cover
Article Per Year (5 Year)
All
Home Page
OAI Link
Editorial Team
Contact
Reviewer
Google Scholar
Contact Name
Abdur Rahman
Contact Email
arrahman@ulm.ac.id
Phone
+6287741278430
Journal Mail Official
fishscientiae@ulm.ac.id
Editorial Address
Achmad Yani Street, 36th Office Box 6 Banjarbaru, South Kalimantan-Indonesia,
Location
Kota banjarmasin,
Kalimantan selatan
INDONESIA
Fish Scientiae : Jurnal Ilmu-Ilmu Perikanan dan Kelautan
Published by Universitas Lambung Mangkurat
ISSN : 16933710     EISSN : 25411187     DOI : http://dx.doi.org/10.20527
Core Subject : Agriculture,
Agriculture, Biological Sciences & Forestry
Fish Scientiae is a journal containing articles on Fishing Technology, Technology Aquaculture, Technology General of Fisheries, Water Resources Management, Agribusiness Fisheries, Marine Sciences, Biology Fisheries and Aquatic Ecology. The writings can be published in this journal can be shaped dissertations, theses, research reports, scientific papers and book reviews. Fish Scientiae is Sciences Journal of Fisheries and Marine Resources, is published twice a year (June and December) by the Faculty of Fisheries and Marine Resources.
Arjuna Subject : Ilmu Pertanian dan Biologi (Semua) - Ilmu Pertanian dan Biologi (Lain-Lain)
Articles 7 Documents
 1 
Search results for , issue "Vol 3 No 2 (2013): Issue December-Fish Scientiae Journal" : 7 Documents clear
KARAKTERISTIK FISIKO-KIMIA KITOSAN DAN OLIGO KITOSAN KULIT UDANG (Litopenaeus vannamei) Candra Candra; Findya Puspitasari
Fish Scientiae Vol 3 No 2 (2013): Issue December-Fish Scientiae Journal
Publisher : Faculty of Fisheries and Marine Resources of Lambung Mangkurat University-South Kalimantan

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (18.696 KB)

Abstract

This study aims to make chitosan and oligo-chitosan and studied its characteristics. The parameters tested in this study were moisture, ash, protein and fat content. Characteristics of chitosan depolimerasi process into oligo-chitosan were significantly lower levels of protein, ash, fat, white and degrees but there was an increase of water content, because due to the drying process was not optimal. Moisture, protein, ash content, white degree and viscosity of chitosan and oligochitosan were still below the quality standard due to less optimal deproteinization, demineralization, deacetylation and depolymerization. The higher of ash was decreasesolubility and viscosity of chitosan and oligo-chitosan.
TUTUPAN TERUMBU KARANG KABUPATEN KOTABARU PROVINSI KALIMANTAN SELATAN (STUDI KASUS PERAIRAN SEPAGAR) Deddy Dharmaji
Fish Scientiae Vol 3 No 2 (2013): Issue December-Fish Scientiae Journal
Publisher : Faculty of Fisheries and Marine Resources of Lambung Mangkurat University-South Kalimantan

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (320.824 KB)

Abstract

This research aims to know the percentage of living coral cover in the village of Sepagar. The benefits of this research are as input for the parties involved in the efforts of the management and conservation of coral reefs in the waters of the villageSepagar. The results of the observation and calculation of the coral reefs is done using the method of Point Intercept Trancek (PIT) shows that the community of coral reefsin the waters of the Sepagar included in the types of coral reefs of the sandbar (patchreef). Generally burnt coral reefs grow and develop in the relatively shallow waters with depths ranging from 1-5 meters. The results showed on the three stations found 7of the 10 components of the reef that is. Acropora (AC), Non-Acropora (NA), DeadCoral with Algae (DCA), Dead Coral (DC), Soft Coral Sand (SC) (S), and the Rubble(R). Component not found is Fleshy Seawed (FS), Rock (RK) and Silt (SL). At station1, the total percentage of living coral closure (living cover) by 51.4%, In station 2 of55,3 % , and in station 3 of 51.3 % .The percentage the coral lived in waters sepagar in good not far different the percentage the coral live in every station.
ANALISIS KESESUAIAN KUALITAS AIR KOLAM BERDASARKAN PARAMETER pH, DO, AMONIAK, KARBONDIOKSIDA DAN ALKALINITAS DI BALAI BENIH DAN INDUK IKAN AIR TAWAR (BBI-IAT) KECAMATAN KARANG INTAN KABUPATEN BANJAR Fidia Ningsih; Mijani Rahman; Abdur Rahman
Fish Scientiae Vol 3 No 2 (2013): Issue December-Fish Scientiae Journal
Publisher : Faculty of Fisheries and Marine Resources of Lambung Mangkurat University-South Kalimantan

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (563.469 KB)

Abstract

In this research data obtained from measurements or observations a represented in the form of tabulated and graphics so clear the existence of variation search on each point of observation. Data analysis using STORET model and EQI. Statistical tests performed on 6 variables (Kolam1, II, III, IV, Indoor Pool, Outdoor Pool V, VI). Each variable water quality analysis: pH, DO, NH3, CO2 and Alkalinityas much as 6 times the observation (Sunday I, II and III of the Week Week) on the morning and afternoon. To know the influence of parameters (pH, DO, NH3, CO2 and Alkalinity) of raw water quality pond done Multiple Linear regression analysis. Linear regression analysis of multiple shown r of ( 0,751 ), it means that happened a positive relationship between variables y (dependent variable) and x (independent ). R2 / determinan of ( 0,564 ), it means of 56,4 % quality standards apool water affected by water quality swimming ( pH, DO, NH3, of CO2 alkalinity )and of 43,6 % affected by another variable. Of a result of calculation to research obtained equation y = 0,484 - 0,067x1 - 0,027x2 - 0,506x3 - 0,036x4 0,002x5 -, it means any additional value the constant ( a ) by 0,484. Its influence will resulting in a decline of water quality is at ph ( X1 ) by 0,067, do ( X2 ) by 0,027 NH3 ( X3 ) by 0,506,CO2 ( X4 ) by 0,036 mg / l and alkalinity ( X5 ) by 0,002 mg / l.
PERBAIKAN KUALITAS PETIS KEPALA UDANG WINDU (Penaeus monodon) DENGAN PENAMBAHAN TEPUNG ARANG KAYU GALAM (Melaleuca cajuputi powell), SEKAM PADI (Oryza sativa L ) DAN TEMPURUNG KELAPA (Cocos nucifera) Juhana Suhanda; Purnomo Purnomo
Fish Scientiae Vol 3 No 2 (2013): Issue December-Fish Scientiae Journal
Publisher : Faculty of Fisheries and Marine Resources of Lambung Mangkurat University-South Kalimantan

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (537.711 KB)

Abstract

This research was conducted with time for 4 months which include the conduct of research, data analysis, report preparation. This study aims to make a paste shrimp head juice Windu quality with the addition of flour Galam wood charcoal, ricehusk and coconut shell. While its use is to produce a paste shrimp head juice Windu acceptable and preferred by consumers. This study used an experimental method based on the pattern and made completely randomized design ( CRD ) with four treatments, namely A ( without the addition of charcoal powder ), treatment B (addition of charcoal powder Galam 0.05 %), treatment C ( addition of rice husk flour 0 , 05 % ) and treatment D ( addition of coconut shell charcoal powder 0.05 % ). Each treatment was done 3 times repetition. The parameters tested include Protein LevelsTest, Test Water Content, Content Test Abu, Organoleptic Test is taste, color, aromaand texture. Acceptance or rejection of the hypothesis based on the results of the F test( analysis of variance ) From the results of the testing and analysis of the four treatments for the highest levels of the protein test is treatment D ( 26.60 % ), thelowest moisture content test is in treatment D ( 19 , 28 % ) and lowest ash content testis treatment A (7.77 % ), but among the treatments on ash content was notsignificantly different so that could mean ash content in each treatment did not differ( not significant ), whereas organoleptic test for taste , color , flavor and texturewhich is the highest treatment D is a sense of taste ( 6.89 ), color (7.31 ), flavor(6.48 ) and texture (6.635).
EFIKASI RUTE VAKSIN Aeromonas hydrophila ASB-01 PADA IKAN GABUS (Ophiocephalus striatus) Olga Olga; Fatmawati Fatmawati
Fish Scientiae Vol 3 No 2 (2013): Issue December-Fish Scientiae Journal
Publisher : Faculty of Fisheries and Marine Resources of Lambung Mangkurat University-South Kalimantan

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (106.8 KB)

Abstract

This study aims to determine the vaccine A.hydrophila ASB-01 is effective forthe control of MAS on snakehead fish. Effectiveness of vaccination was evaluated through the antibody titer, survival, RPS (relative percent survival) and RWK (meantime of death). The study consisted of 5 treatments (immersion vaccination (R), oral(O), intramuscular injection (IM), intraperitoneal injection (IP) and control (PBS pH7.0) with 3 replications. Vaccination doses were 107 cells / ml. Booster vaccination after 14 days later. Dose is equal to the initial vaccination. Furthermore, the next day14 fish were challenged with A.hydrophila ASB-01. To obtain data on antibody titerblood draw done at the time before being vaccinated, shortly before the booster vaccination and 14 days after the booster vaccination. Challenged fish were observedfor 14 days to obtain data on survival, RPS and RWK. The result showed that allthese vaccines may increase the antibody titer, but the highest antibody titers obtained from fish vaccinated injection. Survival rates were vaccinated IM (84.47%), IP(82.20%), R (42.27%), O (42.20%) and controls (13.13%). RPS to IM (82.08%), IP(79.46%), R (33.38%), O (33.31%), while RWK through the IP (3.63 days), IM(79.46 3.57 days), R (2.46 days), O (1.85 days) and controls (1.03 days). Effective vaccination route is through injection.
EMBERIAN VARIASI JENIS PAKAN TERHADAP PERTUMBUHAN BENIH IKAN ARWANA (Scleropages formosus) DI DALAM WADAH BUDIDAYA Yahya Yahya; Untung Bijaksana; M. Adriani
Fish Scientiae Vol 3 No 2 (2013): Issue December-Fish Scientiae Journal
Publisher : Faculty of Fisheries and Marine Resources of Lambung Mangkurat University-South Kalimantan

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (1684.405 KB)

Abstract

This study aims to determine the feed Arowana fish seed (Scleropagesformosos) after feeding egg yolk tobe variations between, mosquito larvae bloodworms-mosquito larvae(A), crickets-mosquito larvae-crickets(B), and bloodworms-crickets- blood worms(C), are maintained in the container cultivation.Overall implemented for ±5 months from January 2013 to May 2013 in the month of PT. Kresna Pusaka Tirta Lestari Jln. Kuripan. No. 19D RT. 33, Eastern District of Banjarmasin, Banjarmasin, South Kalimantan Parameters observed; Growth Relative Weight, Length Relative Growth, FeedConversion, Survival. Aperture mouth, Out of Egg Yolk longtime, and parameterWater Quality For Supporting Data.From the data obtained during the study relative weight of the highest growthratein treatment B (87.78%), and the lowest was intreatment C (83.98%). The mean length of the highest relative growth in treatment A (30.56%), and the lowest was intreatment C (30.44%). The highest feed conversion intreatment B (1,55%), and thelowest was intreatment A (0,59%). The highest survival rate in treatment A (93.33%),followed bytreatment B (91.52%), andthe lowest was intreatment C(86.67%). Theaverage opening mouth highest in treatment A (58.849), followed involves the B(54.922), and the lowest was intreatment C (51.413). Long arowana depleted eggyolks from the eggs pots(TBK) to egg a big body (TBB) is 13 days, from TBB to swimegg (TBR) 15 days, and from plain eggs to TBR 14 days, so the totalis 42 days. Waterquality during the study ranged between temperature 30-32° C, pH73.77, salinity 0.10- 0.18 ppt, and ammonia from 0.13 - 0.18mg/l .Based on the analysis of variance (ANOVA) on all treatments only on survivaland feed conversion were significantly different, followed by HSD test for survivaland Duncan test for feed conversion. Judging from the data is the best overall treatment A with variations of mosquito larvae-bloodworms-mosquito larvae.
DEGRADASI EKOSISTEM RAWA PESISIR DI KECAMATAN JORONG KABUPATEN TANAH LAUT KALIMANTAN SELATAN Eka Iriadenta
Fish Scientiae Vol 3 No 2 (2013): Issue December-Fish Scientiae Journal
Publisher : Faculty of Fisheries and Marine Resources of Lambung Mangkurat University-South Kalimantan

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (220.651 KB)

Abstract

Decreasing area of coastal swamp ecosystem causing stress to aquatic biota whichliving in those habitat, and give impact to fishermen’s prosperity level. Study of coastal swamp’s condition really important, with aim as consideration to decide policies that needed to reach environmental balancing and sustainibility of exploitation. Study was done to both primary and secundary data, which include tabulative, graphical, qualitative and quantitative/statistics and computative, both description and inferential, and so spatial analysis for reach locally information of mangrove area’s degradation, and temporal information of comparation with secondary data. Condition of ecosystem of coastal swamp in Jorong subdistrict, which representated by condition of ecosystem of mangrove showing damaged to really damaged condition. Rate of decreasing of mangrove areas in Jorong subdistrict reach of 614,49 ha, or average rate of areas decreasing were 38,41 ha/year. Factors that caused damaged/degradation process of coastal swamp in Jorong subdistrict, Tanah Laut Regency dominated by wave activities and area’s converted.

Page 1 of 1 | Total Record : 7

 1 

Filter by Year

2013 2019


Reset
Filter By Issues
All Issue Vol 15 No 1 (2025): Edisi Juni Vol 14 No 1 (2024): Edisi Juni 2024, Vol. 14(1),2024 Vol 14 No 2 (2024): EDISI DESEMBER, Vol 14 (2), 2024 Vol 13 No 2 (2023): Edisi Desember 2023, Vol. 13(2),2023 Vol 13 No 1 (2023): Issue June-Fish Scientiae Journal Vol 12 No 2 (2022): Issue December-Fish Scientiae Journal Vol 12 No 1 (2022): Issue June-Fish Scientiae Journal Vol 11 No 2 (2021): Issue December-Fish Scientiae Journal Vol 11 No 1 (2021): Issue June-Fish Scientiae Journal Vol 10 No 2 (2020): Issue December Fish Scientiae Journal Vol 10 No 1 (2020): Issue June-Fish Scientiae Journal Vol 9 No 2 (2019): Issue December-Fish Scientiae Journal Vol 9 No 1 (2019): Issue -Fish Scientiae Journal Vol 5 No 1 (2015): Issue June-Fish Scientiae Journal Vol 8 No 2 (2018): Issue December-Fish Scientiae Journal Vol 8 No 1 (2018): Issue June-Fish Scientiae Journal Vol 7 No 2 (2017): Issue December-Fish Scientiae Journal Vol 7 No 1 (2017): Issue June-Fish Scientiae Journal Vol 6 No 2 (2016): Issue December-Fish Scientiae Journal Vol 6 No 1 (2016): Issue June-Fish Scientiae Journal Vol 5 No 2 (2015): Issue December-Fish Scientiae Journal Vol 4 No 2 (2014): Issue December-Fish Scientiae Journal Vol 4 No 1 (2014): Issue June-Fish Scientiae Journal Vol 3 No 2 (2013): Issue December-Fish Scientiae Journal Vol 3 No 1 (2013): Issue June-Fish Scientiae Journal Vol 2 No 2 (2012): Issue December-Fish Scientiae Journal Vol 2 No 1 (2012): Issue June-Fish Scientiae Journal Vol 1 No 2 (2011): Issue December-Fish Scientiae Journal Vol 1 No 1 (2011): Issue June-Fish Scientiae Journal More Issue