Garuda - Garba Rujukan Digital

All

Jurnal Konstitusi

jk
Website

Published by Pusat Penelitian dan Pengkajian Perkara dan Pengelolaan Perpustakaan Mahkamah Konstitusi Republik Indonesia

ISSN : 18297706 EISSN : 25481657 DOI : https://doi.org/10.31078/jk1841

Core Subject : Humanities, Social,

Humanities Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice

The aims of this journal is to provide a venue for academicians, researchers and practitioners for publishing the original research articles or review articles. The scope of the articles published in this journal deal with a broad range of topics in the fields of Constitutional Law and another section related contemporary issues in law.

Arjuna Subject : Ilmu Sosial - Hukum

Articles 584 Documents

19 20 21 22 23

Sengketa Pemilukada; Menegakkan Keadilan dalam Hasil dan Proses (Analisis Putusan MK Nomor 28/PHPU.D-VIII/2010 tentang Pemilukada Kabupaten Gresik) Wishnu Kurniawan
Jurnal Konstitusi Vol 8, No 5 (2011)
Publisher : The Constitutional Court of the Republic of Indonesia

Democracy process of the Republic of Indonesia has changed over the collapse of the regime’s Suharto. Submission of opinion/ voting rights before the election form through representation in the Legislative votes, while the order of the reform party of Indonesia’s democracy changed the form with a direct election of the aspirations of the community through direct election of the executive (President, Governor, and Mayor / Regent)Democratic party face has changed get a hidrance and obstacle, the hidrance and thats obstacle shapes as money politic, black campaign, veiled campaign, inflate a number of vote, etc. But to canceled that fraud, indonesian civilans & the participants/incumbent has a place to uphold the justice throught the Constitutional Court..Based on the result data processing and analysis carried out performed within this scientific can be concluced that The Constitutional Court actually has authority to receive, examine, prosecute, decide land disputes election result. Constitution Court decision especially about the election result dispute regional head (Regent and Vice Regent) by the Conctitution Court election result with number 28/PHPU.D-VIII/2010 about Perselisihan Hasil Pemilihan Umum Kepala Daerah dan Wakil Kepala Daerah Kabupaten Gresik, Provinsi Jawa Timur Tahun 2010 can be operate well and has gained a place at Gresik Regency civilians.

Pengujian Ketentuan Penghapusan Norma dalam Undang-Undang Muchamad Ali Safa’at
Jurnal Konstitusi Vol 7, No 1 (2010)
Publisher : The Constitutional Court of the Republic of Indonesia

Theoretically and practically (judicial review), include two types, namely formal verification (formale toetsingrecht) and material verification (materielle toetsingrecht). The formal verification is an authority of assessing whether or not a legislative product is produced in accordance with the prevailing procedures. While a material verification is an authority to examine and measure whether or not a legal regulation contradicts with a higher level regulation, as well as whether or not an authority has the right to establish a certain regulation. Article 51 paragraph (3) of Law Number 24 Year 2003 regarding Constitutional Court state about it. In this context, material verification include extensive material, ie the whole matter of law, in part, or a small part of a word or even punctuation that can affect the norm. Thus, the provisions not only affect the meaning, but even the existence of a norm should be examined by the Constitutional Court. In addition, the loss of norms can violate constitutional the rights of citizens’.

Dimensi Judicial Activism dalam Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Pan Mohamad Faiz
Jurnal Konstitusi Vol 13, No 2 (2016)
Publisher : The Constitutional Court of the Republic of Indonesia

A transformative amendment of the 1945 Constitution established a separate judicial institution called the Constitutional Court. This institution is believed to serve a strategic role within Indonesia’s plural legal system particularly in the area of constitutional review and constitutional rights protection. However, the performance of the Constitutional Court has attracted controversy. This controversy arises because the Court is concerned with introducing a sociological paradigm of law that embraces substantive justice with a fluid acknowledgment of procedural justice. A key criticism of the Constitutional Court is that the nature of Court decisions has developed into a practice of judicial activism. This article discusses the dimension of judicial activism used by the Constitutional Court on the grounds for protecting constitutional rights of the citizens through its decisions. It also analyses the extent of judicial activism that can be justified in the decision-making process in the Constitutonal Court.

Konstitusionalitas Mengenai Kekuasaan Negara dalam Kegiatan Penanaman Modal (Analisis Putusan MK No. 21- 22/PUU-V/2007) Iskandar Muda
Jurnal Konstitusi Vol 8, No 6 (2011)
Publisher : The Constitutional Court of the Republic of Indonesia

What it means by “under state control” on article 33 point (2) and (3) of UUD 1945, should not be interpreted that the state will control totally the entire economic activities that serve the public basic; the state is not a company refers to democratic economy of Indonesia which hinder monopoly on business by any state or etatism (state monopoly). The precise understanding of “under state control“ is state responsibility to manage and drive the economy regulation correctly.

Pengaruh Pembatasan Kekuasaan Presiden Terhadap Praktik Ketatanegaraan Indonesia Chrisdianto Eko Purnomo
Jurnal Konstitusi Vol 7, No 2 (2010)
Publisher : The Constitutional Court of the Republic of Indonesia

This research effort to search the contents president power restriction in achieving constitutional governmant in Indonesia. The restriction power of president related to restriction of president authority. In other sides restriction of president power can be viewed thorought functional relation among president with House of representative council (DPR), representative people assembly (MPR), Local Representative Council (DPD), and functional relation among president with Supreme of court (MA) and Constitutional Court (MK).The result of research shown that the restriction content of president power can be viewed not only restriction the time of president’s office but also restriction of content presiden authority, i.e restriction to choose state officers and restriction in law making. And restriction of content president power can be viewed in functional president relation with legislative and constitutive institutions.

Pemilu Kepala Daerah dalam Transisi Demokrasi Zainal Arifin Hoesein
Jurnal Konstitusi Vol 7, No 6 (2010)
Publisher : The Constitutional Court of the Republic of Indonesia

The election of regional head has a strategic position to building democracy in transition. In order that the election of regional head can creating a dignified democracy, the implementation of its should be based on the principle of the general election i.e: independent, fair, equitable, rule of law; the orderly election, transparency, proportionality; professionalism, accountability, efficiency, and effectiveness.

Menakar Perlindungan Justice Colaborator Hariman Satria
Jurnal Konstitusi Vol 13, No 2 (2016)
Publisher : The Constitutional Court of the Republic of Indonesia

Corruption is one form of systematic organized crimes performed with complicated modus operandi. Disclosing of this crime, in addition to requiring special equipment, also needs a certain method. One of the methods is using actors who collaborate or justice collaborator. The provisions on justice collaboratororiginally referred to Article 10 paragraph (2) of Law No. 13 of 2006 on Protection of Witnesses and Victims –but there are indications that these provisions do not provide protection to the justice collaborator. Because even though he plays as a collaborating actor, it does not result in a loss of authority of the state to prosecute the concerned. This provision is considered violating the principle of lex certain criminal law, for its ambiguity and multiple interpretations. Constitutional Court in its decision No. 42/PUU-VIII/2010states that Article 10 paragraph (2) regarding a quoprovision is not contrary to the 1945 Constitution. Without realizing it, Constitutional Court has come affirming the lack of protection on the collaborating actors. The fate of justice collaboratorthen finds the clarity in Article 10 paragraph (1) of Law No. 31 of 2014 on Protection on Witnesses and Victims. In the future, with reference to a quo provision, there is no guarantee to the justice collaboratorthat he would not be prosecuted either criminal or civil, except for statements or testimony that is not done in good faith. Besides regulated under legislation of Witnesses and Victims Protection, protection of the justice collaboratorhas also been set in UNTOC 2000 and UNCAC 2003.

Makna Pasal 28 Uud 1945 terhadap Kebebasan Berserikat dalam Konteks Hubungan Industrial Nia Kania Winayanti
Jurnal Konstitusi Vol 8, No 6 (2011)
Publisher : The Constitutional Court of the Republic of Indonesia

Freedom of association is not the right belongs to certain group but it is belong to every person as a social beings who naturally can not live alone and stand alone, but living in a group of specific communities.In the context of freedom of association for workers / laborers juridically guaranteed by the Constitution through Article 28 . Through its organic regulations, Law number. 21 year 2001 about Trade Union / Labor Union, according to the opinion of the writer this law is too consentrating on the substance of freedom of association in the shaping of workers / laborers organization, so there is a tendency out of the spirit and the purpose of the formation of trade unions / labor unions that promote the creation of the protection of the interests of the workers / laborers, and boils down to the welfare of the workers / laborers.At the level of industrial relations that emphasizes the aspect of Pancasila and Constitution 1945, the concrete is driven to the creation of industrial relations that runs in the balance between the worker / laborer with the company. The spirit and implementation of industrial relations should be clearly reflected in the harmonious relationship between the worker / laborer with the company, in the form of partnerships that are complementary and beneficial, that is created and protected the interests of the workers / laborers and the resulting product and / or service quality and high competitive, as the offerings from the workers to the company in order to create work productivity optimization.

Kejahatan Terselubung di Balik Kertas Suara Tidak Sah yang Gagal Dicegah oleh Pasal 46 Peraturan KPu No.16 Tahun 2010 M. Simanihuruk
Jurnal Konstitusi Vol 7, No 2 (2010)
Publisher : The Constitutional Court of the Republic of Indonesia

Article 46 KPU Regulation No.16 of 2010 count the percentage of the gaining votes of each candidate pair from the total of valid ballot paper. The invalid ballot paper is totally neglected. Thus the democratic right of those people who has an invalid votes is neglected as well. More over a danger implication of this article is a hidden crime that can be planned systematically by increasing the percentage of the gaining votes through out the invalid ballot paper. The more the number of invalid ballot paper, the most the percentage of the gaining votes. If a total number of valid votes is a for a candidate pair A, a total number of valid votes is b for a candidat pair B, according to the survey for example, and a/ (a+b) < b/(a+b) then a candidate pair A can increase mathematically their gaining votes to at least 30,01 % by planning at least t + s total number of invalid ballot paper such that t and s satisfy the inequality s>b – 69.99(a-t)/30.01 where t is the number of invalid ballot papers that should be subtracted from the total gaining vote of the candidate pair A and s is the number of invalid ballot papers that should be subtracted form the total gaining vote of the candidate pair B. This type of a hidden crime some time can be detected by the statistic but some time can not. The detectable hidden crime can be analyzed by Chi-Square formula. This paper provide a simulation how to detect these type of hidden crime. We use the Chi-Square formula, with 0.05 level of significance, to detect these hidden crime. The paper begin with the simulation how to increase the gaining votes at least 30,01 %.

Hermeneutika Hukum: Prinsip dan Kaidah Interpretasi Hukum Weruin, Urbanus Ura; Andayani B, Dwi; Atalim, St.
Jurnal Konstitusi Vol 13, No 1 (2016)
Publisher : Mahkamah Konstitusi Republik Indonesia

This legal hermeneutic article efforts to explore and formulates norms, rules, principles, standards, and criterions that must be referenced in order to understand, analyze, interpret, and explicate the intention and complexities meaning of legal texts, not only according to literary meaning but also to reveal the whole meaningÂ of pratices and outcome of the legal adjudication. These norms, rules, and principles link to primary or general priciples, attitudes and goodwill of intepreter, aim of interpretation, interest of people, structure of legal system, character and role of interpreter, and how to undestand and treate legal noms as text. This bibliographical study and empiris research article find out the meaning, history, and aplication of legal hermeneutic in practices of adjudication. One case from legal adjudication (court dicision) will be analysed here according to principles of legal hermeneutic.

Page 21 of 59 | Total Record : 584

19 20 21 22 23

Filter by Year

2015 2024

Filter By Issues

All Issue Vol. 21 No. 4 (2024) Vol. 21 No. 3 (2024) Vol. 21 No. 2 (2024) Vol. 21 No. 1 (2024) Vol. 20 No. 4 (2023) Vol. 20 No. 3 (2023) Vol. 20 No. 2 (2023) Vol. 20 No. 1 (2023) Vol. 19 No. 4 (2022) Vol. 19 No. 3 (2022) Vol. 19 No. 2 (2022) Vol. 19 No. 1 (2022) Vol. 18 No. 4 (2021) Vol. 18 No. 3 (2021) Vol. 18 No. 2 (2021) Vol. 18 No. 1 (2021) Vol 17, No 4 (2020) Vol. 17 No. 4 (2020) Vol 17, No 3 (2020) Vol. 17 No. 2 (2020) Vol 17, No 2 (2020) Vol 17, No 1 (2020) Vol 16, No 4 (2019) Vol. 16 No. 4 (2019) Vol. 16 No. 3 (2019) Vol 16, No 3 (2019) Vol 16, No 2 (2019) Vol 16, No 1 (2019) Vol 15, No 4 (2018) Vol. 15 No. 4 (2018) Vol 15, No 3 (2018) Vol 15, No 2 (2018) Vol 15, No 1 (2018) Vol 14, No 4 (2017) Vol 14, No 3 (2017) Vol 14, No 2 (2017) Vol. 14 No. 1 (2017) Vol 14, No 1 (2017) Vol 13, No 4 (2016) Vol 13, No 3 (2016) Vol. 13 No. 2 (2016) Vol 13, No 2 (2016) Vol 13, No 1 (2016) Vol 11, No 4 (2014) Vol 11, No 3 (2014) Vol 11, No 2 (2014) Vol 11, No 1 (2014) Vol 10, No 4 (2013) Vol 10, No 3 (2013) Vol 10, No 2 (2013) Vol 10, No 1 (2013) Vol 9, No 4 (2012) Vol 9, No 3 (2012) Vol 9, No 2 (2012) Vol 9, No 1 (2012) Vol 8, No 6 (2011) Vol 8, No 5 (2011) Vol 8, No 4 (2011) Vol 8, No 3 (2011) Vol 8, No 2 (2011) Vol 8, No 1 (2011) Vol 7, No 6 (2010) Vol 7, No 5 (2010) Vol 7, No 4 (2010) Vol 7, No 3 (2010) Vol 7, No 2 (2010) Vol 7, No 1 (2010) Vol 12, No 4 (2015) Vol 12, No 3 (2015) Vol 12, No 2 (2015) Vol 12, No 1 (2015) More Issue

Home Page

OAI Link

Editorial Team

Contact

Reviewer

Google Scholar

Contact Name
Abdul Basid Fuadi

Contact Email
jurnalkonstitusi@mkri.id

Phone
+6281215312967

Journal Mail Official
jurnalkonstitusi@mkri.id

Editorial Address
Pusat Penelitian dan Pengkajian Perkara dan Pengelolaan Perpustakaan Mahkamah Konstitusi Republik Indonesia Jl. Medan Merdeka Barat No. 6, Jakarta 10110 Telp: (021) 23529000 Fax: (021) 3520177 E-mail: jurnalkonstitusi@mkri.id

Location
Kota adm. jakarta pusat,

Dki jakarta

INDONESIA

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Home Page

OAI Link

Editorial Team

Contact

Reviewer

Google Scholar

Contact Name Abdul Basid Fuadi

Contact Email jurnalkonstitusi@mkri.id

Phone +6281215312967

Journal Mail Official jurnalkonstitusi@mkri.id

Editorial Address Pusat Penelitian dan Pengkajian Perkara dan Pengelolaan Perpustakaan Mahkamah Konstitusi Republik Indonesia Jl. Medan Merdeka Barat No. 6, Jakarta 10110 Telp: (021) 23529000 Fax: (021) 3520177 E-mail: jurnalkonstitusi@mkri.id

Location Kota adm. jakarta pusat, Dki jakarta INDONESIA

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Contact Name
Abdul Basid Fuadi

Contact Email
jurnalkonstitusi@mkri.id

Phone
+6281215312967

Journal Mail Official
jurnalkonstitusi@mkri.id

Editorial Address
Pusat Penelitian dan Pengkajian Perkara dan Pengelolaan Perpustakaan Mahkamah Konstitusi Republik Indonesia Jl. Medan Merdeka Barat No. 6, Jakarta 10110 Telp: (021) 23529000 Fax: (021) 3520177 E-mail: jurnalkonstitusi@mkri.id

Location
Kota adm. jakarta pusat,

Dki jakarta

INDONESIA