Garuda - Garba Rujukan Digital

All

Jurnal Konstitusi

jk
Website

Published by Pusat Penelitian dan Pengkajian Perkara dan Pengelolaan Perpustakaan Mahkamah Konstitusi Republik Indonesia

ISSN : 18297706 EISSN : 25481657 DOI : https://doi.org/10.31078/jk1841

Core Subject : Humanities, Social,

Humanities Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice

The aims of this journal is to provide a venue for academicians, researchers and practitioners for publishing the original research articles or review articles. The scope of the articles published in this journal deal with a broad range of topics in the fields of Constitutional Law and another section related contemporary issues in law.

Arjuna Subject : Ilmu Sosial - Hukum

Articles 584 Documents

23 24 25 26 27

Interpretasi Hukum oleh Hakim Konstitusi dalam Mendekonstruksi Anatomi Korupsi Migas Irfan Nur Rachman
Jurnal Konstitusi Vol 14, No 2 (2017)
Publisher : The Constitutional Court of the Republic of Indonesia

Penafsiran hukum merupakan salah satu cara yang dilakukan dapat oleh hakim saat menangani atau menyelesaikan problem yuridis yang dihadapkan atau dimohonkan kepadanya. Hakim konstitusi sudah seringkali melakukan penafsiran hukum terhadap permohonan uji materiil Undang-undang yang dinilai oleh pemohon bertentangan dengan Undang-undang Dasar Negara Republik Indonesia. Penafsiran yang dilakukan hakim konstitusi ini membuat konstitusi menjadi lebih bermakna. Kebermaknaan (kemanfaatan) konstitusi ini dapat terbaca dalam putusannya terkait judicial review terhadap Undang-undang Migas. Dalam putusan hakim konstitusi ini, interpretasi yang digunakannya mampu memberikan tekanan kepada negara supaya serius menunjukkan keseriusannya dalam mebongkar praktik-praktik mafia migas. Negara memang akhirnya menunjukkan iktikad baiknya dengan membangun tata kelola migas yang baik, namun seiring dengan itu, terbukti bahwa interpretasi hakim konstitusi terbukti, bahwa salah satu kejahatan serius di Indonesia adalah korupsi migas.

Konstitusi Desa dan Eksistensinya dalam Regulasi di Indonesia Marthen B. Salinding
Jurnal Konstitusi Vol. 18 No. 1 (2021)
Publisher : Constitutional Court of the Republic of Indonesia, Indonesia

Herman Heller means that the constitution has 3 (three) phases: the constitution as a reality; the constitution in the abstraction process; and the constitution in codification. A constitution that has passed through the codification cycle is a mirror that it has found its existence and its position as a reality of socio-political life in society, or at least the constitution can describe the concept of Fundamental of a country’s community-thinking society. To interpret the understanding, the context of the Constituent Assembly as an abstraction of the value of dynamic living in the community (law and change of society), especially the village community in the period of reform that has undergone significant shifts because of abstraction errors on the constitution. Positioning the village as one of the sub-systems governance that has existed during the state of the archipelago (before Indonesia), the village has positioned the constitution at that time without passing the abstraction to codification. Thus the form of the constitution as the law contained therein rests on the provisions of the Godhead (natural law) far from the conception of value built on the rationality schemes and regulatory logic. Through normative juridical research methods and 3 (three) approaches: Historical approach, conceptual approach, and statue approach, the purpose of this research is to trace the significance of the village constitution as a unity of the village society’s reality by analyzing the context of historical and the things that are behind the trend of the conception of village society before the constitution passed the codification phase and the existence of the village constitution itself in regulations reflected in the law of the Republic of Indonesia number 6 the year 2014 about the village.

Kewenangan Mahkamah Konstitusi dalam Pemakzulan Presiden dan/atau Wakil Presiden di Indonesia Bambang Sutiyoso
Jurnal Konstitusi Vol 7, No 1 (2010)
Publisher : The Constitutional Court of the Republic of Indonesia

The idea of impeachment (pemakzulan) towards the incumbent president of Indonesia surfaces recently. This could be the cause of two main grounds. First, regarding the ongoing investigation process of the Century Bank case. In the beginning, the presumption charges merely towards the monetary policy officials and the concerning president’s assistants, but during the further investigations, a number of political parties, in not so vigorously manner pointed the charges to the incumbent presidents because of the indication of responsibility toward the bailout process of Century Bank. Second, the idea of presidential impeachment got its nudge when the Constitutional Court also declaring that its components are ready in processing the impeachment petition, after it has surfaced the Constitutional Court Rule (Peraturan Mahkamah Konstitusi) No. 21/PMK/2009 on the Guidelines in Judicial Procedures in Hearing the Parliamentary Petition in Violation Charges Towards President of the Republic and/or Vice President of the Republic. Third, Presidential and / or Vice Presidential Impeachments has already been occurred in the history of Indonesian nation, namely towards past Indonesian Presidents such as Sukarno, Suharto and KH. Abdurrahman Wahid.This writing attempts to discuss issues regarding presidential impeachment in Indonesia, such as the power of the Constitutional Court in impeachment process, the legal grounds of impeachments, reasons for impeachments and the procedural mechanism of impeachment. Constitutionally, the procedures and mechanism of presidential and / or vice presidential impeachment has been regulated comprehensively in the Constitution of the Republic of Indonesia, specifically in Article 7 B, Article 24 (2), and Article 24 C of the 1945 Constitution after the Third Amendment. Based on these regulations, impeachment is not a simple process, but requires a long process and involving a number of high state institutions, namely People’s Representative Council (DPR), The Constitutional Court, and People Consultative Assembly (MPR). The involvement of the Constitutional Court in the impeachment process can be related toward historical experiences and as a logical consequence of the constitutional transformation of Indonesia. Beside that, the idea of presidential and / or vice presidential impeachment should not be based merely on political motivation, but should also have the reasonable legal grounds and rationale.

“Benturan Asas Nemo Judex Idoneus In Propria Causa dan Asas Ius Curia Novit” (Telaah Yuridis Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Nomor 005/ Puu-Iv/2006) Yanis Maladi
Jurnal Konstitusi Vol 7, No 2 (2010)
Publisher : The Constitutional Court of the Republic of Indonesia

Constitutional court as the guardian and the interpreter of the constitution has been providing solutions to address the constitutionality issues raised by the justices, the constitutional court in this case has done a comprehensive interpretation of the relevance of procedural law Nemo judex idoneus in propria causa in this case, which in the end use of the principle of constitutional court to answer Nemo in propria causa judex idoneus irrelevant to provide clarity of the constitutional issues raised.

Tafsir Hakim Terhadap Unsur Melawan Hukum Pasca Putusan MK Atas Pengujian UU PTPK Abdul Latif
Jurnal Konstitusi Vol 7, No 3 (2010)
Publisher : The Constitutional Court of the Republic of Indonesia

PENDAHULUANUnsur melawan hukum dalam perkara korupsi merupakan hal yang penting dan menentukan untuk adanya suatu tindak pidana korupsi yang harus dipertanggungjawabkan, baik tanggung jawab jabatan maupun tanggung jawab pribadi. Konsekuensi tanggung jawab peribadi berkaitan dengan tanggung jawab pidana. Menurut Philipus M. Hadjon,117 tanggung jawab jabatan, difokuskan pada legalitas tindakan dengan parameternya peraturan perundang- undangan dan asas-asas umum pemerintahan yang baik. Sedang tanggung jawab pribadi, difokuskan pada perlakuan atau perbuatan tercela dalam konteks tanggung jawab pidana, yakni tanggung jawab atas perbuatan yang tidak patut dilakukan dengan cara melawan hukum, karena itu bertentangan dengan rasa keadilan dan norma- norma sosial yang berlaku dalam kehidupan masyarakat.

Memikirkan Kembali Pengawasan Badan Usaha Milik Negara Berdasarkan Business Judgement Rules Cora Elly Noviati
Jurnal Konstitusi Vol 14, No 2 (2017)
Publisher : The Constitutional Court of the Republic of Indonesia

Berdasarkan putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi, keuangan Badan Usaha Milik Negara (BUMN) tetap merupakan keuangan negara sehingga kewenangan negara di bidang pengawasan tetap berlaku. Meskipun demikian, paradigma pengawasan negara dimaksud harus berubah, yakni tidak lagi berdasarkan paradigma pengelolaan keuangan negara dalam penyelenggaraan pemerintahan (government judgement rules), melainkan berdasarkan paradigma usaha (business judgement rules). Tulisan ini mencoba menghadirkan perspektif tertentu tentang bagaimana mengatur prinsip pengawasan khususnya terkait pemeriksaaan pengelolaan dan pertanggungjawaban keuangan negara pada BUMN berdasarkan putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Nomor 62/PUU-XI/2013. Dengan melakukan pendekatan yuridis normatif tulisan ini menyimpulkan bahwa pemeriksaan pengelolaan pertanggungjawaban keuangan negara berdasarkan business judgement rules (BJR) harus dinormakan secara tegas dalam Undang-Undang Keuangan Negara dan Undang-Undang terkait lainnya. Prinsip-prinsip BJR dan good corporate governance (GCG) sebagai pedoman pengawasan dan pemeriksaan juga harus diatur secara tegas dan sama baik dalam Undang-Undang Keuangan Negara dan undang-undang terkait serta Undang-Undang Perseroan Terbatas.

Vonis Mahkamah Konstitusi Mengeksaminasi Keterwakilan Perempuan Mohamad Faisol
Jurnal Konstitusi Vol 8, No 2 (2011)
Publisher : The Constitutional Court of the Republic of Indonesia

The verdict imposed by the Constitutional Court in the form of revocation of some parts of General Election Rules which arrange the determination of the representative who has the rights to occupy the council seats is not a verdict which discriminates and hinders women rights to fight for occupying the council seats, but it gives them more available and egalitarian chances to female politicians. The Constitutional Court verdict also examines the political party to elect and decide the council representatives truly based on the aspect of rasionality, professionality, and any other special aspects supporting them.

Antara Cita-cita Konservasi dan Kerentanan Masuk Sandera Eksploitasi (Kajian Atas Beberapa Judicial Review terhadap UU Kehutanan) Faiq Tobroni
Jurnal Konstitusi Vol 8, No 3 (2011)
Publisher : The Constitutional Court of the Republic of Indonesia

This paper aims to discuss some decisions of the Constitutional Court on judicial review of the Forestry Law. There are both positive and negative. A positive decision, to my opinion, can seen in No 013/PUU-III/2005 and No 021/PUU-III/2005. The reason I regard as a positive is based on the consequences of decision, which legitimates article about the ban on illegal logging in forests and the confiscation of equipment for stealing wood as constitutional ones. It is supporting conservation.A decision that negatively affects the spirit of conservation is noted in decision No. 003/PUU-II/2005. This ruling tends to prioritize legal certainty for mining companies to resume an open mine system in the preserved forestry. The author saw this one as reflection of the legal policy construction on forestry law that is taken hostage by exploitation interests.This paper, furthermore, tries to uncover the legal policy construction on forestry law as the base of problem sources. Therefore, the author needs to search for not only informations which are in the textual decision, but also ones are beyond it. The larger model of legal policy can be seen from the process of determining emergency condition when formulating the Stipulation of Government Regulation in Lieu of Law (Perpu), then when changing the Perpu become law, and government regulations concerning forestry post-decision of the Court Number 003/PUU-II/2005.The advantage of this paper is on efforts to uncover the source alignments of forestry law on the big corporation based on decision number 003/PUU-II/2005. It to know this source that could be an important basis to understand why decision of the Constitutional Court on the preserved forest is taken hostage.

Menegakkan Demokrasi dan Konstitusionalitas Pemilihan Umum Kepala Daerah Sri Hastuti Puspitasari
Jurnal Konstitusi Vol 8, No 3 (2011)
Publisher : The Constitutional Court of the Republic of Indonesia

The Constitutional Court was not born only to maintain and uphold the Constitution, the Constitutional Court will continue to defend democracy was thus born. Because of the elections is now entered the realm of the general election regime, constitutionally, the authority of the Constitutional Court to resolve election disputes are the results in the paragraph of article 24C sub section (1) the 1945 Constitution of the State of the Republic of Indonesia. Only then the legitimacy of the formal authority of the Constitutional Court explicitly mentioned in the general election dispute referred to in article 236C of the law number 12 year 2008, concerning the amandment of law number 32 of 2004. In the settlement of the election dispute General, the Court not is based only on the results of the calculation of quantitative of the number of votes have been counted, but the Court made a breakthrough that the calculations which, if it is that there is a difference in the calculation of the noise exposure of the door to manipulation that is structural systematic and massive, then the role of democratization and the Court to defend the constitutionality of the general election that is an essential step to bring into the substantive justice

Kontrak Karya PT Freeport Indonesia dalam Perspektif Pancasila dan UUD NRI 1945 Ahmad Redi
Jurnal Konstitusi Vol 13, No 3 (2016)
Publisher : The Constitutional Court of the Republic of Indonesia

PT Freeport Indonesia (PT FI) has a Contract of Work (KK) to undertake mining materials in Grasberg and Ertsberg mining areas which has begun in 1967 and will end in 2021. Since the promulgation of Law No. 4 of 2009 on Mineral and Coal Mining (UU Minerba), regulation on mineral and coal undertaking has been in accordance with Pancasila (State Ideology) and the 1945 Constitution, however, because UU Minerba can only be effective for legal actions after its promulgation therefore items related to KK before the existence of that law cannot be regulated. On the other hand, the existence of KK of PT FI is considered to be in violation with Pancasila namely The Fifth Principle “Social Justice for The Whole People of Indonesia”, and Article 33 (3) of 1945 Constitution concerning the substance of land, water, and natural wealth ‘shall be controlled by the State’ and ‘for maximum use for people’s welfare’. This article shall discuss on whether KK of PT FI has been in accordance with Pancasila and the1945 Constitution? And what should Government do in order KK of PT FI can be regulated within the frame of Pancasila and the 1945 Constitution? The method used in this writing is juridical normative. Based on the writer’s analysis, KK of PT FI is violating Pancasila and the 1945 Constitution. The effort to adjust it to Pancasila and the 1945 Constitution shall be conducted through renegotiation of KK of PT FI based on “hardship” principle in UNIDROIT Principles of International Commercial Contracts and principle of natural resources for national interest and people’s welfare in the Resolution of General Assembly Resolution 1803 (XVII) of 14 December 1962, “Permanent Sovereignty Over Natural Resources.

Page 25 of 59 | Total Record : 584

23 24 25 26 27

Filter by Year

2015 2024

Filter By Issues

All Issue Vol. 21 No. 4 (2024) Vol. 21 No. 3 (2024) Vol. 21 No. 2 (2024) Vol. 21 No. 1 (2024) Vol. 20 No. 4 (2023) Vol. 20 No. 3 (2023) Vol. 20 No. 2 (2023) Vol. 20 No. 1 (2023) Vol. 19 No. 4 (2022) Vol. 19 No. 3 (2022) Vol. 19 No. 2 (2022) Vol. 19 No. 1 (2022) Vol. 18 No. 4 (2021) Vol. 18 No. 3 (2021) Vol. 18 No. 2 (2021) Vol. 18 No. 1 (2021) Vol 17, No 4 (2020) Vol. 17 No. 4 (2020) Vol 17, No 3 (2020) Vol 17, No 2 (2020) Vol. 17 No. 2 (2020) Vol 17, No 1 (2020) Vol 16, No 4 (2019) Vol. 16 No. 4 (2019) Vol. 16 No. 3 (2019) Vol 16, No 3 (2019) Vol 16, No 2 (2019) Vol 16, No 1 (2019) Vol 15, No 4 (2018) Vol. 15 No. 4 (2018) Vol 15, No 3 (2018) Vol 15, No 2 (2018) Vol 15, No 1 (2018) Vol 14, No 4 (2017) Vol 14, No 3 (2017) Vol 14, No 2 (2017) Vol 14, No 1 (2017) Vol. 14 No. 1 (2017) Vol 13, No 4 (2016) Vol 13, No 3 (2016) Vol. 13 No. 2 (2016) Vol 13, No 2 (2016) Vol 13, No 1 (2016) Vol 11, No 4 (2014) Vol 11, No 3 (2014) Vol 11, No 2 (2014) Vol 11, No 1 (2014) Vol 10, No 4 (2013) Vol 10, No 3 (2013) Vol 10, No 2 (2013) Vol 10, No 1 (2013) Vol 9, No 4 (2012) Vol 9, No 3 (2012) Vol 9, No 2 (2012) Vol 9, No 1 (2012) Vol 8, No 6 (2011) Vol 8, No 5 (2011) Vol 8, No 4 (2011) Vol 8, No 3 (2011) Vol 8, No 2 (2011) Vol 8, No 1 (2011) Vol 7, No 6 (2010) Vol 7, No 5 (2010) Vol 7, No 4 (2010) Vol 7, No 3 (2010) Vol 7, No 2 (2010) Vol 7, No 1 (2010) Vol 12, No 4 (2015) Vol 12, No 3 (2015) Vol 12, No 2 (2015) Vol 12, No 1 (2015) More Issue

Home Page

OAI Link

Editorial Team

Contact

Reviewer

Google Scholar

Contact Name
Abdul Basid Fuadi

Contact Email
jurnalkonstitusi@mkri.id

Phone
+6281215312967

Journal Mail Official
jurnalkonstitusi@mkri.id

Editorial Address
Pusat Penelitian dan Pengkajian Perkara dan Pengelolaan Perpustakaan Mahkamah Konstitusi Republik Indonesia Jl. Medan Merdeka Barat No. 6, Jakarta 10110 Telp: (021) 23529000 Fax: (021) 3520177 E-mail: jurnalkonstitusi@mkri.id

Location
Kota adm. jakarta pusat,

Dki jakarta

INDONESIA

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Home Page

OAI Link

Editorial Team

Contact

Reviewer

Google Scholar

Contact Name Abdul Basid Fuadi

Contact Email jurnalkonstitusi@mkri.id

Phone +6281215312967

Journal Mail Official jurnalkonstitusi@mkri.id

Editorial Address Pusat Penelitian dan Pengkajian Perkara dan Pengelolaan Perpustakaan Mahkamah Konstitusi Republik Indonesia Jl. Medan Merdeka Barat No. 6, Jakarta 10110 Telp: (021) 23529000 Fax: (021) 3520177 E-mail: jurnalkonstitusi@mkri.id

Location Kota adm. jakarta pusat, Dki jakarta INDONESIA

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Contact Name
Abdul Basid Fuadi

Contact Email
jurnalkonstitusi@mkri.id

Phone
+6281215312967

Journal Mail Official
jurnalkonstitusi@mkri.id

Editorial Address
Pusat Penelitian dan Pengkajian Perkara dan Pengelolaan Perpustakaan Mahkamah Konstitusi Republik Indonesia Jl. Medan Merdeka Barat No. 6, Jakarta 10110 Telp: (021) 23529000 Fax: (021) 3520177 E-mail: jurnalkonstitusi@mkri.id

Location
Kota adm. jakarta pusat,

Dki jakarta

INDONESIA