Indonesia's Criminal Code entered into force and was simultaneously adjusted by Law No. 1 of 2026 on Criminal Law Adjustments. Using prescriptive normative legal research, the study applies statutory, conceptual, and case approaches together with grammatical, systematic, teleological, and temporal interpretation. It finds that political buzzers do not constitute a special category of offender; liability turns on each person's conduct and culpability. For conduct committed before January 2, 2026, Article 28(3) in conjunction with Article 45A(3) of the EIT Law required intent, knowledge of falsity, electronic dissemination, and actual public unrest in physical space. Since January 2, 2026, Articles 263 and 264 of the Criminal Code, as adjusted by Law No. 1 of 2026, both require knowledge and actual public unrest, while differing in the type of prohibited content. Constitutional Court Decision No. 170/PUU-XXIV/2026 confirms their result-based character. The article proposes a six-layer test covering tempus delicti and lex mitior, attribution, content classification, mens rea, public unrest and causation, and modes of participation.
Examining the Legitimacy of the Free Nutritious Meal Program through Western Legal Philosophy and Pancasila Lutfiadi Lutfiadi; Moh. Ali Imron F.H.; Win Yuli Wardani; Noer Dini Camelia; Febrina Heryanti
Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Kyadiren Vol 8 No 2 (2027): Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Kyadiren
Publisher : PPPM, Sekolah Tinggi Ilmu Hukum (STIH) Biak-Papua

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.46924/jihk.v8i2.503

Abstract

The Free Nutritious Meal (MBG) Program is a strategic state policy aimed at addressing nutritional needs, improving human resources, and promoting social welfare. This study examines its legitimacy through natural law, legal positivism, utilitarianism, and Pancasila legal philosophy. Using normative legal research with philosophical, statutory, and conceptual approaches, the study employs literature review and qualitative normative analysis. The MBG Program possesses substantial philosophical legitimacy by promoting the protection of life, human dignity, legality, legal certainty, social utility, and distributive justice. From a Pancasila perspective, the program reflects Divinity through institutional integrity, Humanity through respect for dignity, Unity through equitable access, Democracy through public participation, and Social Justice through proportional benefit distribution. However, its legitimacy remains conditional upon consistent implementation of legality, morality, accountability, transparency, and social justice. Thus, legitimacy depends not only on policy objectives but also on substantive implementation.
Checks and Balances in Two Systems of Government: Indonesia and Japan Wirianingsih Wirianingsih; Toto Tohir Suriaatmaja
Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Kyadiren Vol 8 No 2 (2027): Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Kyadiren
Publisher : PPPM, Sekolah Tinggi Ilmu Hukum (STIH) Biak-Papua

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.46924/jihk.v8i2.505

Abstract

Checks and balances constitute a fundamental principle of modern constitutionalism, evolving from the separation of powers to prevent the concentration of governmental authority and ensure institutional accountability. This study comparatively examines the design and effectiveness of legislative oversight over the executive in Indonesia’s presidential system and Japan’s parliamentary system. Using a normative-juridical method, the study applies statutory, conceptual, and comparative approaches through analysis of constitutional provisions, legislation, institutional documents, and legal scholarship. The findings show that Indonesia adopts a relative separation of powers, with the House of Representatives (DPR) exercising legislative, budgetary, and oversight functions to constrain executive authority. Japan, by contrast, employs a parliamentary system characterized by a fusion of powers, in which the Cabinet is politically accountable to the National Diet. The effectiveness of checks and balances depends on political configurations, institutional capacity, and constitutional arrangements. Thus, checks and balances are context-dependent mechanisms shaped by each system’s constitutional and political structure.
The Borgtocht (Suretyship) Paradox in Bankruptcy: Guarantor Liability versus Ownership Rights Rahmandika Reinhardiyan; Jum Anggriani
Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Kyadiren Vol 8 No 2 (2027): Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Kyadiren
Publisher : PPPM, Sekolah Tinggi Ilmu Hukum (STIH) Biak-Papua

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.46924/pknfph18

Abstract

Debtor bankruptcy presents complex legal issues when third-party assets pledged as collateral under a borgtocht (suretyship) arrangement are included in the bankruptcy estate, even though the third-party owner has not been declared bankrupt. This study examines the legal status of third-party collateral assets and the forms of legal protection available under Indonesian bankruptcy and secured-transactions law. It employs a normative juridical research method using statutory, conceptual, and case-based approaches, with particular emphasis on Supreme Court Decision No. 476 K/Pdt.Sus-Pailit/2022. The findings demonstrate that liability arising from a borgtocht arrangement does not automatically transfer ownership of third-party assets to the debtor’s bankruptcy estate. Legal protection is available through verification of ownership, the filing of ancillary claims (gugatan lain-lain), and the exercise of available legal remedies, as further reinforced by Supreme Court Circular Letter No. 2 of 2024 (SEMA No. 2 of 2024). The study concludes that clearer limitations on the curator’s authority and more precise mechanisms for the execution of third-party collateral are necessary to ensure legal certainty and safeguard the property rights of non-debtor third parties.

Page 36 of 36 | Total Record : 356

 32   33   34   35   36 

Filter by Year

2016 2026


Reset
Filter By Issues
All Issue Vol 8 No 2 (2027): Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Kyadiren Vol 8 No 1 (2026): Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Kyadiren Vol 7 No 2 (2026): Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Kyadiren Vol 7 No 1 (2025): Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Kyadiren Vol 6 No 2 (2025): Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Kyadiren Vol 6 No 1 (2024): Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Kyadiren Vol 5 No 2 (2024): Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Kyadiren Vol 5 No 1 (2023): Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Kyadiren Vol 4 No 1 (2022): Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Kyadiren Vol 3 No 2 (2022): Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Kyadiren Vol 6 No 1 (2021): Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Kyadiren Vol 3 No 1 (2021): Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Kyadiren Vol 2 No 2 (2021): Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Kyadiren Vol 5 No 2 (2020): Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Kyadiren Vol 5 No 1 (2020): Jurnal Ilmu Hukum KYADIREN Vol 2 No 1 (2020): Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Kyadiren Vol 1 No 2 (2020): Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Kyadiren Vol 4 No 2 (2019): Jurnal Ilmu Hukum KYADIREN Vol 1 No 1 (2019): Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Kyadiren Vol 1 No 1 (2016): Jurnal Ilmu Hukum KYADIREN More Issue