cover
Contact Name
Rachmat Hidayat
Contact Email
dr.rachmat.hidayat@gmail.com
Phone
+6281949581088
Journal Mail Official
editor.bioscmed@gmail.com
Editorial Address
Jl. Sirna Raga no 99, 8 Ilir, Ilir Timur 3, Palembang
Location
Kota palembang,
Sumatera selatan
INDONESIA
Bioscientia Medicina : Journal of Biomedicine and Translational Research
Published by HM Publisher
ISSN : -     EISSN : 25980580     DOI : https://doi.org/10.37275/bsm
Core Subject : Health, Science,
This journal welcomes the submission of articles that offering a sensible transfer of basic research to applied clinical medicine. BioScientia Medicina covers the latest developments in various fields of biomedicine with special attention to : 1.Rhemumatology 2.Molecular aspect of Indonesia Traditional Herb 3.Cardiology and Cardiovascular diseases 4.Genetics 5.Immunology 6.Environmental health 7.Toxicology 8. Neurology 9. Pharmacology 10. Oncology 11. Other multidisciplinary studies related medicine. The views of experts on current advances in nanotechnology and molecular/cell biology will be also considered for publication as long as they have a direct clinical impact on human health.
Articles 1,518 Documents
Adjunctive Vaginal Probiotic Therapy for Preterm Premature Rupture of Membranes: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Latency Period, Maternal Infection, and Neonatal Morbidity Vani Ardiani; Donel S; Maya Savira; Zulmaeta
Bioscientia Medicina : Journal of Biomedicine and Translational Research Vol. 10 No. 1 (2026): Bioscientia Medicina: Journal of Biomedicine & Translational Research
Publisher : HM Publisher

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.37275/bsm.v10i1.1484

Abstract

Background: Preterm premature rupture of membranes (PPROM) significantly drives preterm birth rates and consequent neonatal morbidity and mortality. While standard antibiotic therapy aims to prolong pregnancy latency, it concurrently disrupts the protective vaginal microbiota. Adjunctive vaginal probiotics have been investigated as a means to restore beneficial flora, potentially mitigating ascending infection and improving perinatal outcomes. This study systematically synthesized the current randomized trial evidence regarding this adjunctive therapeutic strategy. Methods: We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis following PRISMA guidelines. PubMed, EMBASE, and CENTRAL databases were searched (2014–October 2025) for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing adjunctive vaginal probiotics plus antibiotics versus antibiotics (alone or with placebo) in singleton pregnancies complicated by PPROM between 24+0 and 34+0 weeks’ gestation. Primary outcomes included the latency period (days) and maternal chorioamnionitis or infectious morbidity. Key secondary outcomes were neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) admission, neonatal sepsis, and neonatal mortality. Data were pooled using a random-effects model, calculating Mean Differences (MD) or Risk Ratios (RR) with 95% Confidence Intervals (CI). Risk of bias was assessed using the Cochrane RoB 2 tool. Results: Three RCTs, encompassing 330 participants, met the inclusion criteria. Significant methodological limitations, including high risk of bias and critical baseline confounding by gestational age in the largest trial, were identified across the included studies. A sensitivity analysis addressing high heterogeneity (I²=98%) for latency (excluding one retrospective study; n=290) indicated a modest but statistically significant prolongation associated with probiotics (MD 2.98 days; 95% CI 1.80–4.16; p<0.0001; I²=0%). Probiotic use was linked to a significantly lower risk of maternal infection (RR 0.43; 95% CI 0.24–0.77; p=0.005; I²=0%; n=270). Statistically significant reductions were also observed for NICU admission (RR 0.59; 95% CI 0.46–0.75; p<0.0001; I²=55%; n=330) and neonatal mortality (RR 0.38; 95% CI 0.18–0.81; p=0.01; I²=0%; n=270), although these estimates are likely inflated due to baseline confounding. Conclusion: This meta-analysis suggests adjunctive vaginal probiotics may offer benefits in PPROM management by modestly prolonging latency and significantly reducing maternal infectious morbidity. While substantial reductions in NICU admission and neonatal mortality were observed, these findings must be interpreted with extreme caution due to the limited quantity and low quality of the primary evidence, particularly the high risk of bias and confounding. Definitive conclusions cannot be drawn, and routine clinical adoption is not supported by current evidence. High-quality, large-scale RCTs are imperative.
Ecthyma Contagiosum (Orf Virus) Masquerading as Subcorneal Pustular Dermatosis: A Diagnostic Pitfall in an Adolescent Lisa Alverina; Luh Made Mas Rusyati; Suharmono Hadi; Herman Saputra
Bioscientia Medicina : Journal of Biomedicine and Translational Research Vol. 10 No. 1 (2026): Bioscientia Medicina: Journal of Biomedicine & Translational Research
Publisher : HM Publisher

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.37275/bsm.v10i1.1485

Abstract

Background: Ecthyma contagiosum (Orf) is a zoonotic viral infection caused by a Parapoxvirus, typically presenting as a self-limiting, solitary cutaneous lesion on the hands of occupationally exposed individuals. Atypical, multifocal, or pustular presentations can pose a significant diagnostic challenge, mimicking various inflammatory dermatoses. Case presentation: We present the case of a 17-year-old female with no direct animal contact who developed a progressive, widespread, and painful pustular eruption on her extremities over three weeks. The clinical presentation was highly suggestive of Subcorneal Pustular Dermatosis (SPD), prompting treatment with systemic corticosteroids, which led to clinical worsening. A delayed epidemiological history revealed an environmental link to a nearby goat farm and a family cluster of similar, milder lesions. A diagnostic punch biopsy was pivotal, revealing viral cytopathic effects, including extensive ballooning degeneration and epidermal necrosis, inconsistent with SPD. Subsequent bacterial culture confirmed superinfection with Enterobacter cloacae ssp. cloacae. The diagnosis was established by the pathognomonic histopathological findings. Conclusion: The patient’s steroid therapy was immediately ceased, and targeted antibiotic therapy was initiated, leading to complete resolution. This case highlights the Orf virus as a critical clinical chameleon and a diagnostic pitfall for generalized pustular eruptions. It underscores the necessity of a high index of suspicion for zoonoses, even in non-occupational settings, and confirms the indispensable role of histopathology in differentiating viral cytopathy from sterile neutrophilic dermatoses to prevent iatrogenic harm from inappropriate immunosuppression.
Vitamin D in the Breast Cancer Continuum: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Primary Prevention, Patient Prognosis, and Adjunctive Treatment Response Felix Setiawan; Yan Wisnu Prajoko; Niken Puruhita; Aliva Nabila Farinisa
Bioscientia Medicina : Journal of Biomedicine and Translational Research Vol. 10 No. 1 (2026): Bioscientia Medicina: Journal of Biomedicine & Translational Research
Publisher : HM Publisher

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.37275/bsm.v10i1.1486

Abstract

Background: The role of vitamin D across the breast cancer spectrum remains complex and contested. Compelling preclinical antineoplastic mechanisms contrast with inconsistent clinical findings. Large randomized controlled trials (RCTs) show null effects for primary prevention, while observational studies often link higher vitamin D status at diagnosis with better prognosis. Key conflicts include this prevention-prognosis disconnect, debates over linear versus J-shaped prognostic dose-responses, and a "receptor-status paradox" where estrogen receptor-positive (ER-positive) disease shows prognostic links, but hormone receptor-negative (HR-negative)/triple-negative (TNBC) subtypes derive greater benefit (improved pathological complete response, pCR) from vitamin D intervention during neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT). This study systematically synthesizes evidence across these distinct clinical contexts. Methods: Following PRISMA guidelines, we systematically reviewed PubMed, EMBASE, and CENTRAL (January 1st, 2014–September 2nd, 2025) for high-impact RCTs and large prospective cohort studies evaluating vitamin D supplementation or serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D (25(OH)D) levels regarding breast cancer incidence, prognosis (survival/recurrence), or pCR after NACT. Quality was assessed (Cochrane RoB 2; Newcastle-Ottawa Scale). Data were extracted dually. Findings were synthesized stratigraphically (prevention, prognosis, treatment). A random-effects meta-analysis pooled pCR data from NACT RCTs. Results: Six high-quality studies (3 RCTs, 3 cohorts; N=31,026) were included. (1) Prevention: The VITAL RCT (N=25,871; mean baseline 25(OH)D 30.8 ng/mL) found no reduction in incident invasive breast cancer with 2000 IU/day vitamin D3 (HR 1.02, 95% CI 0.79–1.31). (2) Prognosis: Cohort studies (N=4,835) showed higher 25(OH)D linked to better OS (Adj HR T3 vs T1: 0.72). Complexity emerged: one study linked benefit specifically to ER-positive recurrence (Adj HR 0.87), while another reported a J-shaped curve for EFS, with worse outcomes at both low (≤52 nmol/L; Adj HR 1.63) and high (≥99 nmol/L; Adj HR 1.37) levels versus intermediate. (3) Treatment: Meta-analysis of two NACT RCTs (N=310) showed vitamin D supplementation significantly increased pCR rates (38.1% vs 22.6%; Pooled RR 1.69, 95% CI 1.21–2.36; P=0.002; I²=0%). Subgroup data strongly suggested greater benefit in HR-negative/TNBC and baseline-deficient patients. Conclusion: Vitamin D supplementation appears ineffective for primary breast cancer prevention in replete populations. Its prognostic role is complex, suggesting an optimal 25(OH)D range (potentially ~30-40 ng/mL) and possible ER-specific hormonal modulation effects, though causality from observational data remains uncertain. Critically, vitamin D intervention during NACT significantly improves pCR, particularly in HR-negative/TNBC, likely via distinct chemosensitization/immunomodulatory mechanisms. This synthesis provides a framework for understanding these context-dependent roles, supporting vitamin D assessment and potentially adjunctive NACT supplementation, especially in deficient patients with aggressive subtypes, pending necessary validation in larger trials.
Fatal Lung-Kidney Crosstalk in Bronchopulmonary Dysplasia: A Case of Refractory Weaning Unmasking Confirmed Williams Syndrome and Severe Obstructive Nephrolithiasis Komang Okky Maharani Ciptana Putri; Mario Bernardinus Realino Nara; Defranky Theodorus
Bioscientia Medicina : Journal of Biomedicine and Translational Research Vol. 10 No. 1 (2026): Bioscientia Medicina: Journal of Biomedicine & Translational Research
Publisher : HM Publisher

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.37275/bsm.v10i1.1487

Abstract

Background: Bronchopulmonary dysplasia (BPD) is the most common, serious morbidity of prematurity, frequently complicated by a protracted and difficult weaning process from respiratory support. Refractory weaning failure, defined as a lack of response to conventional BPD therapies, should trigger a broad investigation for non-pulmonary, systemic confounders. Case presentation: We present the case of a 1,480-gram, 35+4 weeks' gestation female infant with severe hyaline membrane disease who subsequently developed moderate-to-severe BPD. The infant exhibited refractory respiratory failure, failing multiple extubation attempts, and showing no clinical improvement despite standard BPD management, including a 15-day course of furosemide. On day 58, investigation for worsening cholestasis incidentally revealed a 1.3 cm obstructive right renal calculus with severe hydronephrosis and acute pyelonephritis. This finding, coupled with evolving "elfin" facies, prompted a systemic workup. Key confirmatory data included severe hypercalcemia (13.4 mg/dL) and an echocardiogram revealing supravalvular aortic stenosis (SVAS). These findings, along with a characteristic phenotype, established a clinical diagnosis of Williams Syndrome. The infant rapidly developed urosepsis and anuric acute kidney injury (AKI), culminating in irreversible respiratory failure. Conclusion: This case provides a definitive clinico-pathological correlation for a rare and fatal triad. The severe nephrolithiasis is explained by a "two-hit" mechanism: baseline idiopathic hypercalcemia from Williams Syndrome, massively amplified by iatrogenic hypercalciuria from furosemide therapy. The patient's demise was a direct consequence of lung-kidney crosstalk, wherein the obstructive urosepsis and AKI induced a fatal inflammatory and hydrostatic pulmonary edema that overwhelmed the infant's BPD-compromised lungs.
Adaptive Radiotherapy (ART) versus Non-Adaptive IMRT for Locoregionally Advanced Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma: A Meta-Analysis of Dosimetric Advantages, Clinical Outcomes, and Organ-at-Risk Sparing Gina Amalia; Yan Wisnu Prajoko; Niken Puruhita
Bioscientia Medicina : Journal of Biomedicine and Translational Research Vol. 10 No. 1 (2026): Bioscientia Medicina: Journal of Biomedicine & Translational Research
Publisher : HM Publisher

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.37275/bsm.v10i1.1488

Abstract

Background: Intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) is the cornerstone of treatment for nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC), offering high dose conformity. However, anatomical variations during the multi-week therapy course can compromise dosimetric accuracy. Adaptive radiotherapy (ART), which adjusts the treatment plan based on intra-treatment imaging, aims to mitigate these effects. This meta-analysis synthesized contemporary comparative evidence (2014–2025) on the efficacy and safety of ART versus non-adaptive IMRT in locoregionally advanced NPC. Methods: Following PRISMA guidelines, PubMed, Embase, Scopus, and Cochrane Library were searched for studies comparing ART with non-adaptive IMRT (cohorts or hybrid/phantom plan comparisons) in locoregionally advanced NPC. Primary outcomes were locoregional recurrence-free survival (LRFS) and overall survival (OS); secondary outcomes included progression-free survival (PFS), distant metastasis-free survival (DMFS), and dosimetric metrics for targets (D98, Conformity Index [CI]) and organs-at-risk (OARs: parotid Dmean, spinal cord Dmax, brainstem Dmax). Hazard Ratios (HR) and Mean Differences (MD) were pooled using random-effects models. Data estimation methods (Tierney, Wan, Cochrane) were employed where necessary. Heterogeneity was assessed using I². Results: Nine studies (2 cohort, 7 dosimetric/anatomical) involving 362 patients (clinical) and 215 datasets (dosimetric) were included. ART significantly improved LRFS compared to non-adaptive IMRT (pooled HR = 0.53, 95% CI 0.32–0.88; I²=0%). No significant differences were found for OS (HR=0.98, 95% CI 0.64–1.50), PFS (HR=0.70, 95% CI 0.45–1.07), or DMFS (HR=0.88, 95% CI 0.48–1.62). Compared to hybrid/phantom plans, ART significantly enhanced target coverage (pooled PTV D98 MD = 2.15 Gy, 95% CI 1.10–3.20 Gy; I²=78%) and conformity (pooled CI MD = 0.05, 95% CI 0.02–0.08; I²=85%). ART significantly reduced OAR doses: parotid Dmean (pooled MD = -3.50 Gy, 95% CI -4.95 to -2.05 Gy; I²=90%), spinal cord Dmax (pooled MD = -3.95 Gy, 95% CI -5.80 to -2.10 Gy; I²=93%), and brainstem Dmax (pooled MD = -2.75 Gy, 95% CI -4.40 to -1.10 Gy; I²=91%). Dosimetric analyses exhibited high heterogeneity. Conclusion: ART significantly improves LRFS in locoregionally advanced NPC compared to non-adaptive IMRT. It provides substantial dosimetric advantages, enhancing target coverage and conformity while critically reducing doses to parotid glands, spinal cord, and brainstem. Despite high dosimetric heterogeneity and no demonstrated OS benefit, the improvements in LRFS and dose delivery support the thoughtful implementation of ART.
Bridging the Therapeutic Gap: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis on the Efficacy, Safety, and Pathophysiological Impact of Sodium Zirconium Cyclosilicate in Enabling Guideline-Directed Medical Therapy Edy Nur Rachman; Ian Effendi; Zulkhair Ali; Novadian; Suprapti
Bioscientia Medicina : Journal of Biomedicine and Translational Research Vol. 10 No. 1 (2026): Bioscientia Medicina: Journal of Biomedicine & Translational Research
Publisher : HM Publisher

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.37275/bsm.v10i1.1489

Abstract

Background: Hyperkalemia is a life-threatening complication of chronic kidney disease (CKD) and heart failure (HF), primarily impeding the use of life-saving renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system inhibitors (RAASi). This systematic review and meta-analysis evaluate the evidence for sodium zirconium cyclosilicate (SZC) in managing hyperkalemia and enabling RAASi therapy. Methods: This systematic review searched Medline, Embase, and Cochrane CENTRAL to September 2025. Dual reviewers independently screened, extracted data, and assessed bias (Cochrane RoB 2, Newcastle-Ottawa Scale). We included RCTs and observational studies of SZC in adults with hyperkalemia. A random-effects meta-analysis was performed on RCTs reporting maintenance-phase efficacy and safety. Results: The search yielded 1,254 citations, with 6 pivotal studies included. The meta-analysis of 3 RCTs found that SZC (5-10g daily) was significantly more effective than placebo at maintaining normokalemia over 12-28 days. The pooled mean difference in serum K+ was -0.58 mEq/L (95% CI: -0.65 to -0.51; I2 = 0%). SZC did increase the risk of edema (pooled Risk Ratio: 2.95; 95% CI: 1.51 to 5.76; I2 = 0%). The narrative synthesis of observational data confirmed that SZC use was associated with a >2.5-fold increase in the likelihood of continuing RAASi therapy. Conclusion: Sodium zirconium cyclosilicate is a highly effective and rapidly acting agent for both acute correction and chronic management of hyperkalemia. Our meta-analysis provides a precise estimate of its high maintenance-phase efficacy. Its primary clinical benefit lies in providing a renal-independent pathway for potassium excretion, thereby "uncoupling" potassium levels from RAASi use and bridging a critical treatment gap.
Beyond Glycemia: Independent Hemodynamic and Metabolic Drivers of Incident Diabetic Kidney Disease in a 5-Year Prospective Indonesian Primary Care Cohort Juliana; Nelly
Bioscientia Medicina : Journal of Biomedicine and Translational Research Vol. 10 No. 1 (2026): Bioscientia Medicina: Journal of Biomedicine & Translational Research
Publisher : HM Publisher

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.37275/bsm.v10i1.1490

Abstract

Background: The relative contributions of hyperglycemia, hypertension, and metabolic adiposity to the progression of diabetic kidney disease (DKD) are debated, particularly in Southeast Asian populations and in the context of modern polypharmacy. We aimed to prospectively quantify the independent impact of glycemic burden, hemodynamic stress, and central adiposity on the 5-year incidence of DKD in an Indonesian primary care cohort. Methods: We conducted a 5-year, multi-center, prospective cohort study at 25 primary care clinics in Indonesia. We randomly sampled and enrolled 1,250 T2DM patients without pre-existing DKD (eGFR > 60 mL/min/1.73m² and normoalbuminuria). The primary composite outcome was incident DKD, defined as persistent albuminuria (ACR ≥ 30 mg/g on 2 of 3 occasions) or a sustained eGFR decline of ≥ 30%. Baseline predictors included HbA1c, Systolic Blood Pressure (SBP), and Waist-to-Height Ratio (WHtR). Multivariable Cox proportional-hazards models were used to estimate Hazard Ratios (HRs), adjusting for demographics, baseline eGFR, and baseline use of RAAS inhibitors (RAASi) and SGLT2 inhibitors. Results: Of 1,250 participants, 980 (78.4%) completed the 5-year follow-up. Over a median 4.9 years, 215 participants (21.9%) developed the composite DKD outcome. In the fully-adjusted multivariable Cox model, all three pathways were strong, independent predictors of incident DKD. The standardized HR for SBP (per 1-SD increase) was 1.68 (95% CI: 1.40–2.01; p<0.001), for HbA1c (per 1-SD increase) was 1.45 (95% CI: 1.22–1.73; p<0.001), and for WHtR (per 1-SD increase) was 1.39 (95% CI: 1.18–1.65; p<0.001). Conclusion: In this prospective primary care cohort, hemodynamic stress (SBP), glycemic burden (HbA1c), and metabolic adiposity (WHtR) were all independent, potent drivers of incident DKD, even after controlling for the use of protective cardio-renal medications. These findings confirm that a multi-pillar strategy, aggressively targeting blood pressure, glucose, and weight/metabolic health simultaneously, is essential for DKD prevention.
Modulation of TGF-β/Smad and Nrf2 Signaling Pathways by Thymoquinone in the Attenuation of Renal Fibrosis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Pre-clinical Models Chairil Makky; Ian Effendi; Zulkhair Ali; Novadian; Suprapti
Bioscientia Medicina : Journal of Biomedicine and Translational Research Vol. 10 No. 1 (2026): Bioscientia Medicina: Journal of Biomedicine & Translational Research
Publisher : HM Publisher

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.37275/bsm.v10i1.1491

Abstract

Background: Renal fibrosis is the irreversible, final common pathway for all progressive forms of chronic kidney disease (CKD), leading to end-stage renal disease. Its pathogenesis is characterized by the over-activation of pro-fibrotic signaling, chiefly the Transforming Growth Factor-beta (TGF-β)/Smad pathway, and the failure of endogenous cytoprotective mechanisms like the nuclear factor erythroid 2-related factor 2 (Nrf2) antioxidant response. Thymoquinone (TQ), the primary bioactive constituent of Nigella sativa, is a pleiotropic compound with known anti-inflammatory and antioxidant properties. This study was designed to systematically quantify its mechanistic efficacy in modulating the core Nrf2 and TGF-β pathways in established pre-clinical models of renal fibrosis and injury. Methods: We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis following PRISMA guidelines. We performed a comprehensive search of major databases (including PubMed and Scopus) for pre-clinical in vivo studies published between 2014 and 2025 that investigated TQ monotherapy or TQ-dominant combination therapy in rodent models of renal injury. The eight studies that met the inclusion criteria utilized diverse models: Unilateral Ureteral Obstruction (UUO), cisplatin-induced nephrotoxicity, gentamicin-induced nephrotoxicity, 5-fluorouracil (5-FU)-induced acute kidney injury (AKI), lipopolysaccharide (LPS)-induced inflammation, carfilzomib (CFZ)-induced renal impairment, and ischemia-reperfusion (IRI). Primary outcomes were the expression of renal Nrf2 and TGF-β1. Secondary outcomes included markers of fibrosis (collagen deposition, histology scores), renal function (BUN, creatinine), oxidative stress (MDA, SOD, GSH, CAT), and inflammation (TNF-α, NF-κB, IL-6, IL-1β). Data were pooled using a random-effects model, and primary analyses were stratified by injury model subgroup. Results: Thymoquinone treatment resulted in a profound and significant upregulation of the protective Nrf2 pathway (SMD: 2.38; 95% CI [1.05, 3.71]; p < 0.001; 3 studies) and its downstream target Heme Oxygenase-1 (HO-1). Concurrently, TQ treatment markedly suppressed the primary pro-fibrotic driver, TGF-β1 (SMD: -2.09; 95% CI [-2.99, -1.19]; p < 0.001; 2 studies). This pivotal dual modulation translated into significant functional and structural improvements. TQ robustly attenuated renal fibrosis scores (SMD: -1.89; 95% CI [-2.55, -1.23]; p < 0.001; 2 studies). Stratified subgroup analysis showed TQ significantly improved renal function in both chemotoxic AKI models (BUN SMD: -2.31; 95% CI [-3.22, -1.40]) and chronic obstructive/fibrosis models (BUN SMD: -1.17; 95% CI [-1.75, -0.59]). This functional protection was underpinned by potent, broad-spectrum reversal of oxidative stress and inflammation across all subgroups. Conclusion: Thymoquinone consistently ameliorates renal injury and fibrosis across a wide spectrum of pre-clinical models. Its mechanism of action is multifaceted, critically involving the dual modulation of opposing pro-fibrotic and protective pathways: it suppresses the TGF-β1 cascade while simultaneously activating and restoring the Nrf2 antioxidant response. This body of evidence strongly supports Thymoquinone as a high-potential candidate for translational research and development as a novel, network-targeting therapy for human renal fibrosis.
Beyond Phosphate Binding: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis on the Efficacy and Safety of the Novel Paracellular Phosphate Inhibitor, Tenapanor, for Hyperphosphatemia in Dialysis Patients Eva Julita; Ian Effendi; Zulkhair Ali; Novadian; Suprapti
Bioscientia Medicina : Journal of Biomedicine and Translational Research Vol. 10 No. 1 (2026): Bioscientia Medicina: Journal of Biomedicine & Translational Research
Publisher : HM Publisher

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.37275/bsm.v10i1.1492

Abstract

Background: Hyperphosphatemia is a critical driver of cardiovascular morbidity and mortality in patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD) undergoing dialysis. Current management, reliant on phosphate binders, is hampered by high pill burden and poor adherence. Tenapanor, a first-in-class, minimally-absorbed sodium/hydrogen exchanger 3 (NHE3) inhibitor, reduces paracellular phosphate absorption. We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis of all available Phase 3 trials to quantify its efficacy and safety. Methods: We searched PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane CENTRAL through October 2025 for Phase 3 clinical trials evaluating tenapanor for hyperphosphatemia in dialysis patients. Data were extracted from 6 eligible studies (N=1573). We conducted separate random-effects meta-analyses for different study designs: 1) parallel-group monotherapy vs. placebo, 2) withdrawal-design monotherapy vs. placebo, 3) parallel-group add-on therapy vs. placebo, and 4) safety (diarrhea incidence) vs. placebo. Efficacy was measured by Mean Difference (MD) in serum phosphate change; safety by Risk Ratio (RR). Results: Tenapanor demonstrated significant efficacy across all study designs. In parallel-group monotherapy (1 study, N=167), tenapanor was superior to placebo (MD: -1.89 mg/dL; 95% CI: -2.36 to -1.42). In withdrawal-design studies (2 RCTs, N=373), tenapanor maintained serum phosphate levels significantly better than placebo (Pooled MD: -0.75 mg/dL; 95% CI: -1.05 to -0.45; I2=0%). As an add-on therapy (1 RCT, N=235), tenapanor provided additional phosphate reduction versus binders alone (MD: -0.65 mg/dL; 95% CI: -0.96 to -0.35). Tenapanor significantly increased the risk of diarrhea versus placebo (3 RCTs, N=521; Pooled RR: 4.10; 95% CI: 2.50 to 6.72; I2=30%), which was the primary adverse event leading to discontinuation. Conclusion: Tenapanor represents a new mechanistic paradigm for hyperphosphatemia management. It is a highly effective phosphate-lowering agent, both as monotherapy and add-on therapy, but is associated with a significant, mechanism-based risk of gastrointestinal side effects.
Complete Clinical and Trichoscopic Remission of Refractory Patch Alopecia Areata with a Multi-Modal Microneedling and Vitamin D3 Protocol: A Case Report Stephanie Lukita; Ferra Olivia Mawu; Thigita Aga Pandaleke
Bioscientia Medicina : Journal of Biomedicine and Translational Research Vol. 10 No. 1 (2026): Bioscientia Medicina: Journal of Biomedicine & Translational Research
Publisher : HM Publisher

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.37275/bsm.v10i1.1493

Abstract

Background: Refractory patch alopecia areata (AA) presents a significant therapeutic challenge, as many patients fail first-line treatments. This gap necessitates the exploration of novel, mechanistically-targeted therapeutic strategies. Case presentation: We present the case of a 44-year-old female with a 2.5 × 3.0 cm patch of AA, refractory to a 3-month compliant trial of topical 0.25% desoximetasone and 5% minoxidil. Baseline diagnostics included histopathology (peribulbar lymphocytic infiltrate), quantitative trichoscopy (yellow dots, black dots, exclamation mark hairs), and laboratory workup, which revealed a serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D [25(OH)D] insufficiency (18.2 ng/mL). A multi-modal protocol was initiated: (1) systemic 5,000 IU/day oral cholecalciferol, (2) 10 sessions of 1.5 mm microneedling at two-week intervals, and (3) immediate post-procedure application of topical 100,000 IU cholecalciferol. Significant regrowth of pigmented terminal hairs was observed by week 12. After 20 weeks (10 sessions), complete clinical regrowth was achieved. Final quantitative trichoscopy confirmed the full resolution of all pathological markers, with a healthy density of terminal hairs. The patient’s systemic 25(OH)D level was corrected to 41.5 ng/mL. The treatment was well-tolerated. Conclusion: This case report documents a complete remission associated with a multi-modal protocol. The contribution of the systemic vitamin D repletion is a major, unresolvable confounder, making attribution impossible. However, this hypothesis-generating case suggests a combined (systemic, physical, and topical) approach may represent a potential rescue strategy for refractory patch AA, warranting further controlled investigation.

Filter by Year

2017 2026


Filter By Issues
All Issue Vol. 10 No. 9 (2026): Bioscientia Medicina: Journal of Biomedicine & Translational Research Vol. 10 No. 8 (2026): Bioscientia Medicina: Journal of Biomedicine & Translational Research Vol. 10 No. 7 (2026): Bioscientia Medicina: Journal of Biomedicine & Translational Research Vol. 10 No. 6 (2026): Bioscientia Medicina: Journal of Biomedicine & Translational Research Vol. 10 No. 5 (2026): Bioscientia Medicina: Journal of Biomedicine & Translational Research Vol. 10 No. 4 (2026): Bioscientia Medicina: Journal of Biomedicine & Translational Research Vol. 10 No. 3 (2026): Bioscientia Medicina: Journal of Biomedicine & Translational Research Vol. 10 No. 2 (2026): Bioscientia Medicina: Journal of Biomedicine & Translational Research Vol. 10 No. 1 (2026): Bioscientia Medicina: Journal of Biomedicine & Translational Research Vol. 9 No. 12 (2025): Bioscientia Medicina: Journal of Biomedicine & Translational Research Vol. 9 No. 11 (2025): Bioscientia Medicina: Journal of Biomedicine & Translational Research Vol. 9 No. 10 (2025): Bioscientia Medicina: Journal of Biomedicine & Translational Research Vol. 9 No. 9 (2025): Bioscientia Medicina: Journal of Biomedicine & Translational Research Vol. 9 No. 8 (2025): Bioscientia Medicina: Journal of Biomedicine & Translational Research Vol. 9 No. 7 (2025): Bioscientia Medicina: Journal of Biomedicine & Translational Research Vol. 9 No. 6 (2025): Bioscientia Medicina: Journal of Biomedicine & Translational Research Vol. 9 No. 5 (2025): Bioscientia Medicina: Journal of Biomedicine & Translational Research Vol. 9 No. 4 (2025): Bioscientia Medicina: Journal of Biomedicine & Translational Research Vol. 9 No. 3 (2025): Bioscientia Medicina: Journal of Biomedicine & Translational Research Vol. 9 No. 2 (2025): Bioscientia Medicina: Journal of Biomedicine & Translational Research Vol. 9 No. 1 (2025): Bioscientia Medicina: Journal of Biomedicine & Translational Research Vol. 8 No. 12 (2024): Bioscientia Medicina: Journal of Biomedicine & Translational Research Vol. 8 No. 11 (2024): Bioscientia Medicina: Journal of Biomedicine & Translational Research Vol. 8 No. 10 (2024): Bioscientia Medicina: Journal of Biomedicine & Translational Research Vol. 8 No. 9 (2024): Bioscientia Medicina: Journal of Biomedicine & Translational Research Vol. 8 No. 8 (2024): Bioscientia Medicina: Journal of Biomedicine & Translational Research Vol. 8 No. 7 (2024): Bioscientia Medicina: Journal of Biomedicine & Translational Research Vol. 8 No. 6 (2024): Bioscientia Medicina: Journal of Biomedicine & Translational Research Vol. 8 No. 5 (2024): Bioscientia Medicina: Journal of Biomedicine & Translational Research Vol. 8 No. 4 (2024): Bioscientia Medicina: Journal of Biomedicine & Translational Research Vol. 8 No. 3 (2024): Bioscientia Medicina: Journal of Biomedicine & Translational Research Vol. 8 No. 2 (2024): Bioscientia Medicina: Journal of Biomedicine & Translational Research Vol. 8 No. 1 (2024): Bioscientia Medicina: Journal of Biomedicine & Translational Research Vol. 7 No. 12 (2023): Bioscientia Medicina: Journal of Biomedicine & Translational Research Vol. 7 No. 11 (2023): Bioscientia Medicina: Journal of Biomedicine & Translational Research Vol. 7 No. 10 (2023): Bioscientia Medicina: Journal of Biomedicine & Translational Research Vol. 6 No. 18 (2023): Bioscientia Medicina: Journal of Biomedicine & Translational Research Vol. 6 No. 17 (2023): Bioscientia Medicina: Journal of Biomedicine & Translational Research Vol. 7 No. 9 (2023): Bioscientia Medicina: Journal of Biomedicine & Translational Research Vol. 7 No. 8 (2023): Bioscientia Medicina: Journal of Biomedicine & Translational Research Vol. 7 No. 7 (2023): Bioscientia Medicina: Journal of Biomedicine & Translational Research Vol. 7 No. 6 (2023): Bioscientia Medicina: Journal of Biomedicine & Translational Research Vol. 7 No. 5 (2023): Bioscientia Medicina: Journal of Biomedicine & Translational Research Vol. 7 No. 4 (2023): Bioscientia Medicina: Journal of Biomedicine & Translational Research Vol. 7 No. 3 (2023): Bioscientia Medicina: Journal of Biomedicine & Translational Research Vol. 7 No. 2 (2023): Bioscientia Medicina: Journal of Biomedicine & Translational Research Vol. 7 No. 1 (2023): Bioscientia Medicina: Journal of Biomedicine & Translational Research Vol. 6 No. 16 (2022): Bioscientia Medicina: Journal of Biomedicine & Translational Research Vol. 6 No. 15 (2022): Bioscientia Medicina: Journal of Biomedicine & Translational Research Vol. 6 No. 14 (2022): Bioscientia Medicina: Journal of Biomedicine & Translational Research Vol. 6 No. 13 (2022): Bioscientia Medicina: Journal of Biomedicine & Translational Research Vol. 6 No. 12 (2022): Bioscientia Medicina: Journal of Biomedicine & Translational Research Vol. 6 No. 11 (2022): Bioscientia Medicina: Journal of Biomedicine & Translational Research Vol. 6 No. 10 (2022): Bioscientia Medicina: Journal of Biomedicine & Translational Research Vol. 6 No. 9 (2022): Bioscientia Medicina: Journal of Biomedicine & Translational Research Vol. 6 No. 8 (2022): Bioscientia Medicina: Journal of Biomedicine & Translational Research Vol. 6 No. 7 (2022): Bioscientia Medicina: Journal of Biomedicine & Translational Research Vol. 6 No. 6 (2022): Bioscientia Medicina: Journal of Biomedicine & Translational Research Vol. 6 No. 5 (2022): Bioscientia Medicina: Journal of Biomedicine & Translational Research Vol. 6 No. 4 (2022): Bioscientia Medicina: Journal of Biomedicine & Translational Research Vol. 6 No. 3 (2022): Bioscientia Medicina: Journal of Biomedicine & Translational Research Vol. 6 No. 2 (2022): Bioscientia Medicina: Journal of Biomedicine & Translational Research Vol. 6 No. 1 (2022): Bioscientia Medicina: Journal of Biomedicine & Translational Research Vol. 5 No. 12 (2021): Bioscientia Medicina: Journal of Biomedicine & Translational Research Vol. 5 No. 11 (2021): Bioscientia Medicina: Journal of Biomedicine & Translational Research Vol. 5 No. 10 (2021): Bioscientia Medicina: Journal of Biomedicine & Translational Research Vol. 5 No. 9 (2021): Bioscientia Medicina: Journal of Biomedicine & Translational Research Vol. 5 No. 8 (2021): Bioscientia Medicina: Journal of Biomedicine & Translational Research Vol. 5 No. 7 (2021): Bioscientia Medicina: Journal of Biomedicine & Translational Research Vol. 5 No. 6 (2021): Bioscientia Medicina: Journal of Biomedicine & Translational Research Vol. 5 No. 5 (2021): Bioscientia Medicina: Journal of Biomedicine & Translational Research Vol. 5 No. 4 (2021): Bioscientia Medicina: Journal of Biomedicine & Translational Research Vol. 5 No. 3 (2021): Bioscientia Medicina: Journal of Biomedicine & Translational Research Vol. 5 No. 2 (2021): Bioscientia Medicina: Journal of Biomedicine & Translational Research Vol. 5 No. 1 (2021): Bioscientia Medicina: Journal of Biomedicine & Translational Research Vol. 4 No. 4 (2020): Bioscientia Medicina: Journal of Biomedicine and Translational Research Vol. 4 No. 3 (2020): Bioscientia Medicina: Journal of Biomedicine and Translational Research Vol. 4 No. 2 (2020): Bioscientia Medicina: Journal of Biomedicine and Translational Research Vol. 4 No. 1 (2020): Bioscientia Medicina: Journal of Biomedicine and Translational Research Vol. 3 No. 4 (2019): Bioscientia Medicina: Journal of Biomedicine and Translational Research Vol. 3 No. 3 (2019): Bioscientia Medicina: Journal of Biomedicine and Translational Research Vol. 3 No. 2 (2019): Bioscientia Medicina: Journal of Biomedicine and Translational Research Vol. 3 No. 1 (2019): Bioscientia Medicina: Journal of Biomedicine and Translational Research Vol. 2 No. 4 (2018): Bioscientia Medicina: Journal of Biomedicine and Translational Research Vol. 2 No. 3 (2018): Bioscientia Medicina: Journal of Biomedicine and Translational Research Vol. 2 No. 2 (2018): Bioscientia Medicina: Journal of Biomedicine and Translational Research Vol. 2 No. 1 (2018): Bioscientia Medicina: Journal of Biomedicine and Translational Research Vol. 1 No. 1 (2017): Bioscientia Medicina: Journal of Biomedicine and Translational Research More Issue