cover
Article Per Year (5 Year)
All
Home Page
OAI Link
Editorial Team
Contact
Reviewer
Google Scholar
Contact Name
Abdul Syatar
Contact Email
mazahibunapmh@gmail.com
Phone
+6285340255385
Journal Mail Official
mazahibunapmh@gmail.com
Editorial Address
l. Sultan Alauddin No.63, Romangpolong, Kec. Somba Opu, Kabupaten Gowa
Location
Kab. gowa,
Sulawesi selatan
INDONESIA
Mazahibuna: Jurnal Perbandingan Mazhab
Published by Universitas Islam Negeri Alauddin Makassar
ISSN : 26856905     EISSN : 26857812     DOI : -
Core Subject : Religion,
Religion
Mazahibuna: Jurnal Perbandingan Mazhab merupakan jurnal ilmiah yang mempublikasikan karya-karya tulis terkait dengan kajian perbandingan hukum, baik itu antara hukum Islam dan hukum positif, ketokohan mazhab, maupun pemikiran hukum Islam kekinian.
Arjuna Subject : Umum - Umum
Articles 7 Documents
 1 
Search results for , issue "VOLUME 7 ISSUE 1, JUNE 2025" : 7 Documents clear
Decoupling Jihad from Boko-Haram Insurgency: A Critical Analysis of Misconceptions and Realities in Nigeria Yusuph, Ismael Funsho; Abdulraheem, Taofeeq Abolaji; Abdulazeez, Abdurrozaq Opeyemi
Mazahibuna: Jurnal Perbandingan Mazhab VOLUME 7 ISSUE 1, JUNE 2025
Publisher : Universitas Islam Negeri Alauddin Makassar

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.24252/mazahibuna.vi.55536

Abstract

The concept of Jihad is an essential Islamic doctrine often misrepresented and misunderstood, particularly in contemporary discourse. Jihad has a well-defined framework in Islamic law but insurgent groups such as Jama’atu Ahlis Sunnah Lida’awati wal Jihad in Nigeria, popularly known as Boko-Haram, claim to act under its banner. The situation raises concerns about the distortion of Jihad and subsequent conflation with insurgency. Therefore, this study aimed to critically examine the principles of Jihad under Islamic law and determine the possible connection to the activities of Boko-Haram. The analysis of misconceptions surrounding Jihad was to clarify its distinction from insurgency. This was achieved through the adoption of a qualitative method to analyze the classical and contemporary Islamic legal texts in order to establish the parameters of Jihad. Moreover, the principles were compared with the actions of Boko-Haram to determine whether their claims could be substantiated in Islamic jurisprudence. The results showed that the activities of Boko-Haram were not in line with the principles of Jihad as prescribed in Islamic law. However, their actions reflected the characteristics of insurgency which negated the ethical and legal framework of Jihad rooted in justice, equity, and moral conduct. This study contributed to the discourse on Jihad by systematically distinguishing the concept from insurgency through Islamic legal principles, offering a scholarly response to contemporary misinterpretations. The analysis further served as a foundation for future studies on religious misinterpretations in justifying violence and could also inform policy formulation, counter-radicalization tactics, and public awareness initiatives.
Harmonizing the Hijri Calendar: A Comparative Insight of Indonesia's Imkān al-Ru’yah Crescent Visibility Criteria with Malaysia and Saudi Arabia Fikri, Mursyid; Anas, Muh Fauzi; Lubis, Arjuna Hiqma; Indriana
Mazahibuna: Jurnal Perbandingan Mazhab VOLUME 7 ISSUE 1, JUNE 2025
Publisher : Universitas Islam Negeri Alauddin Makassar

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.24252/mazahibuna.vi.51264

Abstract

The determination of the beginning of Hijri months in Indonesia reflects significant diversity, particularly in the methods adopted by different Muslim organizations. This study aims to examine the potential conflicts arising from the implementation of the new Imkān al-Ru’yah criteria in Indonesia and to compare them with the criteria used in Saudi Arabia and Malaysia. This research employs a qualitative approach, utilizing in-depth interviews and literature analysis. The collected data is analyzed through content analysis to understand the underlying factors contributing to the differences in Hijri month determination. The findings indicate that the new Imkān al-Ru’yah criteria have intensified long-standing disputes due to variations in crescent visibility in the eastern hemisphere. Key discrepancies arise from differences in hisab criteria, interpretations of Islamic legal principles regarding Ulil Amri, and the symbolic meaning of the crescent moon. The study also reveals that Muhammadiyah’s KHGT criteria align with those of Saudi Arabia, whereas the new Mabims criteria differ from those of Saudi Arabia. This study provides a comparative analysis of Hijri month determination criteria across multiple countries, highlighting the underlying theological and astronomical factors that shape different methodologies. The research offers insights into the complexities of Hijri calendar determination in Indonesia and contributes to discussions on standardizing crescent sighting criteria. The findings may serve as a basis for fostering greater alignment among Islamic organizations and regional authorities.
Sharia Legal Certainty in Boycotts: Assessing the Implications of Fatwas on Socio-Economic Justice Nadia; Arief, Ahmad; Turobovich, Juraev Abror
Mazahibuna: Jurnal Perbandingan Mazhab VOLUME 7 ISSUE 1, JUNE 2025
Publisher : Universitas Islam Negeri Alauddin Makassar

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.24252/mazahibuna.vi.52254

Abstract

This study aimed to examine the effectiveness of Fatwa No. 14/Ijtima' Ulama/VIII/2024 in clarifying the ambiguities of No. 83 of 2023, which addresses the boycott of products affiliated with Israel. The legal certainty provided by Fatwa No. 14, its role in guiding the public and businesses, and its broader socio-economic implications were evaluated. The study adopted content analysis, historiographical review, and documentary to analyze primary and secondary sources, such as official fatwas, policy reports, academic journals, and media reports. This method assesses the fatwa’s clarity, its social impact, and potential economic consequences. The result showed that Fatwa No. 14 aimed to resolve the ambiguity of No. 83 by promoting domestic products, local ownership, and national labor. However, the criteria remain imprecise, particularly concerning foreign ownership limits and the proportion of local raw materials, leading to public confusion and potential economic losses for unrelated businesses. Reactions to the fatwa have been polarized, with some perceiving the decree as a demonstration of economic solidarity, while others criticize the adverse effects of the fatwa on local businesses. This study provides a comprehensive legal and socio-economic assessment of MUI's fatwa on product boycotts, showing legal ambiguities and policy gaps that have yet to be addressed. By bridging Islamic legal studies and economic analysis, the study offers a novel perspective on the intersection of religious decrees and market dynamics. There is also a need for clearer guidelines and regulatory frameworks to ensure the fatwa’s effectiveness while minimizing unintended economic repercussions. In conclusion, this study contributes to the broader discourse on Sharia legal certainty, religious fatwas, and the impact on socio-economic justice.
Religious Controversy in the Tiban Tradition: Perspectives of Islamic Scholars and Indigenous Leaders in Jajar Village, Trenggalek Sekarwati, Henny
Mazahibuna: Jurnal Perbandingan Mazhab VOLUME 7 ISSUE 1, JUNE 2025
Publisher : Universitas Islam Negeri Alauddin Makassar

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.24252/mazahibuna.vi.51726

Abstract

Tradisi tiban adalah sebuah adat atau kebudayaan yang dilakukan oleh masyarakat Desa Jajar Kecamatan Gandusari Kabupaten Trenggalek setiap tahun terutama pada musim kemarau untuk meminta diturunkannya hujan. Seiring berkembangnya zaman, tiban mengalami pergeseran makna yang semula bertujuan untuk mendatangkan hujan, kini menjadi sebuah kebudayaan yang biasanya dilakukan ketika ada hari jadi Desa Jajar dan hajatan. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengkaji bagaimana pandangan Tokoh agama Islam dan Tokoh Adat di Desa Jajar mengenai tradisi tiban. Penelitian ini merupakan penelitian lapangan (field research) yang bersifat deskriptif analisis komporatif. Hasil dari penelitian ini tokoh agama Islam di Desa Jajar memiliki dua pendapat yang berbeda tentang tradisi tiban. Pendapat pertama melarang dilakukan tradisi tiban dengan alasan tiban terdapat tindakan-tindakan bernuansa mendolimi diri sendiri dan juga orang lain yang mana itu bertentangan dengan ajaran islam. Pendapat kedua berpendpat bahwa tradisi tiban sesuatu yang dibolehkan. Alasannya, karena tiban hanyalah menjadi salah satu cara yang ditempuh masyarakat jajar untuk mendatangkan hujan dan itu hanya wasilah dengan tidak mengindahkan permohonannya kepada Allah. Sedangkan, menurut tokoh adat tiban boleh dilakukan sebagai bentuk kesenian kuno. Kata kunci : Tradisi Tiban, Tokoh Adat, Tokoh Islam.
Ijtihād Maqāṣidī and Legal Adaptation: A Comparative Analysis of Contemporary Islamic Jurisprudence in Responding to Emerging Issues Athambawa, Mahroof
Mazahibuna: Jurnal Perbandingan Mazhab VOLUME 7 ISSUE 1, JUNE 2025
Publisher : Universitas Islam Negeri Alauddin Makassar

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.24252/mazahibuna.vi.54378

Abstract

This study aimed to examine the significance of ijtihād Maqāṣidī in contemporary Islamic jurisprudence, focusing on its role in addressing legal and ethical dilemmas. The study explored how Islamic law remains adaptive and relevant in modern contexts by analyzing different scholarly perspectives on Maqāṣid al-Sharīʿah. A qualitative method was adopted, utilizing doctrinal analysis and comparative methodology. Primary and secondary Islamic legal sources, including classical and contemporary juristic opinions, were analyzed to evaluate different schools of thought regarding ijtihād Maqāṣid. Additionally, case studies such as the COVID-19 pandemic and the moon sighting debate were examined to show practical applications of Maqāṣid in Islamic legal reasoning. The result showed three primary methods among contemporary scholars, namely (1) scholars who consider Maqāṣid as an independent legal proof, (2) those who limit Maqāṣid only to explicitly supported textual evidence, and (3) the moderate scholars who integrate textual sources with Maqāṣid to develop balanced legal rulings. The result reflected the strengths and weaknesses of each method, showing how Maqāṣid-based reasoning improves the adaptability of Islamic jurisprudence. This study provided a comprehensive examination of Maqāṣid’s role in contemporary Islamic legal thought, offering a distinct understanding of ijtihād Maqāṣidī beyond traditional jurisprudential analyses. By integrating historical and modern perspectives, the results contributed to ongoing debates on the evolution of Islamic legal methodologies. Furthermore, there was a need for incorporating ijtihād Maqāṣid in modern legal discourse to ensure that Islamic law remained relevant and effective in addressing new societal challenges. This study also advocated for a structured application of Maqāṣid in judicial and legislative frameworks, promoting further investigation into its potential in legal reform and policy-making in Islamic jurisdictions.
METODOLOGI PERBANDINGAN MADZHAB DALAM AL-MUGHNI KARYA IBNU QUDAMAH: PENDEKATAN DAN IMPLIKASINYA DALAM STUDI HUKUM ISLAM Khairatun Hisan; Dzulkifli Hadi Imawan; Haqqiya, Hannafa
Mazahibuna: Jurnal Perbandingan Mazhab VOLUME 7 ISSUE 1, JUNE 2025
Publisher : Universitas Islam Negeri Alauddin Makassar

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.24252/mazahibuna.vi.54759

Abstract

This study investigates the methodology of muqāranah al-mażāhib (comparative of madhhabs) as applied by Ibn Qudāmah in his seminal work, Kitāb al-Mugnī, a key reference in the landscape of Islamic jurisprudence in Indonesia. The primary purpose is to critically analyze Ibn Qudāmah’s comparative legal approach and assess its relevance for contemporary ijtihad. Employing a qualitative method, the research utilizes content analysis and textual hermeneutics to examine selected chapters of al-Mugnī—specifically those related to acts of worship and mu‘āmalah (social transactions). The findings reveal that Ibn Qudāmah's method systematically compares the legal views of the four major Sunni madhhabs and includes perspectives from other jurists, presenting them with detailed argumentation and rational justification. His use of tarjīḥ (preference) reflects a critical evaluative process that selects the most compelling legal opinion based on textual evidence and reasoning. The originality of this study lies in its focused analysis of Ibn Qudāmah's structured comparative technique, which balances scholarly objectivity with methodological rigor. The implications of this research are significant for contemporary Islamic legal scholarship, particularly in advancing the practice of collective ijtihad, refining fatwa formulation processes, and fostering a tolerant yet disciplined engagement with legal diversity. Furthermore, the integration of maqāṣid al-sharī‘ah into this comparative framework enriches its applicability in addressing modern socio-legal issues.
Achieving Maqāṣid al-Sharīʿah through Artificial Intelligence: Mechanisms of Facilitation, Control, and Quality Assurance Maiga, Mohamed Hamadikinane
Mazahibuna: Jurnal Perbandingan Mazhab VOLUME 7 ISSUE 1, JUNE 2025
Publisher : Universitas Islam Negeri Alauddin Makassar

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.24252/mazahibuna.vi.55038

Abstract

This study examines how artificial intelligence (AI) can be applied to fulfill the objectives of Sharia (maqāṣid al-sharīʿah), especially in terms of facilitation, supervision, and quality assurance in addressing modern societal issues. Using a descriptive-analytical approach, the research focuses on defining AI and its significance, analyzing its characteristics in relation to Sharia goals, and evaluating the impact of its appropriate use. The study draws on a range of scholarly and scientific sources to assess how AI aligns with Islamic legal principles. The results indicate that AI possesses key strengths—such as speed, accuracy, and efficiency—that support the Sharia principle of taysīr (ease and facilitation). When used correctly, AI enhances societal well-being by improving control systems, increasing productivity in fields like agriculture and industry, and helping to reduce insecurity and scarcity. These benefits show that AI can be a powerful tool in achieving public interest and preventing harm, aligning with the ethical aims of Islamic law. This research stands out by directly linking the practical applications of AI to the values embedded in maqāṣid al-sharīʿah, offering an innovative perspective that bridges Islamic jurisprudence with emerging technologies. It also provides useful insights for policymakers, academics, and practitioners, suggesting that AI can be harnessed as an effective strategy for promoting ethical development in social, economic, political, and cultural spheres. The study encourages further exploration into models of ethical governance rooted in Islamic principles in the digital age.

Page 1 of 1 | Total Record : 7

 1 

Filter by Year

2025 2025


Reset
Filter By Issues
All Issue VOLUME 7 ISSUE 2, DECEMBER 2025 VOLUME 7 ISSUE 1, JUNE 2025 VOLUME 6 ISSUE 2, DECEMBER 2024 VOLUME 6 ISSUE 1, JUNE 2024 VOLUME 5 ISSUE 2, DECEMBER 2023 VOLUME 5 ISSUE 1, JUNE 2023 VOLUME 4 ISSUE 2, DECEMBER 2022 VOLUME 4 ISSUE 1, JUNE 2022 VOLUME 3 ISSUE 2, DECEMBER 2021 VOLUME 3 ISSUE 1, JUNE 2021 VOLUME 2 ISSUE 2, DECEMBER 2020 VOLUME 2 ISSUE 1, JUNE 2020 VOLUME 1 ISSUE 2, DECEMBER 2019 VOLUME 1 ISSUE 1, JUNE 2019 More Issue