cover
Article Per Year (5 Year)
All
Home Page
OAI Link
Editorial Team
Contact
Reviewer
Google Scholar
Contact Name
Deswin Nur
Contact Email
jurnal@kppu.go.id
Phone
+6281289188713
Journal Mail Official
jurnal@kppu.go.id
Editorial Address
Jl. Ir. H. Juanda No. 36
Location
Unknown,
Unknown
INDONESIA
Jurnal Persaingan Usaha
Published by Komisi Pengawas Persaingan Usaha
ISSN : 20870361     EISSN : 28096304     DOI : https://doi.org/10.55869/kppu.v1i1
Core Subject : Economy,
Economics, Econometrics & Finance
Analisis empiris atas kebijakan persaingan Studi kasus atau bedah putusan KPPU (yang telah inkracht) baik dalam konteks kegiatan yang dilarang, perjanjian yang dilarang, dan penyalahgunaan posisi dominan Analisis atas transaksi merger dan akuisisi, serta studi kasus penanganan perkara merger dan akuisisi Pengembangan regulasi dan hukum beracara di KPPU Studi komparatif implementasi hukum persaingan usaha antarnegara (antara KPPU dengan negara lain) Isu-isu yang berkaitan dengan kelembagaan KPPU (struktur dan kinerja) Diskursus dan kritik teori tentang persaingan usaha Pengembangan metodologi riset terkait persaingan usaha Isu-isu yang berkaitan dengan pengawasan kemitraan UMKM (termasuk implementasi konsep ekonomi pasar Pancasila, atau perdebatan antara competition dan cooperation)
Arjuna Subject : Ilmu Ekonomi, Ekonometrika dan Keuangan (semua kategori) - Ilmu Ekomomi dan Ekonometrika
Articles 42 Documents
 1   2   3   4   5 
Mengungkap Algorithmic Pricing Cartel dalam E-Commerce melalui Leniency Program Auliansyah Pratama, Reiyan; Rahmadani, Nindy
Jurnal Persaingan Usaha Vol 5 No 2 (2025): Jurnal Persaingan Usaha
Publisher : Komisi Pengawas Persaingan Usaha

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.55869/kppu.v5i2.227

Abstract

The development of the digital economy has created a new form of cartel practice, where business actors use pricing algorithms to coordinate automatic price setting on e-commerce platforms, known as the Algorithmic Pricing Cartel. This phenomenon poses a challenge for competition law enforcement, as collusion occurs through algorithmic systems that are difficult to detect. The purpose of this study is to analyze the role and mechanism of pricing algorithms in facilitating digital cartels, the urgency of regulating a leniency program in Indonesia, and a comparison with the United States, the European Union, and Japan. The research method used is a literature study with a normative and comparative approach to relevant regulations and competition policies. The findings indicate that pricing algorithms can facilitate price fixing. Hypothetically, implementing a leniency program in Indonesia could serve as a strategic solution to uncover and address pricing algorithms cartels and strengthen competition law enforcement in the digital economy era.
Persekongkolan Tender Pelabuhan Nusa Penida: Faktor, Dampak, dan Peran KPPU Asa, M. Fanshurullah; Aprilia, Sonia
Jurnal Persaingan Usaha Vol 5 No 2 (2025): Jurnal Persaingan Usaha
Publisher : Komisi Pengawas Persaingan Usaha

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.55869/kppu.v5i2.235

Abstract

One of the tender collusion cases that occurred was the procurement of goods and services in the port construction sector of Nusa Penida, Bali, in the 2022 fiscal year. This study aims to analyze the factors causing collusion, its impacts, and stakeholders’ perceptions of the Indonesian Competition Commission (KPPU). The research applies a quantitative approach using primary data collected through questionnaires distributed to KPPU staff and external parties involved in the Nusa Penida port collusion case. Secondary data were obtained from official KPPU documents regarding the case. The data were then processed using Statistical Package for the Social Sciences (SPSS) version 25. Overall, the analysis shows that the independent variables have a very strong influence on the dependent variable, with an Adjusted R Square value of 0.988, meaning 98%. The implementation yielded an average score of 28, falling into the “adequate” category. Validity and reliability tests also proved high, with a Cronbach’s Alpha value of 0.956. The variables that have a positive influence are Structure (X1), Behavior (X2), and Institutional (X4), while the variables that negatively influence are Performance (X3) and Demand Factors (X5). Therefore, this study highlights the importance of strengthening institutions and fostering ethical business behavior, as well as the need for control over performance and demand factors to create fair and healthy business competition.

Page 5 of 5 | Total Record : 42

 1   2   3   4   5 

Filter by Year

2021 2025


Reset
Filter By Issues
All Issue Vol 5 No 2 (2025): Jurnal Persaingan Usaha Vol 3 No 1 (2023): Jurnal Persaingan Usaha Vol 2 No 2 (2022): Jurnal Persaingan Usaha Vol 2 No 1 (2022): Jurnal Persaingan Usaha Vol 1 No 2 (2021): Jurnal Persaingan Usaha Vol 1 No 1 (2021): Jurnal Persaingan Usaha