cover
Article Per Year (5 Year)
All
Home Page
OAI Link
Editorial Team
Contact
Reviewer
Google Scholar
Contact Name
Arlina Permanasari
Contact Email
drpmfakultashukum@gmail.com
Phone
+62215637747
Journal Mail Official
teraslawreview@trisakti.ac.id
Editorial Address
Fakultas Hukum Universitas Trisakti Gedung H, Lantai 3 Jl. Kyai Tapa No. 1, Grogol, Jakarta 11440
Location
Kota adm. jakarta barat,
Dki jakarta
INDONESIA
terAs Law Review: Jurnal Hukum Humaniter dan HAM
Published by Universitas Trisakti
ISSN : 27158950     EISSN : 27162060     DOI : https://doi.org/10.25105/teras-lrev
Core Subject : Social,
Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice
terAs Law Review : Jurnal Hukum Humaniter dan HAM is an open access and peer-review journal with a double-blind review process. terAs Law Review : Jurnal Hukum Humaniter dan HAM encourages and accepts contributors from all over the world to submit their articles particularly on: International Humanitarian Law International Human Rights Law (with special reference to armed conflicts) However, terAs Law Review : Jurnal Hukum Humaniter dan HAM also receives various manuscripts from other branch of law, as long as the topic of discussion has to do with armed conflict, such as: International Law International Criminal Law International Environmental Law The Law of Treaty International Settlement of Disputes Refugee Law Diplomatic and consular relations Disarmament Law Cyber Law Philosophy and Theory of Law Constitutional Law Islamic Law Etc.
Arjuna Subject : Umum - Umum
Articles 5 Documents
 1 
Search results for , issue "Vol. 7 No. 2 (2025): November 2025" : 5 Documents clear
EKSISTENSI PENGADILAN HAM DALAM PENANGANAN PELANGGARAN HAM APARAT PENEGAK HUKUM TERHADAP KELOMPOK KRIMINAL BERSENJATA DI PAPUA: EXISTENCE OF HUMAN RIGHTS COURTS IN HANDLING HUMAN RIGHTS VIOLATIONS BY LAW ENFORCEMENT OFFICERS AGAINST ARMED CRIMINAL GROUPS IN PAPUA Tulia, Arter Lukas
terAs Law Review : Jurnal Hukum Humaniter dan HAM Vol. 7 No. 2 (2025): November 2025
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum Universitas Trisakti

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.25105/5f40e864

Abstract

The protection of the rights of life of humans is part of the category of non-derogable rights, namely rights that cannot be reduced. the existence of a separatist movement or KKB in Papua is considered an act of human rights violation, but in handling it through law enforcement officials resulted in not a few KKB members losing their lives, which for these actions is also a gross human rights violation.  To analyze and find out about gross human rights violations by law enforcement officials against KKB members in Papua and the role and existence of the Human Rights Court in handling gross human rights violations. This research uses normative juridical legal research methods, because the topic studied can be resolved through analysis of secondary data or literature sources, without requiring primary data collection. The right to life in its regulation is contained in the provisions of the 1945 Indonesian Constitution, Law Number 39 of 1999 and Law Number 12 of 2005. The existence of the KKB in Papua is in fact a violation of human rights, but its handling by law enforcement officials, in fact, is not carried out through legal procedures, namely through the process of investigation, prosecution and court hearings, but unscrupulous law enforcement officials have in fact taken action to violate human rights by eliminating the lives of several KKB members. the existence of a human rights court until now has not optimally carried out its function to take action and prosecute the perpetrators of human rights violations both KKB members and law enforcement officials involved in eliminating the lives of several KKB members.
Konstitusi Dalam Menjamin Hak Kebebasan Beragama Bagi Pemeluk Agama Minoritas di Indonesia: THE CONSTITUTION IN GUARANTING THE FREEDOM OF RELIGION TOWARDS MINORITY RELIGION ADHERENTS IN INDONESIA Batubara, Dian Prahara; Batubara , Dian Prahara; Yasin, Ikhsan Fatah
terAs Law Review : Jurnal Hukum Humaniter dan HAM Vol. 7 No. 2 (2025): November 2025
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum Universitas Trisakti

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.25105/51k45t27

Abstract

Kebebasan beragama merupakan hak konstitusional yang dijamin oleh Pasal 29 ayat (2) Undang-Undang Dasar 1945, namun implementasinya di Indonesia masih menghadapi berbagai tantangan, khususnya bagi pemeluk agama minoritas. Latar belakang penelitian ini berangkat dari realitas bahwa meskipun norma hukum telah menjamin kebebasan tersebut, dalam praktiknya masih terjadi diskriminasi, kekerasan berbasis agama, hingga pembatasan dalam pembangunan tempat ibadah bagi kelompok minoritas seperti umat Kristen, Hindu, Buddha, dan kepercayaan lokal. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengkaji efektivitas konstitusi dalam menjamin hak kebebasan beragama dan menilai peran negara dalam menegakkan hak tersebut melalui pendekatan teori rule of law dan kontrak sosial. Metode yang digunakan adalah yuridis normatif dan yuridis empiris, dengan mengkaji norma hukum serta studi kasus pelanggaran terhadap minoritas agama di Indonesia. Hasil kajian menunjukkan bahwa meskipun terdapat perlindungan formal melalui konstitusi dan berbagai undang-undang, implementasinya belum sepenuhnya menjamin keadilan dan perlindungan bagi kelompok minoritas. Diperlukan reformasi kebijakan, penegakan hukum yang tegas, serta pendekatan multikultural dan pendidikan toleransi agar kebebasan beragama benar-benar dapat dinikmati oleh seluruh warga negara tanpa diskriminasi. 
KONFLIK NILAI DALAM PERLINDUNGAN HAK ASASI MANUSIA: STUDI TENTANG RESPONS GLOBAL TERHADAP PELANGGARAN DI PALESTINA DAN IMPLIKASINYA TERHADAP PRINSIP UNIVERSALITAS: VALUE CONFLICTS IN HUMAN RIGHTS PROTECTION: A STUDY OF GLOBAL RESPONSES TO VIOLATIONS IN PALESTINE AND THEIR IMPLICATIONS FOR THE PRINCIPLE OF UNIVERSALITY Dinda Widianti; Widianti, Dinda
terAs Law Review : Jurnal Hukum Humaniter dan HAM Vol. 7 No. 2 (2025): November 2025
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum Universitas Trisakti

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.25105/6k59gn12

Abstract

Konflik Palestina menjadi simbol kompleksitas antara prinsip universalitas hak asasi manusia (HAM) dan realitas geopolitik global. Jurnal ini mengkaji bagaimana pelanggaran HAM yang sistemik di wilayah Palestina menantang efektivitas dan konsistensi penerapan prinsip-prinsip HAM internasional. Melalui pendekatan yuridis-normatif dan analisis politik global, artikel ini menyoroti ketimpangan respons internasional, baik dari negara-negara besar, organisasi internasional, maupun lembaga HAM. Hasil kajian menunjukkan bahwa universalitas HAM kerap tereduksi oleh kepentingan politik dan ekonomi, sehingga menimbulkan krisis legitimasi dalam penegakan hukum HAM internasional. Studi ini merekomendasikan perumusan ulang pendekatan multilateral yang lebih independen dan berkeadilan dalam menghadapi kasus-kasus pelanggaran HAM berat, terutama di kawasan konflik berkepanjangan seperti Palestina.
PERTANGGUNGJAWABAN INTERNASIONAL NEGARA KETIGA DALAM KONFLIK BERSENJATA NON-INTERNASIONAL: ANALISIS DUGAAN DUKUNGAN UEA TERHADAP RAPID SUPPORT FORCE DI SUDAN: INTERNATIONAL RESPONSIBILITY OF THIRD STATES IN NON-INTERNATIONAL ARMED CONFLICTS: AN ANALYSIS OF ALLEGED UAE SUPPORT FOR THE RAPID SUPPORT FORCE IN SUDAN Nugraha, Egi; Permanasari, Arlina
terAs Law Review : Jurnal Hukum Humaniter dan HAM Vol. 7 No. 2 (2025): November 2025
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum Universitas Trisakti

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.25105/bm72dy72

Abstract

The non-international armed conflict (NIAC) between the Sudan Armed Forces (SAF) and the Rapid Support Forces (RSF) is currently one of the world’s largest humanitarian crisis. Allegations of support from the United Arab Emirates (UAE) to the RSF raise legal issues concerning the violation of the principle of third-state neutrality under international humanitarian law. This research applies the theories of international humanitarian law, neutrality, and state responsibility to analyze whether the alleged support provided by the UAE in Sudan’s internal conflict has breached international obligations and may influence the transformation of the conflict’s status into an international armed conflict (IAC). The findings show that the UAE’s involvement can be categorized as an internationally wrongful act, potentially triggering state responsibility. This study recommends strengthening international monitoring mechanisms to uphold and ensure the application of third-state neutrality in non-international armed conflicts.
THE IMPACT OF THE MILITARY APPROACH TOWARDS THE CONFLICT OF TPNPB-OPM IN THE RELATION TO THE PRINCIPLE OF PROPORTIONALITY: THE IMPACT OF THE MILITARY APPROACH TOWARDS THE CONFLICT OF TPNPB-OPM IN THE RELATION TO THE PRINCIPLE OF PROPORTIONALITY Nava M, Madinnatu; Mushtafa, Madinnatu Nava
terAs Law Review : Jurnal Hukum Humaniter dan HAM Vol. 7 No. 2 (2025): November 2025
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum Universitas Trisakti

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.25105/aatn2s41

Abstract

This research examines the impact of the military approach which is considered not to be a solution to the conflict that occurred in Nduga Regency, Papua. The increasing number of refugees is one of the impacts of the prolonged conflict that has not been resolved. Through this research, the author describes the increasing number of refugees exacerbated by the fall of victims as evidence of the lack of effectiveness of the military approach in order to resolve the TPNPB-OPM conflict in Nduga Regency, Papua. This incident is contrary to the implementation of the principle of proportionality based on international humanitarian law as stipulated in the 1949 Geneva Convention. This type of research is qualitative research. The method used is descriptive juridical analytical, namely problem identification using data sources in the form of primary legal materials, secondary legal materials, and tertiary legal materials. The result of this research is that the military approach to the TPNPB-OPM conflict in Nduga Regency, Papua is not effective enough to stop the conflict and has an impact on the increasing number of refugees which causes more civilian casualties so that it is contrary to the principle of proportionality.

Page 1 of 1 | Total Record : 5

 1 

Filter by Year

2025 2025


Reset
Filter By Issues
All Issue Vol. 7 No. 2 (2025): November 2025 Vol. 7 No. 1 (2025): Mei 2025 Vol. 6 No. 2 (2024): November 2024 Vol. 6 No. 1 (2024): Mei 2024 Vol. 5 No. 2 (2023): November 2023 Vol. 5 No. 1 (2023): Mei 2023 Vol. 4 No. 2 (2022): November 2022 Vol. 4 No. 1 (2022): Mei 2022 Vol. 3 No. 2 (2021): November 2021 Vol. 3 No. 1 (2021): Mei 2021 Vol. 2 No. 2: November 2020 Vol. 2 No. 1: Mei 2020 Vol. 1 No. 1 (2019): terAs Law Review Vol. 4 No. 7 (2008): Jurnal Hukum Humaniter Vol. 4 No. 6 (2008): Jurnal Hukum Humaniter Vol. 3 No. 5 (2007): Jurnal Hukum Humaniter Vol. 3 No. 4 (2007): Jurnal Hukum Humaniter Vol. 2 No. 3 (2006): Jurnal Hukum Humaniter Vol. 1 No. 2 (2006): Jurnal Hukum Humaniter Vol. 1 No. 1 (2005): Jurnal Hukum Humaniter More Issue