cover
Article Per Year (5 Year)
All
Home Page
OAI Link
Editorial Team
Contact
Reviewer
Google Scholar
Contact Name
Dr. Yati Nurhayati, SH.,MH
Contact Email
yatinurhayati1904@yahoo.com
Phone
+6281223692567
Journal Mail Official
yatinurhayati1904@yahoo.com
Editorial Address
Jl Adyaksa No.2 Banjarmasin, Kalimantan Selatan, Indonesia.
Location
Kota banjarmasin,
Kalimantan selatan
INDONESIA
Al-Adl : Jurnal Hukum
Published by Universitas Islam Kalimantan Muhammad Arsyad Al Banjari
ISSN : 19794940     EISSN : 24770124     DOI : -
Core Subject : Social,
Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice
Al - Adl : Jurnal Hukum is a journal that contains scientific writings in the field of law either in the form of research lecturers and the results of studies in the field of law published the first time in 2008 with the period published twice a year. Al - Adl Journal of Law is registered in LIPI with the code E-ISSN 2477-0124 and P-ISSN 1979-4940. Every script that goes into the editorial will be reviewed by reviewers in accordance with the field of knowledge. The review process is not more than 1 month and there is already a decision about whether or not the submission is accepted.This journal provides open access which in principle makes research available for free to the public and will support the largest exchange of global knowledge. Al Adl : Jurnal Hukum publihes twice a year (biannually) on January and July focuses on matters relating to: - Criminal law - Business law - Constitutional law - State Administration Law - Islamic law - The Basic Law
Arjuna Subject : Ilmu Sosial - Hukum
Articles 13 Documents
 1   2 
Search results for , issue "Vol 18, No 1 (2026)" : 13 Documents clear
TINDAK PIDANA NARKOTIKA OLEH RESIDIVIS: ANALISIS PENJATUHAN PIDANA BERDASARKAN UNDANG-UNDANG NOMOR 35 TAHUN 2009 TENTANG NARKOTIKA Yulianis Safrinadiya Rahman; Sri Herlina
Al-Adl : Jurnal Hukum Vol 18, No 1 (2026)
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum, Universitas Islam Kalimantan Muhammad Arsyad Al Banjari

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31602/al-adl.v18i1.20643

Abstract

One of the significant challenges in criminal law is the prevalence of narcotics offenses committed by recidivists—individuals who reoffend after having previously served a sentence. Recidivist status creates complex juridical dilemmas, as it serves as a statutory ground for sentence aggravation, often resulting in severe verdicts ranging from life imprisonment to the death penalty. This practice triggers a debate regarding the fundamental objectives of sentencing, where judges are compelled to strike a balance between retribution (retributive justice) to ensure deterrence, prevention (preventative justice), and rehabilitation (rehabilitative justice) aimed at social reintegration. This study aims to examine the legal framework governing narcotics offenses under Law Number 35 of 2009 concerning Narcotics and the specific sentencing mechanisms applied to repeat offenders. This research employs a normative legal methodology, utilizing secondary data through library research to analyze relevant statutes and legal literature. The findings demonstrate that the sentencing system under the Narcotics Law mandates aggravated penalties for offenders involved in organized networks, those involving minors, and those with recidivist status. Sentencing for narcotics recidivists emphasizes enhanced sanctions; while Articles 486 to 488 of the Criminal Code (KUHP) establish general provisions for recidivism, Article 144 of Law Number 35 of 2009 specifically stipulates that recidivists may be subject to an additional one-third of the maximum prescribed penalty.
REFORMULASI PENGATURAN KEWENANGAN BADAN INTELIJEN NEGARA DALAM HUKUM KEAMANAN NASIONAL BERDASARKAN KONSTITUSI RI Abdas Raga Sugara; M. Hadin Muhjad; Rudi Indrawan
Al-Adl : Jurnal Hukum Vol 18, No 1 (2026)
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum, Universitas Islam Kalimantan Muhammad Arsyad Al Banjari

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31602/al-adl.v18i1.20423

Abstract

This study examines the regulation of the authority of the State Intelligence Agency (Badan Intelijen Negara/BIN) within the framework of national security law based on the Constitution of the Republic of Indonesia. The analysis focuses on three principal issues: (1) the regulation of BIN’s authority in national security law under the 1945 Constitution; (2) the nature of intelligence institutions within the national legal system; and (3) the reformulation of the scope of BIN’s authority in the Constitution and its implementing regulations. The research employs a normative juridical method with historical, conceptual, statutory, comparative, philosophical, and case-based approaches. The findings reveal the existence of legal residue and sociological problems following the enactment of Law Number 17 of 2011 on State Intelligence, particularly concerning democratic guarantees, the protection of human rights, accountability, and the political neutrality of intelligence activities. In addition, the absence of clear regulation regarding an Intelligence Committee has resulted in weak coordination and oversight of state intelligence. Accordingly, this study proposes a model for reconstructing BIN’s authority through the clarification of limits on interception and financial flow examinations based on judicial authorization, the establishment of an Intelligence Committee as an independent coordination and oversight mechanism, and the strengthening of the principles of accountability and political neutrality of intelligence within the framework of a democratic rule-of-law state.
EFEKTIVITAS HUKUM UU NOMOR 1 TAHUN 2024 DALAM PENANGGULANGAN KEJAHATAN CYBERCRIME DI INDONESIA Muh. Chaerul Anwar; Andi Dewi Pratiwi; Muh. Arfhani Ichsan
Al-Adl : Jurnal Hukum Vol 18, No 1 (2026)
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum, Universitas Islam Kalimantan Muhammad Arsyad Al Banjari

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31602/al-adl.v18i1.20542

Abstract

method by examining the prevailing regulatory framework under the UU ITE and its preventive mechanisms against cybercrime. The focus of this research lies in the tools and instruments employed in the implementation of these regulations, including cyber monitoring technologies and capacity building for law enforcement agencies. The findings indicate that although there has been a decline in certain types of cybercrime, such as phishing, incidents of data breaches have increased. Amendments to the provisions of the UU ITE have contributed to clearer legal protection and a more balanced approach between safeguarding freedom of expression and protecting individual rights. Despite advancements in the structure of law enforcement, significant challenges persist, particularly with regard to limited regional capacity, uneven infrastructure development, and low levels of public digital literacy. This study further highlights the importance of periodic regulatory updates and international cooperation in addressing cybercrime that is increasingly complex and transnational in nature. Strengthening the legal system and enhancing public awareness are therefore identified as key factors in fostering a safer digital environment and supporting sustainable growth of the digital economy.
AKSESIBILITAS JAMINAN KESEHATAN BAGI PEKERJA INFORMAL DI INDONESIA: ANALISIS KEBIJAKAN JAMINAN KESEHATAN NASIONAL BERDASARKAN PRINSIP HAK ASASI MANUSIA Hanafi Hanafi; Istiana Heriani
Al-Adl : Jurnal Hukum Vol 18, No 1 (2026)
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum, Universitas Islam Kalimantan Muhammad Arsyad Al Banjari

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31602/al-adl.v18i1.20563

Abstract

The right to health is a fundamental right guaranteed under Article 28H of the 1945 Constitution of the Republic of Indonesia and various international human rights instruments, which obligate the state to provide health services that are available, affordable, accessible, and of adequate quality. In pursuit of this obligation, the Indonesian government launched the National Health Insurance Program (Jaminan Kesehatan Nasional/JKN), administered by BPJS Kesehatan, as part of the mandate of the National Social Security System Law. The program aims to deliver comprehensive health protection to all citizens, including informal workers, who account for more than 59% of the total working population in Indonesia. However, from a normative perspective, JKN policies have not fully accommodated the characteristics and needs of informal workers. The existing legal framework remains general in nature and has yet to provide specific regulations that are adaptive to the conditions of workers with unstable incomes, high mobility, and limited access to information. This situation has implications for low participation rates, the potential discontinuity of membership during income fluctuations, and disparities in access to health services. These conditions indicate a misalignment between the principle of universality mandated by regulation and the realities on the ground, resulting in unequal protection between formal and informal workers, as well as between urban and rural populations. Through a normative legal approach employing statutory and conceptual analyses, this study finds that strategic measures are required, including more flexible JKN financing schemes, the expansion of Contribution Assistance Recipients (Penerima Bantuan Iuran/PBI), the integration of participant data, the strengthening of primary healthcare facilities in remote areas, and the involvement of informal workers in the policy formulation process. These measures are expected to enhance the protection of the right to health for informal workers in an inclusive, equitable, and sustainable manner.
KEDUDUKAN DAN KEKUATAN PEMBUKTIAN DEEPFAKE DALAM PROSES PERSIDANGAN Soffyan Angga Fahlani; Eko Taufikur Rahman; Muhammad Azianor Ilmy; Arisandy Mursalin
Al-Adl : Jurnal Hukum Vol 18, No 1 (2026)
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum, Universitas Islam Kalimantan Muhammad Arsyad Al Banjari

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31602/al-adl.v18i1.18914

Abstract

Technological advancement has extended to the rapid development of artificial intelligence (AI), which has the capacity to facilitate human work and activities. One notable technological innovation is AI-based deepfake technology, which is capable of altering or generating images, videos, and audio with a high degree of resemblance to their original counterparts. While deepfakes offer benefits in creative and industrial domains, they also pose significant legal challenges, particularly with respect to misuse for cybercrime, the dissemination of disinformation, defamation, and violations of privacy. This study addresses the legal status of deepfakes within the classification of legal objects or subjects under the prevailing legal framework in Indonesia, as well as their evidentiary value under criminal procedural law and the Electronic Information and Transactions Law. This research employs a normative juridical method with statutory and conceptual approaches. Data collection is based on primary legal materials, particularly Law Number 1 of 2024 concerning the Second Amendment to Law Number 11 of 2008 on Electronic Information and Transactions (UU ITE), as well as secondary legal materials derived from relevant legal scholarship. The findings indicate that deepfakes may be classified as electronic information and/or electronic documents that possess legal standing as objects of law within the UU ITE framework. Furthermore, deepfakes may serve as admissible evidence in criminal proceedings, provided that the requirements of authentication, integrity, and relevance are satisfied. Through an expansive interpretative approach, deepfakes may also be construed as circumstantial evidence. Nevertheless, the assessment of their evidentiary validity necessitates the support of digital forensic analysis to verify the authenticity and integrity of electronic content. Accordingly, regulatory reinforcement and more comprehensive oversight mechanisms governing the use of deepfake technology are essential to prevent misuse that may cause harm to individuals and society at large.
ADDRESSING ISLAMIC ECONOMIC LAWSUIT ON RELIGIOUS COURTS AND FINANCIAL INSTITUTIONS OF CENTRAL KALIMANTAN Muhammad Luthfi Setiarno Putera; Muhammad Amin; Reza Noor Ihsan; Muhammad Faqihuddin Ibnu Sabil
Al-Adl : Jurnal Hukum Vol 18, No 1 (2026)
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum, Universitas Islam Kalimantan Muhammad Arsyad Al Banjari

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31602/al-adl.v18i1.20447

Abstract

The development of sharia financial institutions which continues to experience a positive trend in Central Kalimantan does not rule out the possibility of sharia economic disputes to emerge. Thus, there needs to be further elaboration regarding the potential and prospects for sharia economic disputes in Central Kalimantan and how prepared sharia financial institutions and religious courts are in handling sharia economic cases. This research is a type of empirical juridical research with a case approach which relies on primary data sources obtained directly from the field using observation, interviews and documentation methods which are then analyzed using analytical descriptive methods. The results of the research led the author to the first conclusion, that the potential/prospects for sharia economic matters in Central Kalimantan were very large, this could not be separated from the existence of sharia financial institutions which could serve users in various levels of society, both upper-middle and lower-middle class. Second, the readiness of Islamic financial institutions to address Islamic economic issues is supported by a sound management system. The principle of "knowing your customer" is always prioritized, ensuring consensus. Similarly, the readiness of religious courts, with judges undergoing competency development related to Islamic economics and legal sources for resolving Islamic economic disputes, is complemented by structured regulations issued by the Supreme Court.
SELF DECLARE DALAM PROSES PENETAPAN SERTIFIKASI HALAL Nahdhah Nahdhah; Iwan Riswandie
Al-Adl : Jurnal Hukum Vol 18, No 1 (2026)
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum, Universitas Islam Kalimantan Muhammad Arsyad Al Banjari

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31602/al-adl.v18i1.20904

Abstract

This study aims to examine and analyze the regulatory framework of the self-declaration mechanism in the halal certification process and the adequacy of the normative basis for oversight by the Halal Product Assurance Organizing Agency (BPJPH) under Law Number 33 of 2014 concerning Halal Product Assurance. The research is prompted by several controversies, such as the "Nabidz halal wine" case, in which products obtained halal certification through the self-declaration mechanism, subsequently triggering significant public debate. These cases demonstrate a multiplicity of interpretations regarding the oversight mechanisms within the self-declaration-based certification system. Employing a normative legal research methodology, this study analyzes Articles 49 and 50 of Law Number 33 of 2014. The findings reveal that while the self-declaration mechanism legally expands the reach of halal certification, the presence of vague clauses results in a lack of legal certainty regarding product halal status. Furthermore, the normative foundation for BPJPH oversight is legally insufficient; although Articles 49 and 50 grant supervisory authority, they are characterized as open norms and do not explicitly encompass the self-declaration mechanism.
TINJAUAN MAQASHID SYARIAH TERHADAP PERSELINGKUHAN SEBAGAI ALASAN POLIGAMI PADA PUTUSAN NOMOR 2982/PDT.G/2023/PA.BL Muhammad Rafi Azzizuddin; Abd. Rouf
Al-Adl : Jurnal Hukum Vol 18, No 1 (2026)
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum, Universitas Islam Kalimantan Muhammad Arsyad Al Banjari

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31602/al-adl.v18i1.17665

Abstract

In Court Decision Number 2982/Pdt.G/2023/PA.BL, the judge stipulated that infidelity may serve as a legal basis for polygamy. Statutorily, however, such a ground is not recognized within the formal requirements for polygamy under the prevailing Marriage Law. This study examines the use of infidelity as a justification for granting polygamy permits, specifically analyzing the judge's ratio decidendi in Decision Number 2982/Pdt.G/2023/PA.BL and evaluating it through the lens of Imam al-Shatibi’s maqashid al-shari’ah. This research adopts a normative legal method with a case approach. Legal materials are derived from secondary data collected through library research. Data processing involves editing, classifying, analyzing, and concluding, while the analysis of legal materials is conducted qualitatively with a prescriptive approach. The findings demonstrate that Decision Number 2982/Pdt.G/2023/PA.BL is consistent with maqashid al-shari’ah. Regarding the core issue—polygamy on the grounds of infidelity—the petition technically fails to meet the criteria stipulated in the Marriage Law. Nevertheless, the panel of judges exercised judicial discretion, considering various dimensions and emphasizing the substantial harm (mudharat) that would ensue should the petition be rejected. Within the framework of Imam al-Shatibi’s maqashid al-shari’ah, this case intersects with four of the al-kulliyat al-khams (the five essentials): the preservation of religion (hifz al-din), life (hifz al-nafs), lineage (hifz al-nasl), and property (hifz al-mal), as an endeavor to mitigate harm and realize the welfare (maslahah) of humanity.
PROBLEMATIKA STREET PHOTOGRAPHY DALAM PERSPEKTIF ESTETIKA SENI DAN HUKUM HAK KEKAYAAN INTELEKTUAL Desy Sugianti; Miftah Ulumudin Tsani; Dedi Sugiyanto
Al-Adl : Jurnal Hukum Vol 18, No 1 (2026)
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum, Universitas Islam Kalimantan Muhammad Arsyad Al Banjari

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31602/al-adl.v18i1.22092

Abstract

This study examines street photography in Indonesia as a visual art practice that engages freedom of expression, ethical considerations, and Intellectual Property Rights (IPR). Street photography functions not only as documentation of everyday life in public spaces but also as a medium for expressing social conditions, cultural dynamics, and urban life. Advances in digital technology and social media have facilitated the processes of image capture and dissemination, thereby increasing public access to street photography works. However, these developments have also generated legal and ethical issues. From a legal perspective, photographers hold copyright over photographic works as original creations, including both moral rights and economic rights. Nevertheless, street photography practices frequently involve photographing individuals without prior consent, which may give rise to issues concerning the right to privacy and the right to one’s image. These issues become more pronounced when photographs are used for commercial purposes or widely disseminated through digital media. This study employs a qualitative method with a normative–interpretative legal approach through the analysis of copyright regulations, legal concepts of privacy, and relevant literature. The findings indicate that the existence of public space does not eliminate the ethical responsibility of photographers. Although copyright resides with the photographer, respect for the rights and dignity of photographic subjects must be upheld. The study concludes that street photography practices in Indonesia require a balance between creative freedom, ethical awareness, and legal understanding in order to develop responsibly and sustainably.
ANALISIS NILAI KEADILAN PADA SYARAT PENAHANAN TERSANGKA DALAM PENYIDIKAN (PERBANDINGAN KUHAP 1981 DAN KUHAP 2025) Nisa Amalina Adlina
Al-Adl : Jurnal Hukum Vol 18, No 1 (2026)
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum, Universitas Islam Kalimantan Muhammad Arsyad Al Banjari

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31602/al-adl.v18i1.19049

Abstract

This study was conducted with two primary objectives. First, it examines the concept of justice in relation to the benchmark of investigators’ concerns used to assess and determine the detention of suspects under the subjective detention requirement stipulated in Article 21 paragraph (1) of the Indonesian Criminal Procedure Code (KUHAP) of 1981. Second, it analyzes a comparative assessment of the value of justice embodied in the detention requirements for suspects under Article 21 paragraph (1) of the 1981 KUHAP and Article 93 paragraph (5) of the 2025 KUHAP. This research employs normative legal research, positioning law within a system of norms by referring to statutory regulations relevant to the subject matter. Data were collected through library research and analyzed using a descriptive-analytical approach by systematically presenting the issues and examining them in depth. The findings indicate that the value of justice inherent in the subjective detention requirement under Article 21 paragraph (1) of the 1981 KUHAP—specifically regarding circumstances that give rise to “concerns” that a suspect may abscond, destroy or remove evidence, and/or reoffend—is not aligned with the principle of equality before the law. In practice, this provision relies solely on the subjective assessment of the authorized investigator, thereby creating room for discriminatory treatment in determining whether suspects should be detained. The reform of the KUHAP through Law No. 20 of 2025 reflects an effort to enhance the value of justice by formulating more objective detention requirements under Article 93 paragraph (5) compared to Article 21 paragraph (1) of the 1981 KUHAP. Nevertheless, the reformed detention provisions still lack clear evaluative benchmarks and implementing regulations, which continues to allow investigative discretion in determining whether a suspect may be detained. Consequently, the value of justice has not yet been fully guaranteed.

Page 1 of 2 | Total Record : 13

 1   2 

Filter by Year

2026 2026


Reset
Filter By Issues
All Issue Vol 18, No 1 (2026) Vol 17, No 1 (2025) Vol 16, No 2 (2024) Vol 16, No 1 (2024) Vol 15, No 2 (2023) Vol 15, No 1 (2023) Vol 14, No 2 (2022) Vol 14, No 1 (2022) Vol 13, No 2 (2021) Vol 13, No 1 (2021) Vol 12, No 2 (2020) Vol 12, No 1 (2020) Vol 11, No 2 (2019) Vol 11, No 1 (2019) Vol 10, No 2 (2018) Vol 10, No 1 (2018) Vol 9, No 3 (2017) Vol 9, No 2 (2017) Vol 9, No 1 (2017) Vol 8, No 3 (2016) Vol 8, No 2 (2016) Vol 8, No 1 (2016) Vol 7, No 14 (2015) Vol 7, No 13 (2015) Vol 6, No 12 (2014) Vol 6, No 11 (2014) Vol 5, No 10 (2013) Vol 5, No 9 (2013) More Issue