cover
Contact Name
Babayo Sule
Contact Email
babayosule@randwickresearch.com
Phone
+6282277881898
Journal Mail Official
rissjadmin@randwickresearch.com
Editorial Address
Jl. Jalaluddin No. 155 Dusun II Desa Selemak, Kec. Hamparan Perak Kab. Deli Serdang, Sumatera Utara
Location
Unknown,
Unknown
INDONESIA
Randwick International of Social Science Journal
Published by RIRAI Publisher
ISSN : 27225666     EISSN : 27225674     DOI : -
Core Subject : Humanities, Social,
The RISS Journal publishes research and analysis papers in the fields of social science include humanities such as anthropology, business studies, communication studies, corporate governance, criminology, history, culture, cross-cultural studies, ethics, education, economy, geography, philosophy, psychology, sociology, social welfare political, population studies, performing arts, visual arts, human right studies, gender and sexuality, religious studies. RISS Journal is published in both online and printed versions.
Articles 412 Documents
Developing An Inclusive Service Model for Persons with Disabilities in University Sexual Violence Prevention and Response Task Forces: Findings from A Focus Group Discussion at Universitas Sumatera Utara Meutia Nauly; Hairani Siregar; Suri Mutia Siregar; Narosu Siregar; Patricia Srisere Ikaria Situmorang
Randwick International of Social Science Journal Vol. 7 No. 3 (2026): RISS Journal, July
Publisher : RIRAI Publisher

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.47175/rissj.v7i3.1308

Abstract

Sexual violence prevention and response in higher education require institutional systems that ensure equitable access for all members of the academic community, including persons with disabilities. Despite the establishment of Sexual Violence Prevention and Response Task Forces (Satgas PPK) in Indonesian universities, evidence on disability-inclusive service models remains limited. This study aimed to identify barriers to accessible support services and develop an inclusive service model for university-based task forces using a participatory approach. A qualitative study was conducted through a Focus Group Discussion (FGD) involving multidisciplinary stakeholders, including task force members, academics, disability advocates, legal aid organizations, government agencies, and an international partner from Universiti Sains Malaysia. Data were analyzed using thematic analysis. Five major themes emerged: (1) barriers to accessible reporting and service utilization, (2) strengthening faculty-based peer support, (3) victim-centered and disability-inclusive services, (4) multidisciplinary referral pathways, and (5) institutional governance for sustainable services. The findings highlight the importance of integrating accessible reporting, trained peer supporters, coordinated psychosocial and legal assistance, and institutional policies supported by permanent organizational structures. The proposed Inclusive Service Model emphasizes accessibility, collaboration, and institutional commitment as key elements of sustainable violence prevention and response in higher education, providing practical and policy recommendations for strengthening inclusive governance and protecting persons with disabilities.
Ordering the Rise: Indonesia’s Normative Engagement with China and the Constitution of Asia-Pacific International Society, 2018–2025 Ilham Dary Athallah; Hayara Khairia; Tsabita Husna; Ronna Rihadatul Aisy; Fatin ‘Atikah Sandy
Randwick International of Social Science Journal Vol. 7 No. 3 (2026): RISS Journal, July
Publisher : RIRAI Publisher

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.47175/rissj.v7i3.1312

Abstract

Indonesia’s decision to upgrade defense engagement with China in early 2025, culminating in the first ministerial “2+2” joint foreign and defense dialogue that China has established with any country, raises a puzzle for mainstream explanations of Southeast Asian security behavior. Why would a self-described middle power deepen military cooperation with the region’s predominant rising power while simultaneously sustaining expansive security ties with the United States and other partners? This study addresses that puzzle through the English School of international relations specifically the tradition of Hedley Bull (1977) and Barry Buzan (2004) which conceptualizes international society as a normative order sustained by primary institutions: sovereignty, diplomacy, balance of power, great power management, and international law. We argue that Indonesia’s defense cooperation with China between 2018 and 2025 was not reducible to hedging as an instrumental posture, nor to constrained accommodation. Instead, Indonesia pursued normative engagement as an order-constituting practice: institutionalizing diplomacy through regularized mechanisms, reaffirming sovereignty and non-interference, preserving balance through non-exclusive partnerships, and keeping international law claims alive through persistent UNCLOS-centered diplomacy. We demonstrate that Indonesia performed a form of middle-power facilitative management, constructing institutional pathways through which a rising great power is drawn into consultative habits, and specify the scope conditions governing this mechanism. The case extends Bull’s concept of great power management by identifying a previously undertheorized actor type: the middle power as order-constituting agent.