cover
Contact Name
Aditya Halim Perdana Kusuma Putra
Contact Email
adityatrojhan@gmail.com
Phone
+6282292222243
Journal Mail Official
adityatrojhan@gmail.com
Editorial Address
Jalan Abu Bakar Lambogo No. 91 Makassar
Location
Kota makassar,
Sulawesi selatan
INDONESIA
Golden Ratio of Social Science and Education
Published by Manunggal Halim Jaya
ISSN : -     EISSN : 27975827     DOI : https://doi.org/10.52970/grsse
Golden Ratio of Social Science and Education (GRSSE) encourages courageous and bold new ideas, focusing on contribution, theoretical, managerial, and social life implications. Golden Ratio of Social Science and Education (GRSSE) welcomes papers: Arts, Anthropology Communication Education Education method Islamic education Law science Psychology Public administration Public service administration Sociology Teaching Method Linguistic Economic Development Economic Science Publication Frequency: Twice Issue Per Year (May - October) The Golden Ratio of Social Science and Education (GRSSE), with e-ISSN: 2797-5827 is an open-access journal, is peer-reviewed. The journal accepts contributions in English only. Golden Ratio of Social Science and Education (GRSSE) is providing scholars the best in theory, research, and methodology as well as providing a platform to professionals and academics to share their ideas, knowledge, and findings. Golden Ratio of Social Science and Education (GRSSE) is accepted qualitative or quantitative approach. The main objective of this journal is to provide a channel for the publication of articles based on original research as well as commentaries on a range of social science and education area: education, education method, Islamic education, arts, communication, psychology, anthropology, sociology, public administration, public service administration, linguistic. For economics, business, and management field of expertise only accept with qualitative approach.
Articles 201 Documents
Beyond Conventional Responses: Comparative Land Defense Strategy Against the Hybrid-Separatist Threat In Indonesia and the Philippines Royhan Asshiddiky
Golden Ratio of Social Science and Education Vol. 6 No. 2 (2026): June - November
Publisher : Manunggal Halim Jaya

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.52970/grsse.v6i2.2480

Abstract

Contemporary separatism no longer works in one domain: armed violence, narrative building in the international arena, and exploitation of development gaps as a recruitment base operates simultaneously. Defense responses that target only the physical domain experience structural deficits that cannot be overcome by increasing combat capacity. Basically, this study aims to identify patterns of failure to adapt land defense doctrines in the face of hybrid-separatist threats in Indonesia and the Philippines, as well as formulate the most institutionally realistic transformation prerequisites. This study uses a comparative case study design with the logic of most-similar systems and process tracing methods, with data sourced from official doctrinal documents, International Crisis Group reports, IISS, SIPRI, and relevant academic literature. The results of the study show that the TNI-AD and AFP face a similar pattern of structural failure even though they are taken through different paths: The Regional Command holds the architectural potential of community-based early detection that has never been connected to a multi-domain threat management system, while the Bayanihan IPSP offers a conceptually robust whole-of-nation framework but is not successfully operationalized consistently and does not have an adaptation mechanism to shifting actors partial post-peace threat. The study concludes that doctrinal transformation (not the addition of resources) is a key prerequisite for successful strategic adaptation, and that the most realistic solution lies in expanding the scope of doctrine in existing systems, rather than establishing new institutional structures.