cover
Article Per Year (5 Year)
All
Home Page
OAI Link
Editorial Team
Contact
Reviewer
Google Scholar
Contact Name
Anik Iftitah
Contact Email
supremasijurnalhukumunisba@gmail.com
Phone
+6285646498763
Journal Mail Official
supremasijurnalhukumunisba@gmail.com
Editorial Address
Jl. Mojopahit No. 12A Telp/Fax. (0342) 813145 Blitar, Jawa Timur https://ejournal.unisbablitar.ac.id/index.php/supremasi/about/editorialTeam
Location
Kota blitar,
Jawa timur
INDONESIA
Jurnal Supremasi
Published by Universitas Islam Balitar Blitar
ISSN : 25273353     EISSN : 25273353     DOI : https://doi.org/10.30957/supremasi
Core Subject : Humanities, Social,
Humanities Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Social Sciences
Jurnal Ilmiah Ilmu Hukum, dengan lingkup publikasi hasil Penelitian Hukum Empiris (Sosio Legal), Penelitian Hukum Normatif, gagasan konseptual, kajian, dan aplikasi teori dalam bidang Ilmu Hukum atau keilmuan yang berkaitan dengan bidang Ilmu Hukum
Arjuna Subject : Ilmu Sosial - Hukum
Articles 154 Documents
 12   13   14   15   16 
KEDUDUKAN SURAT EDARAN MENTERI KETENAGAKERJAAN TENTANG LARANGAN PENAHANAN IJAZAH DALAM HUKUM POSITIF INDONESIA Utomo, Deny Setiyo
Jurnal Supremasi Vol 15 No 2 (2025): Volume 15 Nomor 2 Tahun 2025
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum, Universitas Islam Balitar

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.35457/pfm3zs25

Abstract

The Minister of Manpower issued Circular Letter Number M/5/HK.04.00/V/2025 as a response to the rampant practice of employers (companies) withholding workers' diplomas/personal documents. The research was conducted to identify and analyze the status and binding force of the Circular Letter of the Minister of Manpower within the Indonesian legal system. This research employs a normative legal research method with a statutory approach and a conceptual approach. The results of the study indicate that the Circular Letter is not classified as legislation or decisions. The Circular Letter is a policy rule issued based on the discretionary authority of the institution/government officials. The Circular Letter of the Minister of Manpower is only binding on the institutions/government officials addressed (Governors, Regency/City Heads, and other stakeholders). The Circular Letter of the Minister of Manpower cannot generally bind, thus, the circular letter serves as an announcement or notification for employers. The Circular Letter of the Minister of Manpower is issued as a legal correction regarding the withholding of diplomas that is not explicitly regulated in the Manpower Law. To strengthen the content of the Minister of Manpower's Circular Letter, it can be achieved by issuing a Ministerial Regulation or making amendments to the Manpower Law.
INTEGRASI KONTRAK TERAPEUTIK DAN PERLINDUNGAN KONSUMEN DALAM LAYANAN MEDIS Yatini, Yatini
Jurnal Supremasi Vol 15 No 2 (2025): Volume 15 Nomor 2 Tahun 2025
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum, Universitas Islam Balitar

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.35457/9y6aqr13

Abstract

The legal relationship between doctors and patients in medical practice is not merely ethical in nature but also establishes a contractual bond known as a therapeutic contract. Within the framework of civil law, this contract fulfills the elements of an agreement as regulated in Articles 1313 and 1320 of the Indonesian Civil Code. Patients, as recipients of medical services, can be classified as consumers as defined under Law Number 8 of 1999 on Consumer Protection (UUPK). This study aims to analyze the construction of therapeutic contracts as service agreements in civil law, examine the legal status of patients as consumers, and formulate a model for strengthening legal protection for patients in healthcare services. The research employs a normative juridical method with statutory, conceptual, and case study approaches. The findings indicate that although therapeutic contracts are valid under civil law, in practice they still generate imbalances in the doctor–patient relationship, particularly in terms of information and medical decision-making. This research proposes an integrative model of legal protection through written medical contracts, harmonization of regulations between the Health Law and UUPK, expansion of the authority of the Consumer Dispute Settlement Body (BPSK), and enhancement of patients’ legal literacy. This model is expected to foster a more balanced and just legal relationship in healthcare services.
DUALISME KEWENANGAN PENGAWASAN KOPERASI SIMPAN PINJAM (KSP) ANTARA KEMENTERIAN KOPERASI DAN UKM SERTA OTORITAS JASA KEUANGAN (OJK) Perdana, M. Taufan; susetiyo, weppy; kasiani, kasiani
Jurnal Supremasi Vol 15 No 2 (2025): Volume 15 Nomor 2 Tahun 2025
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum, Universitas Islam Balitar

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.35457/4n04k667

Abstract

This study juridically analyzes the dualism of supervisory authority over Savings and Loan Cooperatives (KSP) between the Ministry of Cooperatives and SMEs and the Financial Services Authority (OJK). Using a normative legal method, the research identifies regulatory ambiguity and overlap concerning licensing, guidance, and sanctions. The findings indicate that inconsistencies in legislation create supervisory gaps, which can harm KSP members. Therefore, this study recommends a revision and harmonization of regulations to clarify the authority of both institutions. New policies should be based on the characteristics of cooperatives as member-based, family-oriented entities to ensure optimal protection for their members.   Keywords: Dualism of Authority, Cooperative Supervision, OJK
PERLINDUNGAN HUKUM HAK ULAYAT MASYARAKAT ADAT DI INDONESIA PERSPEKTIF PERBANDINGAN DENGAN NEGARA LAIN Ibnusani, Rijal
Jurnal Supremasi Vol 15 No 2 (2025): Volume 15 Nomor 2 Tahun 2025
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum, Universitas Islam Balitar

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.35457/1thm3m70

Abstract

Abstract This research comprehensively analyzes the legal protection of Indigenous Communal Land Rights (Hak Ulayat) in Indonesia and compares it with implementation mechanisms in Malaysia and Australia. The primary goal is to formulate an ideal institutional model for protecting Hak Ulayat in Indonesia, drawing upon best practices from Australia. The approach used is normative juridical, primarily employing comparative legal analysis and statutory review. The findings indicate that while Indonesia formally recognizes Hak Ulayat (UUD 1945 and UUPA 1960), practical protection is hampered by overlapping regulations, conflicts of interest (state-corporate), and administrative weaknesses. Comparatively, Malaysia grants formal legal status (Native Customary Rights/NCR) but maintains dominant state control. In contrast, Australia, through the Native Title Act 1993, offers a system that is more structured, participatory, and provides stronger legal certainty. The conclusion asserts that Indonesia urgently requires regulatory and institutional reform. The ideal institutional model, achievable through comparative learning, must involve an independent body that synergizes with the formal institution (BPN) to ensure more effective, just, and transparent protection of Indigenous Communal Land Rights.

Page 16 of 16 | Total Record : 154

 12   13   14   15   16 

Filter by Year

2016 2025


Reset
Filter By Issues
All Issue Vol 15 No 2 (2025): Volume 15 Nomor 2 Tahun 2025 Volume 15 Nomor 1 Tahun 2025 Volume 14 Nomor 2 Tahun 2024 Volume 14 Nomor 1 Tahun 2024 Volume 13 Nomor 2 Tahun 2023 Volume 13 Nomor 1 Tahun 2023 Volume 12 Nomor 2 Tahun 2022 Volume 12 Nomor 1 Tahun 2022 Volume 11 Nomor 2 Tahun 2021 Volume 11 Nomor 1 Tahun 2021 Volume 10 Nomor 2 Tahun 2020 Volume 10 Nomor 1 Tahun 2020 Volume 9 Nomor 2 Tahun 2019 Volume 9 Nomor 1 Tahun 2019 Volume 8 Nomor 2 Tahun 2018 Volume 8 Nomor 1 Tahun 2018 Volume 7 Nomor 2 Tahun 2017 Volume 7 Nomor 1 Tahun 2017 Volume 6 Nomor 2 Tahun 2016 Volume 6 Nomor 1 Tahun 2016 More Issue