cover
Article Per Year (5 Year)
All
Home Page
OAI Link
Editorial Team
Contact
Reviewer
Google Scholar
Contact Name
Indah Purbasari
Contact Email
tlr@trunojoyo.ac.id
Phone
+6282337334798
Journal Mail Official
tlr@trunojoyo.ac.id
Editorial Address
Faculty of Law, University of Trunojoyo Madura, Indonesia Jl. Raya Telang - Kamal, Bangkalan.
Location
Kab. bangkalan,
Jawa timur
INDONESIA
Trunojoyo Law Review
Published by Universitas Trunojoyo Madura
ISSN : 26861496     EISSN : 27152081     DOI : https://doi.org/10.21107/trl
Core Subject : Humanities, Social,
Humanities Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice
Trunojoyo Law Review, published by Faculty of Law University of Trunojoyo, Madura. Its a biannual refereed journal concerned with the practice and processes of law and justice. It provides a forum for academics, practitioners and community representatives to explore issues and reflect on practices relating to the full range of engaged activity. This journal is a peer-reviewed online journal dedicated to the publication of high-quality research focused on research, implementation. The mission of Trunojoyo Law Reveiw is to serve as the premier peer-reviewed, interdisciplinary journal to advance theory and practice related to all forms of social science and humanities. This includes highlighting innovative endeavors; critically examining emerging issues, trends, challenges, and opportunities and reporting on studies of impact in the areas of law and justice. We proudly announce that Trunojoyo Law Reveiw has indexed by Google Scholar, Portal Garuda, Dimensions, etc
Arjuna Subject : Ilmu Sosial - Hukum
Articles 5 Documents
 1 
Search results for , issue "Vol 8, No 2 (2026): August (On Progress)" : 5 Documents clear
Legal Framework for Addressing Cybercrime Threats in Strengthening Indonesia’s National Defense and Security Shobri, Taufiq; Yusgiantoro, Purnomo; Navalino, Djoko Andreas; Sutanto, Sutanto
TRUNOJOYO LAW REVIEW Vol 8, No 2 (2026): August (On Progress)
Publisher : Faculty of Law Universitas Trunojoyo Madura

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.21107/tlr.v8i2.33492

Abstract

This study aims to analyze the forms of cybercrime threats in Indonesia and examine the existing legal framework for addressing them. The study contributes to strengthening the legal perspective on cybercrime regulation by identifying weaknesses in current regulations and proposing improvements to support national cybersecurity governance. This research employs a normative legal research method using statutory, conceptual, and case approaches. Data were collected through a literature review of laws and regulations, academic journals, policy reports, and other relevant legal sources, and analyzed qualitatively. The findings indicate that cybercrime threats in Indonesia continue to grow in both scale and complexity, including phishing, ransomware, malware attacks, Distributed Denial of Service (DDoS), and data breaches targeting government institutions and financial sectors. Although Indonesia has enacted several regulations, such as the Electronic Information and Transactions Law and the Personal Data Protection Law, the regulatory framework remains fragmented and lacks comprehensive legal provisions governing national cybersecurity. The study concludes that strengthening the legal framework and institutional coordination is essential to improve cyber defense and national security. Therefore, this study recommends developing a comprehensive cybersecurity law, improving inter-agency coordination, and enhancing capacity in cybersecurity governance to effectively address cybercrime threats in Indonesia.
The Role of Mediators in Dispute Resolution Based on Progressive Law to Achieve Substantive Justice Sutarjo, Sutarjo; Pudjiastuti, Diah
TRUNOJOYO LAW REVIEW Vol 8, No 2 (2026): August (On Progress)
Publisher : Faculty of Law Universitas Trunojoyo Madura

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.21107/tlr.v8i2.32930

Abstract

This study aims to analyze the role of mediators in criminal dispute resolution within the framework of progressive legal theory to achieve substantive justice. It addresses the inconsistency between the ultimum remedium principle, which positions criminal punishment as a last resort, and the restrictive regulatory framework governing penal mediation in Indonesia. The study contributes a conceptual and critical evaluation of how restorative justice regulations limit mediators' authority and hinder the broader institutionalization of penal mediation within the criminal justice system. It proposes harmonizing restorative justice policies with progressive law to strengthen mediation as a humane and participatory mechanism. This research employs doctrinal legal research using statutory and conceptual approaches. The data were analyzed qualitatively through systematic and conceptual interpretation. The findings indicate that although restorative justice has been formally recognized, strict limitations on offense types, loss thresholds, non-recidivism, and victim consent significantly restrict penal mediation. Consequently, criminal case resolution remains predominantly formalistic and litigation-oriented. The study concludes that regulatory rigidity obstructs the realization of substantive justice. It recommends comprehensive legal reform to expand mediators’ authority and integrate penal mediation more fully into Indonesia’s criminal justice system in line with progressive legal principles.
Questioning Security Guarantees After the Return of the Former Shia Community: Islam and Human Rights Law Analysis Abdullah, Saiful; Al Maashani, Mahmood Ali Suhail; Amancik, Amancik; Sumantri, Bambang; Ni'am, Moh. Widadun
TRUNOJOYO LAW REVIEW Vol 8, No 2 (2026): August (On Progress)
Publisher : Faculty of Law Universitas Trunojoyo Madura

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.21107/tlr.v8i2.28300

Abstract

This study aims to examine the mechanisms and systems for restoring the right to security for former Shia adherents who have returned to their hometowns in Sampang Regency. The government must ensure the fulfillment of this right to security in accordance with its commitment to guarantee that there is no harassment or exclusion of former Shia adherents after their return. This study contributes to advancing knowledge and mechanisms for resolving Sunni-Shia conflicts, with a focus on restoring the right to security and equality. This study employs an empirical legal research method with a socio-legal research approach. The study’s findings reveal that disturbances persist, affecting the fulfillment of the right to security following the return of former Shia adherents. Such disturbances include ongoing threats of murder against former Shia adherents if they revert to their former sect. Additionally, strict surveillance by law enforcement officials and the community toward former Shia adherents—whether during religious rituals or their interactions with the general public—results in their freedom to socialize with the community and practice their faith appearing restricted, which has a psychological impact on them. Certainly, these restrictions conflict with the guarantee of religious freedom enshrined in Indonesian national law, Islamic law, and international human rights instruments. This study concludes that the government’s enforcement of the right to security has not yet been fulfilled in the post-conflict Sunni-Shia reconciliation process, and recommends further government policies to ensure the fulfillment of the right to security and the absence of excessive surveillance of former Shia adherents’ activities, particularly religious practices.
Legality and Effectiveness of the DPR’s Aspiration Network System under Administrative Law Maarif, Ihsanul; Arifin, Firdaus; Al Dhaheri, Luma Ali Faraj; Nggilu, Novendri M.; Al Arif, M. Yasin
TRUNOJOYO LAW REVIEW Vol 8, No 2 (2026): August (On Progress)
Publisher : Faculty of Law Universitas Trunojoyo Madura

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.21107/tlr.v8i2.33486

Abstract

The public aspiration management system within Indonesia’s House of Representatives (DPR) operates without a clear framework rooted in administrative law, resulting in procedural ambiguity, weak institutional accountability, and limited meaningful public participation. The aim of this study is to analyze the normative and institutional shortcomings of the House of Representatives’ consultation system; consequently, it seeks to contribute by proposing a conceptual framework grounded in administrative law. Employing normative legal research with a conceptual and statutory approach, this study also draws on a qualitative analysis of institutional documents and academic literature. The findings revealed the absence of standardized regulations governing aspiration procedures, which rendered the system discretionary and resistant to objective evaluation. Aspirations are treated as political functions rather than administrative obligations, undermining the legitimacy of legislative representation. The study recommends institutional and regulatory reforms, including the development of standard operating procedures, a digital aspiration tracking system, and the integration of accountability principles into legislative ethical codes. These findings not only expose institutional deficiencies but also reconceptualize the DPR’s aspiration system within the framework of administrative law. A key theoretical contribution lies in extending the scope of administrative law beyond the executive branch to legislative institutions, particularly in the governance of public participation. Public aspirations are reframed as administrative rights and forms of public service rather than merely political functions. The introduction of a “limited administrative embedding” model provides a structured approach to integrating administrative principles into legislative functions without diminishing their political character.
Government and Institutional Support for Pesantren Entrepreneurship: An Economic Law Analysis Alhifni, Anas
TRUNOJOYO LAW REVIEW Vol 8, No 2 (2026): August (On Progress)
Publisher : Faculty of Law Universitas Trunojoyo Madura

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.21107/tlr.v8i2.33489

Abstract

This study examines the legal and regulatory frameworks shaping entrepreneurship in Indonesian pesantren, focusing on the application of economic law within Islamic boarding schools. Specifically, it investigates business licensing and Islamic finance law, with an emphasis on how these regulations influence the entrepreneurial practices within pesantren. Using a mixed-methods approach, the study combines quantitative data from surveys of 150 stakeholders and qualitative insights from interviews with 27 informants at Pesantren Sunan Drajat in Lamongan, East Java. The research identifies a strong alignment between pesantren entrepreneurship and national economic development policies, particularly in micro, small, and medium enterprises (MSMEs). However, it also reveals significant regulatory gaps in business formalization, intellectual property protection, and access to Islamic financial resources, thereby hindering entrepreneurial growth. This study contributes to the fields of institutional economics and legal pluralism, offering a detailed analysis of the pesantren system as a hybrid institution combining religious education with economic activity. The study argues for a more integrated economic legal framework that is responsive to the unique socio-religious needs of pesantren, recommending enhanced legal facilitation, expanded financial access, and more effective institutional support mechanisms.

Page 1 of 1 | Total Record : 5

 1 

Filter by Year

2026 2026


Reset
Filter By Issues
All Issue Vol 8, No 2 (2026): August (On Progress) Vol 8, No 1 (2026): February Vol 7, No 2 (2025): August Vol 7, No 1 (2025): February Vol 6, No 2 (2024): August Vol 6, No 1 (2024): February Vol 5, No 2 (2023): Agustus Vol 5, No 1 (2023): FERUARY Vol 5, No 1: FERUARY Vol 4, No 2 (2022): AGUSTUS Vol 4, No 1 (2022): Februari Vol 4, No 2: AGUSTUS Vol 2, No 2 (2020): Agustus Vol 2, No 1 (2020): February Vol 1, No 1 (2019): Februari More Issue