Garuda - Garba Rujukan Digital

Women's Participation in Mediation Houses in Banjarmasin City Zulaeha, Mulyani; Faishal, Achmad; Anwary, Ichsan; Suprapto, Suprapto; Saprudin, Saprudin; Tornado, Anang Shophan; Ilmy, Muhammad Azianoor; Mustika, Cindyva Thalia
Riwayat: Educational Journal of History and Humanities Vol 8, No 4 (2025): October
Publisher : Universitas Syiah Kuala

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.24815/jr.v8i4.51206

Community service in the Compulsory Lecturer Service Program (PDWA) aims to develop the capacity of women in resolving disputes/conflicts and the strategic role of women's involvement in the Mediation House, so that equality of position is created between men and women to obtain opportunities/opportunities and participation in development, especially in facilitating the resolution of disputes and disputes in the community through mediation channels that prioritize deliberation and consensus with an approach that prioritizes peace. Through this service theme, it is hoped that it can inspire women to take a role in the Mediation House. The results of this service activity show that women also have the capacity and ability to become facilitators in resolving disputes in the community through mediation, because in principle women have good communication skills to facilitate the resolution of disputes/conflicts between the parties. Thus, women's participation in the mediation space can be an important investment for a better future in Banjarmasin City, which has a domino effect on increasing women's legal literacy and strengthening social networks (agents of change).

KEDUDUKAN DAN KEKUATAN PEMBUKTIAN DEEPFAKE DALAM PROSES PERSIDANGAN Soffyan Angga Fahlani; Eko Taufikur Rahman; Muhammad Azianor Ilmy; Arisandy Mursalin
Al-Adl : Jurnal Hukum Vol 18, No 1 (2026)
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum, Universitas Islam Kalimantan Muhammad Arsyad Al Banjari

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31602/al-adl.v18i1.18914

Technological advancement has extended to the rapid development of artificial intelligence (AI), which has the capacity to facilitate human work and activities. One notable technological innovation is AI-based deepfake technology, which is capable of altering or generating images, videos, and audio with a high degree of resemblance to their original counterparts. While deepfakes offer benefits in creative and industrial domains, they also pose significant legal challenges, particularly with respect to misuse for cybercrime, the dissemination of disinformation, defamation, and violations of privacy. This study addresses the legal status of deepfakes within the classification of legal objects or subjects under the prevailing legal framework in Indonesia, as well as their evidentiary value under criminal procedural law and the Electronic Information and Transactions Law. This research employs a normative juridical method with statutory and conceptual approaches. Data collection is based on primary legal materials, particularly Law Number 1 of 2024 concerning the Second Amendment to Law Number 11 of 2008 on Electronic Information and Transactions (UU ITE), as well as secondary legal materials derived from relevant legal scholarship. The findings indicate that deepfakes may be classified as electronic information and/or electronic documents that possess legal standing as objects of law within the UU ITE framework. Furthermore, deepfakes may serve as admissible evidence in criminal proceedings, provided that the requirements of authentication, integrity, and relevance are satisfied. Through an expansive interpretative approach, deepfakes may also be construed as circumstantial evidence. Nevertheless, the assessment of their evidentiary validity necessitates the support of digital forensic analysis to verify the authenticity and integrity of electronic content. Accordingly, regulatory reinforcement and more comprehensive oversight mechanisms governing the use of deepfake technology are essential to prevent misuse that may cause harm to individuals and society at large.

KEDUDUKAN DAN KEKUATAN PEMBUKTIAN DEEPFAKE DALAM PROSES PERSIDANGAN Soffyan Angga Fahlani; Eko Taufikur Rahman; Muhammad Azianor Ilmy; Arisandy Mursalin
Al-Adl : Jurnal Hukum Vol 18 No 1 (2026)
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum, Universitas Islam Kalimantan Muhammad Arsyad Al Banjari

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31602/al-adl.v18i1.18914

Technological advancement has extended to the rapid development of artificial intelligence (AI), which has the capacity to facilitate human work and activities. One notable technological innovation is AI-based deepfake technology, which is capable of altering or generating images, videos, and audio with a high degree of resemblance to their original counterparts. While deepfakes offer benefits in creative and industrial domains, they also pose significant legal challenges, particularly with respect to misuse for cybercrime, the dissemination of disinformation, defamation, and violations of privacy. This study addresses the legal status of deepfakes within the classification of legal objects or subjects under the prevailing legal framework in Indonesia, as well as their evidentiary value under criminal procedural law and the Electronic Information and Transactions Law. This research employs a normative juridical method with statutory and conceptual approaches. Data collection is based on primary legal materials, particularly Law Number 1 of 2024 concerning the Second Amendment to Law Number 11 of 2008 on Electronic Information and Transactions (UU ITE), as well as secondary legal materials derived from relevant legal scholarship. The findings indicate that deepfakes may be classified as electronic information and/or electronic documents that possess legal standing as objects of law within the UU ITE framework. Furthermore, deepfakes may serve as admissible evidence in criminal proceedings, provided that the requirements of authentication, integrity, and relevance are satisfied. Through an expansive interpretative approach, deepfakes may also be construed as circumstantial evidence. Nevertheless, the assessment of their evidentiary validity necessitates the support of digital forensic analysis to verify the authenticity and integrity of electronic content. Accordingly, regulatory reinforcement and more comprehensive oversight mechanisms governing the use of deepfake technology are essential to prevent misuse that may cause harm to individuals and society at large.

Analysis of the Authority of Community Organizations in Conducting the Sealing and Confiscation of Assets Soffyan Angga Fahlani; Eko Taufikur Rahman; Muhammad Azianor Ilmy
Jurnal Daulat Hukum Vol 9, No 3 (2026): September 2026
Publisher : Magister of Law, Faculty of Law, Universitas Islam Sultan Agung

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.30659/jdh.v9i3.52807

The involvement of community organizations (ormas) in acts of sealing and confiscating assets reflects a shift in their role from social organizations to actors resembling law enforcement authorities. In practice, such actions often arise in land disputes, business conflicts, or pressure against certain parties under the justification of protecting public interests. However, under the Indonesian legal system, the authority to conduct sealing and confiscation is exclusively granted to law enforcement agencies and judicial institutions pursuant to statutory regulations. Consequently, actions undertaken by ormas potentially violate the principles of legality, due process of law, and the rule of law. This study employs a normative juridical research method using statutory and conceptual approaches. The legal materials consist of primary legal sources, including legislation, court decisions, and official documents, as well as secondary legal materials such as books, journals, and legal doctrines. The analysis was conducted through stages of editing, systematization, and description of relevant legal provisions. The findings demonstrate that ormas, as private entities, do not possess authority through attribution, delegation, or mandate to carry out coercive actions such as sealing and confiscation. Such conduct may therefore be classified as an abuse of authority in the form of arbitrary action without lawful authorization. From the perspective of criminal law, these acts may fulfill the elements of criminal offenses, including unlawful appropriation, extortion, or unauthorized control of property. From the standpoint of civil law, such actions may constitute unlawful acts (torts), giving injured parties the right to seek compensation for damages. Furthermore, within administrative law, actions exceeding the lawful functions of ormas may result in administrative sanctions, including warnings, suspension of activities, and revocation of legal entity status.

Title

Found 4 Documents
Search

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Title Search

Found 4 Documents Search

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Title

Found 4 Documents
Search