cover
Article Per Year (5 Year)
All
Home Page
OAI Link
Editorial Team
Contact
Reviewer
Google Scholar
Contact Name
M Fauzi
Contact Email
fauzi.sh@gmail.com
Phone
+6281350004080
Journal Mail Official
risalahhukum@gmail.com
Editorial Address
Jl. Sambaliung, Gunung Kelua, Samarinda
Location
Kota samarinda,
Kalimantan timur
INDONESIA
Risalah Hukum
Published by Universitas Mulawarman
ISSN : 0216969X     EISSN : 27233766     DOI : https://doi.org/10.30872/risalah
Core Subject : Social,
Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Social Sciences
Jurnal Risalah Hukum merupakan terbitan ilmiah berkala bidang ilmu hukum. Jurnal ini diterbitkan oleh Fakultas Hukum Universitas Mulawarman sebagai media publikasi pemikiran, gagasan maupun hasil penelitian dalam berbagai bidang hukum.
Arjuna Subject : Ilmu Sosial - Hukum
Articles 222 Documents
 13   14   15   16   17 
Analisis Yuridis Tingkat Kepatuhan Membayar Pajak Masyarakat Indonesia Gerald Samuel
Jurnal Risalah Hukum Vol 18 No 1 (2022): Volume 18, Nomor 1, Juni 2022
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum Universitas Mulawarman

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.30872/risalah.v18i1.650

Abstract

The development of a country is determined by the community and the government that regulates it. If the government makes good laws and regulations, the community will always comply with these regulations. Taxes are things that are regulated in laws and regulations. In this case, taxes are an obligation for the community to pay them. The type of research in the legal article entitled Juridical Analysis of the Compliance Level of Paying Taxes for the Indonesian Society is doctrinal or normative legal research. Taxes themselves have essential benefits for the development of the Indonesian state because taxes are a source of state treasury income which is ultimately used for public welfare. This study aims to determine the benefits of taxes, government efforts, and the influence of the Indonesian people's understanding of the importance of paying taxes to create public welfare in Indonesia. Keywords: tax; taxpayer; tax benefits; awareness of paying taxes; tax compliance
Perbedaan Penerapan Pendekaran Per se Illegal Dan Rule of Reason Dalam Putusan KPPU Tentang Kartel Penetapan Harga Dimas Aryadiputra; Deny Slamet Pribadi; Aryo Subroto
Jurnal Risalah Hukum Vol 18 No 1 (2022): Volume 18, Nomor 1, Juni 2022
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum Universitas Mulawarman

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.30872/risalah.v18i1.753

Abstract

The emergence of an economic impact analysis in the decision of the price fixing cartel case in Article 5 of the UULPM which should use the approach in that article is Per se Illegal, including Decision No. 08/KPPU-L/2018, Decision No. 04/KPPI-I/2016, Decision No. 32/KPPU-L/2008, Decision No. 26/KPPU-L/2007, and Decision No. 02/KPPU-I/2003 by analyzing the use of a single Per se Illegal approach in the decision of the price fixing cartel case in ensuring legal certainty. The approach in this study uses doctrinal research. From the results of the analysis of the decision related to the price fixing cartel in the consideration of the commission assembly, it has been found in the form of economic evidence/economic analysis which is a characteristic of the Rule of Reason approach to the reasons for the emergence of the economic analysis not being explained explicitly and clearly by the commission assembly, regarding the assessment that can be made. carried out by the KPPU regarding the agreement in Article 5 of the UULPM, economic evidence may appear if the requirement to prove the agreement is difficult to find. Legal considerations using the Per se Illegal approach as the sole approach in the KPPU's decision related to price fixing cartels in ensuring legal certainty, this has been in line with what is positively regulated in Article 5 of the UULPM wherein the provision contains the phrase "prohibited" on behavior and the resulting impact. must be wrong or illegal so that it does not need further analysis. Keywords: per se illegal; rule of reason; price fixing cartel
Peraturan Pemeliharaan Anak Dalam Hukum Adat Bali Akibat Perceraian Putusan No.36/Pdt.G/2016/Pn.Ng Lisa Aprilia Gusreyna; Siti Kotijah
Jurnal Risalah Hukum Vol 18 No 1 (2022): Volume 18, Nomor 1, Juni 2022
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum Universitas Mulawarman

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.30872/risalah.v18i1.806

Abstract

In Hinduism, divorce is highly avoided, because it is an act of Adharma or sin. The approach used is a doctrinal approach with the aim of knowing two main points of discussion: First, the author wants to develop child care in Balinese customary law due to divorce. Second, the writer wants to analyze the decision No.36/PDT.G/2016/PN.Ng. Based on the results of the study, it can be said that the Balinese patrilinear system is the basis for the struggle for children's rights, as a result of divorce both purusa custom, Hindu religion, and the Supreme Court decision No.36/PDT.G/2016/PN which places a man, namely the father. as a babysitter. Keywords: divorce; balinese customs; child care
Kapasitas Pemerintahan Afghanistan Rezim Taliban Baru Sebagai Peserta Dalam Perjanjian Internasional Miko Aditiya Suharto; Maria Novita Apriyani
Jurnal Risalah Hukum Vol 18 No 1 (2022): Volume 18, Nomor 1, Juni 2022
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum Universitas Mulawarman

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.30872/risalah.v18i1.818

Abstract

The decision by the United States and NATO to withdraw troops from Afghanistan is a golden opportunity for the ultraconservative political factions (Taliban) to take back their control of Afghanistan. This military invasion by the United States and NATO has caused a humanitarian tragedy and an extraordinary humanitarian crisis in Afghanistan since 2001 ago. The Taliban took control of the government in Afghanistan after the United States and NATO withdrew their troops from Chief Ashraf Ghani. This article is a legal scientific article that has been normatively researched, the approaches used in writing this article include the statutory approach and case studies (not a case approach). This article discusses the legitimacy of the occupation of the Afghan government by the Taliban regime, as well as the legal consequences that arise from international agreements that have been made and run from the previous government regime. Conclusion This Scientific Article states that the Status of the Government of Afghanistan by the Taliban is a Succession of Government and is legal under international law and the impact of this succession makes the current Regime Government a Successor of the previous government, so that the Rights & Obligations of the existing International Agreements remain binding on the State of Afghanistan even though it has been change government regime. Keywords: succession, taliban regime, afghanistan, international law
Sanksi Kepada Amerika Serikat Atas Tindakan Unilateralnya Terhadap Suriah Dengan Alasan Penggunaan Senjata Kimia Mutiara; Mahendra Putra Kurnia; Rika Erawaty
Jurnal Risalah Hukum Volume 17, Nomor 2, Desember 2021
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum Universitas Mulawarman

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.30872/risalah.v17i2.155

Abstract

Amerika Serikat, Inggris dan juga Perancis melakukan tindakan unilateral berupa menembakkan rudal ke negara Suriah dengan alasan penggunaan senjata kimia yang dilakukan oleh pemerintah Suriah terhadap rakyatnya sendiri. Hal ini menimbulkan pertanyaan apakah tindakan yang dilakukan oleh Amerika Serikat tersebut merupakan suatu pelanggaran bagi hukum humaniter internasional dan bagaimana sanksi yang akan didapat oleh Amerika Serikat, Inggris dan juga Perancis jika perbuatan tersebut telah melanggar hukum humaniter internasional. Berdasarkan hasil penelitian yang dilakukan bahwa Sanksi Amerika Serikat atas tindakan unilateralnya terhadap Suriah dengan alasan penggunaan senjata kimia. Bahwa dalam hal tersebut Amerika Serikat melakukan tindakan sepihak kepada Suriah karna dugaan penggunaan senjata kimia yang dilakukan oleh Suriah yang hingga saat ini masih belum mendapatkan bukti yang kuat terkait kebenaran tersebut. Oleh karena itu Amerika Serikat telah melanggar ketentuan hukum internasional yaitu Piagam Perserikatan Bangsa-Bangsa (PBB), atas perbuatannya Amerika Serikat, Inggris dan Perancis harus bertanggungjawab sesuai prosedur dari Dewan Keamanan PBB dan diberikan sanksi sesuai Piagam PBB. Keywords: unilateral action, chemical weapon, international law
Tindakan Amerika Serikat Dalam Menarik Diri Dari Paris Agreement Dalam Kerangka Hukum Internasional Mush'ab Al Ma'ruf; Mahendra Putra Kurnia; Syukri Hidayatullah
Jurnal Risalah Hukum Volume 16, Nomor 2, Desember 2020
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum Universitas Mulawarman

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.30872/risalah.v16i2.158

Abstract

This research is motivated by the United States, which withdrew from the Paris Agreement because for the United States, the Paris Agreement is an agreement that weakens the economy. Following Article 28 of the Paris Agreement, this action raises problems that the United States cannot withdraw before 2020. In this case, there needs to be legal clarity in binding the country to global climate protection. The act of withdrawing the United States from the Paris Agreement would undoubtedly be a problem for the countries incorporated in it. In this case, the Paris Agreement continues to run as it should because the United States withdrew using the mechanisms contained in the Paris Agreement. Still, the United States continues to handle climate change because it does not come out of the Convention (UNFCCC). Then in the campaign and carbon trading, the United States should compensate for having left obligations as a developed country party following the Paris Agreement.
Penerapan Sanksi Pidana Tambahan Kebiri Kimia Ditinjau dari Perspektif Keadilan Adella Aldionita Chairi; Ivan Zairani Lisi; Rini Apriyani
Jurnal Risalah Hukum Volume 16, Nomor 2, Desember 2020
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum Universitas Mulawarman

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.30872/risalah.v16i2.203

Abstract

In Indonesia, cases of sexual violence against children are serious crimes. Law Number 17 the Year 2016 concerning Establishment of Government Regulation in place of Law (PERPPU) Number 1 the Year 2016 concerning Second Amendment to Law Number 23 the Year 2002 concerning Child Protection, which can be picked up following chemical castration. The author has two objectives, first about the additional legal requirements for chemical castration in terms of the perspective of justice against victims, the second to provide clarity on the additional innocence of chemical castration in Law Number 17 of 2016 concerning the Establishment of PERPPU Number 1 of 2016 in children The granting of additional castration chemical crime law from the perspective of justice against victims is a form of retaliation for the crime. Nothing in Law Number 17 of 2016 concerning the Establishment of PERPPU Number 1 of 2016 has the objective to be achieved is to protect the nation's children and become material for judges in opposing penalties against violence against children.
Kekuatan Hukum Digital Signature Sebagai Alat Bukti Yang Sah Di Tinjau Dari Hukum Acara Perdata Eman Sulaiman; Nur Arifudin; Lily Triyana
Jurnal Risalah Hukum Volume 16, Nomor 2, Desember 2020
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum Universitas Mulawarman

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.30872/risalah.v16i2.207

Abstract

Indonesia memasuki era globalisasi yang mendorong perkembangan teknologi dan kegiatan usaha para pelaku bisnis ke arah yang lebih efektif dan efesien yaitu e-commerce. Dalam perkembanganya, penggunaan Digital Signature mulai menggeser keberadaan tanda tangan konvesional yang biasa digunakan dalam perjanjian diatas media kertas. Penggunaan Digital signature dalam perdagangan elektronik untuk menjaga keutuhan dan keaslian data dalam suatu dokumen elektronik. Kegiatan perdagangan yang menggunakan media elektronik sebagai alat bukti di dalam sistem pembuktian di Indonesia masih terdapat kekurangan dalam proses pengadilan di Indonesia. Menurut sistem HIR/RGB (hukum acara yang berlaku) dalam acara perdata, hakim terikat pada alat-alat bukti yang sah, yang berarti hakim hanya boleh mengambil keputusan berdasarkan alat-alat bukti yang di tentukan oleh undang-undang saja (HIR/RGB).Penelitian ini menggunakan pendekatan doktrinal, yaitu penelitian hukum menggunakan pendekatan perundang-undangan dan pendekatan konsep dengan menggunakan sumber data dengan menggunakan bahan hukum primer, bahan hukum sekunder, dan bahan hukum tersier dengan metode pengumpulan data dari berbagai sumber bacaan, seperti perundang-undangan, buku-buku, jurnal atau karya ilmiah, serta internet yang dinilai relevan dengan permasalahan yang dibahas.Berdasarkan penelitian yang dilakukan, dapat disimpulkan bahwa Digital Signature bukan lah tanda tangan konvensional yang kemudian discan menggunakan scaner, melaikan menggunakan teknik Kripography. Adanya asas lex specialis derogate lex generalis maka penggunaan alat bukti Digital Signature dalam Hukum Acara Perdata memiliki kekuatan hukum yang sama dengan akta otentik. Kata Kunci: Tanda Tangan, Digital, Alat Bukti.
Pencabutan Hak Politik Pelaku Tindak Pidana Korupsi dalam Perspektif Hak Asasi Manusia Dina Fajar Indah; Haris Retno Susmiyati; Rini Apriyani
Jurnal Risalah Hukum Volume 16, Nomor 2, Desember 2020
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum Universitas Mulawarman

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.30872/risalah.v16i2.285

Abstract

ABSTRACT The judge took the progressive step. This step strongly supports the prevention and eradication of Corruption Crimes. However, in implementing the revocation of rights, the time limit for revocation must be explicitly given for the right to vote. This study aims to find out additional crimes in the form of revocation of rights to choose and be elected to public office if reviewed from the perspective of criminal law and to find out the compatibility between the decisions of the Supreme Court judge Number 537K / Pid.Sus / 2014 with human rights principles. This study uses doctrinal types. Namely, the authors collect material from the literature. These are hardcopy and softcopy that relate to the title of this study and by using an analysis of the object of research. The results obtained from this study are as follows: 1). Revocation of the right to choose and be chosen should be based on the crime rate, the impact caused to society, and the position of the position while doing the crime of corruption. Revocation of certain rights must be determined by a judge’s decision, and there is a time limit for revocation according to what has been stipulated in article 38 Criminal Code. However, Article 38 of the Criminal Code does not regulate specifically related time constraints for the removal of the right to vote and elected in public office. 2). Revocation of the right to be elected in public office complies with the principles of human rights. It can be said to be included in the category of degradable rights, or rights can be restricted. While the revocation of the right to vote who are not given the time constraints and repeal incompatible with the principles of human rights. Because the right to vote is a fundamental right of every citizen, who has been guaranteed by the constitution of 1945, besides, the time limit for the removal of the right to vote still needed due to respect of human rights offender criminal acts of corruption but to provide justice for victims of crime over the extraordinary crime then the period of revocation may be given more long, judging from the level of crimes committed.Keywords: rights; Human Rights; Revocation; Criminal; Corruption
Implikasi Hukum Penggunaan Senjata Kimia (Chemical Weapons) Dalam Perang Suriah Menurut Hukum Humaniter Internasional Homol Prima Sitompul Sitompul
Jurnal Risalah Hukum Volume 15, Nomor 1, Juni 2019
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum Universitas Mulawarman

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.30872/risalah.v15i1.309

Abstract

The case of the use of chemical weapons in the Syrian war raises a concern for the international world in the effort to maintain world peace. The use of chemical weapons is a crime and also a violation of humanitarian law. This is because Syria does not heed humanitarian law as a cornerstone of rules in terms of war. Material and immaterial losses must be immediately accounted for due to the use of chemical weapons in the war. Here is needed how the real law enforcement to resolve violations of humanitarian law, and also the responsibilityof Syria to the victims so that cases like this can not be repeated again. This research aims to find out and analyze humanitarian law such as what was violated by Syria, and find solutions to legal settlement to provide certainty and accountability to victims in the war that occurred in Syria.

Page 15 of 23 | Total Record : 222

 13   14   15   16   17 

Filter by Year

2005 2025


Reset
Filter By Issues
All Issue Vol 21 No 2 (2025): Volume 21, Nomor 2, Desember 2025 Vol 21 No 1 (2025): Volume 21, Nomor 1, Juni 2025 Vol 20 No 2 (2024): Volume 20, Nomor 2, Desember 2024 Vol 20 No 1 (2024): Volume 20, Nomor 1, Juni 2024 Vol 19 No 2 (2023): Volume 19, Nomor 2, Desember 2023 Vol 19 No 1 (2023): Volume 19, Nomor 1, Juni 2023 Vol 18 No 2 (2022): Volume 18, Nomor 2, Desember 2022 Vol 18 No 1 (2022): Volume 18, Nomor 1, Juni 2022 Volume 17, Nomor 2, Desember 2021 Volume 17, Nomor 1, Juni 2021 Volume 16, Nomor 2, Desember 2020 Volume 16, Nomor 1, Juni 2020 Volume 15, Nomor 2, Desember 2019 Volume 15, Nomor 1, Juni 2019 Volume 10, Nomor 1, Juni 2014 Volume 8, Nomor 2, Desember 2012 Volume 8, Nomor 1, Juni 2012 Volume 7, Nomor 2, Desember 2011 Volume 7, Nomor 1, Juni 2011 Volume 6, Nomor 2, Desember 2010 Volume 6, Nomor 1, Juni 2010 Volume 5, Nomor 2, Desember 2009 Volume 5, Nomor 1, Juni 2009 Volume 4, Nomor 2, Desember 2008 Volume 4, Nomor 1, Juni 2008 Volume 3, Nomor 1, Juni 2007 Volume 2, Nomor 2, Desember 2006 Volume 2, Nomor 1, Juni 2006 Volume 1, Nomor 2, Desember 2005 Volume 1, Nomor 1, Juni 2005 More Issue