cover
Article Per Year (5 Year)
All
Home Page
OAI Link
Editorial Team
Contact
Reviewer
Google Scholar
Contact Name
Dr. Rudi Natamihardja, S.H.,DEA
Contact Email
rudi.natamiharja@fh.unila.ac.id
Phone
+6281388420240
Journal Mail Official
lajil@fh.unila.ac.id
Editorial Address
Gedung B, Fakultas Hukum, Universitas Lampung. Jl. Prof. Soemantri Brojonegoro, Gedong Meneng, Bandar Lampung
Location
Kota bandar lampung,
Lampung
INDONESIA
Lampung Journal of International Law (LaJIL)
Published by Universitas Lampung
ISSN : 26566532     EISSN : 27232603     DOI : https://doi.org/10.25041/lajil
Core Subject : Social,
Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice
The Lampung Journal of International Law or abbreviated as LaJIL, is an international journal published by the Faculty of Law, University of Lampung. The scope of this Journal is the development of international law sciences. LaJIL is a means of publication from results of the research, and a means of sharing developments in international law field. The background of the establishment of LaJIL Journal is focus on international law in Indonesian aspect. Therefore, Faculty of Law, University of Lampung took the initiative to establish a journal that specifically develops the issue of international law. Thus, we hope that the results of LaJIL publishing will provide an important output for the development of international law in generally, and to provide knowledge of international law of the sea, international human rights law, international of humanitarian law, international organization law, international trade and economics law, diplomatic law, international settlement disputes law, air and outer space law, international environmental law, international criminal law, and informatics and technology law in particularly. The article which will be published by LaJIL is a review article relating to the development of international law, both public and private international law. LaJIL is available in both print and online version.
Arjuna Subject : Ilmu Sosial - Hukum
Articles 74 Documents
 4   5   6   7   8 
State Recognition of Indigenous Peoples’ Territorial Rights under International Human Rights Law: A Comparative Study of Indonesia and Russia Gemilang, Kharisma; Sulistiyandari, Sulistiyandari; Kartono, Kartono; Handayani, Sri Wahyu; Farhani, Athari
Lampung Journal of International Law Vol. 7 No. 2 (2025)
Publisher : Faculty of Law Universitas Lampung

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.25041/lajil.v7i2.4904

Abstract

This study analyzes the recognition and protection of indigenous peoples’ territorial rights in Indonesia and Russia within the framework of international human rights law and identifies factors affecting their effectiveness. Using a normative legal method with conceptual and comparative approaches, the study finds that Indonesia has a relatively progressive framework through constitutional recognition of indigenous communities, yet implementation remains weak due to fragmented sectoral regulations and reliance on regional administrative recognition. Russia, by contrast, adopts a centralized model that recognizes only small-numbered indigenous peoples and limits collective ownership and meaningful participation. Both countries face tensions between state sovereignty over natural resources and international obligations to protect indigenous collective rights. The study recommends adopting a multi-level governance model that balances national interests and indigenous autonomy, alongside legal reforms to strengthen implementation of the Free, Prior, and Informed Consent (FPIC) principle, enabling more effective integration of international human rights norms into domestic legal systems..
Integrating State Sovereignty and International Obligations: A Comparison of Indonesian and Philippine International Law into Domestic Constitutional Systems Adnyani, Ni Ketut Sari; Suryana, Kadek Dedy; Wiratini, Ni Made; Dantes, Komang Putri Komang Febrinayanti; Tee-Anastacio, Princess Alyssa D.
Lampung Journal of International Law Vol. 7 No. 2 (2025)
Publisher : Faculty of Law Universitas Lampung

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.25041/lajil.v7i2.4909

Abstract

Indonesia and the Philippines integrate international law into their constitutional systems to uphold global commitments, protect human rights, and strengthen the rule of law. This study examines how both countries regulate state sovereignty and position international obligations within the national legal order by addressing two questions: how sovereignty is constructed in the Indonesian and Philippine constitutions and how each state views the relationship between sovereignty and international obligations; and how international law, including treaties and customary rules, is integrated into their domestic legal systems. Using a normative-comparative approach, the study analyzes similarities and differences in the acceptance, ratification, and implementation of international norms at the national level. The findings indicate that although both countries uphold state sovereignty, they differ in how international law is adopted and given binding force. These differences demonstrate how constitutional structures and political-legal orientations influence the implementation of international obligations and shape the relationship between national and international law.
Targeted Killing of Ismail Haniyeh: International Law Perspective Fathi, Muhammad; Imanullah , Muhammad Alfin; Riyanto, Aisyah Ajeng Putri; Najwa , Sayyid Nabil Mahakim
Lampung Journal of International Law Vol. 8 No. 1 (2026)
Publisher : Faculty of Law Universitas Lampung

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.25041/lajil.v8i1.3935

Abstract

The unresolved Palestine-Israel conflict has intensified debate over the legality and ethical implications of targeted killings under international law. This normative legal study examines the killing of Ismail Haniyeh in Tehran by analyzing its compatibility with the principles of distinction, proportionality, and necessity under international humanitarian law. The operation also raises serious concerns under Article 6 of the ICCPR, which prohibits arbitrary deprivation of life, and Article 14, which guarantees fair trial and due process protections. In addition, the operation potentially violated Iran’s sovereignty and territorial integrity under Article 2(4) of the United Nations Charter, which prohibits the use of force against another state. The study highlights the need for stronger accountability mechanisms, greater judicial oversight, and the prioritization of non-lethal alternatives in counterterrorism operations. It further emphasizes that adherence to international legal norms and efforts to address the root causes of the Palestine-Israel conflict remain essential for protecting human rights and maintaining international legal order..
Understanding The Politics of International Law: A Case Study of The Israel-Palestine Conflict Ansori, Ansori; Antai , Godswill Owoche; Aidonojie, Paul Atagamen; Jufri, Muwaffiq; Adebowale, Hassan Ismaila
Lampung Journal of International Law Vol. 8 No. 1 (2026)
Publisher : Faculty of Law Universitas Lampung

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.25041/lajil.v8i1.5118

Abstract

The relationship between international law and international politics remains highly contested in the context of the Israeli-Palestinian conflict, which is shaped by complex legal, political, and historical factors. This study examines how international legal frameworks are interpreted and implemented within broader geopolitical dynamics. Using a doctrinal legal research approach, the study analyzes primary legal sources, including international conventions, United Nations Security Council resolutions, advisory opinions of the International Court of Justice, and proceedings of the International Criminal Court, supported by academic literature and policy documents. The analysis focuses on the application of legal principles related to occupation, self-determination, accountability, and dispute resolution in the Israeli-Palestinian conflict. The findings demonstrate that the enforcement of international law is significantly constrained by geopolitical interests, resulting in selective application and weakening claims of legal neutrality and universality. The study also finds that the effectiveness of international legal mechanisms depends not only on legal norms, but also on institutional impartiality and political commitment to accountability. These findings highlight the need for reforms that reduce politicization and strengthen the credibility of international legal enforcement in resolving global conflicts.

Page 8 of 8 | Total Record : 74

 4   5   6   7   8 

Filter by Year

2019 2026


Reset
Filter By Issues
All Issue Vol. 8 No. 1 (2026) Vol. 7 No. 2 (2025) Vol. 7 No. 1 (2025) Vol. 6 No. 2 (2024) Vol. 6 No. 1 (2024) Vol. 5 No. 2 (2023): Issue In progress (August 2023) Vol. 5 No. 2 (2023) Vol. 5 No. 1 (2023) Vol. 4 No. 2 (2022) Vol. 4 No. 1 (2022) Vol. 3 No. 2 (2021) Vol. 3 No. 1 (2021) Vol. 2 No. 2 (2020) Vol. 2 No. 1 (2020) Vol. 1 No. 2 (2019) Vol. 1 No. 1 (2019) More Issue