cover
Article Per Year (5 Year)
All
Home Page
OAI Link
Editorial Team
Contact
Reviewer
Google Scholar
Contact Name
Suparna Wijaya
Contact Email
wimsolusiprima@gmail.com
Phone
+6287780663168
Journal Mail Official
jolas.jurnalku@gmail.com
Editorial Address
Serpong, Tangerang Selatan
Location
Unknown,
Unknown
INDONESIA
Journal of Law, Administration, and Social Science
Published by PT WIM Solusi Prima
ISSN : -     EISSN : 28092295     DOI : -
Core Subject : Economy, Humanities, Social,
Humanities Economics, Econometrics & Finance Environmental Science Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Social Sciences
Journal of Law, Administration, and Social Science merupakan media penyebarluasan hasil penelitian di rumpun ilmu sosial, ilmu politik, dan humaniora. Sub rumpun Ilmu sosial terdiri dari bidang Ilmu Komunikasi, Jurnalistik, Hubungan Masyarakat, Periklanan, Televisi dan Film, Manajemen Komunikasi dan Media, Komunikasi Penyiaran Islam, Ilmu Kesejahteraan Sosial, Sosiologi, Antropologi, Ilmu Sosiatri, atau Kependudukan. Sub rumpun ilmu politik terdiri dari bidang Ilmu Politik, Hubungan Internasional, Ilmu Administrasi, Ilmu Pemerintahan, Ilmu Sosial Politik, atau Kebijakan Publik. Sub rumpun ilmu humaniora terdiri dari bidang Ilmu Humaniora, Ilmu Sejarah, Ilmu Hukum, Notariat, Kriminologi, Ilmu Kepolisian, Ketahanan Nasional, Studi Pembangunan, Kajian Wilayah, Kajian Budaya, Arkeologi, atau Kepariwisataan.
Arjuna Subject : Ilmu Sosial - Administrasi Publik
Articles 237 Documents
 20   21   22   23   24 
Challenging the right to collective welfare: A legal and human rights review of modern cooperative capitalization in Indonesia Silvia Anas
Journal of Law, Administration, and Social Science Vol 6 No 5 (2026)
Publisher : PT WIM Solusi Prima

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.54957/jolas.v6i5.2267

Abstract

The establishment of Village/Sub-District Red and White Cooperatives (Koperasi Desa/Kelurahan Merah Putih or KDKMP) represents one of the Indonesian government's strategic initiatives to strengthen the people’s economy through the development of cooperative institutions at the village and sub-district levels. This policy is expected to enhance community economic capacity, expand business opportunities, and strengthen national supply chains. Nevertheless, the institutional strengthening of cooperatives through various regulatory instruments has generated debate regarding the balance between governance professionalization and the preservation of economic democracy as the fundamental character of cooperatives. This article aims to analyze the juridical implications of cooperative formalization and capitalization policies on the principles of economic democracy and the protection of the right to collective welfare within the Indonesian legal system. The study employs a normative legal research method using statutory, conceptual, and human rights approaches. The legal materials consist of legislation, international human rights instruments, legal doctrines, and relevant academic literature. The analysis focuses on Minister of Finance Regulation Number 49 of 2025, Presidential Instruction Number 9 of 2025, and Presidential Instruction Number 17 of 2025 as the principal regulatory framework governing KDKMP. The findings indicate that the formalization and strengthening of cooperative governance are intended to improve institutional effectiveness and organizational accountability. However, increasing administrative and managerial standardization may affect the cooperative’s character as an institution founded upon solidarity, member participation, and mutual cooperation. This article proposes a conceptual construction of the right to collective welfare as an analytical framework for assessing the compatibility of state economic policies with the principles of economic democracy, welfare state objectives, and the protection of economic and social rights.
Factors associated with hypertension among cocoa farmers in Sawangaoha Village Kodeoha District North Kolaka Regency Risti Risti; La Ode Muhamad Sety; Devi Savitri Effendy
Journal of Law, Administration, and Social Science Vol 6 No 5 (2026)
Publisher : PT WIM Solusi Prima

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.54957/jolas.v6i5.2270

Abstract

Hypertension is a common health problem and a major risk factor for cardiovascular disease. Among cocoa farmers, hypertension is influenced by factors such as genetic history, smoking habits, stress, and physical activity. These factors contribute to an increased risk of high blood pressure; therefore, understanding them is important for the prevention and control of hypertension. This study aimed to determine the factors associated with hypertension among cocoa farmers in Sawangaoha Village, Kodeoha District, North Kolaka Regency. This study used an analytic observational design with a cross-sectional approach. The sample consisted of 140 respondents selected using consecutive sampling. Data were analyzed bivariately using the Chi-Square test with a significance level of 95% (α = 0.05). The results showed a significant relationship between genetic history and hypertension (p-value = 0.000), smoking habits and hypertension (p-value = 0.002), stress and hypertension (p-value = 0.000), as well as physical activity and hypertension (p-value = 0.028). Based on these findings, it can be concluded that genetic history, smoking habits, stress, and physical activity are associated with the occurrence of hypertension. Therefore, prevention and control efforts are needed, focusing on reducing smoking habits, managing stress, and increasing physical activity to lower the risk of hypertension.
Reconstruction of legal protection for public institutions in the ITE Law after The Constitutional Court decision 105/PUU-XXII/2024 Husni Mubarak; Aji Purnomo; Riswandha Imawan
Journal of Law, Administration, and Social Science Vol 6 No 1 (2026)
Publisher : PT WIM Solusi Prima

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.54957/jolas.v6i1.1996

Abstract

The rapid expansion of digital communication has intensified public expression while simultaneously increasing the use of Article 27A of the ITE Law by state institutions to respond to public criticism, which culminated in Constitutional Court Decision Number 105/PUU-XXII/2024 that reinterpreted the phrase “other person” by excluding public institutions as victims of defamation, thereby generating significant debate regarding the balance between freedom of expression and the protection of state institutions Objective: This study aims to examine the legal status of public institutions after the Constitutional Court’s decision and to analyze the juridical implications of removing criminal protection within the framework of the principle of institutional protection in a constitutional democracy. Methodology: The research employs a normative legal approach using statutory and conceptual methods through the analysis of the Constitutional Court’s ruling, legal doctrines in criminal and constitutional law, and relevant scholarly literature on freedom of expression and institutional reputation. Findings: The results indicate that the concept of honor protected under defamation law is inherently personal and attached to individuals, not institutional entities, thus public institutions no longer possess legal standing as victims in criminal defamation cases, while institutional protection can still be pursued through civil remedies, rights of reply, and administrative clarification mechanisms. Implications: This study underscores that the removal of criminal protection for public institutions does not weaken state authority but instead strengthens democratic governance by preventing the criminalization of criticism, safeguarding freedom of expression, and promoting proportional, transparent, and rights-based mechanisms for protecting institutional credibility in the digital public sphere. Kata Kunci: Mahkamah Konstitusi, Perlindungan Hukum, Kebebasan Ekspresi.
Integrating enterprise risk management and green intellectual capital as catalysts for sustainability performance in the energy transition in Southeast Asia Dewi Cahyani Pangestuti
Journal of Law, Administration, and Social Science Vol 6 No 1 (2026)
Publisher : PT WIM Solusi Prima

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.54957/jolas.v6i1.2038

Abstract

This study investigates the roles of Enterprise Risk Management (ERM) and Green Intellectual Capital (GIC) in driving corporate sustainability within the energy sector in Southeast Asia. A comprehensive synthesis of the literature reveals that the implementation of robust ERM frameworks encompassing financial, political, operational, environmental, and social risks, including Environmental, Social, and Governance (ESG) dimensions enhances firms’ capabilities to identify and mitigate risks in a more holistic and integrated manner. The findings indicate that GIC, particularly green human capital and green structural capital, serves as a positive driver of sustainability performance by strengthening the relationship between managerial capacity and corporate environmental performance. However, the role of green relational capital remains ambiguous and warrants further empirical investigation. Moreover, the integration of ERM with regional policies, cross-border cooperation, and the adoption of digital technologies provides strategic pathways for achieving a more efficient and sustainable energy transition. The study highlights sectoral differences between renewable and fossil energy firms in addressing climate risk costs, as well as the critical importance of coordinated policies and regulatory frameworks in supporting risk mitigation and sustainability initiatives. The theoretical contribution of this research lies in the integration of resource-based theory, stakeholder theory, and natural resource orchestration theory to explain the mechanisms through which ERM and GIC jointly enhance sustainability performance. Practically, the study offers policy and managerial recommendations emphasizing the alignment of risk management strategies, incentives for GIC development, and the adoption of innovative technologies to strengthen resilience and operational efficiency in the energy sector.
Valuation of ecosoc rights violations in insurance and capital market criminal: An approach using the ekosob violation valuation equation in the Wanaartha Life case Ridwan Syahbani Tamher
Journal of Law, Administration, and Social Science Vol 6 No 3 (2026)
Publisher : PT WIM Solusi Prima

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.54957/jolas.v6i3.2249

Abstract

This article conducts a philosophical and socio-legal examination of the systemic violation of Economic, Social, and Cultural (Ecosoc) rights within the Indonesian capital market and insurance sector, focusing exclusively on the PT Asuransi Jiwa Adisarana WanaArtha (WanaArtha Life) default tragedy. Traditionally, corporate defaults and market manipulations such as wash trading are reductively analyzed through the rigid lenses of business law, administrative compliance, and financial loss. However, this study elevates the discourse to a fundamental human rights philosophy perspective. Through empirical observation, including direct engagement with the victims' class action and courtroom proceedings, this research uncovers how state institutions, specifically the Financial Services Authority (OJK) and the Attorney General’s Office, utilize complex financial estimations and positivistic legal interpretations as instruments to alienate the absolute rights of approximately 16,500 policyholders, resulting in a catastrophic sociological and material deprivation of Rp 15.9 Trillion. To counter the utilitarian logic often employed by the state to justify its omissions and asset confiscations, this article introduces a novel conceptual framework: The Ecosoc Violation Valuation Equation. The Equation model mathematically and philosophically just to demonstrates that the absolute dignity of human rights infinitely outweighs any financial justification, administrative rationale, or state revenue estimation (such as Non-Tax State Revenue from confiscated assets) not to professional use that applied in specific case. The findings assert that the state's failure to provide preventive protection, coupled with the subsequent execution of policyholders' assets, constitutes a severe human rights violation.
Protection of customer private property rights in the digital finance ecosystem: A due process of law analysis of the authority to block accounts by the financial services authority Fadhlillah Rifqi Hazazi
Journal of Law, Administration, and Social Science Vol 6 No 3 (2026)
Publisher : PT WIM Solusi Prima

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.54957/jolas.v6i3.2250

Abstract

The rapid development of the digital financial ecosystem has triggered an increase in state interventions against citizens' digital assets to enforce financial stability and combat cybercrime. Administrative actions such as the blocking of customer accounts by the Financial Services Authority (OJK) inherently intersect directly with the boundaries of protecting the right to property guaranteed by the constitution. This study aims to analyze the legality and accountability of OJK's authority in blocking customer accounts from a Human Rights law perspective, specifically the fulfillment of the due process of law principle. Utilizing normative legal research methods with statutory and conceptual approaches, this study finds that the execution of administrative discretion by OJK in conducting account blocks often disregards the procedural rights of customers, such as the right to be heard and the right to legal certainty, thereby creating an asymmetrical position between the state and citizens. The analysis concludes that to achieve substantive justice, a regulatory reconstruction is required to integrate judicial review mechanisms and transparent operational procedures to limit the potential abuse of power by financial services authorities.The rapid development of the digital financial ecosystem has triggered an increase in state interventions against citizens' digital assets to enforce financial stability and combat cybercrime. Administrative actions such as the blocking of customer accounts by the Financial Services Authority (OJK) inherently intersect directly with the boundaries of protecting the right to property guaranteed by the constitution. This study aims to analyze the legality and accountability of OJK's authority in blocking customer accounts from a Human Rights law perspective, specifically the fulfillment of the due process of law principle. Utilizing normative legal research methods with statutory and conceptual approaches, this study finds that the execution of administrative discretion by OJK in conducting account blocks often disregards the procedural rights of customers, such as the right to be heard and the right to legal certainty, thereby creating an asymmetrical position between the state and citizens. The analysis concludes that to achieve substantive justice, a regulatory reconstruction is required to integrate judicial review mechanisms and transparent operational procedures to limit the potential abuse of power by financial services authorities.
Quiet firing as a form of constructive dismissal: Analysis of normative vacuum and protection of the right to decent work in Indonesian Labor Law Nadhiva Rizky Budhyarto
Journal of Law, Administration, and Social Science Vol 6 No 3 (2026)
Publisher : PT WIM Solusi Prima

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.54957/jolas.v6i3.2252

Abstract

Quiet firing has emerged as a salient development in modern employment relations. Unlike conventional termination, quiet firing operates through indirect managerial actions that pressure employees to resign, such as exclusion from work activities, restricted promotions, reduced responsibilities, and sustained psychological pressure. Indonesian labor law does not explicitly recognize or regulate this practice. This normative legal study examines whether quiet firing qualifies as constructive dismissal, explores the regulatory vacuum in Indonesian labor law, and assesses its implications for the right to decent work as a human right. Using statutory, conceptual, and comparative approaches, the study finds that quiet firing substantively meets the characteristics of constructive dismissal by creating objectively unacceptable working conditions that induce resignation. The absence of specific regulation generates legal uncertainty and weakens worker protection, including dignity, fair treatment, career development, and mental health. The article proposes recognizing constructive dismissal as a distinct termination category grounded in the ILO Decent Work Agenda (1999), with clear elements, calibrated burden of proof, and remedies (severance, compensation, reinstatement) within Indonesia’s industrial dispute resolution framework.

Page 24 of 24 | Total Record : 237

 20   21   22   23   24 

Filter by Year

2021 2026


Reset
Filter By Issues
All Issue Vol 6 No 5 (2026) Vol 6 No 4 (2026) Vol 6 No 3 (2026) Vol 6 No 2 (2026) Vol 6 No 1 (2026) Vol 5 No 6 (2025) Vol 5 No 5 (2025) Vol 5 No 4 (2025) Vol 5 No 3 (2025) Vol 5 No 2 (2025) Vol 5 No 1 (2025) Vol 4 No 6 (2024) Vol 4 No 5 (2024) Vol 4 No 4 (2024) Vol 4 No 3 (2024) Vol 4 No 2 (2024) Vol 4 No 1 (2024) Vol 3 No 2 (2023) Vol 3 No 2a (2023) Vol 3 No 1 (2023) Vol 2 No 2 (2022) Vol 2 No 1 (2022) Vol 1 No 2 (2021): Desember 2021 Vol 1 No 1 (2021): Juni 2021 More Issue