cover
Contact Name
Mohamad Abdun Nasir
Contact Email
ulumuna@uinmataram.ac.id
Phone
+6281252834957
Journal Mail Official
ulumuna@uinmataram.ac.id
Editorial Address
Jl. Pendidikan No. 35 Mataram
Location
Kota mataram,
Nusa tenggara barat
INDONESIA
Ulumuna
ISSN : 14113457     EISSN : 27752453     DOI : https://doi.org/10.20414/ujis
Ulumuna (P-ISSN: 1411-3457; E-ISSN: 2355-7648), a journal of Islamic studies published twice a year (June and December) by State Islamic University (UIN) of Mataram since 1997, publishes original (library or field) research articles in the field of Islamic studies. It promotes multidisciplinary approaches to Islam and Islamicate societies and focuses on six main topics: (1) the Qur’an and hadith (2) Islamic Law (3) Islamic Theology (Kalam) (4) Islamic Philosophy (5) Islamic Mysticism (Tasawwuf) (6) Islamic Education (7) Islamic Communication and Propogation (Dakwa) and (8) Islamic Politic. All submitted manuscripts are subject to double-blind review process. Ulumuna was admitted as an accredited journal by the Director General of Strengthening Research and Development, Ministry of Research Technology and Higher Education of the Republic of Indonesia in 2017. The accreditation is given through a Director Decree No. 32a/E/KPT/2017 and is effective until 2022. Ulumuna has become a CrossRef Member since year 2015. Therefore, all of its publications have a unique Digital Object Identifier (DOI) number.
Articles 11 Documents
Search results for , issue "Vol 9 No 2 (2005): Desember" : 11 Documents clear
Wacana Intelektual Muslim Indonesiatentang Kompatibilitas Islam Dengan Demokrasi Winengan Winengan
Ulumuna Vol 9 No 2 (2005): Desember
Publisher : Universitas Islam Negeri Mataram

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.20414/ujis.v9i2.486

Abstract

In the beginning era of Islam, contextual and highly abstract terms like democracy was unknown. Therefore, when the term exists and is applied in the context of muslims’ states, it is responded in various ways due to some reasons. First, respond under genealogical reasons that assumes that democracy was first applied in the Western countries as a product of secular and liberal thinking process. Second, respond under philosophical reasons which looks at democracy through its political aspect that is closely related to state power in which people are found as the source of the power. In the meantime, as for a muslims, the dignity of power is in the Hand of Allah, the Creator. The problem arouses due to the application of democracy in Islam interest some Indonesian Moslem scholars. By using Islamic teaching value study approaches, this article is aimed at describing their opinions about the meaning of term democracy. Among them are M. Amien Rais, Nurcholish Madjid, Ismail Sunny, Syafi’i Ma’arif, Abdoerraoef, Jalaluddin Rakhmat, Muhammad Natsir, Muhammad Tahir Azhary, M. Dawam Rahardjo, Abdurrahman Wahid, and Munawir Sadzali. Based on their point of views, it seems that they do not question the meaning of democracy genealogically. They agree, even, support the concept of democracy which is understood contemporarily, in terms of the power of majority, people’s voice (political participations), and free and responsible election. About the philosophical definition, although they accept the concept of people power, they still perceive the supremacy of God’s order (Syariah) as the basis and is treated as the highest source of power.
Proposisi Kewargaan Dalam Islam: Tafsir Baru Konsep Ummah Abdul Fattah
Ulumuna Vol 9 No 2 (2005): Desember
Publisher : Universitas Islam Negeri Mataram

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.20414/ujis.v9i2.485

Abstract

An Islamic term relating to discourse of citizenship is ummah. In Islamic terminology, the term is a unique one, and no other equal term of Western languages that has the same range of meaning as it does. While other terms—e.g. the people, the nation, or the state—are respectively limited under certain culture, ethnic, race, geography, language, historical element shared or combination of them all, the term of ummah goes beyond these all borders of meaning. This article is aimed at revealing the range meaning of the term ummah and reformulating it in the current modern context. The term is stated in the Qur’an 64 times in 24 different chapters, surah, through two expressions of meaning. First, it is used in homonym with several meaning like certain time, model, animals, related to term ummî, or genie. Secondly, it is used in terms of unification of religious community with its all branches. As comparison, in the Madinah Carter the term is used in two senses of meaning. First, in the article 1, with likely exclusive sense, it is used to mean an organization or community that shares a same religion. Secondly, in the article 25, with more inclusive sense, it is used to mean a pluralistic community that share or live in a socio-politic unity. The two kind of using the term ummah in the Qur’an and the Madinah Carter indicate that Islam has given clear identity to the concept of ummah, and taught a spirit of universality that is bundled by the spirit of shared faith brotherhood. The concept goes beyond the limitation of ethnicity, race, group, language, and territorial border, as what is going on in the Western knowledge and practices.
Satu Negara Satu Tujuan: Menyoal Konsep Negara Khilâfah Taqî Al-dîn Al-Nabhânî Umar Faruq
Ulumuna Vol 9 No 2 (2005): Desember
Publisher : Universitas Islam Negeri Mataram

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.20414/ujis.v9i2.488

Abstract

Taqî al-Dîn al-Nabhânî, an Islamic fundamentalist, with his political party Hizb al-Tahrîr al-Islâm, offered an idea of khilâfah. As a universal nation, which is aimed at providing solutions to the whole problems (final solution), is a political ideology in form covered by religious issue that is universality of Islam. This idea is based on the universality of Islam which has no boundary limit so as the Islamic political system is universal and its implementation to build a khilâfah state should also be universal and absolute. This ideological reason is supported by empirical reason addressed to the countries and nations perceived as disbelievers institutions applied to Islamic nations. Since the world order nowadays is built on the interaction among countries and nations world wide, to show Islamic supremation, the secularistic system must be replaced. The alternative solution offered by Taqî al-Dîn is khilâfah state where Allah is the Judge. Although the functions of representative authority conduct are, the same as those in the theocratic system, the khilâfah nation is claimed to be different from theocracy for historical reasons; there is no historical and ideological relationships between theocracy and Islamic politic. The khalîfah is not an incarnation of God as claimed by an emperor in a theocratic nation. Khalîfah is just a representation of God who is the same as ordinary person in the eye of God. The existence of khalîfah is to facilitate the implementation of Allah’s rules, as the owner and the holder of the authority. The claim that khalîfah is the implementer of Allah’s rules and representation of God, practically, resembles the religious and political functions in a theocratic system. Therefore, khilâfah state is not an expression of religion ressurection, but merely a statement of new order to replace the present system with the khilâfah system claimed to be the religious principles.
Wacana Politik Dan Kepemimpinan Islam Dalam Naskah Kuno Kesultanan Bima Mukhlis Mukhlis
Ulumuna Vol 9 No 2 (2005): Desember
Publisher : Universitas Islam Negeri Mataram

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.20414/ujis.v9i2.487

Abstract

Islamic thought in the field of politics and leaderships is found as the Muslims effort ellaborating basic values of Islamic teachings considered relevant to and applicable in the two fields, mainly in the governmental arrangement and the conduct of ruling persons. The effort is based on the point of view that politics needs some values ordering it so that it as part of human existence (zoon politicon) is able to lead all human beings to a glorified life, not to split them into a lawless and orderless life (homo homini lupus). The effort has been lasting over centuries since the forming of established Muslims community in Madinah. One of sources from wich Muslim thought in the two field in certain period in the long journey of the history of Islam can be traced is manuscripts. Through historical and philological approaches, the outhor took a study on one of heritage manuscripts of Bima Sultanate that was produced in 1882, Jawharat al-Ma‘ârif. Applaying content analysis the outhor picture out the model of Islamic political and leadership tought in the manuscript. Seeing from the three theoretical perspectives concerning the two field, the outhor concluded that the manuscript in line with the third theory which stated that Islam—through al-Qur’an and Sunnah—only has a set of ideal and ethical values concerning the to filed. The ellaboration and practical implementation of the values always follow the local contexts of Muslim communities—in this manuscript the contexts Bimanese Muslim in the 19th century.
Sufistikasi Kekuasaan Pada Kesultanan Riau-Lingga Abad XVIII-XIX M Achmad Syahid
Ulumuna Vol 9 No 2 (2005): Desember
Publisher : Universitas Islam Negeri Mataram

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.20414/ujis.v9i2.489

Abstract

The development of Islam in most parts of Indonesia, such as in Malay, is almost undistinguishable with the political development. There was a good relationship between sultan as the holder of political authority and ‘ulamâ’ as the holder of religious authority symbolized as “one diamond in one ring”. To strengthen his power, a sultan needs legitimacy from ‘ulamâ’ and vice versa, through a close reltionship with the sultan, an ulama can increase his religious authority. Based on the historical analyses, especially on the case of Sultanate of Riau-Lingga in the 18th-19th centuries, the relationship between ulama and sultan was not always in harmony as previously described. The relationship sometime depended on their needs, which from time to time, competitive, cooperative and contestive. Apart from any forms of relationship, this article reveals that there was a “sufistication” process occurred where the political power which was characteristically profane and secular, changed as an influence of the sufism teachings. Thus, what happened in Sultanate of Riau-Lingga proved that sufism is an important phenomenon which changed the historical color and intellectual literature in Indonesia
Politik Pelembagaan Syariat: Strategi Dan Argumentasi PPP, PBB, Dan PKS Di Sidang Tahunan MPR 1999-2002 Muhammad Ansor
Ulumuna Vol 9 No 2 (2005): Desember
Publisher : Universitas Islam Negeri Mataram

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.20414/ujis.v9i2.490

Abstract

Of the classical problems in the discourse of Islam and politics is controversy on interpretation of Islamic Syarî‘ah, and there is no single or only one true definition of the term. The controversy is going worse when some groups of Muslim—with or without intervension and support of the ruling power—insist to have their opinion the true one and should be followed by others. This article is comparing the strategy and arguments used by the three Islam-based parties—PPP, PBB, and PKS—in the parliament of Indonesia when they respond the discourse of applying Islamic Syarî‘ah in Indonesia. They share opinion that the application of Islamic Syarî‘ah through state is a duty of every Muslim, but they differ one another in the way or strategy of realizing and making that come true. Different from PPP and PBB that struggle for adopting the Jakarta Carter into Indonesian 1945 Constitution, PKS (with PAN) suggest adopting Medina Carter. When the majority of parliament members refuses both suggestions, the three parties also take different ways responding the refusal. While PPP can understand the refusal and explicitly agree to no-amendment on the article 29 of Indonesian 1945 Constitution, PBB and PKS declare to be abstains. The controversy indicates the difficulty of unifying Muslim opinion and strategy relating to the how to position Islam in the context of state. The phenomena that occurs between the supporting and the refusing group is not only in terms of positivization of Islamic Syarî‘ah, but also in applying Islam. It ranges from the issues of struggle strategy to the decision of aspects of Syarî‘ah that can be adopted in or made positive law.
Syâfi‘Î’s Influence Of Naskh In The ‘Ulûm Al-Qur’ân Kusmana Kusmana
Ulumuna Vol 9 No 2 (2005): Desember
Publisher : Universitas Islam Negeri Mataram

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.20414/ujis.v9i2.491

Abstract

Muhammad bin Idrîs al-Syâfi‘î dikenal sebagai pemikir dan penulis yang otoritatif dalam bidang fiqh dan ushûl al-fiqh, khususnya di kalangan Sunni. Karya-karyanya dalam dua bidang tersebut menjadi rujukan penting dalam berbagai kajian tentang perkembangan pemikiran hukum dan jurisprudensi Islam. Tulisan ini akan melacak pengaruh terhadap konstruksi konsep naskh dalam dua kategori literatur tafsir al-Qur’an, yaitu: karya-karya yang secara khusus membahas al-nâsikh wa al-mansûkh, dan karya-karya tafsir yang di dalamnya naskh menjadi kunci untuk memahami ayat-ayat tertentu dalam al-Qur’an. Tulisan ini diawali dengan kajian historis dengan menelusuri asal-usul dan perkembangan naskh sejak masa Nabi hingga masa al-Syâfi‘î dan berlanjut hingga masa al-Suyûthî. Kajian dilanjutkan dengan menganalisis, sebagai contoh, enam karya dari penulis yang masing-masing mewakili empat madzhab dalam Islam Sunnî. Dari enam karya yang dikaji itu ditemukan bahwa secara umum teori Syâfi‘î tentang naskh jarang dijadikan rujukan. Dalam hal penerimaan terhadap adanya nask, Syâfi‘î dan enam penulis itu memiliki pendapat yang sama dan memandang bahwa nask merupakan hak eksklusif Tuhan. Pendapat Syâfi‘î tentang pembagian dua model naskh mendapat bantahan dari keenam penulis itu yang mengajukan tiga model naskh. Dalam hal pembedaan istilah naskh dari istilah lainnya, tidak ada satu pun dari mereka yang memandang Syâfi‘î orang pertama yang mengulas masalah tersebut. Akhirnya, signifikansi pendapat Syâfi’î tentang naskh terletak pada pembatasan dan sistematisasi yang dilakukannya sehingga menjadikannya operasional dalam wilayah pendeduksian hukum dan interpretasinya dengan parameter yang lebih terkontrol.
Menjinakkan Barat Dengan Oksidentalisme: Gagasan Kiri Islam Hassan Hanafî Suharti Suharti
Ulumuna Vol 9 No 2 (2005): Desember
Publisher : Universitas Islam Negeri Mataram

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.20414/ujis.v9i2.492

Abstract

In the scholarly thoughts, some recognized Muslim scholars are among them: Nashr Hamîd Abû Zayd, Zia Ghokap, Muhammad Syahrûr, Amina Wadûd, and Hassan Hanafî. They were known for their brilliant ideas and theories in perceiving problems and finding ways out of the problems related either to Islamic affairs and the Muslims or even for the welfare of the whole humankind. The ideas that they offered through writings become inspirations and triggers to Islamic development to compete with the West. It is relative to consider one’s idea as extraordinary or ordinary. In this case, Hassan Hanafi, as one of Muslim scholars, tried to offer an idea popularly known as “al-Yasâr al-Islâmî” or “Islamic Left”. The idea proposed in the “Islamic Left” is an effort to bring back Islam and the Muslims to the previous golden era by eliminating every threat to Islam. This revolution is based on three main considerations: revitalization of classical literature, reality of Islamic world and the needs to fight against western civilization. This article is intended to trace the path of the existence of “Islamic Left” developed by Hassan Hanafî from historical background, terminology, school of thoughts, and Hassan Hanafî’s way of thinking.
Sejarah Tradisi Tulis Dalam Masyarakat Sasak Lombok Jamaluddin Jamaluddin
Ulumuna Vol 9 No 2 (2005): Desember
Publisher : Universitas Islam Negeri Mataram

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.20414/ujis.v9i2.493

Abstract

A great number of classical intellectual treatises, usually called manuscripts, can be found in Lombok, an island in West Nusa Tenggara province. All the manuscripts indicate that writing tradition has been growing in this island since a long time ago. Of many factors influenced the growing of that tradition is trade relationship between Lombok traders and those from other islands. Some significant contributions can be traced through languages ever used in oral communication and in works produced in the community i.e. Sasak, Java, Bali, and Malay, Sanskrit, Arabics. The relationship also contributed to rising intellectual activity and enriching contents of the manuscripts. This article observes historical sides of the writing tradition by providing historical data, epigraphs and other supporting resources that made the writing tradition exist. The article tradition in Sasak community is predicted to have been started since the Sasak people recognized writing system, and have developed hundreds of years ago, producing thousands of manuscripts in some different languages, titles and forms.The writing systems used were varied such as old Javanese, Arab, Bali and Bugis. And the languages used were old Java, Java, Bali, Arabic and Malay. This indicates that, long time ago, Sasak people had made contact with people from many parts of this archipelago like Bali, Java, Malay and even Celebes (Bugis).
Menggagas Agama Baru di Era Postmodernisme Muhammad Zain
Ulumuna Vol 9 No 2 (2005): Desember
Publisher : Universitas Islam Negeri Mataram

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.20414/ujis.v9i2.494

Abstract

When man has come to the highest level of achievement of the use of ratio, well known as postmodern era, religion is still believed to be the solution of humanistic problems. Even in the ultimate level of the use of ratio, religion becomes an expectation. This expectation will never be a reality unless religion can play its part in our every day life. Religion nowadays is understood formally, partially and exclusively. This makes it hard for the religion to cope with the ongoing problems encountered by human beings. To make thing worse, this understanding even can lead to a more severe condition where religion is blamed to be the cause of some social chaos, riots, violence, oppression and injustice. Therefore, to make the dream comes true, religion should be able to play its role universally, as the characteristics of its values. Moreover, if it is believed that a religion comes from the Al-Mighty God, the God of all universes, the values and teachings of the religion are values that go into effects to the whole humankind.

Page 1 of 2 | Total Record : 11