cover
Article Per Year (5 Year)
All
Home Page
OAI Link
Editorial Team
Contact
Reviewer
Google Scholar
Contact Name
Suparna Wijaya
Contact Email
wimsolusiprima@gmail.com
Phone
+6287780663168
Journal Mail Official
jolas.jurnalku@gmail.com
Editorial Address
Serpong, Tangerang Selatan
Location
Unknown,
Unknown
INDONESIA
Journal of Law, Administration, and Social Science
Published by PT WIM Solusi Prima
ISSN : -     EISSN : 28092295     DOI : -
Core Subject : Economy, Humanities, Social,
Humanities Economics, Econometrics & Finance Environmental Science Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Social Sciences
Journal of Law, Administration, and Social Science merupakan media penyebarluasan hasil penelitian di rumpun ilmu sosial, ilmu politik, dan humaniora. Sub rumpun Ilmu sosial terdiri dari bidang Ilmu Komunikasi, Jurnalistik, Hubungan Masyarakat, Periklanan, Televisi dan Film, Manajemen Komunikasi dan Media, Komunikasi Penyiaran Islam, Ilmu Kesejahteraan Sosial, Sosiologi, Antropologi, Ilmu Sosiatri, atau Kependudukan. Sub rumpun ilmu politik terdiri dari bidang Ilmu Politik, Hubungan Internasional, Ilmu Administrasi, Ilmu Pemerintahan, Ilmu Sosial Politik, atau Kebijakan Publik. Sub rumpun ilmu humaniora terdiri dari bidang Ilmu Humaniora, Ilmu Sejarah, Ilmu Hukum, Notariat, Kriminologi, Ilmu Kepolisian, Ketahanan Nasional, Studi Pembangunan, Kajian Wilayah, Kajian Budaya, Arkeologi, atau Kepariwisataan.
Arjuna Subject : Ilmu Sosial - Administrasi Publik
Articles 222 Documents
 19   20   21   22   23 
Regulatory gaps in the protection of the human rights of female live streaming hosts in platform-based employment relations Fransiska Triwidya Purba
Journal of Law, Administration, and Social Science Vol 6 No 2 (2026)
Publisher : PT WIM Solusi Prima

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.54957/jolas.v6i2.2222

Abstract

The rapid growth of the digital economy has generated new forms of platform-based employment, including the profession of live streaming hosts. This occupation has become increasingly popular among women due to its flexibility and accessibility as a source of income. However, the expansion of digital labor has not been accompanied by an adequate regulatory framework capable of ensuring the protection of workers' human rights, particularly those of women. This study aims to analyze the regulatory gap in the protection of women's human rights as live streaming hosts through a sociology of law perspective. The research employs an empirical legal method with a qualitative approach. Primary data were collected through semi-structured interviews with female live streaming hosts, while secondary data were obtained from laws and regulations, academic literature, and relevant supporting documents. The findings reveal significant regulatory gap s that hinder the fulfillment of fundamental labor rights, including access to social security, health protection, job security, and protection from digital violence and harassment. Furthermore, oversight mechanisms for digital platforms remain limited, resulting in an imbalance of bargaining power that places female workers in a vulnerable position. These findings demonstrate a discrepancy between law in books and law in action, which contributes to the structural exclusion of women within the digital economy. Therefore, regulatory reform and stronger policy measures grounded in a human rights approach are necessary to ensure fair, safe, and equitable working conditions for women in the evolving digital labor ecosystem.  
The imbalance of relations between tax authorities and legal representatives in the tax court: An analysis of substantive justice and the constitutional guarantee of equality before the law Akmal Suprobo
Journal of Law, Administration, and Social Science Vol 6 No 3 (2026)
Publisher : PT WIM Solusi Prima

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.54957/jolas.v6i3.2246

Abstract

This study examines the implications of Constitutional Court Decision Number 26/PUU-XXI/2023 for the protection of human rights in tax dispute resolution in Indonesia, particularly concerning the principles of equality before the law and the right to a fair trial. This research employs a normative legal method using statutory, conceptual, and case approaches. The legal materials consist of legislation, court decisions, and relevant literature on human rights and the tax judiciary system. The findings indicate that prior to the decision, the Tax Court operated under a dual supervisory system involving both the Supreme Court and the Ministry of Finance. This arrangement created an imbalance between taxpayers and tax authorities, raising concerns regarding judicial independence and impartiality in tax dispute adjudication. Through Constitutional Court Decision Number 26/PUU-XXI/2023, the authority over the organizational, administrative, and financial supervision of the Tax Court was fully transferred to the Supreme Court. This institutional reform strengthens judicial independence and enhances the protection of the right to an independent, impartial, and fair hearing. Furthermore, the decision encourages broader reforms within the Tax Court system, including improvements to the licensing framework for legal representatives and greater transparency in judicial administration. Consequently, the decision represents a significant milestone in establishing a more equitable, independent, and human rights-oriented tax dispute resolution system in Indonesia.

Page 23 of 23 | Total Record : 222

 19   20   21   22   23 

Filter by Year

2021 2026


Reset
Filter By Issues
All Issue Vol 6 No 3 (2026) Vol 6 No 2 (2026) Vol 6 No 1 (2026) Vol 5 No 6 (2025) Vol 5 No 5 (2025) Vol 5 No 4 (2025) Vol 5 No 3 (2025) Vol 5 No 2 (2025) Vol 5 No 1 (2025) Vol 4 No 6 (2024) Vol 4 No 5 (2024) Vol 4 No 4 (2024) Vol 4 No 3 (2024) Vol 4 No 2 (2024) Vol 4 No 1 (2024) Vol 3 No 2 (2023) Vol 3 No 2a (2023) Vol 3 No 1 (2023) Vol 2 No 2 (2022) Vol 2 No 1 (2022) Vol 1 No 2 (2021): Desember 2021 Vol 1 No 1 (2021): Juni 2021 More Issue